Search

Along the river–ocean transition, few freshwater species persist into polyhaline zones. Among those insect species capable of living in estuaries, it is unclear which Odonata, Trichoptera, and Coleoptera species can occur at intermittent or average salinities above 18 PSU. During surveys of fish and crustaceans in Prince Edward Island (PEI), we noted 3 unexpected insect species from within subtidal-channels. Multiple instars of Coenagrionidae n. det. and Enallagma civile (Familiar Bluet) were collected around marine macroalgae at 5 localities with 6-26 PSU salinities and observed emerging atop macroalgae. Also, collections of the larvae of the caddisfly Limnephilus externus (Limniphilidae), and adult Haliplus cribrarius (Haliplidae) beetles at sites with maxima of 23 and 20 PSU, respectively, suggest rare occurrences of these species within estuarine ecotones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• This Phase Ib trial found that oral administration of AN0025 in combination with preoperative treatment of rectal cancer was well tolerated and shows promising activity. • Overall, 36% of subjects (9 of 25) achieved a complete clinical or pathological response. • AN0025 showed improved response in subjects with more immunogenic tumors at baseline and induced an immune response, in the both the tumor and peripheral samples. • AN0025 should be evaluated in further trials. To assess the safety and efficacy of AN0025 in combination with preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy in either short course (SCRT) or long course radiotherapy (LCRT) settings for those with locally advanced rectal cancer. Twenty-eight subjects with locally advanced rectal cancer participated in this multicenter, open-label, Phase Ib trial. Enrolled subjects received either 250 mg or 500 mg of AN0025 once daily for 10 weeks with either LCRT or SCRT with chemotherapy (7 subjects/group). Participants were assessed for safety/efficacy starting from the first dose of study drug administration and were followed for 2 years. No treatment-emergent adverse or serious adverse events meeting dose-limiting criteria were observed, with only 3 subjects discontinuing AN0025 treatment due to adverse events. Twenty-five of 28 subjects completed 10 weeks of AN0025 and adjuvant therapy and were evaluated for efficacy. Overall, 36.0% of subjects (9/25 subjects) achieved a pathological complete response or a complete clinical response, including 26.7% of subjects (4/15 subjects who underwent surgery) who achieved a pathological complete response. A total of 65.4% of subjects had magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed down-staging ≤ stage 3 following completion of treatment. With a median follow-up of 30 months. The 12-month disease-free survival and overall survival were 77.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56.6, 89.2) and 96.3% (95% CI: 76.5, 99.5), respectively. Treatment with AN0025 administered for 10 weeks along with preoperative SCRT or LCRT did not appear to worsen the toxicity in subjects with locally advanced rectal cancer, was well-tolerated and showed promise in inducing both a pathological and complete clinical response. These findings suggest its activity deserves further investigation in larger clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a therapeutic target to which HER2/HER3 activation may contribute resistance. This Phase I/II study examined the toxicity and efficacy of high-dose pulsed AZD8931, an EGFR/HER2/HER3 inhibitor, combined with chemotherapy, in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).Methods: Treatment-naive patients received 4-day pulses of AZD8931 with irinotecan/5-FU (FOLFIRI) in a Phase I/II single-arm trial. Primary endpoint for Phase I was dose limiting toxicity (DLT); for Phase II best overall response. Samples were analysed for pharmacokinetics, EGFR dimers in circulating exosomes and Comet assay quantitating DNA damage.Results: Eighteen patients received FOLFIRI and AZD8931. At 160 mg bd, 1 patient experienced G3 DLT; 160 mg bd was used for cohort expansion. No grade 5 adverse events (AE) reported. Seven (39%) and 1 (6%) patients experienced grade 3 and grade 4 AEs, respectively. Of 12 patients receiving 160 mg bd, best overall response rate was 25%, median PFS and OS were 8.7 and 21.2 months, respectively. A reduction in circulating HER2/3 dimer in the two responding patients after 12 weeks treatment was observed.Conclusions: The combination of pulsed high-dose AZD8931 with FOLFIRI has acceptable toxicity. Further studies of TKI sequencing may establish a role for pulsed use of such agents rather than continuous exposure.Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01862003. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is uncertainty in the relative benefits and harms of hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) when added to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) +/− systemic chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy alone in people with peritoneal metastases from colorectal, gastric, or ovarian cancers. Methods: We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the medical literature until April 14, 2022 and applied methods used for high‐quality systematic reviews. Findings: We included a total of eight RCTs (seven RCTs included in quantitative analysis as one RCT did not provide data in an analyzable format). All comparisons other than ovarian cancer contained only one trial. For gastric cancer, there is high uncertainty about the effect of CRS + HIPEC + systemic chemotherapy. For stage III or greater epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery, CRS + HIPEC + systemic chemotherapy probably decreases all‐cause mortality compared to CRS + systemic chemotherapy. For colorectal cancer, CRS + HIPEC + systemic chemotherapy probably results in little to no difference in all‐cause mortality and may increase the serious adverse events proportions compared to CRS +/− systemic chemotherapy, but probably decreases all‐cause mortality compared to fluorouracil‐based systemic chemotherapy alone. Interpretation: The role of CRS + HIPEC in gastric peritoneal metastases is uncertain. CRS + HIPEC should be standard of care in women with stage III or greater epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing interval CRS. CRS + systemic chemotherapy should be standard of care for people with colorectal peritoneal metastases, with HIPEC given only as part of a RCT focusing on subgroups and regimes. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42019130504. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tumour-infiltrating CD8+ cytotoxic T cells confer favourable prognosis in colorectal cancer. The added prognostic value of other infiltrating immune cells is unclear and so we sought to investigate their prognostic value in two large clinical trial cohorts. We used multiplex immunofluorescent staining of tissue microarrays to assess the densities of CD8+, CD20+, FoxP3+, and CD68+ cells in the intraepithelial and intrastromal compartments from tumour samples of patients with stage II–III colorectal cancer from the SCOT trial (ISRCTN59757862), which examined 3 months versus 6 months of adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, and from the QUASAR 2 trial (ISRCTN45133151), which compared adjuvant capecitabine with or without bevacizumab. Both trials included patients aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1. Immune marker predictors were analysed by multiple regression, and the prognostic and predictive values of markers for colorectal cancer recurrence-free interval by Cox regression were assessed using the SCOT cohort for discovery and QUASAR 2 cohort for validation. After exclusion of cases without tissue microarrays and with technical failures, and following quality control, we included 2340 cases from the SCOT trial and 1069 from the QUASAR 2 trial in our analysis. Univariable analysis of associations with recurrence-free interval in cases from the SCOT trial showed a strong prognostic value of intraepithelial CD8 (CD8IE) as a continuous variable (hazard ratio [HR] for 75th vs 25th percentile [75 vs 25] 0·73 [95% CI 0·68–0·79], p=2·5 × 10−16), and of intrastromal FoxP3 (FoxP3IS; 0·71 [0·64–0·78], p=1·5 × 10−13) but not as strongly in the epithelium (FoxP3IE; 0·89 [0·84–0·96], p=1·5 × 10−4). Associations of other markers with recurrence-free interval were moderate. CD8IE and FoxP3IS retained independent prognostic value in bivariable and multivariable analysis, and, compared with either marker alone, a composite marker including both markers (CD8IE-FoxP3IS) was superior when assessed as a continuous variable (adjusted [a]HR75 vs 25 0·70 [95% CI 0·63–0·78], p=5·1 × 10−11) and when categorised into low, intermediate, and high density groups using previously published cutpoints (aHR for intermediate vs high 1·68 [95% CI 1·29–2·20], p=1·3 × 10−4; low vs high 2·58 [1·91–3·49], p=7·9 × 10−10), with performance similar to the gold-standard Immunoscore. The prognostic value of CD8IE-FoxP3IS was confirmed in cases from the QUASAR 2 trial, both as a continuous variable (aHR75 vs 25 0·84 [95% CI 0·73–0·96], p=0·012) and as a categorical variable for low versus high density (aHR 1·80 [95% CI 1·17–2·75], p=0·0071) but not for intermediate versus high (1·30 [0·89–1·88], p=0·17). Combined evaluation of CD8IE and FoxP3IS could help to refine risk stratification in colorectal cancer. Investigation of FoxP3IS cells as an immunotherapy target in colorectal cancer might be merited. Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, Cancer Research UK, Swedish Cancer Society, Roche, and Promedica Foundation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented changes to the life of patients with cancer. In this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and general well-being of patients with colorectal cancer by carrying out a prospective longitudinal questionnaire. We found that around one in four participants reported symptoms of anxiety and poor well-being, with 15% at risk of moderate to severe depression. Amongst others, those who were worried that the COVID-19 pandemic would have an effect on their mental health were most at risk of anxiety, depression, and poor well-being. Screening for the mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients is essential to allow timely action from all key stakeholders in order to avoid potentially longer-term detrimental consequences. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented changes to the lives of patients with cancer. To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and well-being of patients with colorectal cancer, we conducted a prospective longitudinal questionnaire study at a UK tertiary cancer centre. In total, 216 participants were included: mean age 65 years, 57% (n = 122) male, 92% (n = 198) of white ethnicity. Amongst participants who completed the screening psychometric questionnaire, 24% (n = 48/203) reported anxiety (GAD-7 ≥ 5), 15% (n = 31/204) depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 10), 3% (n = 5/190) probable post-traumatic stress disorder (PC-PTSD-5 ≥ 4), and 31% (n = 66/213) poor well-being (WHO-5 < 50). In the subgroup (n = 95/216, 44%) who consented to and completed a follow-up survey 6 months later, there was a significant increase in the number of participants at risk of depression (4% vs. 13%, p = 0.021). Self-reported concern about the COVID-19 pandemic impacting one's mental health is associated with increased likelihood of anxiety, depression, and poor well-being, in respective multivariate analyses. In conclusion, screening for the mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is essential to ensure timely action from all key stakeholders and to avoid potentially longer-term detrimental consequences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer is one of the commonest causes of cancer and cancer-related deaths.1 The prognosis remains poor and successive treatment options remain limited.2 Many patients will run out of treatment options before they become medically unfit for therapy.3 Cancer drug innovation presents both opportunities and dilemmas as access to innovative cancer medications can be limited by a significant delay between clinical trials, licensing, and positive drug guidance.4,5 Consequently, where no commissioned alternative medicine exists some pharmaceutical companies operate compassionate usage access schemes (Figure 1). These allow cancer treatment with investigational, unlicensed, or off-label medicines as soon as early evidence of potential benefit emerges.6 There is a paucity of information regarding compassionate schemes. This analysis was performed to ascertain real-world data on patients enrolled in these schemes. Methods: Single-centre study conducted at The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK. We reviewed the process of pharmacy drug set-up and maintenance by undertaking a survey of disease group pharmacists. We undertook a retrospective audit using an electronic patient record of patients who entered into a compassionate scheme between 2018 and 2020. This analysis focused on 27 patients with a diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer receiving compassionate medication who possessed the BRAF mutation (mBRAF V600E) or MSI-H status. We analysed 17 mBRAF patients treated with a triplet combination (encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab), and subsequently, doublet (encorafenib and cetuximab), as defined by the BEACON study, and 10 MSI-high patients on compassionate nivolumab.7,8 Results: Our survey of compassionate medication across 14 disease groups demonstrated the approval process is lengthy and resource intensive. The average approval time was variable, but pharmacy set-up time could take several days depending on the drug or regimen. However, this is countered by our analysis of 27 meta-static colorectal cancer patients. Most patients were fit (> 88% PS ≤ 1, 50% had no known co-morbidities) and for 62% this represented third- line therapy, in a cancer setting with limited or no treatment options. Patients received 10 cycles of treatment on average before progression or unsuitability, with a mean duration on the treatment of 120 days (15–317) on the triplet/doublet combination and 205 days on nivolumab (range: 1–663), demonstrating benefit. Patient demand was uninhibited by geographical distance (> 30% of patients lived 20+ miles away from the treatment centre) and the possibility of hope and life extension with further treatment. Conclusion: Our audit demonstrates that patients received compassionate drugs that were subsequently commissioned by NHSE, with some benefiting from treatment for a considerable period. This suggests there was both a moral gain and a survival advantage over best supportive care; however, there remains limited real-world data and further research is required. Access to compassionate schemes is controversial and limited as they can be seen to promote healthcare inequity, creating a post-code lottery, as they may not be available in some regions, circumvent existing guidelines or benefit pharmaceutical companies by allowing early data and market access. Compassionate usage recognises a human side to drug development which requires a moral balance between patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Advances in multi-modality treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have resulted in low local recurrence rates, but around 30% of patients will still die from distant metastatic disease. In parallel, there is increasing recognition that with radiotherapy and systemic treatment, some patients achieve a complete response and may avoid surgical resection, including in many cases, the need for a permanent stoma. Extended neoadjuvant regimes have emerged to address these concerns. The inclusion of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting has the potential to further enhance this strategy by priming the local immune microenvironment and engaging the systemic immune response. Methods: PRIME-RT is a multi-centre, open label, phase II, randomised trial for patients with newly diagnosed LARC. Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either: short course radiotherapy (25 Gray in 5 fractions over one week) with concomitant durvalumab (1500 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks), followed by FOLFOX (85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin, 350 mg folinic acid and 400 mg/m2 bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given on day 1 followed by 2400 mg/m2 5-FU infusion over 46–48 h, all administered intravenously every 2 weeks), and durvalumab, or long course chemoradiotherapy (50 Gray to primary tumour in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with concomitant oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice per day on days of radiotherapy) with durvalumab followed by FOLFOX and durvalumab. The primary endpoint is complete response rate in each arm. Secondary endpoints include treatment compliance, toxicity, safety, overall recurrence, proportion of patients with a permanent stoma, and survival. The study is translationally rich with collection of bio-specimens prior to, during, and following treatment in order to understand the molecular and immunological factors underpinning treatment response. The trial opened and the first patient was recruited in January 2021. The main trial will recruit up to 42 patients with LARC and commence after completion of a safety run-in that will recruit at least six patients with LARC or metastatic disease. Discussion: PRIME-RT will explore if adding immunotherapy to neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with LARC can prime the tumour microenvironment to improve complete response rates and stoma free survival. Sequential biopsies are a key component within the trial design that will provide new knowledge on how the tumour microenvironment changes at different time-points in response to multi-modality treatment. This expectation is that the trial will provide information to test this treatment within a large phase clinical trial. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04621370 (Registered 9th Nov 2020) EudraCT number 2019-001471-36 (Registered 6th Nov 2020) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Advances in multi-modality treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have resulted in low local recurrence rates, but around 30% of patients will still die from distant metastatic disease. In parallel, there is increasing recognition that with radiotherapy and systemic treatment, some patients achieve a complete response and may avoid surgical resection, including in many cases, the need for a permanent stoma. Extended neoadjuvant regimes have emerged to address these concerns. The inclusion of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting has the potential to further enhance this strategy by priming the local immune microenvironment and engaging the systemic immune response. Methods: PRIME-RT is a multi-centre, open label, phase II, randomised trial for patients with newly diagnosed LARC. Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either: short course radiotherapy (25 Gray in 5 fractions over one week) with concomitant durvalumab (1500 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks), followed by FOLFOX (85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin, 350 mg folinic acid and 400 mg/m2 bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given on day 1 followed by 2400 mg/m2 5-FU infusion over 46–48 h, all administered intravenously every 2 weeks), and durvalumab, or long course chemoradiotherapy (50 Gray to primary tumour in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with concomitant oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice per day on days of radiotherapy) with durvalumab followed by FOLFOX and durvalumab. The primary endpoint is complete response rate in each arm. Secondary endpoints include treatment compliance, toxicity, safety, overall recurrence, proportion of patients with a permanent stoma, and survival. The study is translationally rich with collection of bio-specimens prior to, during, and following treatment in order to understand the molecular and immunological factors underpinning treatment response. The trial opened and the first patient was recruited in January 2021. The main trial will recruit up to 42 patients with LARC and commence after completion of a safety run-in that will recruit at least six patients with LARC or metastatic disease. Discussion: PRIME-RT will explore if adding immunotherapy to neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with LARC can prime the tumour microenvironment to improve complete response rates and stoma free survival. Sequential biopsies are a key component within the trial design that will provide new knowledge on how the tumour microenvironment changes at different time-points in response to multi-modality treatment. This expectation is that the trial will provide information to test this treatment within a large phase clinical trial. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04621370 (Registered 9th Nov 2020) EudraCT number 2019-001471-36 (Registered 6th Nov 2020) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Advances in multi-modality treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have resulted in low local recurrence rates, but around 30% of patients will still die from distant metastatic disease. In parallel, there is increasing recognition that with radiotherapy and systemic treatment, some patients achieve a complete response and may avoid surgical resection, including in many cases, the need for a permanent stoma. Extended neoadjuvant regimes have emerged to address these concerns. The inclusion of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting has the potential to further enhance this strategy by priming the local immune microenvironment and engaging the systemic immune response.Methods: PRIME-RT is a multi-centre, open label, phase II, randomised trial for patients with newly diagnosed LARC. Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either: short course radiotherapy (25 Gray in 5 fractions over one week) with concomitant durvalumab (1500 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks), followed by FOLFOX (85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin, 350 mg folinic acid and 400 mg/m2 bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) given on day 1 followed by 2400 mg/m2 5-FU infusion over 46-48 h, all administered intravenously every 2 weeks), and durvalumab, or long course chemoradiotherapy (50 Gray to primary tumour in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with concomitant oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice per day on days of radiotherapy) with durvalumab followed by FOLFOX and durvalumab. The primary endpoint is complete response rate in each arm. Secondary endpoints include treatment compliance, toxicity, safety, overall recurrence, proportion of patients with a permanent stoma, and survival. The study is translationally rich with collection of bio-specimens prior to, during, and following treatment in order to understand the molecular and immunological factors underpinning treatment response. The trial opened and the first patient was recruited in January 2021. The main trial will recruit up to 42 patients with LARC and commence after completion of a safety run-in that will recruit at least six patients with LARC or metastatic disease.Discussion: PRIME-RT will explore if adding immunotherapy to neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with LARC can prime the tumour microenvironment to improve complete response rates and stoma free survival. Sequential biopsies are a key component within the trial design that will provide new knowledge on how the tumour microenvironment changes at different time-points in response to multi-modality treatment. This expectation is that the trial will provide information to test this treatment within a large phase clinical trial. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04621370 (Registered 9th Nov 2020) EudraCT number 2019-001471-36 (Registered 6th Nov 2020). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Correction to: Radiat Oncol (2021) 16:163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01888-1 After publication of this article [[1]], the authors reported that the Funding information section was incomplete. Durvalumab (MEDI 4736) in combination with extended neoadjuvant regimens in rectal cancer: a study protocol of a randomised phase II trial (PRIME-RT). [Extracted from the article]