Search

Abstract In Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models, such as the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, parameter uncertainty in physics parameterization schemes significantly impacts model output. Our study adopts a Bayesian probabilistic approach, building on prior research that identified temperature (T) and relative humidity (Rh) as sensitive to three key WRF parameters during southeast Australia's extreme heat events. Using Gaussian process regression‐based Bayesian Optimisation (G‐BO), we accurately estimated the optimal distributions for these parameters. Results show that the default values are outside their corresponding optimal distribution bounds for two of the three parameters, suggesting the need to reconsider these default values. Additionally, the robustness of the optimal parameter distributions is validated by their application to an independent extreme heat event, not included in the optimisation process. In this test, the optimized parameters substantially improved the simulation of T and Rh, highlighting their effectiveness in enhancing simulation accuracy during extreme heat conditions.

Abstract A large stretch of the east coast of Australia experienced unprecedented rainfall and flooding over a two‐week period in early 2022. It is difficult to reliably estimate the likelihood of such a rare event from the relatively short observational record, so an alternative is to use data from an ensemble prediction system (e.g., a seasonal or decadal forecast system) to obtain a much larger sample of simulated weather events. This so‐called ‘UNSEEN’ method has been successfully applied in several scientific studies, but those studies typically rely on a single prediction system. In this study, we use data from the Decadal Climate Prediction Project to explore the model uncertainty associated with the UNSEEN method by assessing 10 different hindcast ensembles. Using the 15‐day rainfall total averaged over the river catchments impacted by the 2022 east coast event, we find that the models produce a wide range of likelihood estimates. Even after excluding a number of models that fail basic fidelity tests, estimates of the event return period ranged from 320 to 1814 years. The vast majority of models suggested the event is rarer than a standard extreme value assessment of the observational record (297 years). Such large model uncertainty suggests that multi‐model analysis should become part of the standard UNSEEN procedure.

Extreme event attribution (EEA) information is increasingly in demand from climate services. EEA messages can: raise awareness about the effect climate change has already imposed, inform climate change liability conversations, and be combined with climate projections to inform adaptation. However, due to limitations in observations, models and methods, there are barriers towards operationalising EEA in practice. Operational services will need EEA to be done transparently and using preset formats. Here we review recent experience and practice in EEA in Australia and New Zealand with a view to inform the design of an EEA component of climate services. We present a flow chart of the processes involved, noting particular care is needed on the trigger, event definition, and climate model evaluation, with effective stage gates. We also promote the use of tailored causal network diagrams as a standard tool to inform an EEA study and communicate results, with particular care needed for messages on events with lower confidence or complex sets of influences, including tropical cyclones and extratropical cyclones. We suggest that extending EEA to impact attribution is essential for making EEA messages salient but requires an uplift in forming interdisciplinary teams and in granular exposure and vulnerability datasets and is likely to raise new interdisciplinary methodological questions. Finally, we suggest communication of EEA messages can learn more from its origins in medical epidemiology.

Coarse spatial resolution in gridded precipitation datasets, reanalysis, and climate model outputs restricts their ability to characterize the localized extreme rain events and limits the use of the coarse resolution information for local to regional scale climate management strategies. Deep learning models have recently been developed to rapidly downscale the coarse resolution precipitation to the high local scale resolution at a much lower cost than dynamic downscaling. However, these existing super-resolution deep learning modeling studies have not rigorously evaluated the model’s skill in producing fine-scale spatial variability, particularly over topographic features. These current deep-learning models also have difficulty predicting the complex spatial structure of extreme events. Here, we develop a model based on super-resolution deconvolution neural network (SRDN) to downscale the hourly precipitation and evaluate the predictions. We apply three versions of the SRDN model: (a) SRDN (no orography), (b) SRDN-O (orography only at final resolution enhancement), and (c) SRDN-SO (orography at each step of resolution enhancement). We assess the ability of SRDN-based models to reproduce the fine-scale spatial variability and compare it with the previously used deep learning model (DeepSD). All the models are trained and tested using the Conformal Cubic Atmospheric Model (CCAM) data to perform a 100 to 12.5 km of hourly precipitation downscaling over the Australian region. We found that SRDN-based models, including orography, deliver better fine-scale spatial structures of both climatology and extremes, and significantly improved the deep-learning downscaling. The SRDN-SO model performs well both qualitatively and quantitatively in reconstructing the fine-scale spatial variability of climatology and rainfall extremes over complex orographic regions.

The physical and socioeconomic environments in which we live are intrinsically linked over a wide range of time and space scales. On monthly intervals, the price of many commodities produced predominantly in tropical regions covary with the dominant mode of climate variability in this region, namely the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Here, for the spot prices returns of vegetable oils produced in Asia, we develop autoregressive (AR) models with exogenous ENSO indices, where for the first time these indices are generated by a purpose-built state-of-the-art general circulation model (GCM) climate forecasting system. The GCM is a numerical simulation which couples together the atmosphere, ocean, and sea ice, with the initial conditions tailored to maximize the climate forecast skill at multiyear timescales in the tropics. To serve as additional benchmarks, we also test commodity forecasts using: (a) no ENSO information as a lower bound; (b) perfect future ENSO knowledge as a reference upper bound; and (c) an econometric AR model of ENSO. All models adopting ENSO factors outperform those that do not, indicating the value here of incorporating climate knowledge into investment decision-making. Commodity forecasts adopting perfect ENSO factors have statistically significant skill out to 2 years. When adopting the GCM-ENSO factors, there is predictive power of the commodity beyond 1 year in the best case, which consistently outperforms commodity forecasts adopting an AR econometric model of ENSO.

Heatwaves and bushfires cause substantial impacts on society and ecosystems across the globe. Accurate information of heat extremes is needed to support the development of actionable mitigation and adaptation strategies. Regional climate models are commonly used to better understand the dynamics of these events. These models have very large input parameter sets, and the parameters within the physics schemes substantially influence the model’s performance. However, parameter sensitivity analysis (SA) of regional models for heat extremes is largely unexplored. Here, we focus on the southeast Australian region, one of the global hotspots of heat extremes. In southeast Australia Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is the widely used regional model to simulate extreme weather events across the region. Hence in this study, we focus on the sensitivity of WRF model parameters to surface meteorological variables such as temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed during two extreme heat events over southeast Australia. Due to the presence of multiple parameters and their complex relationship with output variables, a machine learning (ML) surrogate-based global SA method is considered for the SA. The ML surrogate-based Sobol SA is used to identify the sensitivity of 24 adjustable parameters in seven different physics schemes of the WRF model. Results show that out of these 24, only three parameters, namely the scattering tuning parameter, multiplier of saturated soil water content, and profile shape exponent in the momentum diffusivity coefficient, are important for the considered meteorological variables. These SA results are consistent for the two different extreme heat events. Further, we investigated the physical significance of sensitive parameters. This study’s results will help in further optimising WRF parameters to improve model simulation.