Search

Background : Narrow-spectrum antibiotics have been found to be equivalent to anti-Pseudomonal agents in preventing organ space infections (OSI) in children with uncomplicated appendicitis. Comparative effectiveness data for children with complicated appendicitis remains limited. This investigation aimed to compare outcomes between the most common narrow-spectrum regimen (ceftriaxone with metronidazole: CM) and anti-Pseudomonal regimen (piperacillin/tazobactam: PT) used perioperatively in children with complicated appendicitis. Methods : Multicenter retrospective cohort study using clinical data from the NSQIP-Pediatric Appendectomy Collaborative database merged with antibiotic utilization data from the Pediatric Health Information System database. Mixed-effects multivariate regression was used to compare NSQIP-defined outcomes and resource utilization between treatment groups after adjusting for patient characteristics, disease severity, and clustering of outcomes within hospitals. Results : 654 patients from 14 hospitals were included, of which 37.9% received CM and 62.1% received PT. Following adjustment, patients in both groups had similar rates of OSI (CM: 13.3% vs. PT: 18.0%, OR 0.88 [95%CI 0.38, 2.03]), drainage procedures (CM: 8.9% vs. PT: 14.9%, OR 0.76 [95%CI 0.30, 1.92]), and postoperative imaging (CM: 19.8% vs. PT: 22.5%, OR 1.17 [95%CI 0.65, 2.12]). Treatment groups also had similar rates of 30-day cumulative post-operative length of stay (CM: 6.1 vs. PT: 6.0 days, RR 1.01 [95%CI 0.81, 1.25]) and hospital cost (CM: $19,235 vs. PT: $20,552, RR 0.92 [95%CI 0.69, 1.23]). Conclusions : Rates of organ space infection and resource utilization were similar in children with complicated appendicitis treated with ceftriaxone plus metronidazole and piperacillin/tazobactam.

To quantify procedure-level inappropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis utilization as a strategy to identify high-priority targets for stewardship efforts in pediatric surgery.Little data exist to guide the prioritization of antibiotic stewardship efforts as they relate to prophylaxis utilization in pediatric surgery.This was a retrospective cohort analysis of children undergoing elective surgical procedures at 52 children's hospitals from October 2015 to December 2019 using the Pediatric Health Information System database. Procedure-level compliance with consensus guidelines for prophylaxis utilization was assessed for indication, antimicrobial spectrum, and duration. The relative contribution of each procedure to the overall burden of noncompliant cases was calculated to establish a prioritization framework for stewardship efforts.A total of 56,845 cases were included with an overall inappropriate utilization rate of 56%. The most common reason for noncompliance was unindicated utilization (43%), followed by prolonged duration (32%) and use of excessively broad-spectrum agents (25%). Procedures with the greatest relative contribution to noncompliant cases included cholecystectomy and repair of inguinal and umbilical hernias for unindicated utilization (63.2% of all cases); small bowel resections, gastrostomy, and colorectal procedures for use of excessively broad-spectrum agents (70.1%) and pectus excavatum repair and procedures involving the small and large bowel for prolonged duration (57.6%). More than half of all noncompliant cases were associated with 5 procedures (cholecystectomy, small bowel procedures, inguinal hernia repair, gastrostomy, and pectus excavatum).Cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, and procedures involving the small and large bowel should be considered high-priority targets for antimicrobial stewardship efforts in pediatric surgery.