Search

The annual American Heart Association (AHA) and National Institutes of Health statistical report details the most up to date statistics related to heart disease, stroke and cardiovascular risk factors, primarily within the USA. Although not a formal systematic review or meta-analysis, this 600 page report provides the most comprehensive and best summary of cardiovascular statistics for the year in question. Although data are collated from USA data registries, it serves as a critical resource for clinicians, policymakers, administrators and researchers in the northern and southern hemispheres. In this special report, we have chosen to highlight aspects of the document that are relevant to nephrologists, given the overlap of cardiovascular and renal disease. These include (i) key and emerging cardiovascular data signals in the general and chronic kidney disease (CKD) populations, (ii) ethnic and socio-economic disparity, (iii) environmental and behavioural factors that drive high levels of cardiovascular disease and which are key components of the AHA's eight components of the Life Essential cardiovascular health score, and (iv) the impact of COVID-19 both directly and indirectly on heart health. We provide some commentary and critical analysis of both the data and of the production of such data sets suggesting that similar data on CKD could also be published and linked to the AHA and other datasets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The first successful live donor kidney transplant was performed in 1954. Receiving a kidney transplant from a live kidney donor remains the best option for increasing both life expectancy and quality of life in patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, ever since 1954, there have been multiple questions raised on the ethics of live kidney donation in terms of negative impacts on donor life expectancy. Given the close relationship between reduced kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hypertension, cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular mortality, information on the impact of kidney donation on these is particularly relevant. In this article, we review the existing evidence, focusing on the more recent studies on the impact of kidney donation on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular disease and hypertension, as well as markers of cardiovascular damage including arterial stiffness and uraemic cardiomyopathy. We also discuss the similarities and differences between the pathological reduction in renal function that occurs in CKD, and the reduction in renal function that occurs because of a donor nephrectomy. Kidney donors perform an altruistic act that benefits individual patients as well as the wider society. They deserve to have high-quality evidence on which to make informed decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospital-admitted patients is a common complication associated with increased mortality. The diagnosis of AKI relies on the ascertainment of peak increase in serum creatinine (SCr). This study evaluated the incidence of AKI using the increase from mean 7–365 days pre-admission (AKIpre) and admission (AKIadm) SCr levels, and examined the associations of AKI and changes in SCr levels with all-cause mortality. Methods A total of 2436 patients admitted to a tertiary hospital were recruited and followed-up for a median of 47.70 (interquartile range 18.20) months. AKI incidence and severity were defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes-AKI Guidelines. Follow-up data were collected from the Hospital Episode Statistics and Office of National Statistics. Mortality was evaluated during a short- (30 days), mid- (1 year) and long-term (4 years) period. Results No difference in the AKI rates using AKIpre and AKIadm (12.5% versus 12.2%; P = 0.695) or in the AKI severity (P = 0.261) was evident. Agreement between the two definitions was modest (Kappa-statistic = 0.596, P < 0.001). Patients with AKIpre or AKIadm had increased all-cause mortality compared with those without AKI during all follow-up periods. In fully adjusted regression analysis, AKIpre [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.226, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.140–4.347; P = 0.027] and AKIadm (HR = 2.105, 95% CI 1.090–4.064; P = 0.027) remained associated with 30-day mortality. Results for the 1- and 4-year periods were similar. Increases of >4.00 μmol/L and >6.06% from pre-admission or >6.00 μmol/L and >17.24% from admission SCr levels presented increased mortality risk during follow-up. Conclusions Use of admission or pre-admission SCr provides similar incidence rates, but they diagnose different sets of patients. Even minor increases in SCr, below those required for the classification of AKI, were associated with increased mortality. These findings can help the clinicians to identify patients at higher risk for adverse outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Screening for occult coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients has become entrenched in current medical practice as the standard of care and is supported by national and international clinical guidelines. However, there is increasing and robust evidence that such an approach is out-dated, scientifically and conceptually flawed, ineffective, potentially directly harmful, discriminates against ethnic minorities and patients from more deprived socioeconomic backgrounds, and unfairly denies many patients access to potentially lifesaving and life-enhancing transplantation. Herein we review the available evidence in the light of recently published randomized controlled trials and major observational studies. We propose ways of moving the field forward to the overall benefit of patients with advanced kidney disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The efficacy of beta-blockers in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is unclear, and concerns persist that neurohormonal blockade could worsen symptoms of heart failure. We aimed to assess whether beta-blocker therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with CA., Methods and Results: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the impact of beta-blocker therapy on mortality in patients with CA. A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed in August 2023. Data were extracted from observational studies and synthesized with pooling and random effects meta-analysis. Thirteen studies including 4215 patients with CA were incorporated in this review (3688 transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), 502 light chain amyloid cardiomyopathy (AL-CM), 25 not specified; age 74.8 ± 5.5 years, 76% male). Over half of the cohort (52%) received beta-blockers and the rate of beta-blocker withdrawal was 28%. All-cause mortality was 33% (range: 13-51%) after a median follow-up ranging from 13 to 36 months. There was an inverse association between the pooled risk of mortality and the use of beta-blocker therapy at any time point (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.80, I 2  = 83%, P = 0.005, seven studies). There was no association between mortality and beta-blocker use (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.29-1.47, I 2  = 88%, P = 0.30) in the three studies that only included patients with ATTR-CM. The three studies that included patients with both ATTR-CM and AL demonstrated an association of beta-blocker use with reduced mortality (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29-0.63, I 2  = 4%, P < 0.001). The only study that solely included 53 patients with AL-CM, demonstrated improved survival among the 53% who were able to tolerate beta-blocker therapy (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.79, P = 0.02). The absence of information on staging of CA is an important limitation of this study., Conclusions: Treatment with beta-blockers may be associated with a survival benefit in patients with CA, but these findings are subject to selection and survivor biases. Definitive prospective randomized trials of conventional heart failure therapies are needed in CA., (© 2024 The Author(s). ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospital-admitted patients is a common complication associated with increased mortality. The diagnosis of AKI relies on the ascertainment of peak increase in serum creatinine (SCr). This study evaluated the incidence of AKI using the increase from mean 7-365 days pre-admission (AKIpre) and admission (AKIadm) SCr levels, and examined the associations of AKI and changes in SCr levels with all-cause mortality., Methods: A total of 2436 patients admitted to a tertiary hospital were recruited and followed-up for a median of 47.70 (interquartile range 18.20) months. AKI incidence and severity were defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes-AKI Guidelines. Follow-up data were collected from the Hospital Episode Statistics and Office of National Statistics. Mortality was evaluated during a short- (30 days), mid- (1 year) and long-term (4 years) period., Results: No difference in the AKI rates using AKIpre and AKIadm (12.5% versus 12.2%; P = 0.695) or in the AKI severity (P = 0.261) was evident. Agreement between the two definitions was modest (Kappa-statistic = 0.596, P < 0.001). Patients with AKIpre or AKIadm had increased all-cause mortality compared with those without AKI during all follow-up periods. In fully adjusted regression analysis, AKIpre [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.226, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.140-4.347; P = 0.027] and AKIadm (HR = 2.105, 95% CI 1.090-4.064; P = 0.027) remained associated with 30-day mortality. Results for the 1- and 4-year periods were similar. Increases of >4.00 μmol/L and >6.06% from pre-admission or >6.00 μmol/L and >17.24% from admission SCr levels presented increased mortality risk during follow-up., Conclusions: Use of admission or pre-admission SCr provides similar incidence rates, but they diagnose different sets of patients. Even minor increases in SCr, below those required for the classification of AKI, were associated with increased mortality. These findings can help the clinicians to identify patients at higher risk for adverse outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.)