Search

Background: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment for allergic disorders. We have recently discovered that allergen-specific memory B cells (Bmem) are phenotypically altered after 4 months of sublingual AIT for ryegrass pollen allergy. Whether these effects are shared with subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) and affect the epitope specificity of Bmem remain unknown., Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the phenotype and antigen receptor sequences of Bmem specific to the major bee venom (BV) allergen Api m 1 before and after ultra-rush SCIT for BV allergy., Methods: Recombinant Api m 1 protein tetramers were generated to evaluate basophil activation in a cohort of individuals with BV allergy before and after BV SCIT. Comprehensive flow cytometry was performed to evaluate and purify Api m 1-specific Bmem. Immunoglobulin genes from single Api m 1-specific Bmem were sequenced and structurally modeled onto Api m 1., Results: SCIT promoted class switching of Api m 1-specific Bmem to IgG 2 and IgG 4 with increased expression of CD23 and CD29. Furthermore, modeling of Api m 1-specific immunoglobulin from Bmem identified a suite of possible new and diverse allergen epitopes on Api m 1 and highlighted epitopes that may preferentially be bound by immunoglobulin after SCIT., Conclusions: AIT induces shifting of epitope specificity and phenotypic changes in allergen-specific Bmem., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement The studies were supported financially by a Central Clinical School Early Career Fellowship to C.I.M.; a National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant 145303 to P.M.H., R.E.O., and B.D.W.; a National Health and Medical Research CouncilIdeas Grant 2000773 to M.C.v.Z., R.E.O., B.D.W., and M.H.; and an Early Career Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University to A.v.B. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. C. van Zelm, R. E. O’Hehir, and C. I. McKenzie are inventors on a patent application (PCT/AU2023/050439) related to this work. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for grass pollen allergy can modify the natural history of allergic rhinitis and is associated with increased allergen-specific IgG 4 . IgG 4 competitively inhibits functional IgE on the surface of effector cells, such as mast cells and basophils, from binding to allergens. To further understand the important role memory B-cell (Bmem) responses play in mediating the beneficial effects of SLIT, we assessed changes in allergen-specific Bmem subsets induced by SLIT for grass pollen allergy., Methods: Blood samples were collected twice outside the pollen season from twenty-seven patients with sensitization to ryegrass pollen (RGP; Lolium perenne) and seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis. Thirteen received 4-month pre-seasonal SLIT for grass pollen allergy, and 14 received standard pharmacotherapy only. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on FACS-purified Lol p 1-specific Bmem before and after SLIT from four patients, and significant genes were validated by flow cytometry on the total cohort., Results: Four months of SLIT increased RGP-specific IgE and IgG 4 in serum and induced two Lol p 1-specific Bmem subsets with unique transcriptional profiles. Both subsets had upregulated expression of beta 1 integrin ITGB1 (CD29), whereas IGHE (IgE), IGHG4 (IgG 4 ), FCER2 (CD23), and IL13RA1 were upregulated in one subset. There was an increase in the proportion of Lol p 1 + Bmem expressing surface IgG 4 , CD23, and CD29 after SLIT., Conclusions: A clinically successful 4 months course of SLIT for grass pollen allergy induces two transcriptionally unique Bmem fates. Associated changes in surface-expressed proteins on these Bmem subsets can be used as early biomarkers for treatment effects., (© 2022 The Authors. Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The addition of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has the potential to significantly improve outcomes in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. We analysed peripheral blood immune cells of patients receiving combination SABR and ICI to detect the effect of treatment and identify potential biomarkers that predict outcome., Methods: 24 polymetastatic melanoma patients participated in the SABR IMPACT trial, receiving standard dose immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 and/or anti-CTLA-4 and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy to one site. Comprehensive immunophenotyping of T-cells was performed with flow cytometry on blood samples from 13 patients at baseline and following the first 4 cycles of treatment., Results: Following four cycles of immunotherapy and SABR, the proportion of naïve subsets were reduced within both the CD4 and CD8 T-cell lineages. Independently, SABR resulted in increased expression of PD-1 (p = 0.019) and ICOS (p = 0.046) on the CD8+ T-cells, accompanied by a reduction in regulatory T-cell frequencies (p = 0.048). A multivariate discriminant analysis revealed a baseline signature of lower levels of CD8+ naive T-cells and higher expression of TIM-3 on regulatory T-cells and memory T-cells better predicted response., Conclusion: The combination of immunotherapy and SABR changed the immunophenotype of blood T cells, with some shifts attributable to SABR. Importantly, we identified a T-cell signature at baseline that best predicted response. Validation of these findings in an independent cohort could confirm these as biomarkers at baseline or early during treatment, and whether these can be utilised to stratify patients for high or low intensity treatment to reduce toxicity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Immunotherapy for allergy has been practiced for over 100 years. Low-dose repeated exposure to specific allergen extracts over several months to years can successfully induce clinical tolerance in patients with allergy to insect venoms, pollen, house dust mite, and domestic animals. Different regimens and routes for immunotherapy include subcutaneous, sublingual, oral, and intralymphatic. Food allergies have been difficult to treat in this way due to high anaphylactic potential and only recently the first immunotherapy for peanut allergy has received regulatory approval. Several clinical trials have indicated high efficacy in desensitisation of peanut-allergic individuals using oral immunotherapy, which allows for safer administration of relatively high allergen concentrations. Still, the risk of adverse events including serious allergic reactions and high anxiety levels for patients remains, demonstrating the need for further optimisation of treatment protocols. Here we discuss the design and outcomes of recent clinical trials with traditional oral immunotherapy, and consider alternative protocols and formulations for safer and more effective oral treatment strategies for peanut allergy., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Immunology.)