Search

Surgical residents routinely participate in open and laparoscopic groin hernia repairs. The increasing popularity of robot-assisted groin hernia repair could lead to an educational loss for residents. We aimed to explore the involvement of surgical specialists and surgical residents, i.e., non-specialists, in robot-assisted groin hernia repair. The scoping review was reported according to PRISMA-ScR guideline. A protocol was uploaded at Open Science Framework, and a systematic search was conducted in four databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Included studies had to report on robot-assisted groin hernia repairs. Data charting was conducted in duplicate. Of the 67 included studies, 85% of the studies described that the robot-assisted groin hernia repair was performed by a surgical specialist. The rest of the studies had no description of the primary operating surgeon. Only 13% of the included studies reported that a resident attended the robot-assisted groin hernia repair. Thus, robot-assisted groin hernia repair was mainly performed by surgical specialists, and robot-assisted groin hernia repair therefore seems to be underutilized to educate surgical residents.

Emergency groin hernia repair is associated with increased mortality risk, but the actual risk is unknown. Therefore, this review aimed to investigate 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality in adult patients who had undergone emergency or elective groin hernia repair.This review was reported following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and a protocol (CRD42021244412) was registered to PROSPERO. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL in April 2021. Studies were included if they reported 30- or 90-day mortality following an emergency or elective groin hernia repair. Meta-analyses were conducted when possible, and subgroup analyses were made for bowel resection, sex, and hernia type. According to the study design, the risk of bias was assessed using either the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.Thirty-seven studies with 30,740 patients receiving emergency repair and 457,253 receiving elective repair were included. The 30-day mortality ranged from 0-11.8% to 0-1.7% following emergency and elective repair, respectively. The risk of 30-day mortality following emergency repair was estimated to be 26-fold higher than after elective repair (RR = 26.0, 95% CI 21.6-31.4, IThe overall mortality after emergency groin hernia repair is 26-fold higher than after elective repair, but the increased risk is attributable mostly to female and femoral hernias.PROSPERO protocol (CRD42021244412).

Emergency groin hernia is an understudied research field despite its severity requiring emergency surgery associated with high postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients, hernias, and surgical repairs, as well as complication rates following emergency groin hernia repair.Nationwide cohort study based on prospectively collected data obtained from the Danish Hernia Database and person-level linked to the Danish National Patient Registry. We included all adult patients undergoing an emergency groin hernia repair for inguinal- and/or femoral hernias registered in the Danish Hernia Database between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2020. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality, 30- and 90-day readmissions, and reoperations for recurrence. Outcomes were presented as crude numbers, odds ratios for mortality and readmission, and hazard ratios for reoperation.We included 9741 patients in the study. Within 30 days of surgery, 510 (6%) deaths and 1800 (23%) readmissions were recorded. During a median follow-up of 5 years, 537 (6%) reoperations for recurrence were performed. Multivariate analyses showed that mortality and readmission rates were influenced by increasing age, comorbidity, and bowel resection. Cumulative and adjusted reoperation rates were lower for mesh than non-mesh repairs. Moreover, mortality rates have improved over time, whereas readmission rates have increased over time.Complication and mortality rates after emergency groin hernia repair remain high. This study underlines the importance of a timely repair in incarcerated hernias to avoid contaminated surgical fields and the need for bowel resection.

Background and objective: We aimed to validate the diagnostic accuracy of appendicitis, its severity, its description, and the surgical approach, including open or laparoscopic appendectomy and diagnostic laparoscopy, in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) against information from the electronic medical records. Methods: A random sample of 1046 patients of all ages and sexes recorded in the DNPR from the Capital Region of Denmark during 2010–2015 was investigated. Patients’ admission had to include a discharge code for appendicitis (K35−K379) according to the International Classification of Disease version 10 (ICD-10) alone or in combination with a surgical code for appendectomy or the surgical code for a diagnostic laparoscopy. We calculated the positive predictive values (PPVs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Data from a total of 1018 patients were available for data analysis. The ICD-10 codes for appendicitis resulted in a good PPV of >95% when combined with a surgical code. ICD-10 codes combined with the surgical codes could discriminate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis with some caution as the PPVs ranged from 68% to 93%. Only the surgical code for laparoscopic appendectomy yielded a good PPV (99%) for the actual surgical approach. The surgical code for a diagnostic laparoscopy alone did not cover a normal diagnostic laparoscopy. Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of appendicitis and appendectomy in routinely collected administrative health data is good for ICD-10 codes for appendicitis in combination with a surgical code and especially for laparoscopic appendectomy. Uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis can be distinguished with some caution.

Background Yersinia infection affects terminal ileum and lymph nodes and could therefore mimic the symptoms of appendicitis. We aimed to systematically characterise the suspected or confirmed abdominal diseases and/or surgeries associated with Yersinia infection. Materials and methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A protocol (CRD42016053252) was uploaded to PROSPERO. The searches were conducted in PubMed and EMBASE on October 2, 2020. Original reports on patients with abdominal surgical diseases were included. The primary outcome was to characterise suspected or confirmed abdominal surgical diseases and/or surgeries associated with Yersinia infection, while the secondary outcomes were the positive rate of Yersinia species for each disease and surgery, and to investigate the rate of Yersinia spp. in different geographic regions. We calculated the weighted mean prevalence of positive tests for Yersinia spp. for the different diseases and surgeries according to the detection method and for subgroups based on geographic region. Results From the search, 33 studies were included in the systematic review and 18 in the meta-analysis. Across geographic regions, the weighted mean prevalence for Yersinia spp. was 51% (95% CI 34%-69%) in mesenteric lymphadenitis, 65% (95% CI 45%-85%) in terminal ileitis, and 8% (95% CI 2%-15%) in normal appendices. Conclusions Around half of the patients with mesenteric lymphadenitis and terminal ileitis were serologically positive for infections with Yersinia spp. Yersinia infection may cause unnecessary surgery for suspected appendicitis due to symptoms from mesenteric lymphadenitis or terminal ileitis.

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: MAIN OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefits and harms of mesh compared with non‐mesh in emergency groin hernia repair in adult patients with an inguinal or femoral hernia. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the effects of mesh versus non‐mesh in emergency groin hernia repair differ according to the degree of contamination.

ImportanceSurgical training involves letting residents operate under supervision. Since hernia repair is a common procedure worldwide, it is a frequent part of the surgical curriculum.ObjectiveTo assess the risk of reoperation for recurrence after elective primary groin and ventral hernia repair performed by supervised residents compared with that by specialists.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis nationwide register-based cohort study included data from January 2016 to September 2021. Patients were followed up until reoperation, emigration, death, or the end of the study period. The study used data from the Danish Inguinal and Ventral Hernia Databases linked with data from the Danish Patient Safety Authority’s Online Register via surgeons’ unique authorization ID.The cohort included patients aged 18 years or older who underwent primary elective hernia repairs performed by supervised residents or specialists for inguinal, femoral, epigastric, or umbilical hernias. Hernia repairs were divided into the following 4 groups: Lichtenstein groin, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) groin, open ventral, and laparoscopic ventral.ExposuresHernia repairs performed by supervised residents vs specialists.Main Outcomes and MeasuresReoperation for recurrence, analyzed separately for all 4 groups.ResultsA total of 868 specialists and residents who performed 31 683 primary groin and 7777 primary ventral hernia repairs were included in this study. The median age of patients who underwent hernia repair was 60 years (IQR, 48-70 years), and 33 424 patients (84.7%) were male. There was no significant difference in the adjusted risk of reoperation after Lichtenstein groin hernia repair (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 0.99-1.59), laparoscopic groin hernia repair (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.73-1.40), open ventral hernia repair (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.61-1.29), and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 0.99-8.84) performed by supervised residents compared with those by specialists. There was, however, a slightly increased unadjusted, cumulative reoperation rate after Lichtenstein repairs performed by supervised residents compared with those by specialists (4.8% vs 4.2%; P = .048).Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this study suggest that neither open nor laparoscopic repair of groin and ventral hernias performed by supervised residents appeared to be associated with a higher risk of reoperation for recurrence compared with the operations performed by specialists. This indicates that residents may safely perform elective hernia repair when supervised as part of their training curriculum.

Long-term outcomes of cholecystectomy are largely unknown though it is a common procedure in general surgery. We aimed to investigate the long-term mortality rate and incidence of intestinal obstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.This systematic review and meta-analysis was reported according to the PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR guidelines. A protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020178906). The databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were last searched on February 9, 2022 for original studies on long-term complications with n 40 and follow-up ≥ 6 months. Outcomes were long-term mortality and incidence of intestinal obstruction, and meta-analyses were conducted. Risk of bias was assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane "Risk of bias"-tool according to study design.We included 41 studies that reported long-term follow-up on 1,000,534 patients. Of these, 38 studies reported on mortality (514,242 patients) that ranged from 0 to 32%. Meta-analysis estimated a long-term mortality rate of 2.0% (95% CI 1.7-2.3%) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Five studies including 486,292 patients reported on intestinal obstruction that ranged from 0 to 6%. Meta-analysis estimated a long-term rate of intestinal obstruction of 1.3% (95% CI 0.8-1.8%).Long-term mortality after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 2%. The incidence of long-term intestinal obstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 1.3%.