Search

Introduction: Terrible triad (TT) of the elbow is an association at high risk of instability. Treatment aims to restore joint stability. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) repair is systematic, whereas medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair is only exceptionally necessary. The main aim of the present study was to assess clinical results in TT surgery. The secondary objective was to compare clinical progression with versus without MCL repair., Material and Methods: A retrospective study included 50 TTs operated on via an isolated lateral or combined medial-lateral approach. Clinical assessment comprised MEPS, QuickDASH, VAS, flexion-extension and pronation-supination, and return to work and sport. Subgroup analysis was made according to associated MCL repair., Results: Fifty patients (19 female, 31 male) were operated on between January 2006 and January 2017. Mean follow-up was 24 months. At last follow-up, mean MEPS was 89.1, VAS 0.7, QuickDASH 16, flexion-extension 114°, and pronation-supination 137°. Only MEPS was significantly improved by MCL repair (p=0.02), with no significant difference in complications., Discussion: TT surgery with immediate mobilization gave good long-term functional results, not significantly improved by MCL repair. The lateral approach should be adopted in first line, with the medial approach in second line in case of persistent instability after lateral osteo-ligamentous repair., Level of Evidence: IV; retrospective study., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Introduction: Antegrade posterior column screw fixation (APCS) provides stable fixation while reducing the complications related to dual acetabular approaches. The objective of this study was to present the radiological and clinical outcomes of fixation of the posterior column of the acetabulum through a single anterior approach., Hypothesis: APCS will produce better clinical and radiological outcomes relative to not placing any screws in the posterior column., Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective single-center study of 69 patients operated through a single anterior approach for a both-column fracture of the acetabulum between 2014 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups (APCS+, n=24 and APCS-, n=45) depending on whether the posterior column was fixed with an antegrade lag screw or not. The radiological outcomes were defined by the quality of the reduction according to Matta. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris Hip score and Merle Postel D'Aubigné (MDP) score at the final assessment. A sequential hierarchical analysis was done with a Chi 2 test for the radiological criterion and Student's t test for the clinical outcomes., Results: In the APCS+ group, the reduction was anatomical in 71% (17/24) of patients, imperfect in 12% (3/24) and poor in 17% (4/24). In the APCS- group, the reduction was anatomical in 33% (15/45) of patients, imperfect in 31% (14/45) and poor in 35% (16/45). This difference between groups was statistically significant (p=.012). The differences between groups in the Harris (p=.201) and MDP (p>.05) scores were not significant. Mean irradiation in the APCS+ group was significantly higher (114.8 cGy.cm -2 ) relative to the APCS- group (39.8 cGy.cm -2 ) (p<.001). None of the patients in the APCS+ group underwent a subsequent total hip arthroplasty, while 8 patients from the APCS- group did (p=.031). The differences in the postoperative complications were not statistically significant., Discussion: APCS yields satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes without increasing the complication rate; this must be balanced out against the additional irradiation., Level of Evidence: III., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: Recent studies of iliosacral screw fixation performed using intraoperative navigation systems have shown promising results. The Surgivisio Platform is a new-generation three-dimensional intraoperative navigation tool that has been used at our institution for 2years. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the contribution of navigation in terms of iliosacral screw positioning accuracy and of radiation exposure, by comparing outcomes with vs. without navigation., Hypothesis: Navigation allows more accurate percutaneous iliosacral screw positioning regardless of the type of screw fixation (with sacral dysmorphism and/or cemented screw fixation and/or multiple screw fixation)., Materials and Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2019, consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation of pelvic ring fractures without vertical instability were included in this single-centre prospective study. Screw position accuracy was evaluated by postoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Operative time, radiation dose, and complications were recorded., Results: We included 127 patients with 174 iliosacral screws, of which 129 were positioned under fluoroscopic guidance and 45 using navigation. According to the modified Gras classification, 7% (12/174) of the screws were incorrectly positioned and 2% (4/174) required repositioning. The frequency of screw malposition was not significantly different between the fluoroscopy and navigation groups (8.5%, 11/129 vs. 2.2%, 1/45, respectively; p=0.19). However, screw position in dysmorphic sacra was significantly better with navigation (p=0.04), whereas no significant difference in final screw position was found for cemented or multiple screw implantations. In the navigation group, the operative time was significantly longer (28.2min vs. 21.6min, p=0.003), and the mean dose-area product significantly greater (6.6Gy·cm 2 vs. 4.9Gy·cm 2 , p=0.02). The complication rates were not different between the two groups., Conclusion: In patients who have pelvic ring fractures without vertical instability, navigation of percutaneous iliosacral screw placement using the Surgivisio Platform improves screw positioning in dysmorphic sacra, at the cost of a longer operative time and greater radiation exposure of the patient., Level of Evidence: II, prospective study., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)