Search

We sought to automate R.E.N.A.L. (for radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness of tumor to collecting system, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar line) nephrometry scoring of preoperative computerized tomography scans and create an artificial intelligence-generated score (AI-score). Subsequently, we aimed to evaluate its ability to predict meaningful oncologic and perioperative outcomes as compared to expert human-generated nephrometry scores (H-scores).A total of 300 patients with preoperative computerized tomography were identified from a cohort of 544 consecutive patients undergoing surgical extirpation for suspected renal cancer at a single institution. A deep neural network approach was used to automatically segment kidneys and tumors, and geometric algorithms were developed to estimate components of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. Tumors were independently scored by medical personnel blinded to AI-scores. AI- and H-score agreement was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation and their predictive abilities for both oncologic and perioperative outcomes were assessed using areas under the curve.Median age was 60 years (IQE 51-68), and 40% were female. Median tumor size was 4.2 cm and 91.3% had malignant tumors, including 27%, 37% and 24% with high stage, grade and necrosis, respectively. There was significant agreement between H-scores and AI-scores (Lin's ⍴=0.59). Both AI- and H-scores similarly predicted meaningful oncologic outcomes (p0.001) including presence of malignancy, necrosis, and high-grade and -stage disease (p0.003). They also predicted surgical approach (p0.004) and specific perioperative outcomes (p0.05).Fully automated AI-generated R.E.N.A.L. scores are comparable to human-generated R.E.N.A.L. scores and predict a wide variety of meaningful patient-centered outcomes. This unambiguous artificial intelligence-based scoring is intended to facilitate wider adoption of the R.E.N.A.L. score.

To understand perspectives on renal mass biopsy, a survey was distributed to urologists in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative and Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative. Renal mass biopsy (RMB) may reduce treatment of benign renal neoplasms; however, utilization varies widely.Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative and Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative are two quality improvement collaboratives that include a "real-world" collection of urologists from academic- and community-based settings. A 12-item survey assessing current RMB utilization, patient- and tumor-specific factors, adverse events, impact on management, and simulated patient scenarios was distributed. Responses are reported using descriptive statistics.Many responders (n = 54) indicated using RMB in less than 25% of cT1a (59%) and cT1b (85%) tumors. The most important patient-specific factors on the decision to recommend RMB were possible metastasis to the kidney (94%), patient comorbidity as a risk factor for active treatment (89%), and patient age (81%). The most important tumor-specific factors were the presence of bilateral tumors (81%), tumor size (70%) and perceived potential of performing nephron-sparing surgery (67%). Ten responders (19%) noted barriers to RMB in their practice, 23 (43%) recalled experiences with complications or poor outcomes, and 43 (80%) reported experiences where the results of RMB altered management. When presented with simulated patients, few urologists (9%-20%) recommended RMB in younger patients with any sized mass. Recommendations varied based on patient age, comorbidity, and tumor size.Understanding perspectives on RMB usage is essential prior to implementing quality improvement efforts. Most urologists participating in two statewide collaboratives infrequently recommend RMB. Optimizing RMB utilization may help reduce unnecessary treatments.

The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) was challenged by the results of the CARMENA trial. Here we evaluate the role of CN in mRCC patients, including those receiving modern therapies.We included patients with synchronous mRCC between 2011-2020 from the de-identified nationwide Flatiron Health database. We evaluated 3 groups: systemic therapy alone, CN followed by systemic therapy (up-front CN [uCN]) and systemic therapy followed by CN (deferred CN [dCN]). The primary outcome was median overall survival (mOS) in patients receiving systemic therapy alone vs uCN. Secondary outcome was overall survival in patients receiving uCN vs dCN. First-treatment, landmark and time-varying covariate analyses were conducted to overcome immortal time bias. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to assess the effect of therapy on survival.Of 1,910 patients with mRCC, 972 (57%) received systemic therapy, 605 (32%) received uCN, 142 (8%) dCN and 191 (10%) CN alone; 433 (23%) patients received immunotherapy-based therapy. The adjusted mOS was significantly improved in first-treatment, landmark and time-varying covariate analysis (mOS 26.6 vs 14.6 months, 36.3 vs 21.1 months and 26.1 vs 12.2 months, respectively) in patients undergoing CN. Among patients receiving CN and systemic therapy, the timing of systemic therapy relative to CN was not significantly related to overall survival (HR=1.0, 95% CI 0.76-1.32, p=0.99).Our findings support an oncologic role for CN in select mRCC patients. In patients receiving both CN and systemic therapy, the survival benefit compared to systemic alone was similar for up-front and deferred CN.

PDF file - 4006K, Myeloid cell gating strategy. The myeloid cell gating strategy used in these experiments is shown with representative data from a healthy control donor. A. Forward scatter area and height were used to exclude aggregates and clusters of cells. B. Dead cells were excluded by propidium iodode staining. C. CD45+ Leukocytes were divided into lymphocyte and myeloid gates based on side scatter. D. T cells and NK cells were excluded from the myeloid cell analysis by CD3 and CD56 expression. E. Cells that express neither CD14 nor CD16 were excluded from the myeloid analysis (mostly B cells at this point in the gating). F. Myeloid cells were sub-gated into Classical Monocytes (CD14bright CD16-), Intermediate Monocytes (CD14bright CD16dim), Non-classical Monocytes (CD14dim CD16dim), CD14bright CD16bright myeloid cells, and Neutrophils (CD14dim CD16bright). Note that most of the neutrophils were removed along with the erythrocytes during gradient centrifugation on Lympoprep).

PDF file - 471K, Correlation between PD-1 expression and CD69 expression on T cells in pre-operative blood samples. Correlation of PD-1 expression on T cells (x-axis) to CD69 expression T cells (y-axis) is shown. A vertical line marks the median PD-1 expression on and the median CD69 expression is marked by a horizontal line. Statistical significance was calculated by a Spearman correlation. A least squares linear fit is shown as a thick black line.

PDF file - 5296K, Lymphocyte gating strategy. A. Leukocytes were gated as described in Supplemental Figure 1. B. T Cells were identified as CD3+ lymphocytes and NK cells as (CD3- CD56+) lymphocytes. C. T cells were sub-divided by CD4 and CD8 expression. D. CD8+ T cells were divided into subsets of Naive (CD45RA+ CD62L+), Effector (CD45RA+ CD62L-), Central Memory (CD45RA- CD62L+), and Effector Memory (CD45RA- CD62L-). E. CD4+ T Cells were sub-divided as for CD8+ T cells. F. B cells were identified as CD19+ lymphocytes. G. NK Cells were further divided into CD56bright and CD56dim phenotypes. H. B Cells were sub-divided into Naive (CD20+ CD27-), Memory (CD20+ CD27+), and plasmacytoid (CD20- CD27+). Fully differentiated plasma cells fall outside these gates because they are CD45-.

PDF file - 3477K, Effect of surgery on cellular activation markers. Pre-surgical (time point zero) and post-surgical (at designated weeks after surgery) measurements on the same patients are connected by a line and the statistical significance is calculated by a paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Data points from stage 4 patients are marked with black filled diamonds and the data from the single stage 3 patient is shown in grey. Sub-panels are as follows: A) CD69 on T Cells (CD3+ CD45+ CD56-), B) Perforin in CD8+ T Cells, C) Granzyme B in CD8+ T Cells, D) Perforin in CD4+ T Cells, E) Granzyme B in CD56dim NK Cells, F) Perforin in CD56dim NK Cells.

PDF file - 79K, Supplemental Table S1. Donor Characteristics. Supplemental Table S2. Antibody staining panel. Supplemental Table S3. Specific immune parameters analyzed.

Programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor is an inhibitory receptor on hematopoietic cells that can negatively regulate immune responses, particularly responses to tumors, which often upregulate PD-1 ligands. PD-1/PD-1 ligand blocking antibodies can reverse the inhibition and show significant therapeutic promise in treating renal cell carcinoma (RCC), lung cancer, and melanoma. While PD-1 expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes has been associated with poor outcome in RCC, we sought to define immune cell biomarkers, including PD-1, on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) that could predict disease progression of RCC patients before and after nephrectomy. We analyzed expression of numerous immune cell markers on fresh PBMCs from 90 RCC patients preoperatively and 25 age-matched healthy controls by 10-color flow cytometry. Postoperative blood samples were also analyzed from 23 members of the RCC patient cohort. The most striking phenotypic immune biomarker in RCC patients was a significant increase in PD-1 expression on certain PBMCs in a subset of patients. Increased PD-1 expression on CD14bright myelomonocytic cells, effector T cells, and natural killer (NK) cells correlated to disease stage, and expression was significantly reduced on all cell types soon after surgical resection of the primary tumor. The results indicate that PD-1 expression on fresh peripheral blood leukocytes may provide a useful indicator of RCC disease progression. Furthermore, measuring PD-1 levels in peripheral blood may assist in identifying patients likely to respond to PD-1 blocking antibodies, and these therapies may be most effective before and immediately after surgical resection of the primary tumor, when PD-1 expression is most prominent. Cancer Immunol Res; 2(4); 320–31. ©2013 AACR.

subsequent standard of care treaments

Consort diagram

supplementary figure 1 legend

PDF file - 95K

Purpose: Sunitinib and sorafenib are used widely in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These agents are associated with a significant incidence of cardiovascular (CV) dysfunction and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) declines, observed largely in the metastatic setting. However, in the adjuvant population, the CV effects of these agents remain unknown. We prospectively defined the incidence of cardiotoxicity among resected, high-risk RCC patients treated with these agents.Experimental Design: Sunitinib, sorafenib, or placebo was administered for up to 12 months in patients with high-risk, resected RCC. LVEF was measured by multigated acquisition (MUGA) scans at standard intervals. Additional CV adverse events were reported according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).Results: Among 1,943 patients randomized, 1,599 had at least 1 post-baseline MUGA. Within 6 months, 21 patients (1.3%) experienced a cardiac event, defined as an LVEF decline from baseline that was >15% and below the institutional lower limit of normal. Nine of 513 patients (1.8%) were on sunitinib, 7 of 508 (1.4%) on sorafenib, and 5 of 578 (0.9%) on placebo (P = 0.28 and 0.56 comparing sunitinib and sorafenib to placebo, respectively). With dose interruption or adjustment, 16 of the 21 recovered their LVEF to >50%. The incidence of symptomatic heart failure, arrhythmia, or myocardial ischemia did not differ among groups.Conclusions: In the adjuvant setting, we prospectively define low incidence of cardiotoxicity with sunitinib and sorafenib. These findings may be related to close CV monitoring, or potentially to fewer CV comorbidities in our nonmetastatic population. Clin Cancer Res; 21(18); 4048–54. ©2015 AACR.

Purpose:The use of VEGFR TKIs for the adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial. We investigated the effects of adjuvant VEGFR TKIs on circulating cytokines in the ECOG-ACRIN 2805 (ASSURE) trial.Experimental Design:Patients with resected high-risk RCC were randomized to sunitinib, sorafenib, or placebo. Plasma from 413 patients was analyzed from post-nephrectomy baseline, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks after treatment initiation. Mixed effects and Cox proportional hazards models were used to test for changes in circulating cytokines and associations between disease-free survival (DFS) and cytokine levels.Results:VEGF and PlGF increased after 4 weeks on sunitinib or sorafenib (P < 0.0001 for both) and returned to baseline at 6 weeks on sunitinib (corresponding to the break in the sunitinib schedule) but not sorafenib (which was administered continuously). sFLT-1 decreased after 4 weeks on sunitinib and 6 weeks on sorafenib (P < 0.0001). sVEGFR-2 decreased after both 4 and 6 weeks of treatment on sunitinib or sorafenib (P < 0.0001). Patients receiving placebo had no significant changes in cytokine levels. CXCL10 was elevated at 4 and 6 weeks on sunitinib and sorafenib but not on placebo. Higher baseline CXCL10 was associated with worse DFS (HR 1.41 per log increase in CXCL10, Bonferroni-adjusted P = 0.003). This remained significant after adjustment for T-stage, Fuhrman grade, and ECOG performance status.Conclusions:Among patients treated with adjuvant VEGFR TKIs for RCC, drug–host interactions mediate changes in circulating cytokines. Elevated baseline CXCL10 was associated with worse DFS. Studies to understand functional consequences of these changes are under way.

Supplementary Figure: Consort diagram of patients participating in cardiac sub study

Distribution of baseline KIM-1 values

Purpose:No circulating biomarkers are currently available to identify patients at highest risk of recurrence after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) is overexpressed in RCC and its ectodomain circulates in plasma. We investigated whether plasma KIM-1 is a prognostic biomarker in patients with localized RCC after nephrectomy.Experimental Design:The ECOG-ACRIN E2805 (ASSURE) trial evaluated adjuvant sunitinib, sorafenib, or placebo in resected high-risk RCC. KIM-1 levels were measured from banked plasma at trial enrollment 4–12 weeks after nephrectomy. Lognormal accelerated failure time models were used to test for association between KIM-1 and disease-free survival (DFS) as well as overall survival (OS).Results:Plasma from 418 patients was analyzed. Higher post-nephrectomy KIM-1 was associated with worse DFS across all study arms after adjustment for Fuhrman grade, T stage, N stage, and tumor histology [survival time ratio 0.56 for 75th vs. 25th percentile of KIM-1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42–0.73; P < 0.001]. The association between KIM-1 and DFS was stronger among patients with pathologic nodal involvement (Pinteraction = 0.0086). The addition of post-nephrectomy KIM-1 improved the concordance of clinical prognostic models [Stage, Size, Grade, and Necrosis (SSIGN) concordance 0.57 vs. 0.43, P = 0.05; UCLA International Staging System (UISS) concordance 0.60 vs. 0.40, P = 0.0005]. Higher post-nephrectomy KIM-1 was also associated with worse OS after multivariable adjustment (survival time ratio 0.71 for 75th vs. 25th percentile of KIM-1; 95% CI, 0.56–0.91; P < 0.001).Conclusions:Post-nephrectomy plasma KIM-1 is associated with DFS and OS in RCC, and may be a biomarker for microscopic residual disease.

Background: Men with familial prostate cancer and African American men are at risk for developing prostate cancer at younger ages. Genetic markers predicting early-onset prostate cancer may provide clinically useful information to guide screening strategies for high-risk men. We evaluated clinical information from six polymorphisms associated with early-onset prostate cancer in a longitudinal cohort of high-risk men enrolled in prostate cancer early detection with significant African American participation.Methods: Eligibility criteria include ages 35 to 69 with a family history of prostate cancer or African American race. Participants undergo screening and biopsy per study criteria. Six markers associated with early-onset prostate cancer [rs2171492 (7q32), rs6983561 (8q24), rs10993994 (10q11), rs4430796 (17q12), rs1799950 (17q21), and rs266849 (19q13)] were genotyped. Cox models were used to evaluate time to prostate cancer diagnosis and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) prediction for prostate cancer by genotype. Harrell's concordance index was used to evaluate predictive accuracy for prostate cancer by PSA and genetic markers.Results: Four hundred and sixty participants with complete data and ≥1 follow-up visit were included. Fifty-six percent were African American. Among African American men, rs6983561 genotype was significantly associated with earlier time to prostate cancer diagnosis (P = 0.005) and influenced prediction for prostate cancer by the PSA (P < 0.001). When combined with PSA, rs6983561 improved predictive accuracy for prostate cancer compared with PSA alone among African American men (PSA = 0.57 vs. PSA + rs6983561 = 0.75, P = 0.03).Conclusions: Early-onset marker rs6983561 adds potentially useful clinical information for African American men undergoing prostate cancer risk assessment. Further study is warranted to validate these findings.Impact: Genetic markers of early-onset prostate cancer have potential to refine and personalize prostate cancer early detection for high-risk men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(1); 53–60. ©2011 AACR.

Supplemental Table 1: Catalog numbers for MSD assays Supplemental Figure 1: Hazard ratio for CXCL10 and DFS by treatment arm Supplemental Figure 2: Assessment of log-linearity for relationship between IP-10 and recurrence risk Supplemental Table 2: Median changes in cytokines at weeks 4 and 6 Supplemental Table 3: Relationship between on-treatment cytokine levels and DFS Supplemental Table 4: Subset analysis for cytokine changes among patients who did not recur Supplemental Table 5: Evaluation for interaction effects between treatment arm and the association between baseline CXCL10 and DFS

Purpose:Rocapuldencel-T is an autologous immunotherapy prepared from mature monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC), coelectroporated with amplified tumor RNA plus CD40L RNA. This pivotal phase III trial was initiated to investigate the safety and efficacy of a combination therapy dosing regimen of Rocapuldencel-T plus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).Patients and Methods:Patients received either Rocapuldencel-T plus standard of care (SOC) or SOC treatment alone. The primary objective compared overall survival (OS) between groups. Secondary objectives included safety assessments, progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor responses based on RECIST 1.1 criteria. Exploratory analyses included immunologic assessments and correlates with OS.Results:Between 2013 and 2016, 462 patients were randomized 2:1, 307 to the combination group and 155 to the SOC group. Median OS in the combination group was 27.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 23.0–35.9] and 32.4 months (95% CI, 22.5–) in the SOC group HR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.83–1.40). PFS was 6.0 months and 7.83 months for the combination and SOC groups, respectively [HR = 1.15 (95% CI, 0.92–1.44)]. The ORR was 42.7% (95% CI, 37.1–48.4) for the combination group and 39.4% (95% CI, 31.6–47.5) for the SOC group. Median follow up was 29 months (0.4–47.7 months). On the basis of the lack of clinical efficacy, the ADAPT trial was terminated on February 17, 2017. Immune responses were detected in 70% of patients treated with Rocapuldencel-T, and the magnitude of the immune response positively correlated with OS. In addition, we report the survival-predictive value of measuring IL-12 produced by the DC vaccine and the observation that high baseline numbers of T regulatory cells are associated with improved outcomes in DC-treated patients, but are associated with poor outcomes in patients receiving SOC treatment. No serious adverse events attributed to the study medication have been reported to date.Conclusions:Rocapuldencel-T did not improve OS in patients treated with combination therapy, although the induced immune response correlated with OS. Moreover, we identified two potential survival-predictive biomarkers for patients receiving DC based immunotherapy, IL-12 produced by the DC vaccine and higher numbers of T regulatory cells present in the peripheral blood of patients with advanced RCC.

Supplementary Tables 1-5, Figures 1-3. Supplemental Table 1: Events per person-year of follow-up Supplemental Table 2: Event rates among patients randomized to sorafenib or sunitinib who started at reduced vs. full dose Supplemental Table 3a. Event rates among patients who did or did not discontinue treatment due to adverse events, and among patients with ECOG PS 0 vs. 1 Supplemental Table 3b: Baseline LVEF and change in LVEF among patients who did or did not discontinue treatment due to adverse events Supplemental Table 4: Relationship among treatment duration, baseline LVEF by MUGA, and probability of an event by any definition Supplemental Table 5: Relationship among treatment duration, baseline LVEF by MUGA, and probability of an event by the definition "Per Protocol Including Other" Supplemental Figure 1: Relationship among baseline LVEF by MUGA, treatment duration, and event status, where event is defined by any of the criteria Supplemental Figure 2: Relationship among baseline LVEF by MUGA, treatment duration, and event status, where event is defined as a decline in LVEF of 16% or more to below the lower limit of normal, or a grade 3 or higher cardiac adverse event Supplemental Figure 3: Algorithm for management of study drug-induced hypertension

ADAPT study group and participating centers

Sensitivity analysis AFT model for DFS with imputation of KIM-1 levels below lower limit of detection (9.1 pg/mL)

Supplementary Legend S1 from Identification of Novel Target Genes by an Epigenetic Reactivation Screen of Renal Cancer

Aberrant promoter hypermethylation is a common mechanism for inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in cancer cells. To generate a global profile of genes silenced by hypermethylation in renal cell cancer (RCC), we did an expression microarray-based analysis of genes reactivated in the 786-0, ACHN, HRC51, and HRC59 RCC lines after treatment with the demethylating drug 5-aza-2 deoxycytidine and histone deacetylation inhibiting drug trichostatin A. Between 111 to 170 genes were found to have at least 3-fold up-regulation of expression after treatment in each cell line. To establish the specificity of the screen for identification of genes, epigenetically silenced in cancer cells, we validated a subset of 12 up-regulated genes. Three genes (IGFBP1, IGFBP3, and COL1A1) showed promoter methylation in tumor DNA but were unmethylated in normal cell DNA. One gene (GDF15) was methylated in normal cells but more densely methylated in tumor cells. One gene (PLAU) showed cancer cell–specific methylation that did not correlate well with expression status. The remaining seven genes had unmethylated promoters, although at least one of these genes (TGM2) may be regulated by RASSF1A, which was methylated in the RCC lines. Thus, we were able to show that up-regulation of at least 6 of the 12 genes examined was due to epigenetic reactivation. The IGFBP1, IGFBP3, and COL1A1 gene promoter regions were found to be frequently methylated in primary renal cell tumors, and further study will provide insight into the biology of the disease and facilitate translational studies in renal cancer. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(10): 5021-8)

Supplementary Figure S1 from Identification of Novel Target Genes by an Epigenetic Reactivation Screen of Renal Cancer

Background: Most safety and efficacy trials of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines excluded patients with cancer, yet these patients are more likely than healthy individuals to contract SARS-CoV-2 and more likely to become seriously ill after infection. Our objective was to record short-term adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine in patients with cancer, to compare the magnitude and duration of these reactions with those of patients without cancer, and to determine whether adverse reactions are related to active cancer therapy. Patients and Methods: A prospective, single-institution observational study was performed at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. All study participants received 2 doses of the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine separated by approximately 3 weeks. A report of adverse reactions to dose 1 of the vaccine was completed upon return to the clinic for dose 2. Participants completed an identical survey either online or by telephone 2 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Results: The cohort of 1,753 patients included 67.5% who had a history of cancer and 12.0% who were receiving active cancer treatment. Local pain at the injection site was the most frequently reported symptom for all respondents and did not distinguish patients with cancer from those without cancer after either dose 1 (39.3% vs 43.9%; P=.07) or dose 2 (42.5% vs 40.3%; P=.45). Among patients with cancer, those receiving active treatment were less likely to report pain at the injection site after dose 1 compared with those not receiving active treatment (30.0% vs 41.4%; P=.002). The onset and duration of adverse events was otherwise unrelated to active cancer treatment. Conclusions: When patients with cancer were compared with those without cancer, few differences in reported adverse events were noted. Active cancer treatment had little impact on adverse event profiles.

Background Postoperative renal function impairment represents a main limitation for delivering adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Objective To create a model predicting renal function decline after minimally invasive RNU. Design, setting, and participants A total of 490 patients with nonmetastatic UTUC who underwent minimally invasive RNU were identified from a collaborative database including 17 institutions worldwide (February 2006 to March 2020). Renal function insufficiency for cisplatin-based regimen was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 361) were geographically divided into a training set (n = 226) and an independent external validation set (n = 135) for further analysis. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Using transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines, a nomogram to predict postoperative eGFR Results and limitations The model that incorporated age, body mass index, preoperative eGFR, and hydroureteronephrosis was developed with an area under the curve of 0.771, which was confirmed to be 0.773 in the external validation set. The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement. Besides, the model was converted into a risk score with a cutoff value of 0.583, and the difference between the low- and high-risk groups both in overall death risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.59, p Conclusions A nomogram incorporating immediately available clinical variables can accurately predict renal insufficiency for cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy after minimally invasive RNU and may serve as a tool facilitating patient selection. Patient summary We have developed a model for the prediction of renal function loss after radical nephroureterectomy to facilitate patient selection for perioperative chemotherapy.

Introduction:The COVID-19 pandemic starkly affected all aspects of health care, forcing many to divert resources towards emergent patient needs while decreasing emphasis on routine cancer c...

Since the early 1940s, androgen ablation has been the cornerstone of treatment for prostate cancer (PC). Importantly, androgen receptor (AR) signaling is vital not only for the initiation of PC, which is initially androgen-dependent, but also for castration-resistant disease. Recent studies demonstrated clear promise of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) inhibitors for targeting prostate cancer cells harboring mutations in DNA damage-repair genes. In addition, it has been established that PARP-1 inhibition suppresses growth of AR-positive prostate cancer cells in cell and animal models. Thus, prostate cancer represents a particularly promising disease site for targeting PARP-1, given that both DNA repair and AR-mediated transcription depend on PARP-1 function. Here, we describe the development and use of cell-based assay to evaluate the impact of PARP-1 inhibitors on the AR signaling in prostate cancer cells.

To determine if limiting the doses delivered to the penile bulb (PB) and corporal bodies (CB) with IMRT preserves erectile function compared to standard IMRT in men with prostate cancer.117 patients with low-intermediate risk, clinical T1a-T2c prostate adenocarcinoma were enrolled to a single-institution, prospective, single blind, phase III randomized trial. All received definitive IMRT to 74-80 Gy in 37-40 fractions and standard IMRT (s-IMRT) or erectile tissue sparing IMRT (ETS-IMRT), which placed additional planning constraints that limited the D90 to the PB and CB to ≤ 15 Gy and ≤ 7 Gy, respectively. Erectile potency was assessed with components of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and PDE5 medication records.62 patients received ETS-IMRT and 54 received s-IMRT; 1 patient did not receive radiation therapy. Prior to treatment, all patients reported erectile potency. No patients received androgen deprivation therapy. In the intention-to-treat analysis, treatment arms did not differ in potency preservation at 24 months (37.1% ETS-IMRT vs 31.5% s-IMRT, p=0.53). Of 85 evaluable patients with IIEF and PDE5 medication follow-up, erectile potency was seen in 47.9% of patients in the ETS-IMRT arm and 46.0% of patients in the s-IMRT arm (p=0.86). PDE5 inhibitors were initiated in 41.7% of ETS-IMRT patients and 35.1% of s-IMRT patients (p=0.54). Among all patients enrolled, there was no difference in freedom from biochemical failure between those treated with ETS-IMRT and s-IMRT (5-yr 91.8% vs 90.7%, respectively, p=0.77) with a median follow-up of 7.4 years. There were no differences in acute or late GI or GU toxicity. An unplanned per-protocol analysis demonstrated no differences in potency preservation or secondary endpoints between patients who exceeded erectile tissue-sparing constraints and those who met constraints, though power was limited by attrition and unplanned dosimetric crossover.Erectile tissue sparing IMRT that strictly limits dose to the penile bulb and corporal bodies is safe and feasible. Use of this planning technique did not show an effect on potency preservation outcomes at 2 years, though power to detect a difference was limited.

To investigate the difference in renal function outcomes for patients with oncocytomas undergoing active surveillance (AS) vs. partial nephrectomy (PN).We reviewed our institutional database for patients with biopsy/surgically confirmed oncocytoma from 2000-2020. The primary outcome was to assess for differences in renal function outcomes in patients undergoing AS vs. PN. We fit two generalized estimating equation (GEE) with an interaction term between follow up time and management strategy to predict 1) mean eGFR for patients managed with AS and PN and 2) the probability of progression to CKD stage III or greater.We identified 114 eligible patients, of which 32 were managed with AS. Median follow-up was 21 months vs. 44 months for PN vs. AS patients. AS patients tended to be older (median: 72 years vs. 65 years, P0.001) and have lower baseline renal function (median: eGFR: 71 mL/min/1.73mIn our institutional dataset, patients undergoing AS or PN with an oncocytoma had similar long-term renal function outcomes. Given similar renal function outcomes in patients undergoing AS and PN, surgery should remain reserved for select patients with oncocytomas.

The benefit of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) is not yet supported by randomized controlled trials in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but the evidence is increasing. This narrative systematic review was conducted to evaluate the available evidence on the role of NAST in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC.We searched for all relevant articles or conference abstracts published and indexed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus on July 19, 2021. The study was reported according to the PRISMA criteria and designed within the PICOS framework. We included studies comparing patients with non-metastatic UTUC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or immunotherapy (NAI) with patients who underwent definitive surgery alone or surgery plus adjuvant systemic therapy. Prospective uncontrolled studies were also included.We identified 27 reports (NAC, N.=24 and NAI, N.=3) published between 2010 and 2021. Twenty of the 24 studies on NAC were retrospective comparative analyses, whereas the remaining four were prospective single-arm studies. One of the three NAI studies exclusively enrolled patients with UTUC. NAC was associated with improved survival and better pathological response relative to surgery alone, but there was no clear advantage when compared to surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, the drug-induced toxicity and risk of disease progression were acceptable but the inherent bias across study designs, inadequate reporting and heterogeneous definition of primary outcomes render it difficult to synthesize results, compare centers, and inform practice.The current level of evidence supporting NAST for UTUC is relatively low and the inability to predict responsiveness and thereby pinpoint the optimal candidates remains a major challenge. There is a need to compare NAST to adjuvant therapies using clearly defined primary endpoints as minimum reporting standards developed by a multidisciplinary team.

We sought to evaluate outcomes of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis utilizing the ROBUUST (for RObotic surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer Study) registry for patients who did not undergo LND (pNx), LND with negative lymph nodes (pN0) and LND with positive nodes (pN+). Primary and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Multivariable analyses evaluated predictors of outcomes and pathological node positivity. Kaplan-Meier analyses (KMAs) compared survival outcomes.A total of 877 patients were analyzed (LND performed in 358 [40.8%]/pN+ in 73 [8.3%]). Median nodes obtained were 10.2 for pN+ and 9.8 for pN0. Multivariable analyses noted increasing age (OR 1.1, p0.001), pN+ (OR 3.1, p0.001) and pathological stage pTis/3/4 (OR 3.4, p0.001) as predictors for all-cause mortality. Clinical high-grade tumors (OR 11.74, p=0.015) and increasing tumor size (OR 1.14, p=0.001) were predictive for lymph node positivity. KMAs for pNx, pN0 and pN+ demonstrated 2-year OS of 80%, 86% and 42% (p0.001) and 2-year RFS of 53%, 61% and 35% (p0.001), respectively. KMAs comparing pNx, pN0 ≥10 nodes and pN010 nodes showed no significant difference in 2-year OS (82% vs 85% vs 84%, p=0.6) but elicited significantly higher 2-year RFS in the pN0 ≥10 group (60% vs 74% vs 54%, p=0.043).LND during nephroureterectomy in patients with positive lymph nodes provides prognostic data, but is not associated with improved OS. LND yields ≥10 in patients with clinical node negative disease were associated with improved RFS. In high-grade and large tumors, lymphadenectomy should be considered.

Autologous dendritic-cell vaccine therapy combined with systemic therapy may be of benefit in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy according to results from the large ADAPT trial. Combined retrospective analysis and correlative immunology research revealed that patients receiving everolimus may have derived a greater benefit. The currently enrolling phase 2 CoImmune trial is designed to test this hypothesis in patients undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy and systemic therapy.

Background Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) represents the standard of care for high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Open and laparoscopic approaches are well-established treatments, but evidence regarding robotic RANU is growing. The introduction of the Xi® system facilitates the implementation of this multi-quadrant procedure. The aim of this video-article is to describe the surgical steps and the outcomes of Xi® robotic RNU. Methods Single stage Xi® robotic RNU without patients repositioning and robot re-docking were done between 2015 and 2019 and collected in a large worldwide multi-institutional study, the ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer STudy (ROBUUST). Institutional review board approval and data share agreement were obtained at each center. Surgical technique is described in detail in the accompanying video. Descriptive statistics of baseline characteristics and surgical, pathological, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. RESULTSː Overall, 148 patients were included in the analysis; 14% had an ECOG >1 and 68.2% ASA ≥3. Median tumor dimension was 3.0 (IQR:2.0-4.2) cm and 34.5% showed hydronephrosis at diagnosis. Forty-eight% were cT1 tumors. Bladder cuff excision and lymph node dissection were performed in 96% and 38.1% of the procedures, respectively. Median operative time and estimated blood loss were 215.5 (IQR:160.5-290.0) minutes and 100.0 (IQR: 50.0-150.0) mL, respectively. Approximately 56% of patients took opioids during hospital stay for a total morphine equivalent dose of 22.9 (IQR:16.0-60.0) milligrams equivalent. Postoperative complications were 26 (17.7%), with 4 major (15.4%). Seven patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, with median number of cycles of 4.0 (IQR:3.0-6.0). Conclusions Single stage Xi® RNU is a reproducible and safe minimally invasive procedure for treatment of UTUC. Additional potential advantages of the robot might be a wider implementation of LND with a minimally invasive approach.

To investigate the association of surgical approach with outcomes in patients with adrenocortical carcinomas smaller and larger than 6 cm in size.We reviewed the national cancer database for patients undergoing minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) and open adrenalectomy (OA) from 2010 to 2017. To adjust for differences between patients undergoing MIA and OA, we performed propensity score matching within each size strata of ≤6 cm, 6.1 to 10 cm, and 10.1 to 20 cm. We fit generalized estmiating equations with a logit link function to assess for the association of surgical approach with positive surgical margins and a Cox proportional hazards model to assess for the association of surgical approach with overall survival.We identified 364 patients that underwent MIA (182) and OA (182) in the matched cohort. We noted 21% and 18% of patients undergoing MIA and OA had a positive surgical margin, respectively. We did not identify a significant association between surgical approach and positive surgical margins in the cohort as a whole or within each of strata. Furthermore, we did not appreciate a significant association between surgical approach and overall survival in the cohort as a whole or within each size strata.In the National Cancer Database, patients undergoing MIA had similar positive surgical margins and overall survival compared with OA for masses ≤6 cm, 6.1 to 10cm, and10 cm in size. Patients undergoing MIA should be carefully selected with surgical oncologic integrity being the primary determinants of surgical approach.

Item does not contain fulltext INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the outcomes of open vs robotic partial nephrectomy (PN), focusing on predictors of Trifecta failure in patients with highly complex renal masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We queried the prospectively collected database from the SIB International Consortium, including 507 consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal masses treated at 16 high-volume referral centres, to select those with highly complex (PADUA score ≥10) tumors undergoing PN. RT was classified as enucleation, enucleoresection or resection according to the SIB score. Trifecta was defined as achievement of negative surgical margins, no acute kidney injury and no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 postoperative surgical complications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of Trifecta failure. RESULTS: 113 patients were included. Patients undergoing open PN (n = 47, 41.6%) and robotic PN (n = 66, 58.4%) were comparable in baseline characteristics. RT was classified as enucleation, enucleoresection and resection in 46.9%, 34.0% and 19.1% of open PN, and in 50.0%, 40.9% and 9.1% of robotic PN (p = 0.28). Trifecta was achieved in significantly more patients after robotic PN (69.7% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, surgical approach (open vs robotic, OR: 2.62; 95%CI: 1.11-6.15, p = 0.027) and tumor complexity (OR for each additional unit of the PADUA score: 2.27; 95%CI: 1.27-4.06, p = 0.006) were significant predictors of Trifecta failure, while RT was not. The study is limited by lack of randomization; as such, selection bias and confounding cannot be entirely ruled out. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor complexity and surgical approach were independent predictors of Trifecta failure after PN for highly complex renal masses.

Background: To explore predictors of positive surgical margins (PSM) after robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) in a large multicenter international observational project, harnessing the Surface-Intermediate-Base (SIB) margin score to report the resection technique after PN in a standardized way. Methods: Data from consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal masses treated with PN from September 2014 to March 2015 at 16 tertiary referral centers and included in the SIB margin score International Consortium were prospectively collected. For the present study, only patients treated with robotic PN were included. Uni- and multivariable analysis were fitted to explore clinical and surgical predictors of PSMs after PN. Results: Overall, 289 patients were enrolled. Median (IQR) preoperative tumor size was 3.0 (2.3–4.2) cm and median (IQR) PADUA score was 8 (7–9). SIB scores of 0–2 (enucleation), 3–4 (enucleoresection) and 5 (resection) were reported in 53.3%, 27.3% and 19.4% of cases, respectively. A PSM was recorded in 18 (6.2%) patients. PSM rate was 4.5%, 11.4% and 3.6% in case of enucleation, enucleoresection and resection, respectively. Patients with PSMs had tumors with a higher rate of contact with the urinary collecting system (55.6% vs. 27.3%; p < 0.001) and a longer median warm ischemia time (22 vs. 16 min; p = 0.02) compared with patients with negative surgical margins, while no differences emerged between the two groups in terms of other tumor features (i.e., pathological diameter, PADUA score). In multivariable analysis, only enucleoresection (SIB score 3–4) versus enucleation (SIB score 0–2) was found to be an independent predictor of PSM at final pathology (HR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.25–7.63; p = 0.04), while resection (SIB score 5) was not. Conclusions: In our experience, enucleoresection led to a higher risk of PSMs as compared to enucleation. Further studies are needed to assess the differential impacts of resection technique and surgeon’s experience on margin status after robotic PN.