Search

Introduction: Pregnant women have been historically excluded from interventional research. While recent efforts have been made to improve their involvement, there remains a disparity in the evidence base for treatments available to pregnant women compared with the non-pregnant population. A significant barrier to the enrolment of pregnant women within research is risk perception and a poor understanding of decision-making in this population., Objective: Assess the risk perception and influences on decision-making in pregnant women, when considering whether to enrol in a hypothetical interventional research study., Design: Semistructured interviews were undertaken, and thematic analysis was undertaken of participant responses., Participants: Twelve pregnant women were enrolled from an antenatal outpatient clinic., Results: Participants were unanimously positive about enrolling in the proposed hypothetical interventional study. Risk perception was influenced by potential risks to their fetus and their previous experiences of healthcare and research. Participants found the uncertainty in quantifying risk for new research interventions challenging. They were motivated to enrol in research by altruism and found less invasive research interventions more tolerable., Conclusion: It is vital to understand how pregnant women balance the perceived risks and benefits of interventional research. This may help clinicians and scientists better communicate risk to pregnant women and address the ongoing under-representation of pregnant women in interventional research., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Pregnant women have historically been excluded from most medical research, including human challenge studies. The proof-of-concept Lactamica 9 human challenge study investigated whether nasal inoculation of pregnant women with commensal bacteria leads to horizontal transmission to the neonate. Given the unique practical and ethical considerations of both human challenge studies and interventional research involving pregnant women and their newborns, we sought to investigate the motivations, concerns and experiences of these volunteers., Methods: Pre- and post-participation questionnaires were given to all participants in the Lactamica 9 study. These fully anonymized qualitative and Semi-quantitative questionnaires used forced Likert scales, word association and free-text questions., Results: Pre- and post-participation questionnaires were completed by 87.1% (27/31) and 62.5% (15/24) of eligible participants, respectively. Almost all pre-participation respondents agreed with altruistic motivations for participation, and most concerns were related to discomfort from study procedures, with few concerned about the theoretical risks of inoculation to themselves (5/27; 18.5%) or their baby (6/27; 22.2%). Participants most frequently associated the study intervention with the terms "bacteria," "natural," "protective" and "safe." For the post-participation questionnaire, 93.3% (14/15) found all study procedures acceptable, and qualitative feedback was almost entirely positive, with particular emphasis on the research team's flexibility, approachability and friendliness., Conclusions: The successful completion of the Lactamica 9 study demonstrates that human challenge research in healthy pregnant women can be acceptable and feasible. Participants' initial concerns of potential discomfort were outweighed by predominantly altruistic motivations and perception of the intervention as "natural.", Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purpose of Review: Antibiotic use is associated with development of antimicrobial resistance and dysregulation of the microbiome (the overall host microbial community). These changes have in turn been associated with downstream adverse health outcomes. This review analyses recent important publications in a rapidly evolving field, contextualizing the available evidence to assist clinicians weighing the potential risks of antibiotics on a patient's microbiome., Recent Finding: Although the majority of microbiome research is observational, we highlight recent interventional studies probing the associations between antibiotic use, microbiome disruption, and ill-health. These studies include germ-free mouse models, antibiotic challenge in healthy human volunteers, and a phase III study of the world's first approved microbiome-based medicine., Summary: The growing body of relevant clinical and experimental evidence for antibiotic-mediated microbiome perturbation is concerning, although further causal evidence is required. Within the limits of this evidence, we propose the novel term 'microbiotoxicity' to describe the unintended harms of antibiotics on a patient's microbiome. We suggest a framework for prescribers to weigh microbiotoxic effects against the intended benefits of antibiotic use., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning and deep learning (including generative AI) are increasingly being investigated in the context of research and management of human infection., Objectives: We summarise recent and potential future applications of AI and its relevance to clinical infection practice., Methods: 1617 PubMed results were screened, with priority given to clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This narrative review focusses on studies using prospectively collected real-world data with clinical validation, and on research with translational potential, such as novel drug discovery and microbiome-based interventions., Results: There is some evidence of clinical utility of AI applied to laboratory diagnostics (e.g. digital culture plate reading, malaria diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance profiling), clinical imaging analysis (e.g. pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis), clinical decision support tools (e.g. sepsis prediction, antimicrobial prescribing) and public health outbreak management (e.g. COVID-19). Most studies to date lack any real-world validation or clinical utility metrics. Significant heterogeneity in study design and reporting limits comparability. Many practical and ethical issues exist, including algorithm transparency and risk of bias., Conclusions: Interest in and development of AI-based tools for infection research and management are undoubtedly gaining pace, although the real-world clinical utility to date appears much more modest., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Both authors conceived of and planned this Editorial Commentary. AT screened the literature and prepared the first draft of the manuscript, both authors discussed and edited the manuscript. Artificial intelligence was not used in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pharyngeal colonisation by the commensal bacterium Neisseria lactamica inhibits colonisation by Neisseria meningitidis and has an inverse epidemiological association with meningococcal disease. The mechanisms that underpin this relationship are unclear, but could involve the induction of cross-reactive immunity. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether colonisation with N lactamica induces N lactamica-specific B-cell responses that are cross-reactive with N meningitidis., Methods: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, human infection trial at University Hospital Southampton Clinical Research Facility (Southampton, UK), healthy adults aged 18-45 years were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive intranasal inoculation with either 10 5 colony-forming units of N lactamica in 1 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or 1 mL PBS alone. Participants and researchers conducting participant sampling and immunological assays were masked to allocation. The primary endpoint was the frequency of circulating N lactamica-specific plasma cells and memory B cells after N lactamica inoculation (day 7-28) compared with baseline values (day 0), measured using enzyme-linked immunospot assays. The secondary endpoint was to measure the frequency of N meningitidis-specific B cells. In a second study, we measured the effect of duration of N lactamica colonisation on seroconversion by terminating carriage at either 4 days or 14 days with single-dose oral ciprofloxacin. The studies are now closed to participants. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03633474 and NCT03549325., Findings: Of 50 participants assessed for eligibility between Sept 5, 2018, and March 3, 2019, 31 were randomly assigned (n=20 N lactamica, n=11 PBS). Among the 17 participants who were colonised with N lactamica, the median baselines compared with peak post-colonisation N lactamica-specific plasma-cell frequencies (per 10 5 peripheral blood mononuclear cells) were 0·0 (IQR 0·0-0·0) versus 5·0 (1·5-10·5) for IgA-secreting plasma cells (p<0·0001), and 0·0 (0·0-0·0) versus 3·0 (1·5-9·5) for IgG-secreting plasma cells (p<0·0001). Median N lactamica-specific IgG memory-B-cell frequencies (percentage of total IgG memory B cells) increased from 0·0024% (0·0000-0·0097) at baseline to 0·0384% (0·0275-0·0649) at day 28 (p<0·0001). The frequency of N meningitidis-specific IgA-secreting and IgG-secreting plasma cells and memory B cells also increased signficantly in participants who were colonised with N lactamica. Upper respiratory tract symptoms were reported in ten (50%) of 20 participants who were inoculated with N lactamica and six (55%) of 11 participants who were inoculated with PBS (p>0·99). Three additional adverse events (two in the N lactamica group and one in the PBS group) and no serious adverse events were reported. In the second study, anti-N lactamica and anti-N meningitidis serum IgG titres increased only in participants who were colonised with N lactamica for 14 days., Interpretation: Natural immunity to N meningitidis after colonisation with N lactamica might be due to cross-reactive adaptive responses. Exploitation of this microbial mechanism with a genetically modified live vector could protect against N meningitidis colonisation and disease., Funding: Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, and NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SNF acts on behalf of University Hospital Southampton National Health Service Foundation Trust as an investigator or providing consultative advice, or both, on clinical trials and studies of COVID-19 and other vaccines funded or sponsored by vaccine manufacturers including Janssen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novavax, Seqirus, Sanofi, MedImmune, Merck, and Valneva. He receives no personal financial payment for this work. JRL is a named inventor on patent WO2017103593A1: meningococcal infection and modified Neisseria lactamica. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The detection of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) in an individual's bodily fluid by culture techniques or through HCMV DNA detection by polymerase chain reaction, is known as HCMV shedding. Human cytomegalovirus shedding has the potential to transmit HCMV infection, where an individual can become infected with HCMV through contact with the bodily fluid of another individual containing HCMV. Human cytomegalovirus shedding can occur in primary infection and in non-primary infection for individuals with prior infection (HCMV seropositive). Human cytomegalovirus infection causes few or no symptoms in a pregnant woman, but can cause significant harm to her foetus if congenital CMV (cCMV) infection occurs. The association between HCMV shedding in HCMV seropositive pregnant women and the vertical transmission of HCMV to result in cCMV infection is poorly investigated, challenged by a limited understanding of the distribution of HCMV shedding in HCMV seropositive pregnant women. We systematically reviewed the published literature to describe the prevalence of HCMV shedding in HCMV seropositive women during pregnancy up to delivery. This analysis identified nine studies that met our eligibility criteria. In these studies, the prevalence of HCMV shedding in any bodily fluid of HCMV seropositive women during pregnancy and at delivery ranged from 0% to 42.5%. A meta-analysis, performed on six of the nine studies with suitable sample sizes, estimated a pooled prevalence of 21.5% [95% CI 12.7%,30.3%]. To our knowledge, this is the first review to systematically search the literature to summarise the prevalence of HCMV shedding in HCMV seropositive pregnant women. These estimates can help in the development of disease burden models and therapeutic or preventative strategies against cCMV infection in the context of non-primary maternal HCMV infection., (© 2022 The Authors. Reviews in Medical Virology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Infant upper respiratory microbiota are derived partly from the maternal respiratory tract, and certain microbiota are associated with altered risk of infections and respiratory disease. Neisseria lactamica is a common pharyngeal commensal in young children and is associated with reduced carriage and invasive disease by Neisseria meningitidis . Nasal inoculation with N. lactamica safely and reproducibly reduces N. meningitidis colonisation in healthy adults. We propose nasal inoculation of pregnant women with N. lactamica , to establish if neonatal pharyngeal colonisation occurs after birth, and to characterise microbiome evolution in mother-infant pairs over 1 month post partum., Methods and Analysis: 20 healthy pregnant women will receive nasal inoculation with N. lactamica (wild type strain Y92-1009) at 36-38 weeks gestation. Upper respiratory samples, as well as optional breastmilk, umbilical cord blood and infant venous blood samples, will be collected from mother-infant pairs over 1 month post partum. We will assess safety, N. lactamica colonisation (by targeted PCR) and longitudinal microevolution (by whole genome sequencing), and microbiome evolution (by 16S rRNA gene sequencing)., Ethics and Dissemination: This study has been approved by the London Central Research Ethics Committee (21/PR/0373). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed open-access journals as soon as possible., Trial Registration Number: NCT04784845., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)