Search

Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common types of urogenital cancer. The introduction of immune-based combinations, including dual immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has radically changed the treatment landscape for metastatic RCC, showing varying efficacy across different prognostic groups based on the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria., Materials and Methods: This retrospective multicenter study, part of the ARON-1 project, aimed to evaluate the outcomes of favorable-risk metastatic RCC patients treated with immune-based combinations or sunitinib. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate. We carried out a survival analysis by a Cox regression model., Results: A total of 524 favorable-risk patients were included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 37.2 months, the median OS in the overall population was 56.1 months. There was no significant difference in OS between patients receiving sunitinib and those receiving TKI + ICI combinations (p = 0.761). Patients on TKI + ICI had significantly longer PFS compared to patient treated with sunitinib (30.7 vs 22.9 months, p = 0.007). Analysis of OS and PFS based on metastatic site revealed that patients with bone metastases benefited more from ICI plus TKI (56 patients with bone metastases receiving IO + TKI, 38 received pembrolizumab plus axitinib, 15 cabozantinib plus nivolumab and 3 pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib), while sunitinib was more effective for pancreatic and glandular metastases. Additionally, the number of metastatic sites played a role, with TKI plus ICI showing superiority in patients with a single metastatic site. The time from RCC diagnosis to metastatic disease also impacted outcomes, with TKI plus ICI being more effective in patients with a shorter interval (i.e., < 36 months)., Conclusions: The choice between upfront combination or monotherapy for metastatic favorable prognosis RCC remains a current issue. While combination therapy offers prolonged PFS, it does not necessarily translate to improve OS compared to sunitinib. This real-world study supports the superiority in terms of PFS of TKI plus ICI vs TKI monotherapy but not in OS. Probable, other clinical factors should be taking into account to make clinical treatment decisions in this setting., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflicts of Interest: Javier Molina-Cerrillo declares consultant, advisory or speaker roles for IPSEN, Roche, Pfizer, Sanofi, Janssen and BMS. JMC has received research grants from Pfizer, IPSEN and Roche Francesco Massari has received research support and/or honoraria from Astellas, BMS, Janssen, Ipsen, MSD and Pfizer outside the submitted work. Linda Cerbone has received honoraria for advisory boards, speaker engagements and scientific consultancy for educational purposes from AstraZeneca, EISAI, MSD, Ipsen, BMS, A.A.A.; past MSD employee in Medical Affairs. Ondrej Fiala received honoraria from Novartis, Janssen, Merck and Pfizer for consultations and lectures unrelated to this project. Fernando Sabino M. Monteiro has received research support from Janssen, Merck Sharp Dome and honoraria from Janssen, Ipsen, Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Sharp Dome, all unrelated to the present paper. R. Kanesvaran has received fees for speaker bureau and advisory board activities from the following companies; Pfizer, MSD, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Johnson and Johnson, Merck, Amgen, Astellas and Bayer. Camillo Porta has received honoraria from Angelini Pharma, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen and MSD and acted as a Protocol Steering Committee Member for BMS, Eisai and MSD. Sebastiano Buti has received honoraria for speaking at scientific events and advisory roles from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Merck, Eisai, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer and research funding from Novartis and Pfizer. Matteo Santoni has received research support and honoraria from Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, MSD, Astellas, A.A.A. and Bayer, all unrelated to the present paper. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The definition of "non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer" (nmHSPC) can be applied to patients with prostate cancer (PC) who are androgen-deprivation therapy-naïve and without evidence of metastatic disease. This definition includes heterogeneous situations; however, PC patients at high risk of metastatic spread - and who have not started a hormonal treatment - constitute a unique category with unmet clinical needs. This narrative review critically discusses the advances that characterize the rapidly evolving diagnostic and therapeutic scenario in the nmHSPC setting. We found that nmHSPC represents a grey zone in the context of PC. New clinical trials are trying to redefine the therapeutic algorithm of these patients, but escalating treatment seems not to be the right choice for the overall population. Biomarkers able to stratify patients - including molecular ones - are urgently needed, and biomarker-based clinical trials could clarify their prognostic and predictive role in the nmHSPC scenario., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Emilio Francesco Giunta received personal fees from Novartis and travel accommodation from Janssen and Bayer. Giandomenico Roviello received honoraria for advisory boards or invited speaker fees from BMS, Astellas, Bayer, Ipsen, Novartis, Roche, and AstraZeneca. Vincenza Conteduca: received honoraria for advisory boards or speaker fees from Janssen, Astellas, Merck, AstraZeneca, 'Ipsen, Bayer, Novartis, Recordati, BMS, MSD, GSK. Elena Verzoni received honoraria for advisory boards or speaker fees from MSD, Pfizer, Astellas, BMS, AstraZeneca, Ipsen and Janssen. Giuseppe Procopio services advisory boards/consulting for Astellas, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Brystol Myers, BMS, Janssen, EISAI, Ely Lilly, Janssen, IPSEN, Menarini, Merk, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer. Ugo De Giorgi received honoraria for advisory boards or speaker fees for Pfzer, BMS, MSD, PharmaMar, Astellas, Bayer, Ipsen, Roche, Novartis, Clovis, GSK, AstraZeneca, institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Roche, (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) carrying sarcomatoid features (sRCC) has aggressive biology and poor prognosis. First-line immunotherapy (IO)-based combinations have improved the outcome of clear cell RCC patients, including that of sRCC. Real-world data confirming the adequate first-line management of sRCC is largely lacking. We investigated the clinical features and the outcome of sRCC patients treated with IO-based combinations within the ARON-1 study population (NCT05287464). The primary objective was to define the incidence and baseline clinical characteristics of sRCC compared with non-sRCC patients. The secondary objective was to describe the outcome of sRCC patients based on type of first-line treatment (IO + IO vs. IO + tyrosin kinase inhibitor [TKI]). We identified 1362 mRCC patients with IMDC intermediate or poor risk, 226 sRCC and 1136 non-sRCC. These two subgroups did not differ in terms of baseline characteristics. The median overall survival (OS) was 26.8 months (95%CI 21.6-44.2) in sRCC and 35.3 months (95%CI 30.2-40.4) in non-sRCC patients (p = .013). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in non-sRCC patients compared to sRCC (14.5 vs. 12.3 months, p = .064). In patients treated with first-line IO + TKI the median OS was 34.4 months compared to 26.4 months of those who received IO + IO (p = .729). The median PFS was 12.4 months with IO + TKI and 12.3 months with IO + IO (p = .606). In conclusion, we confirm that sRCC are aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. IO-based combinations improve survival outcomes of sRCC patients, regardless from the type of strategy (IO + IO versus IO + TKI) adopted., (© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Hyponatremia has been established as a prognostic indicator of survival in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). Conversely, the influence of normal sodium levels remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate the impact of natremia in mNSCLC patients undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Clinical and biochemical data of patients treated with ICIs for mNSCLC were obtained. Availability of baseline sodium values was a study inclusion criterion. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the cut off sodium value, determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Subsequently, the influence of sodium levels on response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed. PFS and OS were assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to evaluate prognostic factors for PFS and OS. The analysis included 88 patients, of whom 73.1% were men, with a median age of 71 years (range, 47-91). A comparison between patients with baseline natremia ≥ 140 mEq/L (n = 43) and those with < 140 mEq/L (n = 45) revealed PFS durations of 7.0 vs. 2.1 months (p < .01) and OS durations of 15.6 vs. 6.8 months, respectively (p = .02). In the univariate survival analysis, pre-ICI serum sodium ≥ 140 mEq/L (p = .01) was associated with improved PFS, while factors associated with OS included brain metastasis (p = .05) and pre-ICI serum sodium ≥ 140 mEq/L (p = .02). In the multivariate analysis, pre-ICI serum sodium ≥ 140 mEq/L maintained a statistically significant association with OS (p = .04)..This study represents the first investigation into the impact of normonatremia in mNSCLC. Our findings suggest that serum sodium levels < 140 mEq/L at baseline and initial assessment are independently associated with poorer PFS and OS in mNSCLC patients undergoing first-line treatment with ICIs., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Objective: Apalutamide (APA) is a treatment for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). In the ARON-3 study we investigated real-world experiences with APA treatment for mCSPC., Methods: We retrospectively assessed real-world clinical outcomes for patients with mCSPC treated with APA in the ARON-3 study. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from APA initiation to death from any cause. PSA 90 was defined as a prostate-specific antigen decline of ≥90% from baseline, and PSA 0.2 as achievement of a PSA level ≤0.2 ng/ml. Data for adverse events were retrospectively collected from electronic and paper charts and categorized according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0., Key Findings and Limitations: We included 531 patients with mCSPC treated with APA. High-volume disease was reported for 214 patients (40%), and 56 (11%) had visceral metastases. Median OS was not reached. PSA 90 was experienced by 461 patients (87%) and PSA 0.2 by 368 (69%). Median OS was significantly longer for patients with PSA 90 or PSA 0.2 than for subjects without these responses (p < 0.001). The incidence of grade 3-4 fatigue was higher among elderly patients (≥80 yr) than among younger patients (19% vs 5%), but the incidence of other adverse events was comparable between the age groups., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: APA is an effective and tolerable treatment for mCSPC in the real-world setting., Patient Summary: The ARON-3 project collects data for patients with prostate cancer treated in multiple centers worldwide to assess outcomes in the real-world setting. We analyzed data for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer receiving apalutamide. Our results show that apalutamide is a safe and effective drug in the real-world setting as well as in clinical trials., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score is the most important prognostic score to stratify patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), helping to guide treatment choice in first line. We hypothesized that IMDC change may also exert a prognostic role in subsequent lines of mRCC therapy., Methods: Meet-URO 15 is a multicenter Italian study of patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab as a second or subsequent line of therapy. This posthoc analysis aimed to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from nivolumab start as primary endpoints, overall response rate (ORR) and disease-control rate (DCR) as secondary endpoints, according to the change in the IMDC category from the first-line setting (baseline) to nivolumab start. Patients with available prognostic IMDC category information at baseline and before nivolumab were included., Results: 492 patients were included in the analysis. At baseline, 165 (33.5%), 287 (58.3%), and 40 patients (8.2%) had favorable, intermediate, and poor IMDC categories, respectively. Before nivolumab, 364 patients (73.9%) remained in the same prognostic category as at baseline, 27 (5.5%) improved, and 101 (20.5%) deteriorated. Significantly longer mPFS (P = .01) and mOS (P < .01) were reached by patients with a stable favorable group compared to those worsening to intermediate/poor. A longer mOS was also achieved from intermediate/poor patients who improved their IMDC category before nivolumab compared to those remaining stable/worsening (P < .01 and P = .04, respectively). Maintaining IMDC category stability from baseline to nivolumab determined a more consistent DCR in favorable patients (P = .03). Overall, patients who improved their IMDC risk score reached better survival outcomes than those who remained stable/deteriorated., Conclusions: In our sub-analysis, the shift in the IMDC risk category appears to be a helpful prognostic tool for assessing the outcomes of patients with mRCC treated with ≥2nd line nivolumab., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) has been approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the pivotal clinical trials did not include patients previously treated with avelumab maintenance therapy., Objective: The aim of the present retrospective analysis was to assess the effectiveness of EV following avelumab in patients with mUC enrolled in the ARON-2 EV study., Patients and Methods: The study included 182 patients with mUC treated with EV following avelumab maintenance. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR). Statistical analysis involved Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models., Results: Median OS and PFS were 12.7 (95% CI 10.2-14.1) and 7.9 (95% CI 6.4-9.9) months, respectively. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 5% and partial response (PR) in 34% of patients, with an ORR of 39%. The DoR in patients who achieved CR/PR was 10.9 months (95% CI 8.1-11.4). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 peripheral neuropathy and skin rash was 9%, followed by 8% of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea and 4% of grade ≥ 3 hyperglycemia., Conclusions: The results of our large international retrospective study confirm the effectiveness of EV and endorse its use in the population of patients with mUC treated with EV following the frontline platinum-based chemotherapy and subsequent maintenance treatment with avelumab., Competing Interests: Declarations Funding No external funding was used in the preparation of this manuscript. Conflicts of Interest Ondřej Fiala received honoraria from Roche, Janssen, GSK, and Pfizer for consultations and lectures unrelated to this project. Francesco Massari has received research support and/or honoraria from Advanced Accelerator Applications, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Janssen, Ipsen, MSD, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. Umberto Basso received honoraria for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Astra Zeneca; research funding from Ipsen; and travel grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen Oncology, Astellas Pharma, MSD Oncology, Merck/Pfizer, and Bayer, all unrelated to this project. Sebastiano Buti received honoraria as speaker at scientific events and advisory role by BMS, Pfizer, MSD, Ipsen, Roche, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Pierre-Fabre, Novartis, Merck, Gentili, and Astellas, all unrelated to the present paper. Yüksel Ürün has served on advisory board for Abdi-İbrahim, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Deva, Eczacıbaşı, Gen ilaç, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche and received travel grants, honoraria, or consultation fees from Abdi-İbrahim, Astellas, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Deva, Eczacıbaşı, Gen İlaç, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, all unrelated to the present paper. Maria T. Bourlon is a consultant of Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, MSD, Gilead, Astellas, and Asofarma and a speaker for Janssen Pharmaceuticasl, MSD, Merck, and Astellas, all unrelated to the present paper. Mimma Rizzo has received honoraria as a speaker/consultant by MSD, Merck Serono, Astrazeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, and Gilead, all unrelated to the present paper. Linda Cerbone has received honoraria for advisory boards, speaker engagements, and scientific consultancy for educational purposes from AstraZeneca, EISAI, MSD, Ipsen, BMS, and A.A.A.; and is a past MSD employee in Medical Affairs. Javier Molina-Cerrillo reports research funding from Roche, Ipsen, Pfizer, and Janssen; travel support from Pfizer, Janssen, Ipsen, and BMS; and a consulting or advisory role with Ipsen, Roche, BMS, Pfizer, Sanofi, Janssen, Astellas, Eisai, Adium, and MSD, all unrelated to the present paper. Álvaro Pinto is a member of advisory boards of Pfizer, Novartis, Ipsen, BMS, Janssen, Astellas, Sanofi, Bayer, Clovis, Roche, MSD, Pierre Fabre, and Merck; has received research support from Pfizer and BMS; clinical trial payments from Pfizer, Bayer, Janssen, MSD, Clovis, Pharmacyclics, BMS, Sanofi, Astra Zeneca, Roche, Eisai, and Aveo; and travel arrangements from Janssen, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, and Ipsen, all unrelated to the present paper. Andrey Soares reports honoraria from Janssen, Pfizer, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Ipsen, and Adium; consulting or advisory role from Astellas Pharma, Janssen, Roche, Bayer, AstraZeneca, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Adium, Ipsen, Pfizer, and Novartis; research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst), Astellas (Inst), and AstraZeneca (Inst); travel, accommodations, and expenses from Bayer, Janssen, Ipsen, Adium, MSD, and Merck Serono; and ownership in BIO, Brazilian Information Oncology; all unrelated to this study. Alexandr Poprach has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, Ipsen, Roche, Astellas, Merck, Eisai, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, unrelated to this project. Gian Paolo Spinelli has received payment or honoraria for advidory boards from Novartis, Roche, and Bayer, unrelated to this project. Martin Angel received honoraria from Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Raffo, and Pfizer for consultations and lectures unrelated to this project. Fernando Sabino M. Monteiro reports research support provided by Merck Sharp Dome; honoraria from Janssen, Ipsen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck Sharp Dome; and ownership in BIO, Brazilian Information Oncology, all unrelated to this study. Camillo Porta acted as a remunerated consultant and/or speaker for Angelini Pharma, AstraZeneca, BMC, Eisai, Exilixis, Genenta, Ipsen, Merck Serono, and MSD; as a protocol steering committee member for Eisai and MSD; and as an Independent Review Board member for Genenta. Shilpa Gupta is a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Pfizer, Gilead, Bayer, and Seattle Genetics; is a speaker for Bristol Myers Squibb; and has institutional research funding from Seatte Genetics, Pfizer, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, and Tyra Biosciences. Matteo Santoni has received research support and honoraria from Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, MSD, Astellas, and Bayer, all unrelated to the present paper. Patrizia Giannatempo, Enrique Grande, Zin W. Myint, Ugo De Giorgi, Renate Pichler, Francesco Grillone, Fabio Calabrò, Luca Galli, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Giandomenico Roviello, Jakub Kucharz, Se Hoon Park, Emmanuel Seront, Carlo Messina, Daniele Santini, Akihiro Yano, Lorena Incorvaia, Martina Catalano, Luigi Formisano, Gaetano Facchini, Giuseppe Fornarini, Sara Elena Rebuzzi, Cecilia Nasso, Marco Stellato, Deniz Tural, Gaetano Aurilio, Ilana Epstein, Francesco Carrozza, Giovanni Benedetti, Tomáš Büchler, Cinzia Ortega, Roubini Zakopoulou, Nicola Battelli, and Joaquin Bellmunt declare that they have no conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript. Tomáš Büchler and Camillo Porta are Editorial Board members of Targeted Oncology. Tomáš Büchler and Camillo Porta were not involved in the selection of peer reviewers for the manuscript nor any of the subsequent editorial decisions. Ethics Approval The study protocol was approved on 28 September 2023, by the Ethical Committee of the coordinating center (Marche Region – Italy – no. 2022 39/7875, Study Protocol “ARON 2 Study” NCT05290038) and by the Institutional Review Boards of participating centers. Consent to Participate Informed consent with subsequent analysis of the follow-up data was obtained from all participants. Consent for Publication Not applicable. Availability of Data and Material The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient data security but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Code Availability Not applicable. Author Contributions Study concept and design: all authors; acquisition of data: all authors; analysis and interpretation of data: all authors; drafting of the manuscript: Fiala, Massari, Gupta, and Santoni; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors; statistical analysis: Santoni; obtaining funding: none; administrative, technical, or material support: none; and supervision: Gupta and Santoni., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Therapeutic advancements based on immuno-oncology combinations have revolutionized the management of patients with renal cell carcinoma. However, patients who have progressive disease as the best response, "primary refractory" (P ref ), face dismal outcomes., Objective: Our multicenter retrospective real-world study aims to assess the prevalence and clinicopathological characteristics of P ref patients., Methods: This study collected data from 72 centers across 22 countries (1709 patients), involving patients aged ≥18 years with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. All patients were treated with first-line immune-oncology combinations. Data included patient demographics, histology, metastatic sites, and treatment responses. Radiological assessments followed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Statistical analyses employed Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazard models, logistic regression, and the receiver operating characteristic curve., Results: In our study, the P ref rate was 19%. Nivolumab/ipilimumab showed the highest P ref rate (27%), while pembrolizumab/lenvatinib exhibited the lowest (10%). Primary refactory patients demonstrated significantly lower median overall survival (7.6 months) compared with non-P ref patients (55.7 months), p < 0.001. At the multivariate analysis, nephrectomy, sarcomatoid de-differentiation, intermediate/poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk, and bone and brain metastases emerged as significant predictors of overall survival for P ref patients with renal cell carcinoma. Logistic regression showed a significant relationship between liver metastases, intermediate/poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk, and no surgery and an increased risk of P ref . This study presents limitations, mainly because of its retrospective design., Conclusions: The ARON-1 study provides valuable insights into P ref patients, emphasizing the challenges of this precociously resistant subgroup. Identified predictors could guide risk stratification, aiding clinicians in tailored therapeutic approaches., Competing Interests: Declarations Funding No external funding was used in the preparation of this article. Conflicts of Interest/Compting Interests Ondrej Fiala received honoraria from Novartis, Janssen, Merck, BMS, MSD, Pierre Fabre, and Pfizer for consultations and lectures unrelated to this project. Sebastiano Buti has received honoraria for speaking at scientific events and advisory roles from Astra Zeneca, BMS, Ipsen, Merck, Eisai, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer and research funding from Novartis and Pfizer unrelated to this project. He has also been on the advisory board for Gentili. Francesco Massari has received research support and/or honoraria from Astellas, BMS, Janssen, Ipsen, MSD, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. Enrique Grande has received honoraria for speaker engagements and advisory roles or received funding for continuous medical education from Adacap, Amgen, Angelini, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, Bristol Myers Squibb, Caris Life Sciences, Celgene, Clovis-Oncology, Eisai, Eusa Pharma, Genetracer, Guardant Health, HRA-Pharma, Ipsen, ITM-Radiopharma, Janssen, Lexicon, Lilly, Merck KGaA, MSD, Nanostring Technologies, Natera, Novartis, ONCODNA (Biosequence), Palex, Pharmamar, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Servier, Taiho, and Thermo Fisher Scientific and research grants from Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, and Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. All of the above are unrelated to the present paper. Alexandr Poprach has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, Ipsen, Roche, Astellas, Merck, Eisai, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, unrelated to this project. Javier Molina-Cerrillo declares consultant, advisory, or speaker roles for Ipsen, Roche, Pfizer, Sanofi, Janssen, and BMS unrelated to this project. Zin W. Myint has received research support from Merck unrelated to the present paper. Ray Manneh Kopp has received research support and/or honoraria from Amgen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Tecnofarma and Roche, unrelated to this project. Jakub Kucharz has received honoraria from Angelini, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, IPSEN, Janssen, Merck MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, and research funding from Novartis, all unrelated to the present paper. Fernando Sabino M. Monteiro has received research support from Janssen and Merck Sharp Dome and honoraria from Janssen, Ipsen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck Sharp Dome, all unrelated to the present paper. Ravindran Kanesvaran has received fees for speaker bureau and advisory board activities from the following companies; Pfizer, MSD, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Johnson and Johnson, Merck, Amgen, Astellas, and Bayer, unrelated to this project. Tomáš Büchler has received research support from AstraZeneca, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Merck KGaA, MSD, and Novartis; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas, Janssen, and Sanofi/Aventis; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Ipsen, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Roche, Servier, Accord, MSD, and Pfizer, all unrelated to the present paper. Andrey Soares has received honoraria from Janssen, Pfizer, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Ipsen, Adium. Consulting or Advisory Role from Astellas Pharma, Janssen, Roche, Bayer, AstraZeneca, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Adium, Ipsen, and Pfizer, research Funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst), Astellas (Inst), and AstraZeneca (Inst), travel, accommodations, and expenses from Bayer, Janssen, Ipsen, Adium, MSD, and Merck Serono, and ownership in BIO, Brazilian Information Oncology. All are unrelated to this study. Camillo Porta has received honoraria from Angelini Pharma, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eisai, Exelixis, Genenta, Ipsen, Merck Serono, and MSD and acted as a Protocol Steering Committee Member for Eisai and MSD, unrelated to this project. Matteo Santoni has received research support and honoraria from Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, MSD, Astellas, A.A.A. and Bayer, all unrelated to the present paper. Daniele Santini, Haoran Li, Giandomenico Roviello, Se Hoon Park, Umberto Basso, Martina Catalano, Emmanuel Seront, Jawaher Ansari, Marwan Ghosn, Fabio Calabrò, Dipen Bhuva, Maria T. Bourlon, Michela Roberto, Mattia Alberto Di Civita, Veronica Mollica, Andrea Marchetti, Nicola Battelli, Marco Ricci, and Aristotelis Bamias have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article. Tomas Buchler and Camillo Porta are Editorial Board members of Targeted Oncology. Tomas Buchler and Camillo Porta were not involved in the selection of peer reviewers for the manuscript nor any of the subsequent editorial decisions. Ethics Approval The “ARON-1” project obtained approved from the Ethics Committee of the Marche Region (2021-492) and adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent to Participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent for Publication Not applicable. Availability of Data and Material The datasets generated during and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Code Availability Not applicable. Authors’ Contributions Conception and design: DS, MS, FM; acquisition of data: DS, MS, FM; analysis and interpretation of data: DS, MS, FM; drafting of the manuscript: DS, MS, FM; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors; statistical analysis: MS; supervision: MS, FM., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: The gut microbiota and its associated metabolites play a critical role in shaping the systemic immune response and influencing the efficacy of immunotherapy. In this study, patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) were included to explore the correlation between gut microbiota and metabolites and immunotherapy efficacy in patients with ES-SCLC., Methods: Pre- and post-treatment, we collected stool samples from 49 ES-SCLC patients treated with an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody. We then applied 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) non-targeted metabolomics technology. Subsequently, the gut microbiota and metabolites were identified and classified., Results: The results showed no statistical difference in gut microbiota alpha and beta diversity between the responder (R) and non-responder (NR) patients at baseline. However, the alpha diversity of the R patients was significantly higher than that of the NR patients after treatment. There were also differences in the microbiome composition at the baseline and post-treatment. Notably, after treatment, Faecalibacterium , Clostridium&#95;sensu&#95;stricto&#95;1 , and [Ruminococcus]&#95;torques were enriched in the R group, while Dubosiella , coriobacteriaceae&#95;UCG-002 was enriched in the NR group. The non-targeted metabolomics results also indicated that short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were up-regulated in the R group after treatment. More, differential metabolites were enriched in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, including the PD-L1 expression and programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint pathway in cancer., Conclusions: These findings are anticipated to provide novel markers for predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with ES-SCLC, and offer new directions for further research on molecular mechanisms., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-1201/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 AME Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is currently the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC); however, up to 50% of patients are ineligible for cisplatin, necessitating alternative treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to be effective in cisplatin-ineligible patients. However, despite advances in the first-line setting, the prognosis remains poor, and challenges persist in selecting optimal therapies, treatment sequences and combination regimens. Maintenance therapy with avelumab revealed improved overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with best supportive care alone in patients with platinum-responsive mUC. Antibody-drug conjugates and targeted therapy with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors have shown promise in selected patients, particularly in patients with metastatic disease that has progressed despite platinum-based chemotherapy. At the European Society of Medical Oncology Congress in 2023, groundbreaking results were presented from two phase III trials, EV-302/KEYNOTE-A39 and CheckMate 901, focusing on previously untreated mUC. In the former, the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab showed significant improvements in OS, PFS and overall response rate compared with chemotherapy alone; the combination of nivolumab with gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy demonstrated a significant extension in median OS, PFS and overall response rate compared with chemotherapy alone. In addition, erdafitinib therapy resulted in significantly longer OS than chemotherapy among patients with mUC and FGFR alterations after previous treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. This comprehensive summary of the current treatment landscape for mUC incorporates clinical trial evidence and discussion of agents that are currently under investigation to provide support for clinical decision making and understanding of future therapeutic approaches., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

Opinion Statement: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) stands as the second most prevalent non-melanoma skin cancer worldwide, comprising approximately 20% of all cutaneous malignancies. Determining its precise incidence poses challenges; however, reports indicate a global increase in its prevalence. At the time of diagnosis, the majority of cSCCs are localized, resulting in favorable 5-year cure rates surpassing 90%. Nevertheless, a subset of patients (3-7%) encounters locally advanced or metastatic cSCC, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. The risk of metastasis ranges from 0.1% to 9.9%, carrying an associated mortality risk of 2.8%. Factors influencing recurrence, metastasis, and disease-specific mortality underscore the significance of perineural invasion (PNI) as a key indicator. Patients with PNI may manifest clinical symptoms and/or radiologic signs of PNI, while the majority remain asymptomatic, and PNI is frequently identified upon histologic examination. Despite its lower frequency compared to other cancer types, PNI serves as a recognized adverse prognostic factor for cSCC. Surgery is the elective treatment for these patients, while the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) is yet contentious and have not been conclusively assessed, particularly in clear surgical margin. Prospective comparative studies are required to comprehensively evaluate the benefit and the risks of ART for cSCC and PNI patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for poor performance status patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) remains unknown., Objective: In the present sub-analysis of the ARON-2 study, we investigated the role of pembrolizumab for advanced UC patients with ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status (ECOG-PS) 2., Patients and Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a cytologically and/or histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced UC progressing or recurring after platinum-based therapy and treated with pembrolizumab between 1 January 2016 to 1 April 2024 were included. In this sub-analysis we focused on patients with ECOG-PS 2., Results: We included 1,040 patients from the ARON-2 dataset; of these, 167 patients (16%) presented an ECOG-PS 2. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.5-16.1) in the overall study population, 18.2 months (95% CI 15.8-22.2) in patients with ECOG-PS 0-1, and 3.7 months (95% CI 3.2-5.2) in subjects with ECOG-PS 2 (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall study population was 5.3 months (95% CI 4.3-97.1), 6.2 months (95% CI 5.5-97.1) in patients with ECOG-PS 0-1, and 2.8 months (95% CI 2.1-3.4) in patients with ECOG-PS 2. Among the latter, liver metastases and progressive disease during first-line therapy were significant predictors of OS at both univariate and multivariate analyses. For PFS, univariate and multivariate analyses showed a prognostic role for lung metastases, liver metastases, and progressive disease during first-line therapy., Conclusions: This large real-world evidence study suggests the effectiveness of second-line pembrolizumab for mUC patients with poor performance status. The presence of liver metastases and progressive disease during first-line therapy is associated with worse clinical outcomes and, thus, should be taken into account when making treatment decisions in clinical practice., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

The addition of metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDRT) to immunotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has shown promising results. We report the real-world data from the ARON-2 study (NCT05290038) on the impact of conventional (CRT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on the outcome of aUC patients receiving pembrolizumab after platinum-based-chemotherapy. Medical records of 837 patients were reviewed from 60 institutions in 20 countries. Two hundred and sixty-two patients (31%) received radiotherapy (cohort A), of whom 193 (23%) received CRT and 69 (8%) received SBRT. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of variables of interest with OS and PFS. With a median follow-up of 22.7 months, the median OS was 10.2 months, 6.8 months and 16.0 months in no RT, CRT and SBRT subgroups (p = 0.005), with an 1y-OS rates of 47%, 34% and 61%, respectively (p < 0.001). The 1y-OS rate in the SBRT subgroup were significantly higher for both lower (63%) and upper tract UC (68%), for pure urothelial histology (63%) and variant histologies (58%), and for patients with bone (40%) and lymph-node metastases (61%). Median PFS was 4.8 months, 9.6 months and 5.8 months in the CRT, SBRT and no RT subgroups, respectively (p = 0.060). The 1y-PFS rate was significantly higher (48%) in the SBRT population and was confirmed in all patient subsets. The difference in terms of ORR was in favour of SBRT. Our real-world analysis showed that the use of SBRT/pembrolizumab combination may play a role in a subset of aUC patients to increase disease control and possibly overall survival., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Chronic spinal pain has negative effects on physical and mental well-being. Psychological factors can influence pain tolerance. However, whether these factors influence descending modulatory control mechanisms measured by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in people with chronic spinal pain is unclear. This systematic review investigated the association between CPM response and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain. Published and unpublished literature databases were searched from inception to 23rd October 2023 included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed. Studies assessing the association between CPM response and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain were eligible. Data were pooled through meta-analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the AXIS tool and the certainty of evidence measured through GRADE. From 2172 records, seven studies ( n = 598) were eligible. Quality of included studies was moderate. There was very low certainty of evidence that depression ( r = 0.01 [95% CI -0.10 to 0.12], I 2 = 0%), and anxiety ( r = -0.20 [95% CI -0.56 to 0.16], I 2 = 84%), fear avoidance ( r = -0.10 [95% CI -0.30 to 0.10], I 2 = 70%) had no statistical associations with CPM responder status. Higher pain catastrophising was associated with CPM non-responder status (r = -0.19; 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.02; n = 545; I2: 76%) based on a very low certainty of evidence measured by GRADE. There is currently limited available evidence demonstrating an association between CPM response and psychological factors for people with chronic pain. Managing an individual's chronic pain symptoms irrespective of comorbid psychological distress, should continue until evidence offer insights that more targeted interventions are needed., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Prostate carcinoma (PC), the second most diagnosed cancer globally, saw approximately 1,414,000 new cases in 2020, with 17% being de novo metastatic. In these cases, the 5-year relative survival rate is 32%. Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) includes those with metastatic disease at initial diagnosis or after initial therapy without long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), eventually progressing to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The established therapeutic principle of ADT has persisted for 80 years, with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists like leuprorelin being commonly used. LHRH antagonists, such as degarelix, have also emerged. Recent advances in mHSPC treatment involve combination strategies with drugs proven effective in CRPC, considering prognostic factors like disease volume and presentation. This review outlines pivotal trials leading to drug approvals in mHSPC and proposes a treatment decision algorithm for the same, based on statement from the Tuscan Interdisciplinary Uro-Oncological Group. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial to tailor treatment intensity and weigh risks and benefits effectively., Competing Interests: Disclosure All authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the absence of targeted mutations and immune checkpoints, platinum-based chemotherapy remains a gold standard agent in the treatment of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). However, cisplatin resistance greatly limits its therapeutic efficacy and presents challenges in the treatment of lung cancer patients. Therefore, the potential clinical needs for this research focus on identifying novel molecular signatures to further elucidate the underlying mechanisms of cisplatin resistance in LUSC. A growing body of evidence indicates that alternative splicing (AS) events significantly influence the tumor progression and survival of patients with LUSC. However, there are few systematic analyses of AS reported in LUSC. This study aims to explore the role of messenger RNA (mRNA), microRNA (miRNA), and AS in predicting prognosis in patients with cisplatin-resistant LUSC and provide potential therapeutic targets and drugs., Methods: Gene expression and miRNA expression, using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and SpliceSeq data were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis were used to construct predictive models. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to evaluate patients' prognosis. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) conducted via the R package "GSEAbase" was used to evaluate the immune-related characteristics. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine protein expression. The Connectivity Map (CMap) database was used to screen for potential drugs. The 3-(4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-3,5-di-phenytetrazoliumromide (MTT) assay was used to determine and calculate the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) of the drugs, sulforaphane and parthenolide., Results: In this study, bioinformatics were used to identify mRNAs, miRNAs, and AS events related to response to cisplatin and to establish an integrated prognostic signature for 70 patients with LUSC and cisplatin resistance. The prognostic signature served as an independent prognostic factor with high accuracy [hazard ratio (HR) =2.346, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.568-3.510; P<0.001], yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.825, 0.829, and 0.877 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, respectively. It also demonstrated high predictive performance in this cohort of patients with LUSC, with an AUC of 0.734, 0.767, and 0.776 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, respectively. This integrated signature was also found to be an independent indicator among conventional clinical features (HR =2.288, 95% CI: 1.547-3.383; P<0.001). In addition, we analyzed the correlation of the signature with immune infiltration and identified several small-molecule drugs that had the potential to improve the survival of patients with LUSC., Conclusions: This study provides a framework for the mRNA-, miRNA-, and AS-based evaluation of cisplatin response and several potential therapeutic drugs for targeting cisplatin resistance in LUSC. These findings may serve as a theoretical basis for the clinical alleviation of cisplatin resistance and thus help to improve treatment responses to chemotherapy in patients with LUSC., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-24-827/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) prognosis, although their efficacy in patients with bone metastases (BMs) remains poorly understood. We investigated the prognostic role of natremia in pretreated RCC patients with BMs receiving immunotherapy., Materials and Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included RCC patients with BMs receiving nivolumab as second-line therapy or beyond. Inclusion criteria involved baseline sodium levels (pre-ICI) and sodium levels after 4 weeks of nivolumab initiation (post-ICI). The population was divided into two groups based on the median value, and response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed., Results: Among 120 eligible patients, those with pre-treatment sodium levels ≥140 mEq/L showed longer OS (18.7 vs. 12.0 months, p=0.04). Pre-treatment sodium levels ≥140 mEq/L were associated with better OS compared to levels <140 mE/L (18.7 vs. 12.0, p=0.04). Post-treatment sodium levels ≥140 mEq/L were associated with improved PFS (9.6 vs . 3.2 months) and OS (25.1 vs. 8.8 months) (p=0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). Patients with consistent sodium levels ≥140 mEq/L at both time points exhibited the best outcomes compared to those with lower values (PFS 11.5 vs. 3.3 months and OS 42.2 vs. 9.0 months, respectively, p<0.01). Disease control rate was significantly higher in the latter group (p<0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed the prognostic significance of sodium levels., Conclusion: Elevated sodium levels (≥140 mEq/L) pre- and post-ICI treatment correlate with better survival outcomes in mRCC patients with BMs. This finding suggests sodium level assessment as a potential prognostic factor in these patients and warrants further investigation, particularly in combination immunotherapy settings., Competing Interests: GB: Speaker bureau: Astellas, Astrazeneca, Amgen. Patents: n. 4 patents with ST Microelectronics. Travel, Accommodations for scientific conferences: Merck, Janssen. UG: services as advisory/board member of Astellas, Bayer, BMS, IPSEN, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, received research grant/funding to the institution from AstraZeneca, Roche, Sanofi and travel/accommodations/expenses from BMS BMS, IPSEN, Janssen, Pfizer. LC: has received honoraria for advisory boards, speaker engagements and scientific consultancy for educational purposes from AstraZeneca, EISAI, MSD, Ipsen, BMS, A.A.A.; past MSD employee in Medical Affairs. MS: honoraria as consultant or advisory role from Janssen; grant for participation at scientific events: Astellas Pharma, Sanofi, Roche Novartis, Ipsen, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer; research funding: Roche, Merck, Janssen. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Catalano, Rebuzzi, Maruzzo, De Giorgi, Buti, Galli, Fornarini, Zucali, Claps, Chiellino, Zampiva, Pipitone, Ricotta, Sorarù, Mollica, Tudini, Fratino, Prati, Caffo, Atzori, Morelli, Prati, Nolè, Vignani, Cavo, Di Napoli, Malgeri, Naglieri, Signori, Banna, Rescigno, Cerbone, Antonuzzo and Roviello.)

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynaecologic malignancies worldwide. Platinum based chemotherapy is the mainstay treatment for ovarian cancer; however, frequent recurrence and chemoresistance onset in patients with advanced diseases remain a therapeutic challenge. Although mechanisms underlying the development of chemoresistance are still ambiguous, the B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) family is closely associated with chemoresistance in ovarian cancer. We previously disclosed that Zeta-Crystallin (CryZ) is a post-transcriptional regulator of Bcl-2 gene expression, by binding to Bcl-2 mRNA and increasing its half-life. Here, we investigated the role of CryZ as a novel therapeutic target in A2780 ovarian carcinoma cells by modulating the protein activity with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) to restore chemosensitivity. Molecular docking and fragment-mapping based approach revealed potential interaction of ASA within CryZ protein. Inhibition of CryZ binding activity to Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl mRNA targets by ASA was demonstrated in A375 cells. Cytotoxicity assays were conducted in A2780S and A2780R ovarian cancer cells to evaluate if CryZ binding activity inhibition and CryZ silencing were able to reverse cisplatin resistance. ASA-treatment determined a downregulation of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl mRNA levels in A2780S and A2780R cells. ASA-treatment or CryZ silencing were able to increase and restore the chemosensitivity in both sensitive and resistant A2780 ovarian cancer cells, respectively. In this research article we demonstrated that the pharmacological or genetic inhibition of CryZ restores the sensitivity to cisplatin in a model of sensitive or resistant ovarian cancer cells. These findings suggest a new gene-targeted chemotherapeutic approach to restore the cytotoxicity in drug-resistant ovarian cancers and increase the sensitivity in non-resistant cells., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Lulli, Trabocchi, Roviello, Catalano, Papucci, Parenti, Molli, Napoli, Landini, Schiavone and Lapucci.)

Background: Although nivolumab prolongs overall survival (OS) in pretreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), underlining clinical and biological features of long-term responses are still to be determined. This study aims to investigate clinical and pathological characteristics of mRCC patients who achieved long-term responses during nivolumab treatment., Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on mRCC patients receiving nivolumab as second or further therapy line between May 2016 and January 2019 in 34 Italian Oncology Centres. Outcome assessments and logistic regression were performed to evaluate factors influencing long-term responses., Results: A total of 571 patients with a median age of 61 years (range 17-85) were included in the analysis. With a median follow-up of 22.1 (1.0-89.0) months, 23.1% of patients were 2-year progression-free on treatment with nivolumab, hence they were categorized as long-term responders. Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, and histology, were similar between long- and short-term responders. Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 80% was significantly associated with long-term response (p = 0.02), while bone metastases (p = 0.03), International mRCC Database Consortium intermediate-poor risk (p < 0.01) and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio ≥ 3.2 (p = 0.02) were associate with short-term responses. Long-term responders exhibited a median progression-free survival of 55.0 months versus 4.0 months of the short-term responders. The median OS was not reached in long-term responders while it was 17.0 months for short*term responders., Conclusion: This retrospective analysis sheds light on factors associated with long-term response to nivolumab in mRCC. Understanding these clinical features will be essential for selecting patients who may mostly benefit from immunotherapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: There is an ongoing debate as to whether sex could be associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) benefit. Existing literature data reveal contradictory results, and data on first-line immune combinations are lacking., Method: This was a real-world, multicenter, international, observational study to determine the sex effects on the clinical outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with immuno-oncology combinations as first-line therapy., Results: A total of 1827 mRCC patients from 71 cancer centers in 21 countries were included. The median OS was 38.7 months (95% CI 32.7-44.2) in the overall study population: 40.0 months (95% CI 32.7-51.6) in males and 38.7 months (95% CI 26.4-41.0) in females (p = 0.202). The median OS was higher in males vs. females in patients aged 18-49y (36.9 months, 95% CI 29.0-51.6, vs. 24.8 months, 95% CI 16.8-40.4, p = 0.426, with + 19% of 2y-OS rate, 72% vs. 53%, p = 0.006), in the clear cell histology subgroup (44.2 months, 95% CI 35.8-55.7, vs. 38.7 months, 95% CI 26.0-41.0, p = 0.047), and in patients with sarcomatoid differentiation (34.4 months, 95% CI 26.4-59.0, vs. 15.3 months, 95% CI 8.9-41.0, p < 0.001). Sex female was an independent negative prognostic factor in the sarcomatoid population (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.15 - 2.57, p = 0.008)., Conclusions: Although the female's innate and adaptive immunity has been observed to be more active than the male's, women in the subgroup of clear cell histology, sarcomatoid differentiation, and those under 50 years of age showed shorter OS than males., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has undergone significant transformations in recent years. The introduction of novel combination therapies involving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors has resulted in improved oncological outcomes compared to traditional TKI monotherapy. In this evolving paradigm, the pivotal role of the multidisciplinary tumor board is underscored, particularly in shaping the therapeutic trajectory for patients eligible for locoregional interventions like cytoreductive nephrectomy and metastasectomy. In cases where systemic treatment is deemed appropriate, the absence of direct comparisons among the various combination therapies complicates the selection of a first-line approach. The clinician is faced with the challenge of making decisions based on patient-specific factors such as performance status, risk classification according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium, comorbidities, and disease characteristics, including the number and location of metastases and tumor histology. Considering these concerns, we propose, as a member of a Tuscany Interdisciplinary Uro-Oncologic Group, an algorithm to streamline the decision-making process for mRCC patients, offering guidance to clinicians in their day-to-day clinical practice.

Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) have been reported in approximately 1% of patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). Outcome data are limited due to the rarity of this metastatic site. Therefore, the aim of our study is to describe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with PM treated as per clinical practice., Materials and Methods: Baseline characteristics and outcome data of patients with PM from RCC were retrospectively collected from 18 Italian oncological referral centers adhering to the Meet-Uro group, from January 2016 to January 2023., Results: We collect 81 RCC patients with PM. 78/81 received systemic treatment, 3/81 only best supportive care. First line treatment included tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) (46/78), ImmuneOncology (IO)-TKI (26/78) and IO-IO (6/78), with different Objective Response Rate (ORR) (43.4% in TKI monotherapy group vs 50% in IO-TKI group, respectively) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) (60.8% in TKI treated patients vs. 76.9% in IO-TKI treated patients). Median PFS was 6.4 months (95%CI 4.18-14.8) in patients treated with TKI monotherapy vs 23.7 months (95%CI 11.1-NR) in patients treated with IO-TKI (p < 0.015). The median OS (mOS) was 22.7 months (95%CI 13.32 - 64.7) in the TKI monotherapy group vs 34.5 mo (95%CI NR-NR) in the IO-TKI group with 53.8% of patients alive at 1 years in the latter group, (p < 0.16). Primary refractory patients were 36.9% for TKI and 15.3% for IO-TKI. According to International Metastatic renal cell carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score, mPFS and mOS were consistent among risk categories. Median PFS was 36.6 months (95%CI 10.9-NR) for good risk patients compared to 10 months (95%CI 7.5-29.8) for intermediate risk and 2.96 months (95%CI 2.43-11.28) for poor risk population (p < 0.0005) whereas mOS was NR (95%CI 28.65-NR) for good risk patients compared to 35.3 months (95%CI 24.6-NA) and 12.4 months (95%CI 3.52-NR) for intermediate and poor risk population, respectively, (p < 0.0002). Only 34/78 (43.5%) received a second line treatment that was TKI (ORR 8.3% and DCR 41.6%) or IO (ORR 18.1% and DCR 40.9%)., Conclusion: We report one of the largest case series regarding PM from RCC. Characteristics of patients suggest a more aggressive behavior of PM from mRCC. Outcome data suggest that TKI-IO as first line treatment, and TKI as second line, confirm their activity for these patients with dismal prognosis., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/objectives: Perineural invasion (PNI), classified according to its presence or absence in tumor specimens, is recognized as a poor prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Herein, we identified five histological features of PNI and investigated their impact on survival outcomes of PDAC resected patients., Methods: Five histopathological features of PNI (diameter, number, site, sheath involvement, and mitotic figures within perineural invasion) were combined in an additional final score (ranging from 0 to 8), and clinical data of PDAC patients were retrospectively analyzed. PNI + patients were stratified in two categories according to the median score value (<6 and ≥ 6, respectively). Impact of PNI on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed., Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled, of whom 34 with PNI (PNI+) and 11 without PNI (PNI-). The DFS was 11 months vs. not reached (NR) (p = 0.258), while the OS was 19 months vs. NR (p = 0.040) in PNI+ and PNI- patients, respectively. A ≥6 PNI was identified as an independent predictor of worse OS vs. <6 PNI + patients (29 vs. 11 months, p < 0.001) and <6 PNI+ and PNI- patients (43 vs. 11 months, p < 0.001). PNI ≥6 was an independent negative prognostic factor of DFS vs. <6 PNI+ and PNI- patients (13 vs. 6 months, p = 0.022)., Conclusions: We report a PNI scoring system that stratifies surgically-treated PDAC patients in a graded manner that correlates with patient prognosis better than the current dichotomous (presence/absence) definition. However, further and larger studies are needed to support this PNI scoring system., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare tumor with an aggressive behavior. The Meet-URO 23/I-RARE registry includes rare genitourinary malignancies. We extracted patients with PSCC to conduct a retrospective study aimed at assessing clinical outcomes and prognostic factors., Patients and Methods: Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival. Prognostic factors for OS and PFS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. From the Meet-URO 23/I-RARE database, we extracted 128 patients with diagnosis of PSCC. About 48% of patients underwent first-line of therapy., Results: In the overall population, median OS from diagnosis was 34.6 months. Significant differences in median OS were observed according to ECOG PS at diagnosis (57.3 months vs. 8.3 months; P < .001), and median age (≤77y 88.8 months vs. >77y 26 months; P = .013). At multivariate analysis, ECOG PS 2-4 at diagnosis (HR 3.04) and lymph node metastases (HR 2.49) were independently associated with a higher risk of death. Among patients undergoing first-line therapy (n = 61), median OS was 12.3 months, and a statistically significant difference was found according to type of response to first-line (DCR 24.4 months vs. PD 7.1 months; P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that only age >77 years was associated with a worse OS (HR 2.16). A statistically significant difference in PFS was found according to platinum plus 5-fluorouracil versus platinum plus taxane (4.9 vs. 3.4 months; P = .036) and regimens with 2 versus 3 drugs (3.4 vs. 8.6 months; P = .019). At the multivariate analysis only regimens with platinum plus taxane were associated with worse PFS (HR 2.83)., Conclusion: In our registry study, PSCC is confirmed to be an aggressive disease. Poor ECOG PS, presence of lymph node metastases, and higher age at diagnosis appear to be associated with worse survival outcomes., Competing Interests: Disclosure The other authors declare no conflict of interest. Francesco Pierantoni: Advisory board: Eli Lilly; Speaker and travel fees: Pfizer, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Jannsen, Takeda, Merck, Astellas, Ipsen. Paola Ermacora: MSD, BMS, AAA, Astellas, Recordati, Eisai (advisory board), Jansenn (travel grant)., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Despite the availability of clinical and molecular algorithms applied for the prediction of prognosis, in up to 30%-40% of patients, intrinsic or acquired drug resistance occurs. Constitutional genetics may help to predict R-CHOP resistance. This study aimed to validate previously identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the literature as potential predictors of R-CHOP resistance in DLBCL patients, SNPs. Methods: Twenty SNPs, involved in R-CHOP pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics or other pathobiological processes, were investigated in 185 stage I-IV DLBCL patients included in a multi-institution pharmacogenetic study to validate their previously identified correlations with resistance to R-CHOP. Results: Correlations between rs2010963 ( VEGFA gene) and sex ( P = 0.046), and rs1625895 ( TP53 gene) and stage ( P = 0.003) were shown. After multivariate analyses, a concordant effect (i.e., increased risk of disease progression and death) was observed for rs1883112 ( NCF4 gene) and rs1800871 ( IL10 gene). When patients were grouped according to the revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI), both these SNPs further discriminated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the R-IPI-1-2 subgroup. Overall, patients harboring the rare allele showed shorter PFS and OS compared with wild-type patients. Conclusions: Two out of the 20 study SNPs were validated. Thus, these results support the role of previously identified rs1883112 and rs1800871 in predicting DLBCL resistance to R-CHOP and highlight their ability to further discriminate the prognosis of R-IPI-1-2 patients. These data point to the need to also focus on host genetics for a more comprehensive assessment of DLBCL patient outcomes in future prospective trials., Competing Interests: Mini E is an Editorial Board Member of the journal Cancer Drug Resistance, while the other authors have declared that they have no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Every year, new compounds contained in consumer products, such as detergents, paints, products for personal hygiene, and drugs for human and veterinary use, are identified in wastewater and are added to the list of molecules that need monitoring. These compounds are indicated with the term emerging contaminants (or Contaminants of Emerging Concern, CECs) since they are potentially dangerous for the environment and human health. To date, among the most widely used methodologies for the removal of CECs from the aquatic environment, adsorption processes play a role of primary importance, as they have proven to be characterized by high removal efficiency, low operating and management costs, and an absence of undesirable by-products. In this paper, the adsorption of ibuprofen (IBU), a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug widely used for treating inflammation or pain, was performed for the first time using two different types of geopolymer-based materials, i.e., a metakaolin-based (GMK) and an organic-inorganic hybrid (GMK-S) geopolymer. The proposed adsorbing matrices are characterized by a low environmental footprint and have been easily obtained as powders or as highly porous filters by direct foaming operated directly into the adsorption column. Preliminary results demonstrated that these materials can be effectively used for the removal of ibuprofen from contaminated water (showing a concentration decrease of IBU up to about 29% in batch, while an IBU removal percentage of about 90% has been reached in continuous), thus suggesting their potential practical application.