Search

Background: Immune checkpoint blockade has shown mixed results in advanced/recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Efficacy may be improved through costimulation with OX40 and 4‐1BB agonists. The authors sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of avelumab combined with utomilumab (a 4‐1BB agonist), PF‐04518600 (an OX40 agonist), and radiotherapy in patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Methods: The primary end point in this six‐arm, phase 1/2 trial was safety of the combination regimens. Secondary end points included the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and immune‐related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, the disease control rate (DCR), the duration of response, progression‐free survival, and overall survival. Results: Forty patients were included (35% with cervical cancer, 30% with endometrial cancer, and 35% with ovarian cancer). Most patients (n = 33; 83%) were enrolled in arms A–C (no radiation). Among 35 patients who were evaluable for efficacy, the ORR was 2.9%, and the DCR was 37.1%, with a median duration of stable disease of 5.4 months (interquartile range, 4.1–7.3 months). Patients with cervical cancer in arm A (avelumab and utomilumab; n = 9 evaluable patients) achieved an ORR of 11% and a DCR of 78%. The median progression‐free survival was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.8–3.5 months), and overall survival was 9.4 months (95% CI, 5.6–11.9 months). No dose‐limiting toxicities or grade 3–5 immune‐related adverse events were observed. Conclusions: The findings from this trial highlight that, in heavily pretreated patients with gynecologic cancer, even multidrug regimens targeting multiple immunologic pathways, although safe, did not produce significant responses. A DCR of 78% in patients with cervical cancer who received avelumab and utomilumab indicates that further research on this combination in select patients may be warranted. In a phase 1/2 trial of heavily pretreated patients who had recurrent gynecologic cancers, avelumab in combination with a 4‐1BB agonist, an OX40 agonist, and/or radiation was safe and had a similar rate of immune‐related adverse events compared with single‐agent immune checkpoint blockade. The combination of multiple immune‐modulating agents, however, did not result in increased efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: BMS-986156 is an agonist of the glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-related protein (GITR) and promotes increased effector T-cell activation. Combined anti-GITR, anti-programmed death-1, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibodies and radiotherapy improve tumor control in preclinical studies. Herein we describe the results of the safety and efficacy of BMS-986156+ipilimumab or nivolumab with/without stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with advanced solid cancers (NCT04021043)., Methods: This open-label, multigroup, single-center phase I/II study enrolled patients with histologically-confirmed stage IV solid cancers resistant to standard treatments. Group 1 (G1, n=20) received four cycles of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) plus BMS-986156 (30 mg as dose level 1 (L1) or 100 mg as dose level 2 (L2)), every 3 weeks (Q3W). Group 2 (G2, n=10) received four cycles of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) plus BMS-986156 (dose as determined in G1, Q3W) with SABR (50 Gy/4 fx or 60-70 Gy/10 fx to liver/lung lesions. Group 3 (G3, n=20) received four cycles of nivolumab (480 mg) plus BMS-986156 (30 mg), every 4 weeks with SABR. Maintenance nivolumab could be given up to 2 years. Tumor responses were assessed every 1-3 months until progression, using immune-related response criteria., Results: 50 patients were enrolled between 10/2019 and 12/2021. Patients received a median of 3 (IQR 2-4.25) initial treatment cycles. 100 mg BMS-986156 with ipilimumab was tolerated well. Five discontinued BMS-986156 with ipilimumab due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with three in G1/L1, one in G1/L2 and one in G2, respectively. 22 patients (44%) experienced Grade 1-3 TRAEs (6, 4, 5, 7 patients for G1/L1, G1/L2, G2, G3). Six (12%) had Grade 3 TRAEs (2, 2, 1, 1 for G1/L1, G1/L2, G2, G3), with elevated alanine aminotransferase (n=3, in G1/L2, G2 and G3) and aspartate aminotransferase (n=2, in G2 and G3) being the most common. There was no Grade 4-5 TRAEs. Overall, 19/39 (48.7%) patients eligible for efficacy analysis had stable disease and 3 (7.7%) achieved a partial response. Out-of-field (abscopal) disease control rate (ACR) and out-of-field (abscopal) response rate (ARR) were 38.5% and 7.7%, respectively, with the highest ACR (50%, 9/18) and ARR (11.1%, 2/18) in G3., Conclusions: BMS-986156 was well-tolerated with ipilimumab, nivolumab, with or without SABR. Outcomes were encouraging in this population, as more than half of patients had stable disease/partial response., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JYC has received research grants from BMS-MDACC Research Alliance, Siemens, AstraZeneca and NCI NIH SORT study; honoraria for scientific meetings from Varian Medical System and IBA; and has served as Scientific Program Co-chair for PTCOG: Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group; also a member in Board of Directors of IASLC: International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. DSH has received research grants from AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Adlai-Nortye, Amgen, Astelles, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biomea, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Deciphera, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Endeavor, Erasca, F. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Fate Therapeutics, Genentech, Genmab, Immunogenesis, Incyte Inc, Infinity, Kyowa Kirin, Merck, Mirati, Navier, NCI-CTEP, Novartis, Numab, Pfizer, Pyramid Bio, Quanta, Revolution Medicine, SeaGen, STCube, Takeda, TCR2, Turning Point Therapeutics, VM Oncology; honoraria for travel, accommodations and expenses from AACR, ASCO, CLCC, Bayer, Genmab, Northwestern, SITC, Telperian, UNC; has consulting, speaker, or advisory role in 280Bio- YingLing Pharma, AbbVie, Acuta, Adaptimmune, Alkermes, Alpha Insights, Amgen, Affini-T, Astellas, Aumbiosciences, Axiom, Baxter, Bayer, BeiGene USA, Boxer Capital, BridgeBio, CARSgen, CLCC, COG, COR2ed, Cowen, Ecor1, EDDC, Erasca, Exelixis, Fate Therapeutics, F.Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Gennao Bio, Gilead, GLG, Group H, Guidepoint, HCW Precision Oncology, Immunogenesis, Incyte Inc, Inhibrix Inc, InduPro, Innovent, Janssen, Jounce Therapeutics Inc, Lan-Bio, Liberium, MedaCorp, Medscape, Novartis, Northwestern, Numab, Oncologia Brasil, ORI Capital, Pfizer, Pharma Intelligence, POET Congress, Prime Oncology, Projects in Knowledge, Quanta, RAIN, Ridgeline, Revolution Medicine, Sanofi and Genzyme Inc, SeaGen, Stanford, STCube, Takeda, Tavistock, Trieza Therapeutics, T-Knife, Turning Point Therapeutics, UNC, WebMD, Ziopharm; and has been advisor for CrossBridge Bio, Molecular Match; and is founder and advisor for OncoResponse, Telperian. JW has received research grants from Alkermes, Nanobiotix, Varian, Artidis, Takeda, HotSpot Therapeutics, Gilead, Kiromic, Bayer Health, BMS, AstraZeneca, Merck, Sciclone, Novocure, Pebble Life Science; and has received consulting fees from Accuray, Alkermes, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Kezar Life Sciences, Legion Healthcare Partners, Novocure, Taiwan Lung Cancer Society, Radiosurgery Society, Life Science Dynamics Limited, Nanorobotics, Nanobiotix, Oncoresponse, Artidis, Boehringer Ingleheim, Alpine Immune Science, Lifescience Dynamics Limited, McKesson Corporation, Reflexion; and has support for travel from Nanobiotix, Varian, Reflexion; has been in the Advisory Boards of Nanobiotix, Reflexion, Novocure, Oncoresponse, McKesson, Life Science Dynamics Limited, Kezar Life Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Alpine Immune Sciences; and has stock options from Reflexion, Oncoresponse; is the founder of Oligo Immune; has business ownership of DV8; and has equity of Molecular Match, Alpine Immune Science, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Legion Healthcare Partners, Nanorobotics, Reflexion, Oncoresponse. EED has received research grants from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Immunocore LTD, Amgen, Aileron Therapeutics, Compugen Ltd, TRACON Pharmaceuticals Inc, Unum Therapeutics, Gilead Immunomedics, BOLT Therapeutics, Aprea Therapeutics, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, PMV Pharma, Triumvira Immunologics, Seagen Inc, Mereo BioPharma 5 Inc, Sanofi, Rain Oncology, Astex Therapeutics, Sotio, Poseida, Mersana Therapeutics, Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dragonfly Therapeutics, A2A Pharma, Volastra, AstraZeneca; is a member in Advisory Boards of BOLT Therapeutics, Mersana Therapeutics, Orum Therapeutics, Summit Therapeutics, PMV Pharma, Fate Therapeutics; is a speaker of PMV Pharma; and has received honoraria for travel, accommodations and expenses from ASCO, LFSA Association, Rain Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Triumvira Immunologics. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Hyperactivated protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) are implicated in human cancers. Inhibiting tumor intrinsic PRMT5 was reported to potentiate antitumor immune responses, highlighting the possibility of combining PRMT5 inhibitors (PRMT5i) with cancer immunotherapy. However, global suppression of PRMT5 activity impairs the effector functions of immune cells. Here, we sought to identify strategies to specifically inhibit PRMT5 activity in tumor tissues and develop effective PRMT5i-based immuno-oncology (IO) combinations for cancer treatment, particularly for methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP)-loss cancer., Methods: Isogeneic tumor lines with and without MTAP loss were generated by CRISPR/Cas9 knockout. The effects of two PRMT5 inhibitors (GSK3326595 and MRTX1719) were evaluated in these isogenic tumor lines and T cells in vitro and in vivo . Transcriptomic and proteomic changes in tumors and T cells were characterized in response to PRMT5i treatment. Furthermore, the efficacy of MRTX1719 in combination with immune checkpoint blockade was assessed in two syngeneic murine models with MTAP-loss tumor., Results: GSK3326595 significantly suppresses PRMT5 activity in tumors and T cells regardless of the MTAP status. However, MRTX1719, a methylthioadenosine-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitor, exhibits tumor-specific PRMT5 inhibition in MTAP-loss tumors with limited immunosuppressive effects. Mechanistically, transcriptomic and proteomic profiling analysis reveals that MRTX1719 successfully reduces the activation of the PI3K pathway, a well-documented immune-resistant pathway. It highlights the potential of MRTX1719 to overcome immune resistance in MTAP-loss tumors. In addition, MRTX1719 sensitizes MTAP-loss tumor cells to the killing of tumor-reactive T cells. Combining MRTX1719 and anti-PD-1 leads to superior antitumor activity in mice bearing MTAP-loss tumors., Conclusion: Collectively, our results provide a strong rationale and mechanistic insights for the clinical development of MRTX1719-based IO combinations in MTAP-loss tumors., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JRA reports non-financial support and reasonable reimbursement for travel from European Society for Medical Oncology and Loxo Oncology; receiving consulting and travel fees from Ellipses Pharma, Molecular Partners, IONCTURA, Sardona, Mekanistic, Amgen, Merus, MonteRosa, Aadi and Bridgebio (including serving on the scientific advisory board); consulting fees from Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology/Ministero De Empleo Y Seguridad Social, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Boxer Capital, LLC, Tang Advisors, LLC and Guidepoint, receiving research funding from Blueprint Medicines, Merck Sharp and serving as investigator in clinical trials with Cancer Core Europe, Symphogen, BioAlta, Pfizer, Kelun-Biotech, GlaxoSmithKline, Taiho, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Hummingbird, Yingli, Bicycle Therapeutics, Merus, Aadi Bioscience, ForeBio, Loxo Oncology, Hutchison MediPharma, Ideaya, Amgen, Tango Therapeutics, Mirati Therapeutics, Linnaeus Therapeutics, MonteRosa, Kinnate, Yingli, Debio, BioTheryX, Storm Therapeutics, Beigene, MapKure, Relay, Novartis, FusionPharma, C4 Therapeutics, Scorpion Therapeutics, Incyte, Fog Pharmaceuticals, Tyra, Nuvectis Pharma. MTB is a co-founder of EpiCypher. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by other authors., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: One of the most common sporadic homozygous deletions in cancers is 9p21 loss, which includes the genes methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), CDKN2A, and CDKN2B, and has been correlated with worsened outcomes and immunotherapy resistance. MTAP-loss is a developing drug target through synthetic lethality with MAT2A and PMRT5 inhibitors. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence and genomic landscape of MTAP-loss in advanced gastrointestinal (GI) tumors and investigate its role as a prognostic biomarker., Materials and Methods: We performed next-generation sequencing and comparative genomic and clinical analysis on an extensive cohort of 64 860 tumors comprising 5 GI cancers. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with GI cancer harboring MTAP-loss and MTAP-intact tumors in a retrospective study., Results: The prevalence of MTAP-loss in GI cancers is 8.30%. MTAP-loss was most prevalent in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at 21.7% and least in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) at 1.1%. MTAP-loss tumors were more prevalent in East Asian patients with PDAC (4.4% vs 3.2%, P = .005) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC; 6.4% vs 4.3%, P = .036). Significant differences in the prevalence of potentially targetable genomic alterations (ATM, BRAF, BRCA2, ERBB2, IDH1, PIK3CA, and PTEN) were observed in MTAP-loss tumors and varied according to tumor type. MTAP-loss PDAC, IHCC, and CRC had a lower prevalence of microsatellite instability or elevated tumor mutational burden. Positive PD-L1 tumor cell expression was less frequent among MTAP-loss versus MTAP-intact IHCC tumors (23.2% vs 31.2%, P = .017)., Conclusion: In GI cancers, MTAP-loss occurs as part of 9p21 loss and has an overall prevalence of 8%. MTAP-loss occurs in 22% of PDAC, 15% of IHCC, 8.7% of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, 2.4% of hepatocellular carcinoma, and 1.1% of CRC and is not mutually exclusive with other targetable mutations., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)