Search

Accurate detection of hypertension is crucial for clinical management of pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD). The 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics childhood hypertension guidelines included new normative blood pressure (BP) values and revised definitions of BP categories. In this study, we examined the effect of applying these changes to the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) cohort compared to use of the 2004 Fourth Report normative data and definitions.Observational cohort study.Children and adolescents in the CKiD cohort.Clinic blood pressure measurements.Blood pressure percentiles and hypertension stages calculated using the 2017 and 2004 guidelines.Agreement analysis compared the estimated percentile and prevalence of high blood pressure based on the 2017 and 2004 guidelines to clinic and combined ambulatory blood pressure readings.The proportion of children classified as having normal clinic blood pressure was similar using the 2017 and 2004 guidelines, but the use of the 2017 normative data classified more participants as having hypertensive-range blood pressure (22% vs. 11%) with marginal reproducibility (kappa= 0.569, 95%CI: 0.538, 0.599). Those identified as hypertensive by the 2017 guidelines had higher levels of proteinuria compared to those identified using the 2004 guidelines. There were substantially more participants with white coat and ambulatory hypertension when using the 2017 guidelines (3.5% vs. 1.5%; and 15.5% vs. 7.9%, respectively). The proportion with masked hypertension was lower using the 2017 guidelines (40.2% vs. 47.8%, respectively) with good reproducibility (kappa= 0.799, 95%CI: 0.778, 0.819), and the percentage of participants with normal ambulatory blood pressure was similar (40.9% vs. 42.9%, respectively), LIMITATIONS: Relationship with long-term progression and target organ damage was not assessed.A greater percentage of children with CKD were identified as hypertensive based on both clinic and ambulatory blood pressure when using the 2017 vs. the 2004 guidelines, and the 2017 guidelines better discriminated those with higher levels of proteinuria. The substantial differences in the classification of hypertension when using the 2004 vs. 2017 guidelines should inform clinical care.

FSGS is a common indication for kidney transplant with a high-risk of posttransplant recurrence.In this review, we summarize current knowledge about FSGS recurrence after kidney transplantation, including epidemiology, pretransplant planning, posttransplant management, and investigational treatments.FSGS recurs in 14%-60% of first transplants, likely associated with a circulating permeability factor. Pretransplant counseling regarding recurrence is critical, and patients with FSGS should undergo pretransplant genetic screening. Rapid progression to ESKD, initial steroid responsiveness, younger age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, and mesangial hypercellularity or minimal change histology on native biopsy may be associated with recurrence. Living donation is not contraindicated but does not result in improved graft survival relative to deceased donation. Pretransplant nephrectomy may be performed for a variety of reasons, but does not decrease recurrence. Pretransplant therapy with rituximab and/or PE is understudied but not clearly effective at preventing recurrence. Patients with FSGS typically present early with rapid-onset severe proteinuria. Diagnosis can be confirmed by biopsy showing foot process effacement; typical FSGS lesions are not seen on light microscopy in the early stages. There is no established effective treatment for recurrent FSGS, but renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition and extracorporeal therapies, including PE and IA, are most commonly used. Adjunct or alternative therapies may include rituximab, lipopheresis, and cyclosporine.

Adolescent- and adult-onset disease minimal change disease (MCD) may have a clinical course distinct from childhood-onset disease. We characterized the course of children and adults with MCD in the Cure Glomerulopathy Network (CureGN) and assessed predictors of rituximab response.Prospective, multicenter, observational study.CureGN participants with proven MCD on biopsy.Age at disease onset. Initiation of RAAS blockade and immunosuppression including rituximab during the study period.Relapse and remission, change in eGFR and kidney failure.Remission and relapse probabilities are estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and gap time recurrent event models. Linear regression models were used for the outcome of change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between rituximab administration and remission.304 childhood (≤12 years old), 49 adolescent (13-17 years old), and 201 adult onset (≥18 years) participants were included with 2.7-3.2 years of follow-up after enrollment. Children had longer time to biopsy (238 days vs. 23 in adolescents, and 36 in adults, p0.001) and were more likely to have received therapy prior to biopsy. Children were more likely to be treated with immunosuppression but not RAAS blockade. The rate of relapse was higher in childhood-onset versus adult-onset participants (hazard ratio (HR) 1.69 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-2.21)). The probability of remission was also higher in childhood-onset disease (HR 1.33 (95%CI 1.02-1.72)). eGFR loss in all groups was minimal. Children were more likely to remit after rituximab than adolescents and adults (adjusted HR 2.1, p=0.003). Across all groups, glucocorticoid-sensitivity was associated with a greater likelihood of achieving complete remission after rituximab (adjusted HR 2.62, p=0.002).CureGN was limited to biopsy-proven disease. Comparisons of childhood to non-childhood cases of MCD may be subject to selection bias, given that childhood cases who are biopsied may be limited to those patients who are least responsive to initial therapy.Among patients with MCD who underwent kidney biopsy, there were differences in the course (relapse and remission) of childhood-onset compared to adolescent and adult-onset disease, as well as rituximab response.

Recent reassessment of the use of race in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in adults has instigated questions about the role of race in eGFR expressions for children. Little research has examined the associations of self-reported race with measured GFR (mGFR) adjusting for serum creatinine or cystatin C in children and young adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study examined these associations and evaluated the performance of the previously published "U25" (under the age of 25 years) eGFR equations in a large cohort of children and young adults with CKD.Observational cohort study.Participants in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) study including 190 Black and 675 non-Black participants contributing 473 and 1,897 annual person-visits, respectively.Self- or parental-reported race (Black, non-Black). Adjustment for serum creatinine or cystatin C, body size, and socioeconomic status.mGFR based on iohexol clearance.Linear regression with generalized estimating equations, stratified by age (6, 6-12, 12-18, and ≥18 years) incorporating serum creatinine or serum cystatin C. Contrasting performance in different self-reported racial groups of the U25 eGFR equations.Self-reported Black race was significantly associated with 12.8% higher mGFR among children in regression models including serum creatinine. Self-reported Black race was significantly associated with 3.5% lower mGFR after adjustment for cystatin C overall but was not significant for those over 12 years. The results were similar after adjustment for body size and socioeconomic factors. The average of creatinine- and cystatin C-based U25 equations was unbiased by self-reported race groups.Small number of children 6 years; lean body mass was estimated.Differences in the creatinine-mGFR relationship by self-reported race were observed in children and young adults with CKD and were consistent with findings in adults. Smaller and opposite differences were observed for the cystatin C-mGFR relationship, especially in the younger age group. We recommend inclusion of children for future investigations of biomarkers to estimate GFR. Importantly, for GFR estimation among those under 25 years of age, the average of the new U25 creatinine and cystatin C equations without race coefficients yields unbiased estimates of mGFR.