Search

The optimal management of asymptomatic, presumed WHO grade I meningiomas remains controversial.To define the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) compared with active surveillance for the management of patients with asymptomatic parafalcine/parasagittal (PFPS) meningiomas.Data from SRS-treated patients from 14 centers and patients managed conservatively for an asymptomatic, PFPS meningioma were compared. Local tumor control rate and new neurological deficits development were evaluated in the active surveillance and the SRS-treated cohorts.There were 173 SRS-treated patients and 98 patients managed conservatively in the unmatched cohorts. After matching for patient age and tumor volume, there were 98 patients in each cohort. The median radiological follow-up period was 43 months for the SRS cohort and 36 months for the active surveillance cohort (P = .04). The median clinical follow-up for the SRS and active surveillance cohorts were 44 and 36 months, respectively. Meningioma control was noted in all SRS-treated patients and in 61.2% of patients managed with active surveillance (P.001). SRS-related neurological deficits occurred in 3.1% of the patients (n = 3), which were all transient. In the active surveillance cohort, 2% of patients (n = 2) developed neurological symptoms because of tumor progression (P = 1.0), resulting in death of 1 patient (1%).Up-front SRS affords superior radiological PFPS meningioma control as compared with active surveillance and may lower the risk of meningioma-related permanent neurological deficit and/or death.

Objective: the optimal management of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas is not well defined. The aim of this study is to compare the imaging and clinical outcomes of patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas managed either with upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or active surveillance. Methods: this retrospective, multicenter study involved patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas. The study end-points included local tumor control and the development of new neurological deficits attributable to the tumor. Factors associated with tumor progression and neurological morbidity were also analyzed. Results: the combined unmatched cohort included 417 patients. Following propensity score matching for age, tumor volume, and follow-up 110 patients remained in each cohort. Tumor control was achieved in 98.2% and 61.8% of the SRS and active surveillance cohorts, respectively. SRS was associated with superior local tumor control (p < 0.001, HR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.002-0.13) compared to active surveillance. Three patients (2.7%) in the SRS cohort and six (5.5%) in the active surveillance cohort exhibited neurological deterioration. One (0.9%) patient in the SRS-treated and 11 (10%) patients in the active surveillance cohort required surgical management of their meningioma during follow-up. Conclusions: SRS is associated with superior local control of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas as compared to active surveillance and does so with low morbidity rates. SRS should be offered as an alternative to active surveillance as the initial management of asymptomatic skull base meningiomas. Active surveillance policies do not currently specify the optimal time to intervention when meningioma growth is noted. Our results indicate that if active surveillance is the initial management of choice, SRS should be recommended when radiologic tumor progression is noted and prior to clinical progression., NA

Determining the appropriate surgical indications for obtunded octogenarians with traumatic acute subdural hematoma (aSDH) has been challenging. We sought to determine which easily available data would be useful adjuncts to assist in early and quick decision-making.We performed a single-center, retrospective review of patients aged ≥80 years with confirmed traumatic aSDH who had undergone emergent surgery. The clinical measurements included the Karnofsky performance scale score, Charlson comorbidity index, Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and abbreviated injury score. The radiographic measurements included the Rotterdam computed tomography score, aSDH thickness, midline shift, and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The neurologic outcomes were defined using the extended Glasgow outcome scale-extended (GOS-E) at hospital discharge and 3-month follow-up. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to compare the ONSD with all clinical, radiographic, and outcome variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the discharge and 3-month GOS-E scores between all clinical and radiographic variables.A total of 17 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 82.5 ± 1.6 years (range, 80-85 years), and the mean GCS score was 11.2 ± 4.1 (range, 4-15). The mean discharge and 3-month GOS-E scores were 3.4 ± 2.6 (range, 1-8) and 2.3 ± 2.1 (range, 1-7), respectively. We found significant negative correlations between the ONSD and the GCS score (r = -0.62; P0.01) and the ONSD and discharge GOS-E score (r = -0.49; P = 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between the abbreviated injury score and the discharge GOS-E score (P = 0.05).Octogenarians sustaining aSDH and requiring emergent surgery have poor outcomes. More data are needed to determine whether the ONSD can be a useful adjunct tool to predict the efficacy of emergent surgery.

Meningioma, a type of brain tumor, is a common incidental finding on brain imaging. The best management approach for patients with an incidental meningioma remains unclear. This retrospective multi-center study investigated the outcomes of patients with an incidental meningioma in a frontobasal location, who were managed with active surveillance (n = 28) compared to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (n = 84). Within 5 years of follow-up, SRS improved the radiological control of incidental frontobasal meningiomas (0% vs. 52%), but no symptoms occurred in either group. In the active surveillance cohort, 12% underwent an intervention for tumor growth. The findings of this study provide information to enable shared decision making between clinicians and patients with incidental frontobasal meningiomas. Meningioma is a common incidental finding, and clinical course varies based on anatomical location. The aim of this sub-analysis of the IMPASSE study was to compare the outcomes of patients with an incidental frontobasal meningioma who underwent active surveillance to those who underwent upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Data were retrospectively collected from 14 centres. The active surveillance (n = 28) and SRS (n = 84) cohorts were compared unmatched and matched for age, sex, and duration of follow-up (n = 25 each). The study endpoints included tumor progression, new symptom development, and need for further intervention. Tumor progression occurred in 52.0% and 0% of the matched active surveillance and SRS cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). Five patients (6.0%) treated with SRS developed treatment related symptoms compared to none in the active monitoring cohort (p = 0.329). No patients in the matched cohorts developed symptoms attributable to treatment. Three patients managed with active surveillance (10.7%, unmatched; 12.0%, matched) underwent an intervention for tumor growth with no persistent side effects after treatment. No patients subject to SRS underwent further treatment. Active monitoring and SRS confer a similarly low risk of symptom development. Upfront treatment with SRS improves imaging-defined tumor control. Active surveillance and SRS are acceptable treatment options for incidental frontobasal meningioma., NA

Purpose/Objective(s) Although patients with brain metastasis treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the definitive or post-operative setting have high rates of local control, surveillance imaging is necessary to assess for central nervous system (CNS) recurrence. Guidelines recommend magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain every three months for surveillance in asymptomatic patients post-SRS. However, optimal frequency and duration of surveillance imaging in long-term survivors is unknown. Our objective is to define the yield and cost of surveillance MRIs in long-term (> 1 year) survivors following SRS. Materials/Methods We identified a cohort of patients with brain metastases treated with SRS in the definitive or postoperative setting at a single institution from 8/2014 to 9/2019. Eligible patients had at least one-year of follow-up with absence of CNS disease failure up to and including the first MRI of the brain after 12 months from SRS. Each post-treatment MRI of the brain was assessed for disease progression or new lesions. CNS disease-free survival was time from SRS to last follow-up, death or CNS failure. Delay to diagnosis and cost per patient were estimated using hypothetical MRI schedules of 2, 3, 4 and 6 months from 1-year post-treatment while CNS disease-free. Delay to diagnosis was calculated as time from actual CNS progression to hypothetical imaging date. Medicare reimbursement median cost of $498 per MRI brain with and without contrast was used for this analysis. Results A total of 373 patients treated with SRS for brain metastasis were identified at our institution. 61 patients met eligibility criteria for inclusion in this study (median follow-up 2.50 years, median age at treatment 60 years). The median CNS disease-free survival in this population was 2.37 years from date of SRS. 15 patients (24.6%) had CNS progression at median time of 2.26 years. Of the 15 patients, 3 patients were symptomatic at recurrence. Median frequency of MRI after one year post SRS was 5.9 months. Per patient, $1156 was spent annually on MRIs of the brain after 12 months with average annual yield of 17.0%. The cost per diagnosis of CNS progression was $6806. A 2-month, 3-month, 4-month and 6-month MRI schedule had a respective estimated delay to diagnosis of 0.69 months, 1.13 months, 1.44 months and 3.19 months. The respective mean total cost of each MRI schedule per patient from one-year post-treatment while CNS disease-free was $4662, $3053, $2229 and $1380. Conclusion Patients with metastatic disease to the brain treated definitively or postoperatively with SRS without evidence of CNS recurrence at one year have a low rate of CNS failure and relatively good prognosis. Based strictly on limiting delay of diagnosis, a 2-month MRI Brain schedule is optimal in this population, albeit with a relatively small increase in financial cost over the patient's lifespan. We propose a multi-institutional study of long-term survivors with brain metastasis to strengthen these findings. Author Disclosure B.J. Rich: None. D. Kwon: None. Y.S. Soni: None. D.L. John: None. J.B. Bell: None. G. Azzam: None. E.A. Mellon: None. R. Yechieli: Support and guide school in strategic and management related matters; Toras Chaim Toras Emes, Miami FL.C. Benjamin: None. R. Benveniste: None. R.J. Komotar: None. M. Ivan: None. J. Morcos: None. T. Diwanji: None.