Search

Charge heterogeneity is inherent to all therapeutic antibodies and arises from post-translational modifications (PTMs) and/or protein degradation events that may occur during manufacturing. Among therapeutic antibodies, the bispecific antibody (bsAb) containing two unique Fab arms directed against two different targets presents an additional layer of complexity to the charge profile. In the context of a bsAb, a single domain-specific PTM within one of the Fab domains may be sufficient to compromise target binding and could potentially impact the stability, safety, potency, and efficacy of the drug product. Therefore, characterization and routine monitoring of domain-specific modifications is critical to ensure the quality of therapeutic bispecific antibody products. We developed a Digestion-assisted imaged Capillary isoElectric focusing (DiCE) method to detect and quantitate domain-specific charge variants of therapeutic bispecific antibodies (bsAbs). The method involves enzymatic digestion using immunoglobulin G (IgG)-degrading enzyme of S. pyogenes (IdeS) to generate F(ab) 2 and Fc fragments, followed by imaged capillary isoelectric focusing (icIEF) under reduced, denaturing conditions to separate the light chains (LCs) from the Fd domains. Our results suggest that DiCE is a highly sensitive method that is capable of quantitating domain-specific PTMs of a bsAb. In one case study, DiCE was used to quantitate unprocessed C-terminal lysine and site-specific glycation of Lys 98 in the complementarity-determining region (CDR) of a bsAb that could not be accurately quantitated using conventional, platform-based charge variant analysis, such as intact icIEF. Quantitation of these PTMs by DiCE was comparable to results from peptide mapping, demonstrating that DiCE is a valuable orthogonal method for ensuring product quality. This method may also have potential applications for characterizing fusion proteins, antibody-drug conjugates, and co-formulated antibody cocktails., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jennifer Nguyen, Sophia Liu, Michael Rosconi, and Erica Pyles have patent #16/882,453 pending to US. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: GP2017 is an adalimumab biosimilar. The objective of this study is to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of GP2017 in its approved formulation and GP2017-high concentration formulation (HCF) in a randomized, double-blind, two-arm PK bridging study., Research Design and Methods: Healthy male subjects received a single 40 mg subcutaneous injection of either GP2017-HCF (n = 162) or GP2017 (n = 168). PK, safety, and immunogenicity were assessed over 72 days post-injection., Results: The 90% confidence intervals [CIs] of geometric mean ratios between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 for C max , AUC 0-inf , AUC 0-360 and AUC 0-last were within the pre-defined margin of 0.80 to 1.25; thus, PK comparability between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 was demonstrated. Subgroup analysis of PK comparability by anti-drug antibody (ADA) subpopulation showed that the 90% CIs of geometric mean ratios between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 for C max , AUC 0-inf , AUC 0-360 and AUC 0-last were within the margin of 0.80 to 1.25 in ADA-positive and ADA-negative subjects. The proportions of subjects with positive ADA responses and with neutralizing antibodies were comparable between the GP2017-HCF and GP2017 groups. GP2017-HCF and GP2017 were well tolerated, and there were no reports of deaths or other serious adverse events., Conclusion: Results show PK comparability between GP2017-HCF and GP2017 and comparable safety and tolerability.