Search

Abstract Complex alumina parts were printed using vat photopolymerization (VPP), which is a stereolithography‐based additive manufacturing (AM) technique used to shape ceramic preforms, or green parts. The critical flaw size was determined using classical fracture mechanics techniques. The strength and fracture toughness were measured and compared to flaws detected in x‐ray computed tomography (XCT or CT) distributions as well as the fracture surfaces. The strength was lower compared traditionally made alumina, and that is due to layering effects, slurry defects, and printing defects. The critical flaw size from fracture mechanics was 206 µm. XCT has high enough resolution to detect the critical flaw size and much smaller features, where the average flaw size observed in CT scans was around 80–100 µm. The fracture surfaces indicate that flaws causing failure are larger than that of the critical flaw size (∼300 µm), but fracture surfaces do not show definitive features compared to traditionally made ceramics. Since XCT can observe flaws smaller than the critical flaw size, this method can be used as a screening technique.

This article proposes a generalizable, data-driven framework for qualifying laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured parts using part-specific in situ data, including powder bed imaging, machine health sensors, and laser scan paths. To achieve part qualification without relying solely on statistical processes or feedstock control, a sequence of machine learning models was trained on 6299 tensile specimens to locally predict the tensile properties of stainless-steel parts based on fused multi-modal in situ sensor data and a priori information. A cyberphysical infrastructure enabled the robust spatial tracking of individual specimens, and computer vision techniques registered the ground truth tensile measurements to the in situ data. The co-registered 230 GB dataset used in this work has been publicly released and is available as a set of HDF5 files. The extensive training data requirements and wide range of size scales were addressed by combining deep learning, machine learning, and feature engineering algorithms in a relay. The trained models demonstrated a 61% error reduction in ultimate tensile strength predictions relative to estimates made without any in situ information. Lessons learned and potential improvements to the sensors and mechanical testing procedure are discussed.