Search

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation (BTT) has expanded considerably, though evidence-based selection criteria and long-term outcome data are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether risk factors often used to exclude patients from ECMO BTT—specifically older age and not yet being listed for transplant—are validated by long-term outcomes. Methods: To ensure minimum 5-year follow-up, a retrospective cohort study was performed of adult patients actively listed for lung transplantation at a high-volume center and bridged on ECMO between January 2012 and December 2017. Data was collected through January 1, 2023. Results: Among 50 patients bridged on ECMO, 25 survived to transplant. Median age at listing was 58 (interquartile range [IQR], 42–65) in the transplanted group and 65 (IQR, 56.5–69) in the deceased group (P = 0.051). One-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival were 88% (22/25), 60% (15/25), and 44% (11/25), respectively, with eight patients still living at the time of review. Median time spent at home during the year post-transplant was 340 days (IQR, 314–355). Older age at listing was a negative predictor of survival on ECMO to transplant (odds ratio 0.92 [95% confidence interval, 0.86–0.99], P = 0.01). Thirteen patients were placed on ECMO prior to being listed and three were listed the same day as ECMO cannulation, with 10/16 transplanted. No significant difference in post-transplant survival was found between patients placed on ECMO prior to listing (n = 10) and those already listed (n = 15) (P = 0.93, log-rank). Serial post-transplant spirometry up to 5 years and surveillance transbronchial biopsy demonstrated good allograft function and low rates of cellular rejection. Conclusions: In one of the oldest cohorts of ECMO BTT patients described, favorable survival outcomes and allograft function were observed up to 5 years irrespective of whether patients were previously listed or bridged to decision. Despite inherent limitations to this retrospective, single-center study, the data presented support the feasibility of ECMO BTT in older and not previously listed advanced lung disease patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The safety of lung transplantation using ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has been confirmed in multiple clinical studies; however, limited evidence is currently available regarding the potential effects of EVLP on posttransplant graft complications and survival with mid‐ to long‐term follow‐up. In this study, we reviewed our institutional data to better understand the impact of EVLP. Methods: Lungs placed on EVLP from 2014 through 2020 and transplant outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Data were compared between lungs transplanted and declined after EVLP, between patients with severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD3) and no PGD3 after EVLP, and between matched patients with lungs transplanted with and without EVLP. Results: In total, 98 EVLP cases were performed. Changes in metabolic indicators during EVLP were correlated with graft quality and transplantability, but not changes in physiological parameters. Among 58 transplanted lungs after EVLP, PGD3 at 72 h occurred in 36.9% and was associated with preservation time, mechanical support prior to transplant, and intraoperative transfusion volume. Compared with patients without EVLP, patients who received lungs screened with EVLP had a higher incidence of PGD3 and longer ICU and hospital stays. Lung grafts placed on EVLP exhibited a significantly higher chance of developing airway anastomotic ischemic injury by 30 days posttransplant. Acute and chronic graft rejection, pulmonary function, and posttransplant survival were not different between patients with lungs screened on EVLP versus lungs with no EVLP. Conclusion: EVLP use is associated with an increase of early posttransplant adverse events, but graft functional outcomes and patient survival are preserved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although COVID-19 is no longer a declared global health emergency, data remain limited on the impact of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients., Methods: We identified lung transplant recipients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 from March 2020 through August 2022 in our institutional database and investigated clinical outcomes. We then analyzed outcomes based on date of COVID-19 diagnosis (first wave March 2020-October 2020; second wave November 2020-2021; third wave December 2021-September 2022) and compared these results., Results: Of the 210 lung transplant recipients (median age 67; 67% men) enrolled, 140 (67%) required hospital admission. Among admitted recipients, 35 (25%) were intubated and 7 (5%) were placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Overall survival was 67.1% at 1 y and 59.0% at 2 y post-COVID-19 diagnosis. COVID-19 led to mortality in all 5 patients diagnosed during their index admission for lung transplantation. Although overall survival was significantly better in recipients with COVID-19 during the third wave, in-hospital mortality remained high (first wave 28%, second wave 38%, and 28% third wave). Vaccination (partially vaccinated versus none and fully vaccinated versus none) was the only significant protective factor for hospital admission, and age 70 y and older and partially vaccinated (versus none or fully vaccinated) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality., Conclusions: Overall survival after COVID-19 infection in lung transplant recipients continues to improve; however, in-hospital mortality remains remarkably high. Vaccination appears to have been impactful in preventing hospital admission, but its impact on in-hospital mortality is still unclear. Further research is needed to better identify lung transplant recipients at high risk for mortality from COVID-19., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)