Search

In preclinical experiments, cyclic fasting-mimicking diets (FMDs) showed broad anticancer effects in combination with chemotherapy. Among different tumor types, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is exquisitely sensitive to FMD. However, the antitumor activity and efficacy of cyclic FMD in TNBC patients remain unclear. Here, we show that a severely calorie-restricted, triweekly, 5-day FMD regimen results in excellent pathologic complete response (pCR) rates (primary endpoint) and long-term clinical outcomes (secondary endpoints) when combined with preoperative chemotherapy in 30 patients with early-stage TNBC enrolled in the phase 2 trial BREAKFAST. Bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed that highly glycolytic cancer cells, myeloid cells, and pericytes from tumors achieving pCR undergo a significant, early downmodulation of pathways related to glycolysis and pyruvate metabolism. Our findings pave the wave for conducting larger clinical trials to investigate the efficacy of cyclic FMD in early-stage TNBC patients and to validate early changes of intratumor glycolysis as a predictor of clinical benefit from nutrient restriction. This study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04248998)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare the following competing interests: G.V.B., speaker/advisory board: Novartis, Eli Lilly, Daichi/Astrazeneca, Roche, MSD, and Seagen; G.P., consulting fees: Roche, Bayer, and Astra Zeneca; C.V., consulting fees/advisory board: Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, and Menarini Stemline; C.V., honoraria as speaker: Novartis, Eli Lilly, Istituto Gentili, Accademia Nazionale di Medicina, MSD, Research grant: Roche; F.d.B., consulting fees/advisory board: Roche, EMD Serono, NMS Nerviano Medical Science, Sanofi, MSD, Novartis, Incyte, BMS, Menarini, Astra Zeneca, Pierre Fabre, Mattioli 1885, MCCann Health, Taiho; F.d.B., IQVIA Speaker Bureau: BMS, Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Merck Group, MSD, Pfizer, Servier, Sanofi, Roche, AMGEN, Incyte, Dephaforum, Seagen, Nadirex, BMS, Ambrosetti, and Itanet; and F.d.B., research grant/funding: Novartis, F.Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd, BMS, Ignyta Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Spa, Kymab, Pfizer, Tesaro, MSD, MedImmune LCC, Exelixis Inc., LOXO Oncology Inc., DAICHI SANKIO Dev. Ltd, Basilea Pharmaceutica International AG, Janssen-Cilag International NV, and Merck KGAA. C.V. and F.d.B. are co-inventors of the FMD regimen used in this study. The Italian patent (no. 102019000009954) has been released and was first deposited on June 24(th), 2019, with an extension granted under PCT WO 2020/261131 on June 24(th), 2020. The European patent (no. 207403399), Canadian patent (no. 2144217), and USA patent are pending., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The multi-kinase inhibitor (mKi) regorafenib has demonstrated efficacy in chemorefractory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, lack of predictive biomarkers and concerns over significant toxicities hamper the use of regorafenib in clinical practice., Experimental Design: Serial liquid biopsies were obtained at baseline and monthly until disease progression in chemorefractory patients with mCRC treated with regorafenib in a phase II clinical trial (PROSPECT-R n = 40; NCT03010722) and in a multicentric validation cohort (n = 241). Tissue biopsies collected at baseline, after 2 months and at progression in the PROSPECT-R trial were used to establish patient-derived organoids (PDO) and for molecular analyses. MicroRNA profiling was performed on baseline bloods using the NanoString nCounter platform and results were validated by digital-droplet PCR and/or ISH in paired liquid and tissue biopsies. PDOs co-cultures and PDO-xenotransplants were generated for functional analyses., Results: Large-scale microRNA expression analysis in longitudinal matched liquid and tissue biopsies from the PROSPECT-R trial identified MIR652-3p as a biomarker of clinical benefit to regorafenib. These findings were confirmed in an independent validation cohort and in a "control" group of 100 patients treated with lonsurf. Using ex vivo co-culture assays paired with single-cell RNA-sequencing of PDO established pre- and post-treatment, we modeled regorafenib response observed in vivo and in patients, and showed that MIR652-3p controls resistance to regorafenib by impairing regorafenib-induced lethal autophagy and by orchestrating the switch from neo-angiogenesis to vessel co-option., Conclusions: Our results identify MIR652-3p as a potential biomarker and as a driver of cell and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms of resistance to regorafenib., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare and lethal cancers, with a 5-year survival inferior to 20%(1-3). The only potential curative treatment is surgical resection. However, despite complex surgical procedures that have a remarkable risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality, the 5-year survival rate after radical surgery (R0) is 20-40% and recurrence rates are up to ~ 75%(4-6). Up to ~ 40% of patients relapse within 12 months after resection, and half of these patient will recur systemically(4-6). There is no standard of care for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in resectable BTC, but retrospective reports suggest its potential benefit (7, 8)., Methods: PURITY is a no-profit, multicentre, randomized phase II/III trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and nabpaclitaxel (GAP) as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable BTC at high risk for recurrence. Primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant GAP followed by surgery as compared to upfront surgery, in terms of 12-month progression-free survival for the phase II part and of progression free survival (PFS) for the phase III study. Key Secondary objectives are event free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival, (RFS), overall survival (OS), R0/R1/R2 resection rate, quality of life (QoL), overall response rate (ORR), resectability. Safety analyses will include toxicity rate and perioperative morbidity and mortality rate. Exploratory studies including Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in archival tumor tissues and longitudinal ctDNA analysis are planned to identify potential biomarkers of primary resistance and prognosis., Discussion: Considering the poor prognosis of resected BTC experiencing early tumor recurrence and the negative prognostic impact of R1/R2 resections, PURITY study is based on the rationale that NAC may improve R0 resection rates and ultimately patients' outcomes. Furthermore, NAC should allow early eradication of microscopic distant metastases, undetectable by imaging but already present at the time of diagnosis and avoid mortality and morbidity associated with resection for patients with rapid progression or worsening general condition during neoadjuvant therapy. The randomized PURITY study will evaluate whether patients affected by BTC at high risk from recurrence benefit from a neoadjuvant therapy with GAP regimen as compared to immediate surgery., Trial Registration: PURITY is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06037980) and EuCT(2023-503295-25-00)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Severe calorie restriction, in the form of cyclic fasting or fasting-mimicking diets (FMDs), boosts the antitumor activity of cytotoxic chemotherapy in mouse models of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This effect is mostly mediated by fasting/FMD-induced reduction of plasma glucose concentration and by a boost in antitumor immunity. However, clinical evidence that cyclic FMD may impact on the outcomes of advanced TNBC (aTNBC) patients is lacking. We compared the overall survival (OS) of 14 aTNBC patients receiving first-line carboplatin-gemcitabine plus cyclic FMD in the context of the NCT03340935 trial with the OS of 76 consecutive aTNBC patients treated with carboplatin-based chemotherapy alone at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to adjust the prognostic impact of FMD for other prognostic variables. Patients undergoing cyclic FMD in combination with carboplatin-gemcitabine had better OS when compared to patients receiving chemotherapy alone (median OS 30.3 months, 95% CI 18-NR, vs 17.2 months, 95% CI 15.3-25.1, log-rank P value .041). Multivariable analysis confirmed an association between FMD use and better OS (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19-0.86; P = .019) also after propensity score-based matching according to patient ECOG PS and the presence of de novo metastatic disease (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.21-0.83; P = .013). Cyclic FMD in combination with first-line chemotherapy may improve clinical outcomes in aTNBC patients. Our study paves the way for conducting phase II trials to investigate if cyclic FMD can increase the antitumor activity/efficacy of chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in patients with early-stage TNBC or aTNBC., (© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Background: Bone-targeted agents (BTA), such as denosumab (DN) and zoledronic acid (ZA), have historically reduced the risk of skeletal related events in cancer patients with bone metastases (BM), with no improvement in survival outcomes. In the immunotherapy era, BM have been associated with poor prognosis upon immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Currently, the impact of bone tumor burden on survival upon BTAs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients treated with ICI remains unknown., Methods: Data from ICI-treated aNSCLC patients with BM (4/2013-5/2022) in one institution were retrospectively collected. BTA-ICI concurrent treatment was defined as BTA administration at any time before or within 90 days from ICI start. High bone tumor burden (HBTB) was defined as ≥ 3 sites of BM. Median OS (mOS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier. Aikaike's information criterion (AIC) was used to select the best model for data analysis adjusted for clinical variables., Results: Of 134 patients included, 51 (38 %) received BTA. At a mFU of 39.6 months (m), BTA-ICIs concurrent treatment did not significantly impact on mOS [8.3 m (95% CI 3.9-12.8) versus (vs) 6.8 m (95% CI 4.0-9.6) p = 0.36]; these results were confirmed after adjustment for clinical variables selected by AIC. A multivariate model showed a significant interaction between BTA use and HBTB or radiation therapy to BM. In subgroup analyses, only HBTB confirmed to be associated with significantly longer mOS [8.3 m (95% CI 2.4-14.2) vs 3.5 m (95% CI 2.9-4.1), p = 0.003] and mPFS [3.0 m (95% CI 1.6-4.4) vs 1.8 m (95% CI 1.6-2.0) p = 0.001] upon BTA-ICI concurrent treatment, with the most pronounced OS benefit observed for DN-ICI concurrent regimen [15.2 m (95% CI 0.1-30.7) vs 3.5 m (95% CI 2.9-4.1) p = 0.002]., Conclusions: In the immunotherapy era, HBTB can identify patients experiencing survival benefit with BTA, especially with DN-ICI combination. HBTB should be included as a stratification factor in the upcoming trials assessing BTA and ICI combinations in patients with aNSCLC and BM., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: SM declares personal fees from Italfarmaco, Sanofi and MSD outside the submitted work. EZ declares personal fees from AMGEN, outside the submitted work CP declares personal fees from BMS and MSD, outside the submitted work. AP declares personal fees from Astrazeneca, Roche, BMS. GG declares travel accommodation from Roche and personal fees from Italfarmaco, Astra Zeneca, BMS, MSD outside the submitted work. MCG declares personal financial interests with the following organizations: AstraZeneca, MSD International GmbH, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim Italia S.p.A, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ignyta, Incyte, Inivata, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda; she also declares Institutional financial interests with the following organizations: Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer (MISP), AstraZeneca, MSD International GmbH, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim Italia S.p.A, Celgene, Ignyta, Incyte, Inivata, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Tiziana, Foundation Medicine; at the end, she has received research funding from the following organizations: AIRC, AIFA, Italian Moh, TRANSCAN. FdB provided consultation, attended advisory boards and/or provided lectures for the following organizations, from whom received honoraria or education grants: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ignyta, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer. GLR declares personal fees from MSD, TAKEDA; GSK; AMGEN; PFIZER; SANOFI; JANSEN; Eli Lilly, BMS, Roche, Italfarmaco, Novartis and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. DS declares personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim and BMS, outside the submitted work. RF declares personal fees from MSD and Beigene outside the submitted work. The other authors report no conflict of interest. ., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Prognostic tools to estimate the risk of relapse for patients with liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer (LL-mCRC) undergoing resection with curative intent are needed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a surrogate of postsurgical minimal residual disease is a promising marker in localized CRC. We explored the role of postoperative ctDNA as a marker of minimal residual disease in patients with radically resected LL-mCRC., Materials and Methods: Seventy-six patients with LL-mCRC were retrospectively included. DNA from tumor tissue was sequenced, and one somatic mutation was then assessed by digital droplet polymerase chain reaction in plasma samples collected after surgery to identify the persistence of ctDNA. Relapse-free survival and postresection overall survival were compared between patients with positive vs negative postoperative ctDNA., Results: ctDNA was found in 39 (51%) of 76 patients with LL-mCRC. At a median follow-up of 77 months, 33 of 39 ctDNA-positive patients and 20 of 37 ctDNA-negative patients experienced disease relapse ( P = .008). ctDNA-positive patients reported significantly shorter RFS than ctDNA-negative ones (median RFS 12.7 v 27.4 months hazard ratio, 2.09, P = .008). In the multivariable model including other prognostic covariates, this association was still significant ( P = .046) and a trend toward shorter overall survival among ctDNA-positive patients was reported (hazard ratio, 1.65, P = .183)., Conclusion: The detection of postsurgical ctDNA is an independent negative prognostic marker and identifies patients at high risk of relapse after liver metastases resection., Competing Interests: Paolo MancaPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I have a patent for a method for the identification of gene panels optimal for TMB estimation (Inst) Romano DanesiHonoraria: Lilly, EUSA Pharma, Novartis Italy, Seattle Genetics, GENTILI, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline Gianluca MasiConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Eisai, MSD OncologyPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Terumo (Inst) Marzia Del ReConsulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Roche Molecular DiagnosticsSpeakers' Bureau: Sanofi, Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Roche, MSD Oncology Filippo PietrantonioHonoraria: Servier, Bayer, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Lilly, Sanofi, MSD Oncology, AmgenConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Servier, MSD Oncology, organonResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst) Chiara CremoliniHonoraria: Roche, Amgen, Bayer, Servier, MSD, Merck, Pierre Fabre, OrganonConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Bayer, Amgen, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Nordic PharmaSpeakers' Bureau: Servier, Merck, Pierre FabreResearch Funding: Merck, Bayer, Roche, ServierNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: Systemic immunosuppression characterizing cancer patients represents a concern regarding the efficacy of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination, and real-world evidence is needed to define the efficacy and the dynamics of humoral immune response to mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines., Methods: We conducted an observational study that included patients with solid tumors who were candidates for mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. The primary objective was to monitor the immunologic response to the mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in terms of anti-spike antibody levels. All the patients received two doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine or the BNT162b2 vaccine. Healthcare workers served as a control group of healthy subjects., Results: Among the 243 patients included in the present analysis, 208 (85.60%) and 238 (97.94%) resulted seroconverted after the first and the second dose of vaccine, respectively. Only five patients (2.06%) had a negative titer after the second dose. No significant differences in the rate of seroconversion after two vaccine doses were observed in patients as compared with the control group of healthy subjects. Age and anticancer treatment class had an independent impact on the antibody titer after the second dose of vaccination. In a subgroup of 171 patients with available data about the third timepoint, patients receiving immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors seem to have a higher peak of antibodies soon after the second dose (3 weeks after), but a more pronounced decrease at a late timepoint (3 months after)., Conclusions: The systemic immunosuppression characterizing cancer patients did not seem to dramatically affect the humoral response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in our population of patients with solid tumors. Further investigation is needed to dissect the interplay between immunotherapy and longitudinal dynamics of humoral response to mRNA vaccines, as well as to analyze the cellular response to mRNA vaccines in cancer patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

Purpose: In GI cancers, anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) rearrangements are extremely less frequent than in non-small-cell lung cancer but may be important to offer personalized strategies of treatment in selected patients. Data about the activity and efficacy of ALK inhibitors (ALKi) in GI cancers are scarce., Materials and Methods: We assembled a clinical and molecular international data set of pretreated patients with metastatic or nonresectable cancers of GI primary tumor origin with documented ALK rearrangement treated with at least one line of ALKi. Measurable disease as per RECIST 1.1 was required for response analysis., Results: Primary tumor sites were distributed as follows: 5 (38%) pancreas, 3 (23%) right colon, and 1 (8%) for each one of gastric, duodenal, rectal, left colon, and biliary tract sites. Seven patients (54%) were treated with alectinib, 5 (38%) with crizotinib, and 1 (8%) with entrectinib. After disease progression, five patients (38%) received a subsequent ALKi treatment line, and at the time of data cutoff date, treatment was still ongoing in two patients. Five of 12 evaluable patients (41%) achieved a partial response to first-line ALKi, five patients (41%) had stable disease, and 2 (17%) had progressive disease. No complete responses were registered. At a median follow-up of 39.6 months (interquartile range: 19.8-59.5), the median progression-free survival was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.68 to no response) and the median overall survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 5.46 to no response)., Conclusion: Treatment with ALKi provides remarkable responses and clinical benefit in pretreated patients with ALK fusion-positive GI malignancies. Despite the rarity, ALK rearrangements represent an important therapeutic target in individual pretreated patients with GI solid tumors. Further work providing prospective clinical validation of this target is needed., Competing Interests: Marzia Del ReConsulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Roche Molecular DiagnosticsSpeakers' Bureau: Sanofi, Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Roche, MSD Oncology Paolo MancaPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I have a patent for a method for the identification of gene panels optimal for TMB estimation (Inst) Andrew HendifarConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Ipsen, Perthera, Celgene, AbbVie, EisaiResearch Funding: Ipsen, NGM Biopharmaceuticals (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: HalozymeOther Relationship: FibroGen Alexander DrilonHonoraria: Pfizer, Loxo/Bayer/Lilly, IASLCConsulting or Advisory Role: Ignyta, Loxo, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Blueprint Medicines, Genentech/Roche, BeiGene, Hengrui Therapeutics, Exelixis, Bayer, Tyra Biosciences, Takeda/Millennium, BerGenBio, MORE Health, Lilly, AbbVie, 14ner Oncology/Elevation Oncology, Monopteros Therapeutics, Novartis, EMD Serono/Merck, Repare Therapeutics, Melendi, Archer, Nuvalent Inc, Janssen, Amgen, Merus, Axis Pharma, Medscape, Liberum, Med Learning, PeerView, EPG Health, JNCCN/Harborside, Ology, Clinical Care Options, touchIME, Entos, Treeline, Prelude Therapeutics, Applied Pharmaceutical Science IncSpeakers' Bureau: Helsinn Therapeutics, Beigene, Remedica Ltd, TP Therapeutics, Verastem, Ignyta/Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Liberum, Loxo/Bayer/Lilly, Lungevity, NIH, PER, OncLive/MJH Life Sciences, Clinical Care Options/NCCN, Lung Cancer Canada, AIOT, Chugai Pharma, Chugai Pharma, Sirio Libanes Hospital, Answers in CME, Faculty RTP, RV MoreResearch Funding: Foundation MedicinePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Wolters Kluwer (Royalties for Pocket Oncology)Other Relationship: Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Teva, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Puma Biotechnology, Merus, Boehringer Ingelheim Guilherme HaradaSpeakers' Bureau: MSD, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Anne Hansen ReeHonoraria: MSD Oncology, BMSiResearch Funding: BMSi (Inst) Samuel KlempnerStock and Other Ownership Interests: TP Therapeutics, Nuvalent IncHonoraria: NateraConsulting or Advisory Role: Lilly, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo/UCB Japan, Sanofi/Aventis, MersanaResearch Funding: Leap Therapeutics (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), Silverback Therapeutics (Inst)Other Relationship: NCCN Gunhild Mari MælandsmoPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent application submitted for a nine-protein/gene panel predicting response to anti VEGF therapies in combination with chemotherapy (Inst) Hege G. RussnesHonoraria: AstraZeneca (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), InCyte (Inst), Merck (Inst), Roche (Inst)Research Funding: Foundation Medicine (Inst) James M. ClearyHonoraria: Blueprint Medicines, Syros PharmaceuticalsConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers SquibbResearch Funding: Merck, Tesaro, AstraZeneca, Esperas Pharma, AbbVie (Inst), Merus (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), BMS (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Agios, Bristol Myers Squibb Andrea Sartore-BianchiConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Bayer, Sanofi, Servier, Novartis Maria Di BartolomeoHonoraria: Lilly, MSD Oncology, Servier, BMSiConsulting or Advisory Role: Lilly, MSD OncologyResearch Funding: LillyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Sanofi Filippo PietrantonioHonoraria: Servier, Bayer, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Lilly, Sanofi, MSD Oncology, AmgenConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Servier, MSD Oncology, MerckResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Astrazeneca (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Introduction: In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), baseline circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) variant allele fraction (VAF) might serve as a surrogate of disease burden and should be evaluated in comparison with CEA and RECIST-defined sum of target lesions., Methods: In this pre-planned analysis of the VALENTINO trial, we included patients with RAS wild-type mCRC receiving upfront FOLFOX/panitumumab with available baseline liquid biopsy. CtDNA was analysed by means of a 14-gene NGS panel. For each patient, the gene with the highest VAF in ctDNA was selected., Results: The final cohort included 135 patients. The median VAF was 12.6% (IQR: 2.0-45.2%). Higher VAF was observed in patients with liver metastases and with synchronous metastases presentation. Patients with high VAF had poorer median OS compared to those with low VAF (21.8 vs 36.5 months; HR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.20-2.76; p = 0.005). VAF outperformed baseline CEA and target lesion diameter in the prognostic stratification and remained significantly correlated with OS (p = 0.003) in a multivariate model. VAF was not significantly correlated with dimensional response and PFS., Conclusion: CtDNA measured by VAF is prognostic in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. Response and PFS after an anti-EGFR-based first-line strategy are independent from initial tumour burden., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)