Search

Propylene dichloride (PDC) is a chlorinated substance used primarily as an intermediate in basic organic chemical manufacturing. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently evaluating PDC as a high-priority substance under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). We conducted a systematic review of the non-cancer and cancer hazards of PDC using the EPA TSCA and Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) frameworks. We identified 12 epidemiological, 16 toxicokinetic, 34 experimental animal, and 49 mechanistic studies. Point-of-contact respiratory effects are the most sensitive non-cancer effects after inhalation exposure, and PDC is neither a reproductive nor a developmental toxicant. PDC is not mutagenic in vivo, and while in vitro evidence is mixed, DNA strand breaks consistently occur. Nasal tumors in rats and lung tumors in mice occurred after lifetime high-level inhalation exposure. Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) was observed in Japanese print workers exposed to high concentrations of PDC. However, co-exposures, as well as liver parasites, hepatitis, and other risk factors, may also have contributed. The cancer mode of action (MOA) analysis revealed that PDC may act through multiple biological pathways occurring sequentially and/or simultaneously, although chronic tissue damage and inflammation likely dominate. Critically, health benchmarks protective of non-cancer effects are expected to protect against cancer in humans., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Heather Lynch reports financial support was provided by American Chemistry Council. Jordan Kozal reports financial support was provided by American Chemistry Council. Andrew Maier reports financial support was provided by American Chemistry Council. Evan Beckett reports financial support was provided by American Chemistry Council. Rita Schoeny reports financial support was provided by American Chemistry Council. Sarah Brown reports financial support was provided by American Chemistry Council. Rachel Freid reports financial support was provided by American Chemistry Council. Melissa J. Vincent reports financial support was provided by American Chemistry Council., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As part of a systematic review of the non-cancer and cancer hazards of propylene dichloride (PDC), with a focus on potential carcinogenicity in workers following inhalation exposures, we determined that a mode of action (MOA)-centric framing of cancer effects was warranted. In our MOA analysis, we systematically reviewed the available mechanistic evidence for PDC-induced carcinogenesis, and we mapped biologically plausible MOA pathways and key events (KEs), as guided by the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS)-MOA framework. For the identified pathways and KEs, biological concordance, essentiality of KEs, concordance of empirical observations among KEs, consistency, and analogy were evaluated. The results of this analysis indicate that multiple biologically plausible pathways may contribute to the cancer MOA for PDC, but that the relevant pathways vary by exposure route and level, tissue type, and species; further, more than one pathway may occur concurrently at high exposure levels. While several important data gaps exist, evidence from in vitro mechanistic studies, in vivo experimental animal studies, and ex vivo human tumor tissue analyses indicates that the predominant MOA pathway likely involves saturation of cytochrome p450 2E1 (CYP2E1)-glutathione (GSH) detoxification (molecular initiating event; MIE), accumulation of CYP2E1-oxidative metabolites, cytotoxicity, chronic tissue damage and inflammation, and ultimately tumor formation. Tumors may occur through several subsets of inflammatory KEs, including inflammation-induced aberrant expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), which causes DNA strand breaks and mutations and can lead to tumors with a characteristic mutational signature found in occupational cholangiocarcinoma. Dose concordance analysis showed that low-dose mutagenicity (from any pathway) is not a driving MOA, and that prevention of target tissue damage and inflammation (associated with saturation of CYP2E1-GSH detoxification) is expected to also prevent the cascade of processes responsible for tumor formation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jordan S. Kozal reports financial support was provided to Stantec (ChemRisk) by American Chemistry Council. Heather N. Lynch reports financial support was provided to Stantec (ChemRisk) by American Chemistry Council. Andy Maier reports financial support was provided to Stantec (ChemRisk) by American Chemistry Council. Rita S. Schoeny reports financial support was provided to Rita Schoeny, LLC by American Chemistry Council. Joanna Klapacz reports a relationship with The Dow Chemical Company that includes: employment. Paul A. Jean reports a relationship with Olin Corporation that includes: employment. Jordan S. Kozal, Heather N. Lynch, and Andy Maier are employees of Stantec (ChemRisk), and Rita S. Schoeny is an independent consultant at Rita Schoeny, LLC; both firms provide services to clients such as governments, corporations, law firms and various scientific/professional organizations. Joanna Klapacz is an employee of The Dow Chemical Company and Paul A. Jean is an employee of Olin Corporation, both producers of PDC. The content and the conclusions of the manuscript are exclusively those of the authors. This manuscript was supported by funding from the American Chemistry Council, an industry trade association., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Immunotoxicity is the critical endpoint used by some regulatory agencies to establish toxicity values for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). However, the hypothesis that exposure to certain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) causes immune dysregulation is subject to much debate. An independent, international expert panel was engaged utilizing methods to reduce bias and "groupthink". The panel concluded there is moderate evidence that PFOS and PFOA are immunotoxic, based primarily on evidence from animal data. However, species concordance and human relevance cannot be well established due to data limitations. The panel recommended additional testing that includes longer-term exposures, evaluates both genders, includes other species of animals, tests lower dose levels, assesses more complete measures of immune responses, and elucidates the mechanism of action. Panel members agreed that the Faroe Islands cohort data should not be used as the primary basis for deriving PFAS risk assessment values. The panel agreed that vaccine antibody titer is not useful as a stand-alone metric for risk assessment. Instead, PFOA and PFOS toxicity values should rely on multiple high-quality studies, which are currently not available for immune suppression. The panel concluded that the available PFAS immune epidemiology studies suffer from weaknesses in study design that preclude their use, whereas available animal toxicity studies provide comprehensive dataset to derive points of departure (PODs) for non-immune endpoints. The panel recommends accounting for potential PFAS immunotoxicity by applying a database uncertainty factor to POD values derived from animal studies for other more robustly supported critical effects.

Concern over substances that may cause cancer has led to various classification schemes to recognize carcinogenic threats and provide a basis to manage those threats. The least useful schemes have a binary choice that declares a substance carcinogenic or not. This overly simplistic approach ignores the complexity of cancer causation by considering neither how the substance causes cancer, nor the potency of that mode of action. Consequently, substances are classified simply as "carcinogenic", compromising the opportunity to properly manage these kinds of substances. It will likely be very difficult, if not impossible, to incorporate New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) into binary schemes. In this paper we propose a new approach cancer classification scheme that segregates substances by both mode of action and potency into three categories and, as a consequence, provides useful guidance in the regulation and management of substances with carcinogenic potential. Examples are given, including aflatoxin (category A), trichlorethylene (category B), and titanium dioxide (category C), which demonstrate the clear differentiation among these substances that generate appropriate levels of concern and management options., (© 2022. The Author(s).)