Search

Purpose: When mobility deficits persist after stroke or spinal cord injury (SCI), outpatient neurorehabilitation services are required. This study aimed to explore the current practice of German outpatient neurorehabilitation services and identify factors associated to this practice. Methods: This was a qualitative observational study in which semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from outpatient neurorehabilitation services and mobility-impaired patients. A qualitative content analysis with a data-driven coding process was used. Results: Three general practitioners, five physical, five occupational, and one speech therapist, one neuropsychologist, two outpatient nurses, one rehabilitation technician, one social worker, two patient advocates (long-term survivors, each stroke and SCI), and 20 patients (10 after stroke, 10 after SCI, all first-ever affected since approximately one year) participated. The reported experiences ranged from high satisfaction to perceived deficits in participation-oriented, evidence-based, and coordinated care. Identified associated factors were: (a) availability of specialised therapists and professional education, (b) outpatient service catalogue, (c) cost coverage, (d) setting rehabilitation goals, and (e) physician as care coordinator. Conclusion: Areas of improvement identified focused on: setting rehabilitation goals towards participation, training therapists on evidence-based treatments and shared decision-making, updating the outpatient service catalogue, and implementing coordination actions. Implementation of these recommendations should be evaluated. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Professionals need to be trained in setting rehabilitation goals and treatments. The continuing education should be based on current evidence and address interprofessionalism. Academization and continuing education in scientific work for therapists should be advanced. Professionals should educate patients about rehabilitation goals and set rehabilitation goals together, both interprofessional coordinated and with the patient (shared decision-making). Activity and participation should be the central aspects. Rehabilitation clinicians should give instructions to therapists on what to do if rehabilitation goals are not worked on. Rehabilitation clinicians should encourage interprofessional collaboration and information exchange where this is not the case. The exchange of information between outpatient professionals should be promoted through appropriate measures, that is, interprofessional meetings could be introduced. The outpatient service catalogue should be revised regarding evidence-based and participation-oriented treatments and enable appropriate cost coverage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractPurposeMaterials and methodsResultsConclusion\nImplications for RehabilitationMobility impairments are a common consequence of stroke and spinal cord injury (SCI). Assistive products (APs) such as wheelchairs are often needed for activities and participation. The aim of the study was to explore the provision and use of APs in Germany and to identify associated factors underlying this practice.Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 professionals from outpatient neurorehabilitation services (three general practitioners, five physical therapists, five occupational therapists, one speech therapist, one neuropsychologist, two outpatient nurses, one rehab technician and one social worker), two patient advocates (long-term survivors, each stroke and SCI) and 20 patients (10 each after stroke and SCI with mobility impairment, and first-ever affected). Analysis was performed by qualitative content analysis.Reported experiences were mixed, varying from high satisfaction to unusable APs and unmet needs. Identified factors associated with these experiences were related to care pathways, care coordination, inter-professional collaboration, professionals’ knowledge and patient information, cost coverage, and approval procedures.Overall, patients seem satisfied with the APs they receive, but patients with more severe mobility impairments in particular experience deficits in the provision and use of APs. Further research is needed to develop and test strategies for the provision and use of APs.Interprofessional collaboration between the multiple stakeholders and the involvement of end users is needed to realise the full potential of specific assistive products (APs).A care pathway should be implemented for the provision of appropriate APs.Professionals’ expertise in both APs and end user empowerment needs to be improved.The approval process of the public health insurance should be accelerated and geared more towards the individual needs of patients.Interprofessional collaboration between the multiple stakeholders and the involvement of end users is needed to realise the full potential of specific assistive products (APs).A care pathway should be implemented for the provision of appropriate APs.Professionals’ expertise in both APs and end user empowerment needs to be improved.The approval process of the public health insurance should be accelerated and geared more towards the individual needs of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]