Search

Introduction: The FDA authorized the emergency use of enhanced hemoadsorption with oXiris in critically ill adult COVID patients with respiratory failure or severe disease to reduce inflammation. In this study, we evaluated critically ill adult COVID patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) who were exposed versus not exposed to enhanced hemoadsorption with oXiris during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)., Methods: Retrospective cohort study of critically ill adult COVID patients with AKI requiring CRRT. Exposure to oXiris was defined as receiving oXiris for >12 cumulative hours and more than one-third of the time within the first 72 h of CRRT. Study outcomes included filter-specific performance metrics and clinical outcomes such as ventilator requirement, mortality, and dialysis dependence. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to balance potential confounders in weighted regression models., Results: 14,043 h of CRRT corresponding to 85 critically ill adult patients were analyzed. Among these, 2,736 h corresponded to oXiris exposure (n = 25 patients) and 11,307 h to a standard CRRT filter (n = 60 patients). Transmembrane pressures (TMPs) increased rapidly and were overall higher with oXiris versus standard filter, but filter life (median of 36.3 vs. 33.1 h, p = 0.913, respectively) and filter/clotting alarms remained similar in both groups. In adjusted models, oXiris exposure was not independently associated with the composite of hospital mortality and dialysis dependence at discharge (OR 2.13, 95% CI: 0.98-4.82, p = 0.06), but it was associated with fewer ventilator (β = -15.02, 95% CI: -29.23 to -0.82, p = 0.04) and intensive care unit days (β = -14.74, 95% CI: -28.54 to -0.95, p = 0.04) in survivors., Discussion/conclusion: In critically ill adult COVID patients with AKI requiring CRRT, oXiris filters exhibited higher levels of TMP when compared to a standard CRRT filter, but no differences in filter life and filter/clotting alarm profiles were observed. The use of oXiris was not associated with improvement in clinical outcomes such as hospital mortality or dialysis dependence at discharge., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Approximately 20% of patients with acute brain injury (ABI) also experience acute kidney injury (AKI), which worsens their outcomes. The metabolic and inflammatory changes associated with AKI likely contribute to prolonged brain injury and edema. As a result, recognizing its presence is important for effectively managing ABI and its sequelae. This review discusses the occurrence and effects of AKI in critically ill adults with neurological conditions, outlines potential mechanisms connecting AKI and ABI progression, and highlights AKI management principles. Tailored approaches include optimizing blood pressure, managing intracranial pressure, adjusting medication dosages, and assessing the type of administered fluids. Preventive measures include avoiding nephrotoxic drugs, improving hemodynamic and fluid balance, and addressing coexisting AKI syndromes. ABI patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) are more susceptible to neurological complications. RRT can negatively impact cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation, with effects tied to specific RRT methods. Continuous RRT is favored for better hemodynamic stability and lower risk of dialysis disequilibrium syndrome. Potential RRT modifications for ABI patients include adjusted dialysate and blood flow rates, osmotherapy, and alternate anticoagulation methods. Future research should explore whether these strategies enhance outcomes and if using novel AKI biomarkers can mitigate AKI-related complications in ABI patients., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is well entrenched as one of the dominant KRT modalities in modern critical care practice. Since its introduction four decades ago, there have been considerable innovations in CKRT machines that have improved precision, safety, and simplicity. CKRT is the preferred KRT modality for critically ill patients with hemodynamic instability. Early physical therapy and rehabilitation can be feasibly and safely provided to patients connected to CKRT, thus obviating concerns about immobility. Although randomized clinical trials have not shown a mortality difference when comparing CKRT and intermittent hemodialysis, CKRT allows precision delivery of solute and fluid removal that can be readily adjusted in the face of dynamic circumstances. Accumulated evidence from observational studies, although susceptible to bias, has shown that CKRT, when compared with intermittent hemodialysis, is associated with better short- and long-term kidney recovery and KRT independence. Critical care medicine encompasses a wide range of sick patients, and no single KRT modality is likely to ideally suit every patient in every context and for every condition. The provision of KRT represents a spectrum of modalities to which patients can flexibly transition in response to their evolving condition. As a vital tool for organ support in the intensive care unit, CKRT enables the personalization of KRT to meet the clinical demands of patients during the most severe phases of their illness., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Nephrology.)