Search

Nations worldwide have committed to restoring millions of hectares of forest as a strategy to mitigate climate change with many other co‐benefits. Paradoxically, the suitability of climatic conditions for the trees being planted at the restoration sites is changing, which may reduce the long‐term viability of these projects. We assessed the potential future viability of trees planted as part of Ecuador's National Reforestation Plan from 2014 to 2017, committed under the global Bonn Challenge. We selected the 10 most frequently planted tree species (all native) in 1237 restoration sites in northwest Ecuador. We modeled the species' climatic suitability at the restoration sites under Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5 using 14 individual general circulation models for the 2030s, 2050s, and 2070s. We combined the 14 suitability models to create continuous climatic suitability models for each species. We then assessed the species suitability against three modeling thresholds simultaneously. Seven of the species showed high and medium climatic viability, all of these species were native to the region of planting. Three species showed low climatic viability; two of these are native to the country but not to the region being restored. Our results also show how using continuous rather than discrete modeling can affect viability assessments. Our study suggests the importance of including climate niche modeling in restoration projects; however, choosing to plant species that are within their native distribution range may be a good strategy in tropical regions if climate niche projections are not available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ecosystem restoration is an important means to address global sustainability challenges. However, scientific and policy discourse often overlooks the social processes that influence the equity and effectiveness of restoration interventions. In the present article, we outline how social processes that are critical to restoration equity and effectiveness can be better incorporated in restoration science and policy. Drawing from existing case studies, we show how projects that align with local people's preferences and are implemented through inclusive governance are more likely to lead to improved social, ecological, and environmental outcomes. To underscore the importance of social considerations in restoration, we overlay existing global restoration priority maps, population, and the Human Development Index (HDI) to show that approximately 1.4 billion people, disproportionately belonging to groups with low HDI, live in areas identified by previous studies as being of high restoration priority. We conclude with five action points for science and policy to promote equity-centered restoration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]