Search

Background: In Germany, the (model) regulation for postgraduate medical education 2018, the professional codes of conduct of the regional medical councils and the health professions chamber laws of the federal states are the formal basis of postgraduate medical education, but say little about its structure, processes and results. The World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) has developed global standards for improving the quality of postgraduate medical education and published them in a revised edition in 2015. A German version which takes the specifics of medical training in Germany into account has not been published to date.Objective: The Committee for Postgraduate Medical Education (PGME) of the Society for Medical Education (GMA) has set itself the goal of firstly translating the WFME standards into German and secondly making recommendations for physicians with a license for post-graduate training (PLT) and training agents (TA) in clinics and practices which have been adapted to the German context.Methods: The WFME standards were translated into German by a working group of the GMA Committee for PGME, the terminology adapted to PGME in Germany and checked by an interdisciplinary panel of experts made up of 9 members of the committee. In a second step, the WFME basic standards and quality standards for PGME relevant to PLTs and TAs in Germany were iteratively determined by this panel of experts using the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and compiled in the form of recommendations. Results: The translation of the WFME guidelines was approved by the expert group without any changes to the content, taking into account the terminological system of PGME in Germany. In a second step, 90 standards were identified which were considered helpful for PGME in Germany, especially for PLTs and TAs (such as development of a professional identity, a more patient-centered approach or support of self-directed learning). Care was taken to only give recommendations which can be influenced by PLTs and TAs. These standards have been summarized as recommendations to PLTs and TAs and take into account all chapters of the WFME standards. Conclusion: The WFME standards selected here are recommended to PLTs and TAs in clinics and practices to achieve high-quality PGME. Empirical longitudinal studies will be required to examine both the implementation and the results of applying the modified WFME criteria in Germany.

Copyright of ZFA: Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Multiple studies indicate that residents in family medicine (FM) are exposed to considerable stress and are particularly affected by burnout syndrome. Aim of the study was to specify the effects of a so-called "compact intervention" (i.e., a short intervention) in self-care on FM residents. Methods: The authors performed a concurrent and independent mixed-methods study with FM residents on the KWBW VerbundweiterbildungPLUS© program. FM residents could voluntarily take part in a two-day seminar including 270 min on self-care, which can be regarded as a compact intervention. Study participants completed a questionnaire before (T1) and ten to twelve weeks after the course (T2), with subsequent recruitment to interview. The main outcomes of the quantitative part were to evaluate (I) self-rated change of cognition and (II) change in behavior. The qualitative outcomes were all possible effects of the compact intervention on participants´ competencies as well as all sorts of induced behavioral changes. Results: From a total of n = 307 residents, n = 287 FM residents (intervention group: n = 212; control group: n = 75) participated in the study. At T2, 111 post-intervention questionnaires were completed. 56% rated the intervention to be helpful for their well-being (n = 63/111). At T2, there was a significant increase in those willing to act in comparison to T1 (p =.01): 36% (n = 40/111) had changed their behavior and half of the study participants had passed on competencies to others (n = 56/111). From the intervention group, n = 17 participants additionally gave an interview. FM residents favored a trustful learning atmosphere, an interactive teaching concept and practical exercises. They described an encouraging stimulus to act and specified behavioral changes. Conclusions: A compact intervention in self-care could increase well-being, foster competencies and induce behavioral changes, if implemented into a training program with sufficient group cohesiveness. Further studies are required to specify long-term-results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In Germany, the (model) regulation for postgraduate medical education 2018, the professional codes of conduct of the re- gional medical councils and the health professions chamber laws of the federal states are the formal basis of postgraduate medical education, but say little about its structure, processes and results. The World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) has developed global stand- ards for improving the quality of postgraduate medical education and published them in a revised edition in 2015. A German version which takes the specifics of medical training in Germany into account has not been published to date. Objective: The Committee for Postgraduate Medical Education (PGME) of the Society for Medical Education (GMA) has set itself the goal of firstly translating the WFME standards into German and secondly making recommendations for physicians with a license for post-graduate training (PLT) and training agents (TA) in clinics and practices which have been adapted to the German context. Methods: The WFME standards were translated into German by a working group of the GMA Committee for PGME, the terminology adapted to PGME in Germany and checked by an interdisciplinary panel of experts made up of 9 members of the committee. In a second step, the WFME basic standards and quality standards for PGME relevant to PLTs and TAs in Germany were iteratively determined by this panel of experts using the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and compiled in the form of recommendations. Results: The translation of the WFME guidelines was approved by the expert group without any changes to the content, taking into account the terminological system of PGME in Germany. In a second step, 90 standards were identified which were considered helpful for PGME in Germany, especially for PLTs and TAs (such as development of a profes- sional identity, a more patient-centered approach or support of selfdirected learning). Care was taken to only give recommendations which can be influenced by PLTs and TAs. These standards have been sum- marized as recommendations to PLTs and TAs and take into account all chapters of the WFME standards. Conclusion: The WFME standards selected here are recommended to PLTs and TAs in clinics and practices to achieve high-quality PGME. Empirical longitudinal studies will be required to examine both the implementation and the results of applying the modified WFME criteria in Germany. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reports on the activities of the various working groups and sections of the German Society of General Medicine (DEGAM) in the year 2022. The Working Group on Digital Documentation deals with the standardized documentation of medical data in electronic patient records. The Working Group on Academic Practice Assistance discusses the use of academically trained practice assistance professions in outpatient care. The Palliative Medicine Working Group is working on a general practitioner version of the S3 guideline "Palliative Medicine for Patients with Incurable Cancer" and a position paper on the role of general practitioners in assisted suicide. Other topics that are addressed include general pediatric care and vaccinations. The Continuing Education Section has regular meetings and works closely with the German Network of Continuing Education Competence Centers. It also mentions the upcoming election of the DEGAM presidency and the candidacy for the position of section spokesperson. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Anesthesiologic activity in the delivery room environment implies the specifics of a 200% lethality, which describes that emergency situations can affect mother and child. A circumstance that impressively underlines the need for special care in employee training and selection. The training situation in the delivery room is characterized by several difficulties. Technical procedures are often performed on the awake patient, who is herself in an exciting situation during childbirth. A detailed description of the necessary competences in this working environment does not exist at the present. The present study aims to describe the further education situation in anesthesiology. The results can represent the first step of a curriculum development according to the concept of Kern et al. in the sense of a needs assessment., Material and Methods: In a multicenter observational study, doctors in further training (AiW) and consultants (FÄ) were asked about methods of familiarization, feedback, activities taken on and the need for a curriculum. The level of supervision and confidence in action during procedures was also elicited. Participants were contacted via the membership database of the German Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care and could answer the 11-item questionnaire online., Results: A total of 495 questionnaires (329 FÄ; 166 AiW;) were completed. The FÄ and AiW gave different information on the conduct of exit interviews (59.6% vs. 10%) and curriculum support (76.3% vs.17.5%). Independent of the year of training, AiWs perform cesarean sections under on-demand (reactive) supervision. Peridural anesthesia (PDA) is the least frequently performed procedure in the context of the familiarization situation with obstetric anesthesia. The groups have a different confidence of security in the successful implementation of procedures, when AiW are proceeding without direct supervision (FÄ = MD 61; AiW = MD 77; p < 0.001; scale 0 = unsecure-100 = very secure). Practical and technical support is mostly provided immediately by FÄ (> MW 91; scale 0 = never-100 = immediately). Individual values deviate significantly from the average values (outliers). Both groups rate the usefulness or value of describing learning objectives and the availability of a curriculum as high., Discussion: The support of familiarization and continuing support is partly answered differently by consultants and doctors in further training. Individual procedures that are rarely performed, such as administration of a PDA, require special attention in the future. Curricula with workplace-based assessments could provide feedback and assurance to increase confidence in the successful implementation of procedures by AiW. The AiW usually receive immediate professional support. Individual institutions do not seem to have any concepts here and must rethink their processes. This fact is particularly important against the background of the medicolegal significance of the subject. The description of learning objectives and curriculum development is desired both by FÄ and AiW., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The Competence Centers for Postgraduate Medical Education (KW) established throughout Germany represent complex programs to increase the efficiency and quality of postgraduate medical education in general practice. So-called Logic Models serve as the framework for evaluations and quality management processes of complex programs in many areas. The aim of this article is to develop such a model, using the example of the Competence Center in Baden-Württemberg (KWBW) in order to structure its complex program logic and use it as a framework for future evaluations and quality management processes., Methods: The adaptation of the Logic Model to the KWBW took place in an informal, nominal group process with employees and participants of the program., Results: We identified 76 core elements of the KWBW. These core elements were classified in one of the five pillars of the Logic Model (input, activity, output, outcome and impact) and categorized according to fields of action and target groups., Discussion: The Logic Model, which was developed using the KWBW as an example, identifies and structures important core elements of a complex postgraduate medical training program for the first time. It seems to be well suited for visualizing the internal logic of this complex program and the interaction of the various elements within the KWBW. It can thus be used as the basis for a comprehensive and systematic evaluation concept and for quality assurance., Conclusion: The model is also a prerequisite for comparative research questions of other university programs for postgraduate medical education and thus offers an opportunity for cooperative development efforts. This article therefore contributes to promoting quality in continuing medical training., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)