Search

Great advances have been made in mass spectrometric data interpretation for intact glycopeptide analysis. However, accurate identification of intact glycopeptides and modified saccharide units at the site-specific level and with fast speed remains challenging. Here, we present a glycan-first glycopeptide search engine, pGlyco3, to comprehensively analyze intact N- and O-glycopeptides, including glycopeptides with modified saccharide units. A glycan ion-indexing algorithm developed for glycan-first search makes pGlyco3 5–40 times faster than other glycoproteomic search engines without decreasing accuracy or sensitivity. By combining electron-based dissociation spectra, pGlyco3 integrates a dynamic programming-based algorithm termed pGlycoSite for site-specific glycan localization. Our evaluation shows that the site-specific glycan localization probabilities estimated by pGlycoSite are suitable to localize site-specific glycans. With pGlyco3, we confidently identified N-glycopeptides and O-mannose glycopeptides that were extensively modified by ammonia adducts in yeast samples. The freely available pGlyco3 is an accurate and flexible tool that can be used to identify glycopeptides and modified saccharide units.

The remarkable advancement of top-down proteomics in the past decade is driven by the technological development in separation, mass spectrometry (MS) instrumentation, novel fragmentation, and bioinformatics. However, the accurate identification and quantification of proteoforms, all clearly-defined molecular forms of protein products from a single gene, remain a challenging computational task. This is in part due to the complicated mass spectra from intact proteoforms when compared to those from the digested peptides. Herein, pTop 2.0 is developed to fill in the gap between the large-scale complex top-down MS data and the shortage of high-accuracy bioinformatic tools. Compared with pTop 1.0, the first version, pTop 2.0 concentrates mainly on the identification of the proteoforms with unexpected modifications or a terminal truncation. The quantitation based on isotopic labeling is also a new function, which can be carried out by the convenient and user-friendly "one-key operation," integrated together with the qualitative identifications. The accuracy and running speed of pTop 2.0 is significantly improved on the test data sets. This chapter will introduce the main features, step-by-step running operations, and algorithmic developments of pTop 2.0 in order to push the identification and quantitation of intact proteoforms to a higher-accuracy level in top-down proteomics.

Chemoproteomics has emerged as a key technology to expand the functional space in complex proteomes for probing fundamental biology and for discovering new small molecule-based therapies. Here we report a modification-centric computational tool termed pChem to provide a streamlined pipeline for unbiased performance assessment of chemoproteomic probes. The pipeline starts with an experimental setting for isotopically coding probe-derived modifications (PDMs) that can be automatically recognized by pChem, with masses accurately calculated and sites precisely localized. Further, pChem exports on-demand reports by scoring the profiling efficiency, modification-homogeneity and proteome-wide residue selectivity of a tested probe. The performance and robustness of pChem were benchmarked by applying it to eighteen bioorthogonal probes. Of note, the analyses reveal that the formation of unexpected PDMs can be driven by endogenous reactive metabolites (e.g., bioactive aldehydes and glutathione). Together, pChem is a powerful and user-friendly tool that aims to facilitate the development of probes for the ever-growing field of chemoproteomics.

Tandem mass spectrometry has been the principal method in shotgun proteomics for peptide and protein identification. However, incorrect identifications reported by proteome search engines are still unknown, and further validation methods are needed. We have proposed a validation method pValid before, but its scope of application is limited because two features used in pValid are related to open database search and sub-optimal peptide candidates for tandem mass spectra, and the performance on complex datasets still has room for improvement. In this study, we developed a more comprehensive validation method, pValid 2, to break these limitations by removing the two features and bringing in a new feature related to the retention time predicted by a deep learning-based method pPredRT. pValid 2 yielded an average false positive rate of 0.03% and an average false negative rate of 1.37% on three testing datasets, better than those of pValid, and flagged 8.47% to 11.31% more incorrect identifications than pValid on two complex datasets. Moreover, pValid 2 flagged almost all decoy identifications in validating the open-search datasets. In addition, the function of validating identifications given by MaxQuant and MS-GF+ was implemented in pValid 2, and the validation results showed that pValid 2 performed dramatically better than three metabolic labeling validation methods. Further considering its cost-effectiveness as a pure computational approach, pValid 2 has the potential to be a widely used validation tool for peptide identifications of any proteome search engines in shotgun proteomics. SIGNIFICANCE: Identification results given by shotgun proteomics are vital to life science research. The correctness of identifications deeply affects the precision of the subsequent studies about protein structures and functions, protein-protein interactions, pathogenic mechanism, and targeted drugs. Thus, validating the correctness of identifications is crucial and urgent. In 2019, we developed an identification credibility validation method named pValid, whose false positive rate (FPR) is 0.03% and false negative rate (FNR) is 1.79%, comparable to those of the gold standard, i.e., the Synthetic-peptide validation method. However, pValid can only be used for validating the results from pFind, and its validation performance on a few complex datasets still has room for improvement. So, in this submission, we proposed pValid 2, a more comprehensive computational validation method that can validate identifications from any proteome search engines with increased discriminating power.