Search

The aim of this paper is to review the history surrounding the discovery of lethal mutations, later described as delayed reproductive death. Lethal mutations were suggested very early on, to be due to a generalised instability in a cell population and are considered now to be one of the first demonstrations of "radiation-induced genomic instability" which led later to the establishment of the field of "non-targeted effects." The phenomenon was first described by Seymour et al. in 1986 and was confirmed by Trott's group in Europe and by Little and colleagues in the United States before being extended by Mendonca et al. in 1989, who showed conclusively that the distinguishing feature of lethal mutation occurrence was that it happened suddenly after about 9–10 population doublings in progeny which had survived the original dose of ionizing radiation. However, many authors then suggested that in fact, lethal mutations were implicit in the original experiments by Puck and Marcus in 1956 and were described in the extensive work by Sinclair in 1964, who followed clonal progeny for up to a year after irradiation and described "small colony formation" as a persistent consequence of ionizing radiation exposure. In this paper, we examine the history from 1956 to the present using the period from 1986–1989 as an anchor point to reach into the past and to go forward through the evolution of the field of low dose radiobiology where non-targeted effects predominate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To measure medium borne bystander effects, to study the influence of radioadaptive response (RAR) on bystander response, and to discover reliable radioresponsive biomarkers in radio-adapting frogs from Duke Swamp contaminated with an above-background radiation level and in naïve frogs from Twin Lake as the background control site. Frogs were captured at Duke Swamp and Twin Lake and brought to the lab at the Canadian Nuclear Laboratories facility. Half of the frogs from each site were irradiated with 4 Gy while the other half of the frogs were left with no further radiation treatment. Frog bladders were removed and placed in sterile culture media. Upon arrival at McMaster University, the bladders were processed for tissue cultures. After 48 h, the culture media conditioned by the bladder explants were harvested for clonogenic reporter survival assay and calcium flux measurements for assessing bystander effects. HPV-G cells were used as bystander reporter cells in all radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE) assays. The frog bladder cultures were incubated for another 10–12 days followed by immunochemical staining for bcl-2 and c-myc expressions to analyze cellular anti-apoptotic (pro-survival) and pro-apoptotic (pro-death) responses, respectively. Only culture media conditioned by bladders from 4-Gy-irradiated naïve frogs from Twin Lake induced bystander effects (reduction of HPV-G reporter cells' clonogenic survival and presence of strong calcium flux activities). The 4 Gy irradiation dose increased pro-apoptotic c-myc expression in naïve frogs' bladder explants. Culture media conditioned by bladders from radio-adapting frogs from Duke Swamp enhanced HPV-G's clonogenic survival and a 4 Gy irradiation challenge did not change the enhanced clonogenic survival nature nor induce calcium flux. In bladder explants from both control and 4-Gy-irradiated radio-adapting frogs, anti-apoptotic bcl-2 expression for pro-survival responses was ubiquitous while c-myc expression for pro-death responses was limited to a small fraction of cells. The clonogenic RIBE reporter assay using HPV-G and calcium flux measurements are useful diagnostic tools for RIBE assessment of field biological samples, specifically those from frogs. RAR induced by environmentally relevant low-dose radiation induces protective bystander response. Bcl-2 and c-myc are reliable biomarkers for evaluating low dose radiation responses in wild populations of amphibians. Overall, this pilot study emphasizes the importance of looking at non-targeted effects (NTEs) in natural populations of non-human biota that could be vulnerable to chronic low-dose radiation exposures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radium is the most common source of alpha radiation exposure to humans and non-human species in the environment but the dosimetry is complicated by the decay chain which involves gamma exposure due to radon daughters. This paper seeks to determine the separate contributions of alpha and gamma doses to the total dose and total direct and non-targeted effect in a fish and a human cell line. This study aimed to isolate the effect of alpha particles following exposure to low doses of radium in cells, and their progeny which received no further exposure. This was initially done by comparing the survival values of a human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) and an embryonic Chinook salmon cell line (CHSE-214) exposed to gamma radiation, from survival of the same cell lines exposed to mixed alpha and gamma radiation through exposure to Ra-226 and its decay products. A Monte Carlo simulation was later performed to determine the contributions of radium decay products including radon daughters. The human cell line showed increased radioresistance when exposed to low doses of alpha particles. In contrast the fish cell line, which demonstrated radioresistance to low dose gamma radiation, showed increased lethality when exposed to low doses of alpha particles. Significant and complex levels of non-targeted effects were induced in progeny of irradiated cells. The simulation showed that gamma and beta decay products did not contribute significant dose and the highest beta dose was below the threshold for inducing non-targeted effects. The results confirm the need to consider the dose-response relationship when developing radiation weighting factors for low dose exposures, as well as the need to be aware of possible cell line and species differences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this paper is to present the results of discussions at a workshop held as part of the International Congress of Radiation Research (Environmental Health stream) in Manchester UK, 2019. The main objective of the workshop was to provide a platform for radioecologists to engage with radiobiologists to address major questions around developing an Ecosystem approach in radioecology and radiation protection of the environment. The aim was to establish a critical framework to guide research that would permit integration of a pan-ecosystem approach into radiation protection guidelines and regulation for the environment. The conclusions were that the interaction between radioecologists and radiobiologists is useful in particular in addressing field versus laboratory issues where there are issues and challenges in designing good field experiments and a need to cross validate field data against laboratory data and vice versa. Other main conclusions were that there is a need to appreciate wider issues in ecology to design good approaches for an ecosystems approach in radioecology and that with the capture of 'Big Data', novel tools such as machine learning can now be applied to help with the complex issues involved in developing an ecosystem approach.