Search

Prognostic factors for prostate cancer include tumor, node, metastases stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and pathology (via Gleason score [GS] or grade group). Of these, GS yields the largest effect on prostate cancer specific mortality. It was previously determined that those with cores with a mix of higher and lower GS at biopsy (which was termed a "ComboGS") had decreased risk for prostate cancer specific mortality after either surgical or radiation treatment. We validate the effect of ComboGS in an independent cohort of patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive dose-escalated radiation therapy (DE-RT) at 2 institutions.DE-RT was administered to 2539 men, of which 687 men had a ComboGS. To further ascertain the ComboGS effect we employed the modified Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (mCAPRA) score. Rates of biochemical event-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival were compared across CAPRA scores, with and without modification, and the prognostic value of the CAPRA scores was compared using Harrel's concordance index.On univariate analysis in Gleason 7 to 10 patients the presence of ComboGS improved 10-year biochemical event-free survival from 76.6% to 82.4% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.96; P = .021), 10-year distant metastasis-free survival from 89.3% to 93.2% (HR, 0.57; CI, 0.39-0.85; P = .005), 10-year prostate cancer specific survival from 93.9% to 97.4% (HR, 0.39; CI, 0.21-0.7; P = .001), and 10-year overall survival from 65.7% to 75.6% (HR, 0.69; CI, 0.57-0.83; P.001). Multivariable analysis also supported that ComboGS is protective for biochemical failure (HR, 0.64; CI, 0.50-0.83; P.001), distant metastasis (HR, 0.42; CI, 0.28-0.63; P.001), death from prostate cancer (HR, 0.32; CI, 0.17-0.58; P.001), and overall mortality (HR, 0.65; CI, 0.54-0.79; P.001). Additionally, adjusting the mCAPRA score for ComboGS decreased the risk of biochemical failure by nearly 30% (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88; P = .003) and by 50% (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.80; P = .002) for distant metastasis.ComboGS is a useful and readily available independent prognostic factor for all clinical endpoints evaluated. Moreover, the ComboGS can be used in conjunction with the extensively validated CAPRA scoring to better risk stratify patients being treated with definitive DE-RT for GS 7 to 10 disease.

Adoption of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) for patients with early-stage, biologically high-risk breast cancer remains relatively low. We compared clinical outcomes of conventionally fractionated whole breast irradiation (CWBI) versus moderate HWBI in this patient population.We queried a prospectively maintained database for patients with early-stage (T1-2, N0, M0) breast cancer who received whole breast irradiation with either CWBI or moderate HWBI at a single institution. We included only patients with biologically high-risk tumors (defined as either estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 amplified, and/or patients with a high-risk multigene assay) who received systemic chemotherapy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to compare treatment cohorts and to estimate 5-year time to event endpoints. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined based on Cox proportional hazards model.We identified 300 patients, of whom 171 received CWBI and 129 received HWBI. There was a statistically significant difference in median age at diagnosis, 59 years for CWBI versus 63 years for HWBI (P = .004), and in median follow-up time, 97 months for CWBI versus 55 months for HWBI (P.001). After accounting for differences in patient and tumor characteristics with inverse probability of treatment weighting, we found similar 5-year freedom from local recurrence (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.14-4.1), freedom from regional recurrence (HR, 3.395% CI 0.15-69), freedom from distant metastasis (HR 3.9, 95% CI 0.86-17), and disease-free survival (HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.3-2.4), between those treated with CWBI and those treated with HWBI. Results were similar among each of the 3 high-risk subtypes.Our data support the use of moderate HWBI in patients with early-stage, biologically high-risk breast cancer.

Debate exists regarding the optimal management for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent inclusion of chemotherapeutic data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database has made it possible to identify patients with NSCLC who received chemotherapy. We hypothesized that patients with stage III NSCLC experience improved overall survival from trimodality therapy (TMT) versus definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) alone.We analyzed the overall survival of stage III NSCLC patients based on the receipt of TMT versus CRT alone. This included crude and adjusted univariate models as well as crude and doubly robust adjusted multivariable analyses, both utilizing propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Factors included in the multivariable analyses included: age, sex, marital status, income, date of diagnosis, primary site, histology, grade, T stage, N stage, and intended treatment. Planned subset analyses were performed for stage III(N2) patients.Adult patients with stage III NSCLC (N = 9008) from the SEER database were included in our analyses. In our univariate analyses, an overall survival benefit was observed for TMT versus CRT (CrudeHR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.55-0.61, p 0.001; AdjHR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.54-0.61, p 0.001). This persisted in both crude and doubly robust multivariable analyses (CrudeHR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.53-0.61, p 0.001; AdjHR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.53-0.59, p 0.001). Patients with stage III(N2) disease also demonstrated a significant benefit to OS with TMT versus CRT alone.The significant difference in overall survival seen with TMT suggests this may be an effective treatment approach for select patients.