Search

OBJECTIVE The authors’ objective was to examine the safety and efficacy of salvage intracranial cesium-131 brachytherapy in combination with resection of recurrent brain tumors. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients treated with intraoperative intracranial cesium-131 brachytherapy at a single institution. Permanent suture-stranded cesium-131 seeds were implanted in the resection cavity after maximal safe tumor resection. The primary outcomes of interest were local, locoregional (within 1 cm), and intracranial control, as well as rates of overall survival (OS), neurological death, symptomatic adverse radiation effects (AREs), and surgical complication rate graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2020, 36 patients received 40 consecutive cesium-131 implants for 42 recurrent brain tumors and received imaging follow-up for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 17.0 (12.7–25.9) months. Twenty patients (55.6%) with 22 implants were treated for recurrent brain metastasis, 12 patients (33.3%) with 16 implants were treated for recurrent atypical (n = 7) or anaplastic (n = 5) meningioma, and 4 patients (11.1%) were treated for other recurrent primary brain neoplasms. All except 1 tumor (97.6%) had received prior radiotherapy, including 20 (47.6%) that underwent 2 or more prior radiotherapy treatments and 23 (54.8%) that underwent prior resection. The median (IQR) tumor size was 3.0 (2.3–3.7) cm, and 17 lesions (40.5%) had radiographic evidence of ARE prior to salvage therapy. Actuarial 1-year local/locoregional/intracranial control rates for the whole cohort and patients with metastases and meningiomas were 91.6%/83.4%/47.9%, 88.8%/84.4%/45.4%, and 100%/83.9%/46.4%, respectively. No cases of local recurrence of any histology (0 of 27) occurred after gross-total resection (p = 0.012, log-rank test). The 1-year OS rates for the whole cohort and patients with metastases and meningiomas were 82.7%, 79.1%, and 91.7%, respectively, and the median (IQR) survival of all patients was 26.7 (15.6–36.4) months. Seven patients (19.4%) experienced neurological death from progressive intracranial disease (7 of 14 total deaths [50%]), 5 (13.9%) of whom died of leptomeningeal disease. Symptomatic AREs were observed in 9.5% of resection cavities (n = 4), of which 1 (2.4%) was grade 3 in severity. The surgical complication rate was 16.7% (n = 7); 4 (9.5%) of these patients had grade 3 or higher complications, including 1 patient (2.4%) who died perioperatively. CONCLUSIONS Cesium-131 brachytherapy resulted in good local control and acceptable rates of symptomatic AREs and surgical complications in this heavily pretreated cohort, and it may be a reasonable salvage adjuvant treatment for this patient population.

Brain metastases occur frequently in advanced melanoma and traditionally require surgery and radiation therapy. New evidence demonstrates that systemic therapies are effective for controlling metastatic melanoma brain metastases. This study evaluated outcomes after resection of melanoma brain metastases treated with systemic therapy, with or without focal radiotherapy.All patients received immunotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors preoperatively or in the immediate 3 months postoperatively. Resection cavity failure, distant central nervous system progression, and adverse radiation effects were reported in the presence and absence of focal radiotherapy using the Kaplan-Meier method.Between 2011 and 2020, 37 resection cavities in 29 patients met criteria for analysis. Of lesions, 22 (59%) were treated with focal radiotherapy, and 15 (41%) were treated with targeted therapy or immunotherapy alone. The 12- and 24-month freedom from local recurrence was 64.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42.1%-99.8%) and 46.3% (95% CI 24.5%-87.5%), respectively, for systemic therapy alone and 93.3% (95% CI 81.5%-100%) at both time points for focal radiotherapy (P = 0.01). On univariate analysis, focal radiotherapy was the only significant factor associated with reduction of local recurrence risk (hazard ratio 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.85; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in central nervous system progression-free survival or overall survival between patients who received systemic therapy plus focal radiotherapy compared with systemic therapy alone. BRAF mutation status was reviewed for either the brain metastasis (n = 9 patients, 31%) or the primary site (n = 20 patients, 69%), and patients harboring BRAFFocal radiotherapy with systemic therapy for resected melanoma brain metastases significantly decreased resection cavity recurrence compared with systemic therapy alone. BRAF mutation status correlated with poorer outcomes.

Understanding the molecular landscape and microenvironment of melanoma brain metastases is critical to devise improved treatments. Here, we perform bulk and single cell genomic analysis of melanoma brain metastases to identify molecular correlates of clinical outcome. 84 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection at a single institution with a histo-pathologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma brain metastasis were retrospectively identified. In 60 patients (71%) with sufficient brain metastasis tissue for targeted next generation sequencing, DNA mutations were assessed with a CLIA certified sequencing assay. Single nuclear RNA sequencing using the 10x platform was performed on n=6 samples from treatment naïve patients. Overall survival (OS) and CNS progression free survival (CNS PFS) from time of brain metastasis diagnosis were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median patient age was 62 years old (range: 25-78 years), and the median clinical follow up was 17 months. A total of 33 patients (39%) had BRAFV600E melanoma brain metastases. Multivariate analysis incorporating age, performance status, and extracranial disease revealed BRAF status was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p< 0.05). In patients undergoing targeted next generation sequencing, the most common pathogenic variant was TERT promoter mutation (n=44; 73%). With regard to TCGA molecular melanoma subgroups, NRAS mutant (n=22; 37%) brain metastases were most common followed by BRAF mutant (n=20; 33%), NF1 mutant (n=11; 18%), and triple wildtype (n=7; 12%). Evaluation of clinical outcomes in the context of next generation sequencing results revealed no differences by TERT status but demonstrated worse overall survival in the BRAF mutant molecular group (p< 0.01, log-rank test). Single nuclear sequencing of 36,115 nuclei across 6 samples revealed BRAF wildtype tumors exhibit greater infiltrating immune cell populations including microglia and T cell subtypes. Future work will require integration of these findings with different systemic therapy regimens and across larger, prospective, multi-institutional cohorts.

BACKGROUND Exercise has proven benefit in patients with cancer with most studies focused on patients with high functional and neurocognitive status. Patients with brain tumors, however, frequently have deficits in cognition, motor, balance, or other symptoms that are further exacerbated by surgery and adjuvant treatment. We sought to determine providers’ knowledge, attitudes, motivating factors and preferences for integrating exercise into the treatment of patients with brain tumors. METHODS We surveyed multidisciplinary providers in Neurosurgery, Radiation Oncology and Neuro-Oncology from a single, quaternary medical center. Questions assessed demographics, current practices, attitudes, knowledge, motivating factors and barriers for integrating exercise into treatment. Questions were extrapolated from existing published questionnaires and sent electronically. RESULTS Most providers (92%) reported that exercise was important for patients' lifestyle and 80% felt it should be integrated into the treatment of patients with primary brain tumors. Nighty-six percent felt that exercise improved quality of life, decreased fatigue (100%) and reduced treatment related side effects (92%) yet only 57% of providers initiated a conversation about exercise with patients. Top motivating factors for promoting exercise were perceived benefit to patients’ quality of life and disease outcomes. Barriers to provider/patient discussions about exercise included, lack of time or appropriate expertise to discuss exercise with patients, and concern that patients have competing priorities. Some providers (23%) were concerned about potential limitations/complications with patients exercising including inability to participate from side effects of treatment (38%), physical deficits (61%) and fatigue (42%). CONCLUSION Understanding barriers for providers to incorporate exercise into their patients’ treatment regimens is critical to strategizing best practices. Findings from this study help to expand our understanding of barriers and facilitators to incorporating exercise interventions into brain cancer treatment and will assist with the implementation of a structured exercise program to enhance physical health for our patients.

BACKGROUND Safety of immunotherapy (IO) and targeted therapy (TT) with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treatment remains incompletely understood. We aim to identify whether timing of IO/TT in relation to SRS impacts rates of adverse radiation effect (ARE) in MBM. METHODS Retrospective review of patients with MBM treated with SRS and IO/TT within three months prior and one year after SRS, from 2011-2021 at a single institution with at least two months MRI follow-up, identified 108 patients with 939 unique MBM meeting criteria. ARE was confirmed on independent imaging review. Concurrent IO/TT was defined as receiving IO/TT within 4 weeks before or after SRS. Data analysis was performed with the univariate cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Median radiographic follow-up from time of SRS was 16months. IO/TT was initiated prior to SRS for 681 (72.5%) metastases and after SRS for 258 (27.5%) metastases. 837 (89.1%) metastases received concurrent IO/TT. Most common IO agents were ipilimumab (n=416), nivolumab (n=448), and pembrolizumab (n=203). Most common TT agents were dabrafenib (n=548), trametinib (n=540), and vemurafenib (n=81). 2-year local progression-free survival (PFS), distant intracranial PFS, and overall survival were 94.1%, 33.3%, and 55.2%, respectively. 55 (5.9%) metastases in 33 (30.6%) patients experienced ARE. Median time to ARE was 5mo (IQR 4-9mo). Of those who experienced ARE, 22 (66.7%) patients were symptomatic and treated with steroids; 12 (36.4%) patients underwent surgical intervention. ARE rates were not impacted by concurrent vs nonconcurrent IO/TT (5.5% vs 4.9%, p=0.34) nor IO/TT initiation pre vs post SRS (6.0% vs 5.4%, p=0.61). CONCLUSION IO/TT in conjunction with SRS resulted in low ARE rates as compared to historical controls in the pre-IO/TT era. Timing of IO/TT in relation to SRS may not significantly impact ARE rates in MBM treatment.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to describe outcomes after pediatric radiosurgery for malignant CNS lesions. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for 31 pediatric patients treated at a single institution with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for primary or metastatic CNS malignancies between 2000-2020. RESULTS: 25 patients were treated with SRS for focal recurrences of primary CNS malignancies, 1 patient was treated in the adjuvant setting after initial resection, and 5 patients were treated for brain metastases. Primary CNS histologies included ependymoma (n=14), glioma (n=4), medulloblastoma (n=2), and meningioma (n=2). 65% were WHO grade 3 or 4. 71% of patients had received a prior course of involved-field external beam radiation to the brain to a median dose of 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions. Median age at SRS was 14 years (range 4-21). Radiosurgery was predominantly performed in a single fraction to a median dose of 17 Gy to a total of 42 targets among 29 patients. Two patients underwent fractionated radiosurgery to 30 Gy in 5 fractions for larger lesions. Median follow up after SRS was 44 months. 7 patients (23%) had no evidence of disease after SRS at a median follow up of 39 months. 6 patients (19%) developed local recurrence at the site of their treated lesion at a median of 13 months after SRS. 20 patients (65%) developed recurrent disease in the CNS outside of the radiosurgery field at a median of 11 months after SRS. 4 patients developed toxicity from SRS related to radiation treatment effect, all of which occurred within 1 year of SRS. CONCLUSIONS: SRS for malignant CNS lesions in the pediatric population provides effective local control and is well-tolerated. However, there remains a substantial risk of distant CNS failures given the nature of recurrent or metastatic disease in these patients.