Search

BACKGROUND Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is selective for EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. Evidence suggests that the addition of chemotherapy may extend the benefits of EGFR-TKI therapy. METHODS In this phase 3, international, open-label trial, we randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not previously received treatment for advanced disease to receive osimertinib (80 mg once daily) with chemotherapy (pemetrexed [500 mg per square meter of body-surface area] plus either cisplatin [75 mg per square meter] or carboplatin [pharmacologically guided dose]) or to receive osimertinib monotherapy (80 mg once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Response and safety were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 557 patients underwent randomization. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group than in the osimertinib group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.79; PcO.OOl). At 24 months, 57% (95% CI, 50 to 63) of the patients in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group and 41% (95% CI, 35 to 47) of those in the osimertinib group were alive and progression-free. Progression-free survival as assessed according to blinded independent central review was consistent with the primary analysis (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.80). An objective (complete or partial) response was observed in 83% of the patients in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group and in 76% of those in the osimertinib group; the median response duration was 24.0 months (95% CI, 20.9 to 27.8) and 15.3 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 19.4), respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events from any cause was higher with the combination than with monotherapy -- a finding driven by known chemotherapy-related adverse events. The safety profile of osimertinib plus pemetrexed and a platinum-based agent was consistent with the established profiles of the individual agents. CONCLUSIONS First-line treatment with osimertinib-chemotherapy led to significantly longer progression-free survival than osimertinib monotherapy among patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible, central nervous system-active, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with efficacy in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed the relationship between plasma osimertinib levels and its efficacy and safety events., Methods: Comprehensive pharmacokinetics exposure-response (E-R) modelling was performed utilizing steady state area under the curve (AUC ss ) data from first-line, ≥second-line and adjuvant studies from the osimertinib clinical development programme (20-240 mg once-daily dosing; N = 1689 patients). Analyses were conducted for survival using a proportional hazard model; for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) events using a penalized logistic regression model and graphical analysis of potential confounding factors; and for rash and diarrhoea events using descriptive analysis., Results: E-R modelling analyses indicated no clear trend of increasing efficacy with increasing osimertinib AUC ss ; efficacy in all exposure quartiles was significantly better than the control arm (comparator EGFR-TKI, chemotherapy or placebo) irrespective of treatment line. Model-based analysis suggested a potential relationship between increased osimertinib exposure and increased probability of ILD events, predominantly in Japanese patients. Additionally, there were increased probabilities of rash or diarrhoea with increasing osimertinib exposure. The probability of LVEF events showed overlapping confidence intervals for osimertinib ≤80 mg and control., Conclusions: E-R modelling in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC demonstrated that increased osimertinib exposure was unlikely to increase efficacy but may increase occurrence of certain adverse events. Hence, long-term treatment with doses ≥80 mg was not expected to provide additional benefit., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Introduction: EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI)-sensitizing and -resistance mutations may be detected in plasma through circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Circulating tumor DNA level changes reflect alterations in tumor burden and could be a dynamic indicator of treatment effect. This analysis aimed to determine whether longitudinal EGFR-mutation ctDNA testing could detect progressive disease (PD) before radiologic detection., Methods: This was a retrospective, exploratory ctDNA analysis in two phase 3 trials (FLAURA, NCT02296125; AURA3, NCT02151981). Patients had treatment-naïve (FLAURA) or EGFR-TKI pre-treated (AURA3) advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations and on-study PD (RECIST [Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors]), with a baseline ctDNA result and EGFR-mutation ctDNA monitoring beyond Cycle 3 Day 1. Patients received osimertinib versus comparator EGFR-TKIs (FLAURA) or chemotherapy (AURA3). Outcomes included time from ctDNA PD to RECIST PD and the first subsequent treatment (FLAURA only)., Results: Circulating tumor DNA PD preceded or co-occurred with RECIST-defined PD in 93 out of 146 patients (64%) in FLAURA and 82 out of 146 patients (56%) in AURA3. Median time from ctDNA PD to RECIST-defined PD (mo) was 3.4 and 2.6 in the osimertinib and comparator EGFR-TKI arms (FLAURA) and 2.8 and 1.5 in the osimertinib and chemotherapy arms (AURA3). In FLAURA, the median time from ctDNA PD to the first subsequent treatment (mo) was 6.0 and 4.7 in the osimertinib (n = 51) and comparator EGFR-TKI arms (n = 70)., Conclusions: Among patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI or chemotherapy with ctDNA data and RECIST-defined PD, ctDNA PD preceded/co-occurred with RECIST-defined PD in approximately 60% of cases. Longitudinal ctDNA monitoring may detect PD before radiologic PD., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Gray reports participation on the board of directors for IASLC; consulting or advisory fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi-Sankyo, EMD Serono, Gilead Sciences, Inc., IDEOlogy Health, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Loxo Oncology Inc., Merck & Co., Novartis, OncoCyte, Spectrum ODAC, Takeda, and Triptych Health Partners; research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, G1 Therapeutics, Ludwig Institute of Cancer Research, Merck & Co., Novartis, and Pfizer; employment with Moffitt Cancer Center; holding a leadership role as SWOG Lung Committee Chair and ASCO Education Committee Ex-Chair; and payments/honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi-Sankyo, EMD Serono, Gilead Sciences, Inc., IDEOlogy Health, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Loxo Oncology Inc., Merck & Co., Novartis, OncoCyte, Spectrum ODAC, Takeda, and Triptych Health Partners. Dr. Markovets reports employment with AstraZeneca. Dr. Reungwetwattana reports honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Yuhan, and Zuellig; and research grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, and Yuhan. Dr. Majem reports honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Helsinn Therapeutics, Immedica, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; research grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Roche; and travel support from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer and Roche. Dr. Cho reports an advisory role for Bridge Biotherapeutics, Inc., Cyrus Therapeutics, Inc., Guardant Health, Joseah BIO, and KANAPH Therapeutic, Inc.; participation on boards of directors for Gencurix, Inc. and Interpark Bio Convergence Corp.; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Medpacto, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Ono Pharma Co., Ltd., Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, and Yuhan; employment with Yonsei University College of Medicine; being a founder of DAAN Biotherapeutics; grants or funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Champions Oncology, Dizal Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Dong-A ST, Eli Lilly, GI Innovation, Interpark Bio Convergence Corp., Janssen, Medpacto, Merck Sharp & Dohme, MOGAM Institute, Novartis, Ono Pharma Co., Ltd., and Yuhan; royalties from Champions Oncology; and stock or stock options with Bridge Biotherapeutics, Inc., Cyrus Therapeutics, Inc., Gencurix, Inc., KANAPH Therapeutic, Inc., Interpark Bio Convergence Corp., and TheraCanVac, Inc. Dr. Chewaskulyong reports honoraria and research grants from AstraZeneca. Dr. John reports consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Ignyta, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck KGaA, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche/Genentech, and Specialised Therapeutics; honoraria from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche/Genentech; and travel support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche. Dr. Sebastian reports participation on an advisory board for Amgen; consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer lngelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda; grants or contracts from AstraZeneca; honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Boehringer lngelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CureVac, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; and travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer. Drs Todd, Rukazenkov, Barrett, and Chmielecki report employment and holding stock or stock options with AstraZeneca. Dr. Ramalingam reports personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, GSK, Merck, Takeda, and Tesaro and other non-financial support from AstraZeneca. Dr. Hartmaier reports being an inventor on patent US11066709B2, and employment and holding stock or stock options with AstraZeneca. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Comprehensive genotyping is necessary to identify therapy options for patients with advanced cancer; however, many cancers are not tested, partly because of tissue limitations. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) liquid biopsies overcome some limitations, but clinical validity is not established and adoption is limited. Herein, clinical bridging studies used pretreatment plasma samples and data from FLAURA (NCT02296125; n = 441) and AURA3 (NCT02151981; n = 450) pivotal studies to demonstrate clinical validity of Guardant360 CDx (NGS LBx) to identify patients with advanced EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer who may benefit from osimertinib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with EGFR mutation as identified by NGS LBx had significant PFS benefit with first-line osimertinib over standard of care (15.2 versus 9.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.41; P < 0.0001) and with later-line osimertinib over chemotherapy (8.3 versus 4.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.34; P < 0.0001). PFS benefits were similar to the original trial cohorts selected by tissue-based EGFR testing. Analytical validation included accuracy, precision, limit of detection, and specificity. Analytical validity was established for EGFR mutation detection and pan-tumor profiling. Panel-wide limit of detection was 0.1% to 0.5%, with 98% to 100% per-sample specificity. Patients with EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer by NGS LBx had improved PFS with osimertinib, confirming clinical validity. Analytical validity was established for guideline-recommended therapeutic targets across solid tumors. The resulting US Food and Drug Administration approval of NGS LBx demonstrated safety and effectiveness for its intended use and is expected to improve adherence to guideline-recommended targeted therapy use., Competing Interests: Disclosure Statement J.E.G. served on advisory councils or committees for AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc (DSI), EMD Serono–Merck KGaA, Inivata, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Merck, and Novartis; received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol-Myers Squibb, DSI, EMD Serono–Merck KGaA, Inivata, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Merck, and Novartis; and received grants or funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, G 1 Therapeutics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Ludwig Institute of Cancer Research. J.-Y.H. served on advisory councils or committees for Novartis, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Takeda; received honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, and Takeda; and received grants or funding from Roche, Pfizer, and ONO. A.T.-K., X.H., A.K., R.H., Y.R., J.C., and J.C.B. are employees and shareholders of AstraZeneca. C.R.E., M.L., and J.I.O. are employees and shareholders of Guardant Health. Y.-L.W. participated on speaker's bureau for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Roche; and received institutional financial research grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, and Roche. S.S.R. received honoraria from Amgen, BMS, Merck, Genentech, Tesaro, Takeda, Glaxo SmithKline, and AstraZeneca; and grants or funding from Amgen, Advaxis, AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck, Tesaro, Takeda, and Genmab; and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2024 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Among patients with resected, epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR )-mutated, stage IB to IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), adjuvant osimertinib therapy, with or without previous adjuvant chemotherapy, resulted in significantly longer disease-free survival than placebo in the ADAURA trial. We report the results of the planned final analysis of overall survival., Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned eligible patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive osimertinib (80 mg once daily) or placebo until disease recurrence was observed, the trial regimen was completed (3 years), or a discontinuation criterion was met. The primary end point was investigator-assessed disease-free survival among patients with stage II to IIIA disease. Secondary end points included disease-free survival among patients with stage IB to IIIA disease, overall survival, and safety., Results: Of 682 patients who underwent randomization, 339 received osimertinib and 343 received placebo. Among patients with stage II to IIIA disease, the 5-year overall survival was 85% in the osimertinib group and 73% in the placebo group (overall hazard ratio for death, 0.49; 95.03% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.73; P<0.001). In the overall population (patients with stage IB to IIIA disease), the 5-year overall survival was 88% in the osimertinib group and 78% in the placebo group (overall hazard ratio for death, 0.49; 95.03% CI, 0.34 to 0.70; P<0.001). One new serious adverse event, pneumonia related to coronavirus disease 2019, was reported after the previously published data-cutoff date (the event was not considered by the investigator to be related to the trial regimen, and the patient fully recovered). Adjuvant osimertinib had a safety profile consistent with that in the primary analysis., Conclusions: Adjuvant osimertinib provided a significant overall survival benefit among patients with completely resected, EGFR -mutated, stage IB to IIIA NSCLC. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ADAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02511106.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Osimertinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), potently and selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. In the Phase III FLAURA study (NCT02296125), first-line osimertinib improved outcomes vs comparator EGFR-TKIs in EGFRm advanced non-small cell lung cancer. This analysis identifies acquired resistance mechanisms to first-line osimertinib. Next-generation sequencing assesses circulating-tumor DNA from paired plasma samples (baseline and disease progression/treatment discontinuation) in patients with baseline EGFRm. No EGFR T790M-mediated acquired resistance are observed; most frequent resistance mechanisms are MET amplification (n = 17; 16%) and EGFR C797S mutations (n = 7; 6%). Future research investigating non-genetic acquired resistance mechanisms is warranted., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Here, we summarize the initial results from the ADAURA clinical study looking at treatment with osimertinib in patients with a specific type of non-small cell lung cancer (also called NSCLC). Osimertinib (TAGRISSO®) is a medication used to treat a type of NSCLC with a change (mutation) in the EGFR gene, known as EGFR-mutated NSCLC. EGFR stands for 'epidermal growth factor receptor'. It is a protein present on the surface of both healthy and cancer cells that can regulate how cells grow and divide. Sometimes, certain mutations in EGFR can result in the EGFR protein malfunctioning, which can lead to the formation of cancer, like EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Based on previous clinical studies, osimertinib is already approved for use in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC that has spread beyond the lung (metastatic disease). This medication works to stop, prevent, or slow the growth of EGFR-mutated NSCLC tumors, by specifically blocking the activity of EGFR. In the ADAURA clinical study, participants had resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC, which means they had tumors that can be removed by surgery. Participants took either osimertinib or a placebo (a dummy drug with no active ingredient) after having their tumors removed by surgery. Post-surgery chemotherapy was allowed, but not compulsory (this was decided by the participant and their doctor). To date, the study has shown that osimertinib could be beneficial for patients with resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Participants who took osimertinib have stayed cancer-free for longer than those who took the placebo, regardless of whether or not they received chemotherapy after surgery. Osimertinib treatment also reduced the risk of tumors spreading to the brain and spinal cord, otherwise known as the central nervous system (also called CNS). The side effects experienced by the participants taking osimertinib have been consistent with what we already know. Based on the results from ADAURA, osimertinib has been approved for the treatment of resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC after tumor removal. The ADAURA study is still ongoing and more results are expected to be released in the future. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT number: NCT02511106.