Search

Simple Summary: Intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) has repeatedly demonstrated its power to yield high local control rates in all risk constellation of patients with invasive breast cancer when given as tumor bed boost prior to conventional whole breast irradiation (WBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS). Since the standard for WBI continuously moved towards hypofractionation, we initiated a prospective trial in 2011 where we combined a high precision IOERT boost with a "moderate" hypofractionation schedule (15 × 2.7 Gy), the HIOB-trial [NCT01343459], as clinical evidence for this combination was scarce. Our results demonstrated a low five-year local recurrence rate (overall two events in a population of 1119 patients), which undershot such best evidences in two age groups (41–50 y and >50 y). As acute and late toxicity were mild with no impaired cosmetic outcome, the HIOB-concept seems to be a viable treatment option for patients who underwent BCS and intended WBI. Background and purpose: To investigate intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) as a tumor bed boost during breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) on age-correlated in-breast recurrence (IBR) rates in patients with low- to high-risk invasive breast cancer. Material and methods: BCS and IOERT (11.1 Gy) preceded a HWBI (40.5 Gy) in 15 fractions. Five-year IBR-rates were compared by a sequential ratio test (SQRT) with best evidences in three age groups (35–40 y and 41–50 y: 3.6%, >50 y: 2%) in a prospective single arm design. Null hypothesis (H0) was defined to undershoot these benchmarks for proof of superiority. Results: Of 1445 enrolled patients, 326 met exclusion criteria, leaving 1119 as eligible for analysis. After a median follow-up of 50 months (range 0.7–104), we detected two local recurrences, both in the age group >50 y. With no observed IBR, superiority was demonstrated for the patient groups 41–50 and >50 y, respectively. For the youngest group (35–40 y), no appropriate statistical evaluation was yet possible due to insufficient recruitment. Conclusions: In terms of five-year IBR-rates, Boost-IOERT followed by HWBI has been demonstrated to be superior in patients older than 50 and in the age group 41–50 when compared to best published evidence until 2010. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Whereas the genomic landscape of endocrine‐resistant breast cancer has been intensely characterized in previously treated cases with local or distant recurrence, comparably little is known about genomic alterations conveying primary non‐responsiveness to endocrine treatment in luminal early breast cancer. Methods: In this study, 622 estrogen receptor‐expressing breast cancer cases treated with short‐term preoperative endocrine therapy (pET) from the WSG‐ADAPT trial (NCT01779206) were analyzed for genetic alterations associated with impaired endocrine proliferative response (EPR) to 3‐week pET with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. EPR was categorized as optimal (post‐pET Ki67 <10%) versus slightly, moderately, and severely impaired (post‐pET Ki67 10%–19%, 20%–34%, and ≥35%, respectively). Recently described gene mutations frequently found in previously treated advanced breast cancer were analyzed (ARID1A, BRAF, ERBB2, ESR1, GATA3, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53) by next‐generation sequencing. Amplifications of CCND1, FGFR1, ERBB2, and PAK1 were determined by digital PCR or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results: ERBB2 amplification (p = 0.0015) and mutations of TP53 (p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with impaired EPR. Impaired EPR in TP53‐mutated breast cancer cases was independent from the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score group and was seen both with tamoxifen‐ and aromatase inhibitor‐based pET (p = 0.0005 each). Conclusion: We conclude that impaired EPR to pET is suitable to identify cases with primary endocrine resistance in early luminal breast cancer and that TP53‐mutated luminal cancers might not be sufficiently treated by endocrine therapy alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with "HER2-positive" early breast cancer are treated with antibodies to the HER2 protein along with chemotherapy, regardless of whether their cancer also has hormone receptors, or of its molecular features. Because patients with HER2-positive/hormone receptor-positive disease tend to live longer than those with HER2-positive/hormone receptor-negative disease, there may be some patients who are being overtreated under current guidelines. The aim of our exploratory translational analysis of the ADAPT HER2-positive/hormone receptor-positive trial was to investigate the potential of several prognostic (outcome regardless of therapy) and predictive (effect of therapy) biomarkers as early predictors of response to treatment before surgery. Comparison of these biomarkers before and after one treatment cycle, and their effects on whether patients' cancers were completely removed at surgery, suggest that certain patients (those with treatment-induced CD8 protein-expressing cells infiltrating the cancer; without PIK3CA mutation; those with HER2-enriched tumors) may be candidates for less intensive treatment following pre-surgical therapy. Prognostic or predictive biomarkers in HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) may inform treatment optimization. The ADAPT HER2-positive/hormone receptor-positive phase II trial (NCT01779206) demonstrated pathological complete response (pCR) rates of ~40% following de-escalated treatment with 12 weeks neoadjuvant ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) ± endocrine therapy. In this exploratory analysis, we evaluated potential early predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy. The effects of PIK3CA mutations and immune (CD8 and PD-L1) and apoptotic markers (BCL2 and MCL1) on pCR rates were assessed, along with intrinsic BC subtypes. Immune response and pCR were lower in PIK3CA-mutated tumors compared with wildtype. Increased BCL2 at baseline in all patients and at Cycle 2 in the T-DM1 arms was associated with lower pCR. In the T-DM1 arms only, the HER2-enriched subtype was associated with increased pCR rate (54% vs. 28%). These findings support further prospective pCR-driven de-escalation studies in patients with HER2-positive EBC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To identify associations of biological signatures and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) with pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0 ypN0) and survival in the Phase II WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- trial (NCT01817452)., Experimental Design: Patients with cT1-cT4c, cN0-3 HER2+/HR- early breast cancer (EBC) were randomized to pertuzumab+trastuzumab (P+T, n = 92) or P+T+paclitaxel (n = 42). Gene expression signatures were analyzed in baseline biopsies using NanoString Breast Cancer 360 panel (n = 117); baseline and on-treatment (week 3) sTIL levels were available in 119 and 76 patients, respectively. Impacts of standardized gene expression signatures on pCR and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) were estimated by logistic and Cox regression., Results: In all patients, ERBB2 [OR, 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-2.67] and estrogen receptor (ER) signaling (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.13-2.61) were favorable, whereas PTEN (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.87) was unfavorable for pCR. After 60 months median follow-up, 13 invasive events occurred (P+T: n = 11, P+T+paclitaxel: n = 2), none following pCR. Gene signatures related to immune response (IR) and ER signaling were favorable for iDFS, all with similar HR about 0.43-0.55. These patterns were even more prominent in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy-free group, where additionally BRCAness signature was unfavorable (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.04-3.84). IR signatures were strongly intercorrelated. sTILs (baseline/week 3/change) were not associated with pCR or iDFS, though baseline sTILs correlated positively with IR signatures., Conclusions: Distinct gene signatures were associated with pCR versus iDFS in HER2+/HR- EBC. The potential role of IR in preventing recurrence suggests that patients with upregulated IR signatures could be candidates for de-escalation concepts in HER2+ EBC., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)