1. Systematic Mendelian Randomization Exploring Druggable Genes for Hemorrhagic Strokes.
- Author
-
Yang LZ, Yang Y, Hong C, Wu QZ, Shi XJ, Liu YL, and Chen GZ
- Subjects
- Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Cerebral Hemorrhage genetics, Intracranial Aneurysm genetics, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Hemorrhagic Stroke genetics
- Abstract
Patients with hemorrhagic stroke have high rates of morbidity and mortality, and drugs for prevention are very limited. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis can increase the success rate of drug development by providing genetic evidence. Previous MR analyses only analyzed the role of individual drug target genes in hemorrhagic stroke; therefore, we used MR analysis to systematically explore the druggable genes for hemorrhagic stroke. We sequentially performed summary-data-based MR analysis and two-sample MR analysis to assess the associations of all genes within the database with intracranial aneurysm, intracerebral hemorrhage, and their subtypes. Validated genes were further analyzed by colocalization. Only genes that were positive in all three analyses and were druggable were considered desirable genes. We also explored the mediators of genes affecting hemorrhagic stroke incidence. Finally, the associations of druggable genes with other cardiovascular diseases were analyzed to assess potential side effects. We identified 56 genes that significantly affected hemorrhagic stroke incidence. Moreover, TNFSF12, SLC22A4, SPARC, KL, RELT, and ADORA3 were found to be druggable. The inhibition of TNFSF12, SLC22A4, and SPARC can reduce the risk of intracranial aneurysm, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intracerebral hemorrhage. Gene-induced hypertension may be a potential mechanism by which these genes cause hemorrhagic stroke. We also found that blocking these genes may cause side effects, such as ischemic stroke and its subtypes. Our study revealed that six druggable genes were associated with hemorrhagic stroke, and the inhibition of TNFSF12, SLC22A4, and SPARC had preventive effects against hemorrhagic strokes., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics Approval: This study was a reanalysis of previously published data and did not require ethical consent. Informed consent and ethical approval for the study of data were obtained from all participants according to the protocol of the original GWAS data. Consent to Participate: Not applicable. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF