Search

Objective: Not much is known regarding musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) practices of rheumatologists in the United States. We sought to determine the current use of MSUS among past participants of the Ultrasound School of North American Rheumatologists (USSONAR) training program and, by extension, MSUS practicing rheumatologists and to understand barriers to its MSUS use., Methods: An online survey was sent to 374 participants in the 8-month USSONAR blended course (Fundamentals in MSUS and Train the Trainer) between 2009 and 2020. Each respondent had a unique identifier linked to their total number of submitted practice scans and examination scores during training., Results: The survey response rate was 28.1% (105/374), comprising 82% adult and 18% pediatric rheumatologists. Of the respondents, 71% were MSUS certified: 86.7% performed and/or interpreted diagnostic MSUS, 81.0% performed/interpreted procedural MSUS, 59.8% billed for at least 50% of diagnostic studies, and 78.8% billed for at least 50% of procedural studies. The top reasons for not doing diagnostic and procedural ultrasonography were lack of administrative support and limited time, respectively. For 25% of diagnostic ultrasonography and 12.9% of procedural ultrasonography, billing was done less than 50% of the time. Of the respondents, 78.0% reported that USSONAR training made them better rheumatologists., Conclusion: Most USSONAR-trained rheumatologists are certified, practicing both diagnostic and procedural MSUS and billing for most of their work. However, a substantial number of studies are not being billed due to time constraints, limited administrative support, and legal liability. Participants agreed that USSONAR training made them better rheumatologists., (This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.)

Sjögren's disease (SjD) is a systemic autoimmune exocrinopathy with key features of dryness, pain, and fatigue. SjD can affect any organ system with a variety of presentations across individuals. This heterogeneity is one of the major barriers for developing effective disease modifying treatments. Defining core disease domains comprising both specific clinical features and incorporating the patient experience is a critical first step to define this complex disease. The OMERACT SjD Working Group held its first international collaborative hybrid meeting in 2023, applying the OMERACT 2.2 filter toward identification of core domains. We accomplished our first goal, a scoping literature review that was presented at the Special Interest Group held in May 2023. Building on the domains identified in the scoping review, we uniquely deployed multidisciplinary experts as part of our collaborative team to generate a provisional domain list that captures SjD heterogeneity., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Valerie Devauchelle reports receinving funds for consulting to Novartis, Abbvie, Fresenius Kabi. Divi Cornec declares no personal financial competing interests and received research funding from Novartis and GSK. Benjamin A. Fisher has undertaken consultancy for Novartis, BMS, Servier, Galapagos, Roche, UCB, Sanofi and Janssen, and received grant/research support from Janssen, Celgene, Galapagos, Servier. Alberta Hoi reports receiving research funding from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Janssen. Chiara Baldini reports receiving funds for consulting to GSK, Novartis and Horizon, honoraria for educational events from GSK and Sanofi, support for attending meetings from Abbvie and Bristol-Myers Squibb. WF Ng has consulted for Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Abbvie, BMS, Sanofi, MedImmune, Resolves Therapeutics, Janssen and UCB. Simon Bowman receiving funds for consulting from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Iqvia, Janssen, Kiniksa, Novartis, Otsuka-Visterra. His-salary is part funded by the Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK. Karina Torralba reports receiving funds for consulting to Horizon, AstraZeneca, Janssen; for contracted research work with Bioclinica; for clinical trial funding from Novartis, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen. Athena Papas declares grant funding from Novartis and Horizon; advisory board for Novartis. Ionut Pintilie reports receiving funds for consulting to Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Ewopharma, KRKA, Stada, Boehringer Ingelheim, MagnaPharm, MSD. Xavier Mariette declares consulting fee from Astra Zeneca, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Novartis, and Pfizer. Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, MD, PhD Speakers, or consultant fees from Amgen, Abbvie, BMS, Novartis, Galapagos, UCB, Pfizer, Lily, Janssen. Alan Baer reports receiving funds for consulting to Bristol-Myers Squibb and iCell Gene Therapeutics. Blake M. Warner declares research funding and material transfer agreements with Pfizer, Inc., and Mitobridge, Inc. Soumya D. Chakravarty is an employee of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, and owns stock or stock options in Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary. Nevsun Inanc reports claims to have received speakers fee from Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer, UCB, Eli-Lilly and consultancy fee from Abbvie, UCB, Eli-Lilly. Vibeke Strand reports being a founding member of the executive committee of Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) [1992 – present], an international consensus organization that develops and validates outcome measures in rheumatology randomized controlled trials and longitudinal observational studies and has received arms-length funding from as many as 36 sponsors. Md Yuzaiful Md Yusof has received speaker fees from Roche and Novartis and consultancy fees from Aurinia Pharmaceuticals and UCB. Suzanne Arends declares consultancy fees from Argenx and Novartis. Anas Alexis Benyoussef is a consultant for Horus Pharma and Quantel Medical. Sharmila Masli is a consultant for Stellular Bio Inc. and Proteris Biotech. Maureen Rischmueller has undertaken consultancy/speaker engagements for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Global Services, Novartis, Pfizer and Sandoz, and received grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier and UCB. Sara McCoy reports receiving funds for consulting to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Horizon, Novartis, Kiniksa, Targe RWE, Otsuka, Visterra, and iCell. Her time is supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, through the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), grant 1KL2TR002374 and NIH/NIDCR R03DE031340. Raphaele Seror reports receiving funds for consulting to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, GSK, Janssen, Amgen. Hendrika Bootsma declares consultancy fees from Argenx, Novartis, BMS, AztraZeneca, Galapagos.Independent grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, BMS., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Telehealth is an essential facet of care delivery for patients with rheumatic diseases. The Association of American Medical College's (AAMC) telehealth competencies (TCs) define the skills required for delivering general telehealth care across the range of clinician experience. In this study, the American College of Rheumatology's (ACR) TCs working group aimed to adapt the AAMC TCs to rheumatology, outlining the skills acquisition unique to rheumatology with a focus on knowledge, skills, and behaviors expected of recent rheumatology fellowship graduates., Methods: Through a collaborative process, the working group adapted the AAMC TCs to the training structure and practice of rheumatology. The rheumatology TCs underwent peer review among recipients of the Clinician Scholar Educator Award and attendees at the ACR 2021 Convergence conference., Results: The rheumatology TCs define 24 essential skills required for synchronous telehealth care of patients with rheumatic diseases. The working group adapted the AAMC's 20 TCs organized within 6 domains, added 2 skills to the AAMC's domains of patient safety and appropriate use, and data collection and assessment, and created a novel domain of systems-based requirements with 2 competencies. The rheumatology TCs define expected skill levels for recent rheumatology fellowship graduates and experienced rheumatology clinicians., Conclusion: The rheumatology TCs represent the first adaptation of the AAMC TCs to subspecialty care, expanding the scope to include rheumatology fellowship graduates and additional domains of rheumatology practice. These competencies can guide curricular innovations and measurements of proficiency in telehealth care delivery among rheumatology trainees and experienced clinicians, enhancing the care provided to patients with rheumatic diseases., (© 2022 American College of Rheumatology.)

Objectives: To develop an Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasonography score for monitoring disease activity in giant cell arteritis (GCA) and evaluate its metric properties., Methods: The OMERACT Instrument Selection Algorithm was followed. Forty-nine members of the OMERACT ultrasonography large vessel vasculitis working group were invited to seven Delphi rounds. An online reliability exercise was conducted using images of bilateral common temporal arteries, parietal and frontal branches as well as axillary arteries from 16 patients with GCA and 7 controls. Sensitivity to change and convergent construct validity were tested using data from a prospective cohort of patients with new GCA in which ultrasound-based intima-media thickness (IMT) measurements were conducted at weeks 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24., Results: Agreement was obtained (92.7%) for the OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS), calculated as follows: sum of IMT measured in every segment divided by the rounded cut-off values of IMTs in each segment. The resulting value is then divided by the number of segments available. Thirty-five members conducted the reliability exercise, the interrater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the OGUS was 0.72-0.84 and the median intrareader ICC was 0.91. The prospective cohort consisted of 52 patients. Sensitivity to change between baseline and each follow-up visit up to week 24 yielded standardised mean differences from -1.19 to -2.16, corresponding to large and very large magnitudes of change, respectively. OGUS correlated moderately with erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein and Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (corr coeff 0.37-0.48)., Conclusion: We developed a provisional OGUS for potential use in clinical trials., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CDe has received grant support from AbbVie and consulting/speaker’s fees from Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Galapagos, Novartis, Pfizer, Sparrow, Roche and Sanofi, all unrelated to this manuscript. CPo is or has been the principal investigator of studies by AbbVie, Sanofi and Novartis and has received consulting/speaker’s fees from Vifor, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline and Roche, all unrelated to this manuscript. LT received speakers fee from Roche, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB and GE. PB received grant support from Pfizer and speaker’s fees from Janssen. CDu has received consultancy or speaker fees and travel expenses from Abbvie, AOP Orphan, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, Galapagos, Merck-Sharp-Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Vifor and research support from Eli-Lilly, Pfizer, UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript. E-MH has received fees for speaking and/or consulting from Novartis, AbbVie, Sanofi, Sobi; research funding to Aarhus University Hospital from Novo Nordic Foundation, Danish Rheumatism Association, Danish Regions Medicine Grants, Roche, Novartis, AbbVie; travel expenses from Pfizer, Sobi, AbbVie. E-MH has been the principal investigator of studies by SynACT Pharma and involved as site principal investigator in trials by AbbVie, Novartis, Novo and Sanofi, all unrelated to this manuscript. AI received honoraria, advisory boards, speakers’ bureau, educational grants and research support from AbbVie, Alfasigma, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, SOBI and UCB. KDT is or was a research investigator of studies for Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Glaxo SmithKline, Amgen; has received consulting fees from Aurinia, Novartis and Astra Zeneca; and is a contracted researcher of Bioclinica. KSMvdG received a speaker fee from Roche. WAS is or has been the principal investigator of studies by Abbvie, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and has received consulting/speaker’s fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Medac, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi, all unrelated to this manuscript. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Rheumatic diseases cover a wide spectrum of conditions, including primary and secondary degenerative joint diseases and autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. The risks of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis and resultant fractures in aging female rheumatic disease populations, especially those with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, are increased. Changes in the immune system in aging populations need to be considered especially among patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Immunosenescence is closely aligned to reduced adaptive immunity and increased non-specific innate immunity leading to chronic inflammation of inflammaging. The effective use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to control autoimmune rheumatic diseases may also mitigate factors leading to cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. Rheumatic diseases, which largely manifest as arthritis, predispose patients to premature joint degeneration and poor bone health and therefore have a higher risk of developing end-stage arthritis requiring joint arthroplasties sooner or more often than other patients without rheumatic disease.

Introduction/objectives: There has been an increase in the proficiency and utilization of ultrasound among North American rheumatologists over the past decade. This study aims to create an updated upper extremity scanning protocol to inform ultrasound curriculum development for the American College of Rheumatology affiliated fellowship programs and guide clinical practice patterns in North America., Method: Three Delphi survey rounds were used to reach consensus on tiered-mastery designations for scan views of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand joints. The survey was disseminated by Qualtrics™ to 101 potential participants with ultrasound experience. High agreement was defined as having ≥ 85% consensus and final tier designation as > 50% agreement for a preferred tier. Changes in responses were evaluated by McNemar's chi-square test., Results: Consensus was achieved for 70% of scan views of the upper extremity joints. Two views-ulnar transverse view of the wrist and the radial/ulnar orthogonal views over metacarpophalangeal joints 2 and 5 of the hand-were upgraded from tier 2 to tier 1. The suprascapular transverse and the axillary longitudinal views of the shoulder were downgraded from tier 2 to tier 3. A new anterior transverse view of the elbow was added to the protocol with tier 1 designation., Conclusions: This study reflects the current opinions of North American rheumatologists for scanning upper extremity joints and provides support for the updated protocol and guidance for educators in rheumatology ultrasound. Key Points • Ultrasound scan views of the metacarpophalangeal, wrist, elbow, and glenohumeral joint recesses and views of the biceps and rotator cuff tendons at the shoulder were perceived as essential views of the upper extremity scanning protocol for rheumatologists to master and perform routinely. • A targeted scanning approach of the upper extremity joints may be considered when focal symptoms are present. • The North American Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Scanning Protocol shares some similarities with existing musculoskeletal ultrasound protocols of other specialties and worldwide rheumatology societies but varies in the extent of examination and emphasis on certain specialty-specific focuses., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

Objective: Finding a balance between clinical and scholarly productivity is a challenge for many academic clinician-educator rheumatologists. An examination of workload and downstream revenue determines if the financial value generated by services rendered by rheumatologists are proportionate to the financial value created for a health system. A 2005 study found that academic rheumatologists generate $10.02 for every $1.00 they receive for an office visit., Methods: A retrospective analysis of ordering and billing practices of 5 full-time clinician-educator rheumatologists from August 2017 to February 2019 was conducted. Individual workload is defined as averaged full-time equivalent workload based on time spent on clinical and academic duties. Academic productivity was reviewed. Revenue-generating activities that benefited the division directly and downstream revenue were collected. Revenue was extrapolated based on volumes of referrals, publicly available drug costs, and estimated Medicare reimbursement values (average sales price) of representative drugs., Results: The total revenue by physician that benefited the division directly was $597,203, with evaluation and management codes accounting for $174,456. Downstream revenue by physician totaled $2,119,437. The largest contributor was from referrals to the hospital-based infusion center, at $1,287,496. The downstream revenue generated by rheumatologist per dollar of evaluation and management services was found to be $12.14 ($9.37 in 2005 dollars)., Conclusion: For every $1 generated though office visits by 5 practicing academic rheumatologists at our institution, $12.14 was generated through downstream revenue, which, when adjusted for inflation, shows stability in the value generated by academic rheumatologists ($10.02 versus $9.37)., (© 2022 American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: Since 2014, rheumatology fellows have been assessed not only based on their ability to provide patient care and possession of medical knowledge but also on their skill in serving as patient advocates, navigators of health systems, and members of a health care team. Such assessments have been carried out through the use of competency-based milestones from the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). However, a needs assessment has demonstrated interest in more context validity and subspecialty relevance since the development of the ACGME internal medicine (IM) subspecialty reporting milestones. The ACGME thus created a milestones working group, and the present study was undertaken to develop Rheumatology Milestones 2.0 as well as a supplemental guide to assist with implementation., Methods: The working group, consisting of 7 rheumatology program directors, 2 division directors, a community practice rheumatologist, a rheumatology fellow in training, and a public member who is a rheumatology patient, was overseen by the ACGME vice president for milestones development and met through three 12-hour, in-person meetings to compose the rheumatology specialty milestones and supplemental guide within the ACGME Milestones 2.0 project., Results: Informed by the needs assessment data and stakeholders, the working group revised and adapted the ACGME IM subspecialty reporting milestones to create a rheumatology-specific set of milestones and a supplemental guide for their implementation., Conclusion: The Rheumatology Milestones 2.0 provides a specialty-specific, competency-based evaluation tool that can be used by program directors, clinical competency committees, and others to assess the competencies of rheumatology fellows during training and help measure readiness for independent practice., (© 2020 American College of Rheumatology.)