Search

Purpose: This study compared the effectiveness of age‐appropriate, high technology, interactive virtual reality (VR) distraction with standard care (SC) provided by the nurse on adolescents' acute procedural pain intensity perception during burn wound care treatment in the ambulatory clinic setting. Design: This randomized controlled trial included 43 adolescents ages 10–21 from the ambulatory burn clinic of a large children's hospital. Methods: Blinded study participants were randomly assigned to either VR or SC (non‐significantly different, current mean burn surface area, 1.3 and 1.7, respectively) during the first burn wound care procedure in the burn clinic. Blinded research staff collected pre‐procedure data including Spielberger's State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory and postprocedure wound care pain intensity using the Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool. A total of 41 participants completed all study procedures. Results: No statistically significant difference in burn wound care procedural pain was noted between the VR and SC groups after adjusting for several factors. Pre‐procedure state and trait anxiety correlated with reported pre‐procedure pain. Wound care pain was found to be significantly associated with pre‐wound care pain score, time from original burn to clinic burn care treatment, and length of wound care treatment. These factors accounted for approximately 45% of the variation in pain scores during wound care treatment. Practice Implications: VR distraction can be a useful pain management strategy but may not take the place of the unique nurse‐patient relationship that occurs during clinical encounters. Tailoring pain management during burn wound care requires consideration of anxiety, time from the burn injury to the wound care procedure, length of time of the wound care procedure, and pretreatment pain level. Knowing patients' needs, desires, and temperaments along with the specifics about the healthcare procedures are critical to formulating individualized care plans that may or may not include VR. Newer technology, such as easier‐to‐use, less expensive VR, may assist with translation into practice making its clinical use more routine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Palliative Care (PC) is a limited resource, requiring allocation to those most likely to benefit. One currently underserved population is persons sustaining burns, as these injuries may severely limit quality of life, psychosocial and physical health. Additionally, treatment decisions must frequently be made on an emergent basis on behalf of someone unable to participate in decision making. PC services could benefit patients and caregivers substantially, yet only 2% of persons who have been burned are referred to PC. We developed empirically-derived referral criteria; the purpose of this study was to quantify the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of the criteria when retrospectively applied. Methods: Retrospective review of regional burn center admissions (1/1/2019-1/31/2022) to determine adherence to criteria indicating referral to PC should be made or considered. Descriptive statistics characterizing the sample and criteria performance were calculated. Results: N=388 admissions occurred study period (29.9% female; mean(SD) age=39.9 (24.1) years. N=28 persons were referred to PC; n=27 met consult criteria, and n=1 met consider criteria. Criteria for PC consultation indicated referral for n=62, and had 0.96 sensitivity, 0.90 specificity, 0.44 positive predictive value, 1.00 negative predictive value, 0.91 total accuracy. Criteria for considering PC consultation were indicated for n=181 and had 1.00 sensitivity, 0.45 specificity, 0.01 positive predictive value, 1.00 negative predictive value, 0.45 total accuracy. Conclusions: Criteria for PC consultation were sensitive and specific, though the positive predictive value was low. Criteria for consideration show low values; however, documentation did not reveal whether referral was considered or not. Presence of comorbidities was the most commonly-met criterion for referral consideration. Despite the robust sample size, data from a single site may have limited generalizability. Criteria have promising characteristics, may be used as basis for quality improvement efforts, and merit ongoing study and revision to improve predictive ability. Applicability of Research to Practice: These criteria advance clinical practice by providing guidance on identifying persons most likely to benefit from specialist PC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]