Search

Peripheral nerve injuries are often encountered in traumatological care. The aim of this manuscript is to provide initial data, experiences and performance reports from Germany in the implantation of acellular human nerve transplants in peripheral sensory nerve defects of the hand and to put these data in the context of a comprehensive review of the literature. Of the patients 4 (7 digital nerves) were examined 6 months postoperatively and 5 patients (6 digital nerves) were examined 1 year after the operation (3 were also at the 6‑month examination). All patients had a clinical improvement after nerve reconstruction (≥ S3 according to the classification of sensory recovery of the Medical Research Council modified by Mackinnon and Dellon). Disadvantages of our clinical study are the small number of patients, the inhomogeneity (primary and secondary nerve reconstruction) and the lack of comparison with other nerve reconstruction methods., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Introduction: If tensionless nerve coaptation is not possible, bridging the resulting peripheral nerve defect with an autologous nerve graft is still the current gold standard. The concept of conduits as an alternative with different materials and architectures, such as autologous vein conduits or bioartificial nerve conduits, could not replace the nerve graft until today. Chitosan, as a relatively new biomaterial, has recently demonstrated exceptional biocompatibility and material stability with neural lineage cells. The purpose of this prospective randomized clinical experiment was to determine the efficacy of chitosan-based nerve conduits in regenerating sensory nerves in the hand. Materials and methods: Forty-seven patients with peripheral nerve defects up to 26 mm distal to the carpal tunnel were randomized to receive either a chitosan conduit or an autologous nerve graft with the latter serving as the control group. Fifteen patients from the conduit group and seven patients from the control group were available for a 12-month follow-up examination. The primary outcome parameter was tactile gnosis measured with two-point discrimination. The secondary outcome parameters were Semmens Weinstein Monofilament Testing, self-assessed pain, and patient satisfaction. Results: Significant improvement (in static two-point discrimination) was observed six months after trauma (10.7 ± 1.2 mm; p < 0.05) for chitosan-based nerve conduits, but no further improvement was observed after 12 months of regeneration (10.9 ± 1.3 mm). After six months and twelve months, the autologous nerve graft demonstrated comparable results to the nerve conduit, with a static two-point discrimination of 11.0 ± 2.0 mm and 7.9 ± 1.1 mm. Semmes Weinstein Filament Testing in the nerve conduit group showed a continuous improvement over the regeneration period by reaching from 3.1 ± 0.3 after three months up to 3.7 ± 0.4 after twelve months. Autologous nerve grafts presented similar results: 3.3 ± 0.4 after three months and 3.7 ± 0.5 after twelve months. Patient satisfaction and self-reported pain levels were similar between the chitosan nerve conduit and nerve graft groups. One patient required revision surgery due to complications associated with the chitosan nerve tube. Conclusion: Chitosan-based nerve conduits are safe and suitable for bridging nerve lesions up to 26 mm in the hand. Tactile gnosis improved significantly during the early regeneration period, and functional outcomes were similar to those obtained with an autologous nerve graft. Thus, chitosan appears to be a sufficient substitute for autologous nerve grafts in the treatment of small nerve defects in the hand.

Background: Emergency capacities in the operating theatre are limited and often need to be split among surgical departments. Hand injuries often have to compete with other surgical disciplines for the availability of operating capacity. For this reason, an emergency classification was introduced to define a timespan in which the injury should be taken care of in the OR in order to enable the prioritizing of emergency cases in an interdisciplinary approach when capacities are scarce. However, neither valid data nor specific recommendations concerning the medical urgency of treatment or the forensic background of different hand injuries exist to this date., Purpose: This work describes how emergency classifications in Germany are applied to hand surgical cases and how certain hand injuries are prioritized among different hand surgeons., Material and Methods: An online survey was sent to all members of the German Society for Hand Surgery twice during a time span of several months. The survey featured questions on size and type of clinic or practice and requested an assessment of urgency levels for various hand injuries (immediately - within 2 h - within 6 h - within 12 h - within 24 h or elective care). The analysis of the questionnaire and graphic presentation was carried out using Excel., Results: 172 (25 %) out of 700 active members filled in the survey. Among the participants were members of university clinics, hospitals run by the German Statutory Accident Insurance, specialized clinics and primary care clinics. 15 % of participants work in a practice that offers hand-surgical treatment. First and foremost, maximum care hospitals with a hand surgical department participate in the treatment of hand injuries. 64 % of the hospitals use an emergency classification to enable the interdisciplinary prioritizing of surgical emergencies. The categorization of limb-threatening hand injuries appears to be very homogenous among participants whereas non-threatening injuries are assessed rather inconsistently., Conclusion: Emergency treatment of hand injuries primarily depends on available resources and surgical capacities. The assessment of urgency and severity of injuries additionally depends on experience and education. In order to maintain the ability to compete with other surgical disciplines for surgical capacities, a standard classification of hand surgical urgencies needs to be established. As valid data on the treatment of hand injuries are still missing, further studies need to evaluate possible outcomes in order to define the timespan in which surgery should take place., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)