Search

BackgroundWeak nystagmus with fixation removed can be seen both in normal individuals and in recovery from a unilateral vestibular insult, thus its clinical significance is unclear in patients with dizziness. We thus sought to compare features of nystagmus at various stages following unilateral vestibular loss (UVL).MethodsWe enrolled thirty consecutive patients after acute UVL with impaired vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain. The patients were allocated into three groups according to time from onset of symptoms: acute (1–7 days), subacute (8–30 days), and chronic (>30 days). Patients underwent video-oculography (with and without fixation) and video head impulse testing (vHIT) to determine VOR gain. We examined the relationships amongst SPV, VOR gain, and time from symptom onset across groups.ResultsThere were 11, 10, and 9 patients in the acute, subacute, and chronic stages of UVL, respectively. With visual fixation, only 8 patients (26.7%) demonstrated nystagmus, all from the acute group. With fixation removed, 26 patients (86.7%) exhibited spontaneous nystagmus, including 90.9%, 90%, and 77.8% of the patients from the acute, subacute, and chronic groups, respectively. Horizontal nystagmus was paralytic (i.e., fast phase contralesional) in 25 (96.7%) cases. Horizontal SPV was negatively correlated with logarithm of time from onset to examination (r = −0.48, p = 0.007) and weakly negatively correlated with ipsilesional VOR gain (r = −0.325, p = 0.08).ConclusionIn the subacute or chronic stages of UVL, paralytic nystagmus with fixation removed persisted at a low intensity. Therefore, weak nystagmus in the dark may have diagnostic value in chronic dizziness.

This research examines whether Google search volume index (GSVI), a proxy of investor attention, can predict the excess returns and abnormal trading volumes of TPEx 50 index constituents. It also explores the motive underlying GSVI based on positive or negative shocks to stock prices. The empirical data include 48 companies from TPEx 50 index constituents and cover a period from 1 September 2016 to 31 August 2019. The empirical results present that (1) lagged GSVI negatively affects current excess returns, perhaps due to the characteristics of TPEx, in which there are a higher proportion of retail investors, smaller listed companies, and a higher information asymmetry problem. (2) Lagged GSVI can positively affect abnormal current trading volumes. (3) If GSVI is driven by positive shocks, then it can predict excess returns and abnormal trading volumes positively.

ObjectiveTo study the long-term treatment outcome of vestibular paroxysmia (VP).Study designRetrospective study.SettingTertiary referral hospital.MethodsWe analyzed records of 29 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with VP and who were treated with VP-specific anticonvulsants for at least 3 months. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months. We recorded and assessed starting and target dosage of medications, time to achieve adequate therapeutic response, adverse effects, and the rates of short-term and long-term remission without medication.ResultsAll 29 patients were started on oxcarbazepine as first-line treatment, and 93.1% and 100% of patients reported good-to-excellent therapeutic response within 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. Three patients switched to other anticonvulsants at 3 months. At long-term follow-up (8–56 months), most (84.6%) oxcarbazepine-treated patients maintained good therapeutic response at doses between 300 and 600 mg/day. Eleven (37.9%) patients experienced complete remission without medication for more than 1 month, of which six (20.7%) had long-term remission off medication for more than 12 months. Nineteen (65.5%) patients had neurovascular compression (NVC) of vestibulocochlear nerve on MRI, but its presence or absence did not predict treatment response or remission.ConclusionLow-dose oxcarbazepine monotherapy for VP is effective over the long term and is generally well-tolerated. About 20% of patients with VP in our study had long-term remission off medication.

BackgroundDiagnosis of acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) with hearing loss is challenging because the leading vascular cause—AICA territory stroke—can appear benign on head impulse testing. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of various bedside oculomotor tests to discriminate imaging-positive and imaging-negative cases of AVS plus hearing loss.MethodWe reviewed 13 consecutive inpatients with AVS and acute unilateral hearing loss. We compared neurologic findings, bedside and video head impulse testing (bHIT, vHIT), and other vestibular signs (including nystagmus, skew deviation, and positional testing) between MRI+ and MRI– cases.ResultsFive of thirteen patients had a lateral pontine lesion (i.e., MRI+); eight did not (i.e., MRI–). Horizontal-canal head impulse test showed ipsilateral vestibular loss in all five MRI+ patients but only in three MRI– patients. The ipsilesional VOR gains of horizontal-canal vHIT were significantly lower in the MRI+ than the MRI– group (0.56 ± 0.11 vs. 0.87 ± 0.24, p = 0.03). All 5 MRI+ patients had horizontal spontaneous nystagmus beating away from the lesion (5/5). One patient (1/5) had direction-changing nystagmus with gaze. Two had skew deviation (2/5). Among the 8 MRI– patients, one (1/8) presented as unilateral vestibulopathy, four (4/8) had positional nystagmus and three (3/8) had isolated posterior canal hypofunction.ConclusionThe horizontal-canal head impulse test poorly discriminates central and peripheral lesions when hearing loss accompanies AVS. Paradoxically, a lateral pontine lesion usually mimics unilateral peripheral vestibulopathy. By contrast, patients with peripheral lesions usually present with positional nystagmus or isolated posterior canal impairment, risking misdiagnosis as central vestibulopathy.

Background: Diagnosis of acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) with hearing loss is challenging because the leading vascular cause--AICA territory stroke--can appear benign on head impulse testing. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of various bedside oculomotor tests to discriminate imaging-positive and imaging-negative cases of AVS plus hearing loss. Method: We reviewed 13 consecutive inpatients with AVS and acute unilateral hearing loss. We compared neurologic findings, bedside and video head impulse testing (bHIT, vHIT), and other vestibular signs (including nystagmus, skew deviation, and positional testing) between MRI+ and MRI-cases. Results: Five of thirteen patients had a lateral pontine lesion (i.e., MRI+); eight did not (i.e., MRI-). Horizontal-canal head impulse test showed ipsilateral vestibular loss in all five MRI+ patients but only in three MRI-patients. The ipsilesional VOR gains of horizontal-canal vHIT were significantly lower in the MRI+ than the MRI-group (0.56 ± 0.11 vs. 0.87 ± 0.24, p = 0.03). All 5 MRI+ patients had horizontal spontaneous nystagmus beating away from the lesion (5/5). One patient (1/5) had direction-changing nystagmus with gaze. Two had skew deviation (2/5). Among the 8 MRI- patients, one (1/8) presented as unilateral vestibulopathy, four (4/8) had positional nystagmus and three (3/8) had isolated posterior canal hypofunction. Conclusion: The horizontal-canal head impulse test poorly discriminates central and peripheral lesions when hearing loss accompanies AVS. Paradoxically, a lateral pontine lesion usually mimics unilateral peripheral vestibulopathy. By contrast, patients with peripheral lesions usually present with positional nystagmus or isolated posterior canal impairment, risking misdiagnosis as central vestibulopathy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to examine the determinants of banking efficiency in the digital finance environment using data from 35 banks in Taiwan. We use a two-stage DEA model to measure service penetration efficiency and profit creation efficiency. Then, we adopt Tobit regression to evaluate how the key factors affect banking efficiency. Our results show that 13 banks (out of 20 high profit-creating banks) are profit creators but not service penetrators, suggesting that financial inclusion can generate profits, but it is not a necessity. Although IT infrastructure of ATMs and e-banking plays a crucial role in fostering financial inclusion, ATMs are still the backbone of efficient banking, while digital banking in Taiwan is merely a strategic necessity rather than strategic advantage. Further, although financial holding banks are more efficient than their nonfinancial holding counterparts, our research suggests that banks should still specialize in a few products rather than diversify too widely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]