Search

Background: Long-term posttreatment surveillance imaging algorithms for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are not standardized due to debates over optimal surveillance strategy and efficacy. Consequently, current guidelines do not provide long-term surveillance imaging recommendations beyond 6 months., Purpose: We performed a systematic review to evaluate the impact of long-term imaging surveillance (ie, imaging beyond 6 months following completion of treatment) on survival in patients treated definitively for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma., Data Sources: A search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science for English literature published between 2003 and 2024 evaluating the impact of long-term surveillance imaging on survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma., Study Selection: We screened 718 abstracts and performed full-text review for 95 abstracts, with 2 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions assessment tool was used., Data Analysis: A qualitative assessment without a pooled analysis was performed for the 2 studies meeting inclusion criteria., Data Synthesis: No randomized prospective controlled trials were identified. Two retrospective 2-arm studies were included comparing long-term surveillance imaging with clinical surveillance and were each rated as having a moderate risk of bias. Each study included heterogeneous populations with variable risk profiles and imaging surveillance protocols. Both studies investigated the impact of long-term surveillance imaging on overall survival and came to different conclusions, with 1 study reporting a survival benefit for long-term surveillance imaging with FDG-PET/CT in patients with stage III or IV disease or an oropharyngeal primary tumor and the other study demonstrating no survival benefit., Limitations: Limited heterogeneous retrospective data available precludes definitive conclusions on the impact of long-term surveillance imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma., Conclusions: There is insufficient quality evidence regarding the impact of long-term surveillance imaging on survival in patients treated definitively for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. There is a lack of a standardized definition of long-term surveillance, variable surveillance protocols, and inconsistencies in results reporting, underscoring the need for a prospective multicenter registry assessing outcomes., (© 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.)

Objective: To determine the frequency and accuracy of diffusion restriction (DR) of the retina and/or optic nerve (ON) detection on standard brain magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI-MRI) in patients presenting with acute non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO)., Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study that includes all consecutive patients presenting to our tertiary academic center from 2013-2021 with acute non-arteritic CRAO (cases) or acute ischemic stroke syndrome (controls, age and gender-matched) that had brain MRI performed within 14 days from symptom onset. Two neurology residents (junior and senior), a vascular neurologist, and two neuroradiologists, blinded to the site of CRAO, independently reviewed the brain MRIs to assess for the presence of retina and ON DR. The consensus agreement between the two neuroradiologists was used to perform sensitivity and specificity analyses and calculate inter-rater reliability (prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa coefficient)., Results: A total of 128 patients with acute non-arteritic CRAO (mean (SD) age 69 (14) years; 50% female; median time from CRAO to DW-MRI 2 days (IQR 1-5)) and 128 age and gender-matched controls with acute cerebral ischemia were included. After the neuroradiologist consensus, DR was correctly identified in the retina or ON in 51/128 (39.8%) CRAO cases, retina alone 27.3%, ON alone 24.2%, and both retina and ON 11.7%, with almost perfect neuroradiologists' inter-rater reliability for retina (K = 0.91) and ON (K = 0.83). Among controls, the retina DR was identified in 1/128 (0.8%) and ON DR in 5/128 (3.9%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 28.1%, 99.2%, 97.3%, and 58.0% for retina DR, and 27.3%, 96.1%, 87.5%, and 56.9% for ON DR., Conclusions: Though experienced neuroradiologists identified retina and ON DR with excellent inter-rater reliability, these are infrequent findings in real world CRAO practice, with excellent specificity but limited sensitivity. Prospective studies with larger cohort of patients, optimization of standardized orbit DWI-MRI protocols are needed to facilitate a more accurate and reliable identification of retina and ON DR in acute CRAO., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Jaw and maxillofacial bone lesions encompass a wide variety of both neoplastic and non-neoplastic pathologies. These lesions can arise from various tissues, including bone, cartilage, and soft tissue, each presenting distinct challenges in diagnosis and treatment. While some pathologies exhibit characteristic imaging features that aid in diagnosis, many others are nonspecific. This overlap often necessitates a multimodal imaging approach, combining techniques such as radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging to achieve a diagnosis or narrow the diagnostic considerations. This article provides a comprehensive review of the imaging approach to jaw and maxillofacial bone tumors, including updates on the 2022 World Health Organization classification of these tumors. The relevant anatomy of the jaw and dental structures that is important for accurate imaging interpretation is discussed., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Spinal infections are a diverse group of diseases affecting different compartments of the spine with variable clinical and imaging presentations. Diagnosis of spinal infections is based on a combination of clinical features, laboratory markers, and imaging studies. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of spinal infections. The characteristic imaging manifestations of bacterial and viral infections in the spine are discussed with key teaching points emphasized., Competing Interests: Disclosure P. Wangaryattawanich and T.J. Rath have no conflicts of interest to disclose, and there were no financial incentives that would alter the contents of this article. A.M. Condos: The views expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the United States Government. The authors are military service members. This study was prepared as part of official duties. Title 17 U.S C. 105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” The authors received no financial compensation for this presentation. Neither I nor my immediate family members have a financial relationship with a commercial organization that may have a direct or indirect interest in the content., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Diagnosis of brain infections is based on a combination of clinical features, laboratory markers, and imaging findings. Imaging characterizes the extent and severity of the disease, aids in guiding diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, monitors response to treatment, and demonstrates complications. This review highlights the characteristic imaging manifestations of bacterial and viral infections in the brain., Competing Interests: Disclosure A.M. Condos: The views expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the US Government. The authors are military service members. This work was prepared as part of official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. 105 states that ‘Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.’ The authors received no financial compensation for this presentation. Neither I nor my immediate family members have a financial relationship with any commercial organization that may have a direct or indirect interest in the content. P. Wangaryattawanich has no conflicts of interest to disclose and there were no financial incentives that would alter the contents of this article. T.J. Rath has no conflicts of interest to disclose and there were no financial incentives that would alter the contents of this article., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Imaging of head and neck cancer at initial staging and as part of post-treatment surveillance is a key component of patient care as it guides treatment strategy and aids determination of prognosis. Head and neck cancer includes a heterogenous group of malignancies encompassing several anatomic sites and histologies, with squamous cell carcinoma the most common. Together this comprises the seventh most common cancer worldwide. At initial staging comprehensive imaging delineating the anatomic extent of the primary site, while also assessing the nodal involvement of the neck is necessary. The treatment of head and neck cancer often includes a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Post-treatment imaging is tailored for the evaluation of treatment response and early detection of local, locoregional, and distant recurrent tumor. Cross-sectional imaging with CT or MRI is recommended for the detailed anatomic delineation of the primary site. PET/CT provides complementary metabolic information and can map systemic involvement. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Tinnitus is abnormal perception of sound and has many subtypes. Clinical evaluation, audiometry, and otoscopy should be performed before ordering any imaging, as the choice of imaging will depend on various factors. Type of tinnitus (pulsatile or nonpulsatile) and otoscopy findings of a vascular retrotympanic lesion are key determinants to guide the choice of imaging studies. High-resolution CT temporal bone is an excellent tool to detect glomus tumors, abnormal course of vessels, and some other abnormalities when a vascular retrotympanic lesion is seen on otoscopy. CTA or a combination of MR and MRA/MRV are used to evaluate arterial or venous abnormalities like dural arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous malformation, carotid stenosis, dural sinus stenosis, and bony abnormalities like sigmoid sinus wall abnormalities in cases of pulsatile tinnitus without a vascular retrotympanic lesion. MR of the brain is excellent in detecting mass lesions such as vestibular schwannomas in cases of unilateral nonpulsatile tinnitus. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective : To develop a methodology for the measurement of balloon dilation (BD) effects on Eustachian Tube (ET) structure using Computerized Tomography (CT) images. Methods : The BD of the ET was performed on three cadaver heads (five ears) through the nasopharyngeal orifice. The axial CT images of the temporal bones were obtained before dilation, while an inflated balloon was in the lumen of ET, and after balloon removal in each ear. Utilizing Dicom images captured by the ImageJ software 3D volume viewer function, the anatomical landmark coordinates of the ET were matched with their pre- and post-dilation counterparts, and the longitudinal axis of the ET was captured with serial images. The histograms of the regions of interest (ROI) and three different lumen width and length measurements were obtained from captured images. The densities of air, tissue, and bone were determined with histograms as a baseline to determine the BD rate as a function of increased air in the lumen. Results : The small ROI box included the area of prominently dilated ET lumen after BD and best represented the visually obvious changes in the lumen, compared to the ROIs that extended the wider areas (longest and longer). Air density was the outcome measure for comparison with each corresponding baseline value. The average increase in air density in the small ROI was 64%, while the longest and long ROI boxes showed 44 and 56% increases, respectively. Conclusion: This study describes a method to image the ET and quantify the outcomes of BD of the ET using anatomical landmarks.

Cranial neuropathy can result from pathology affecting the nerve fibers at any point and requires imaging of the entire course of the nerve from its nucleus to the end organ in order to identify a cause. MRI with and without intravenous contrast is often the modality of choice with CT playing a complementary role. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Craniofacial chondromyxoid fibromas (CMFs) are a rare benign tumor of cartilaginous origin. They are commonly misdiagnosed due to the paucity of information on tumor characteristics. We performed a systematic review to characterize CMFs located in different regions of the craniofacial skeleton., Methods: A search of the literature was executed using the search phrase "chondromyxoid fibroma" and included articles from 1990-2020. Sixty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 91 patients with analyzable data (22 with calvarial and 69 with sinonasal tumor locations). Descriptive analyses were performed to compare pre-selected characteristics between the 2 groups., Results: Sinonasal CMF frequently presented with cranial nerve palsy and expectedly had a high rate of nasal symptoms. Calvarial tumors frequently presented with an external mass and headache. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in a higher proportion of cases in the calvarial group versus the sinonasal group (83.3% vs. 53.1%). Overall recurrence rate at 17.7% was higher in sinonasal CMF compared with the calvarial tumors at 8.3%. Recurrences after GTR were similar in the sinonasal and calvarial groups (9.7% vs. 9.1%). In patients who did not achieve GTR, recurrence was higher in the sinonasal compared with the calvarial group (27.6% vs. 0%)., Conclusions: Craniofacial CMF in calvarial and sinonasal locations have distinct clinical characteristics and response to treatment. Sinonasal lesions tend to have higher recurrence compared to calvarial CMF. Performance of GTR is associated with decreased recurrence in all CMFs., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Maxillofacial trauma patients comprise a significant subset of patients presenting to emergency departments. Before evaluating for facial trauma, an emergency or trauma physician must perform a primary survey to ensure patient stabilization. Following this primary survey, this document discusses the following clinical scenarios for facial trauma: tenderness to palpation or contusion or edema over frontal bone (suspected frontal bone injury); pain with upper jaw manipulation or pain overlying zygoma or zygomatic deformity or facial elongation or malocclusion or infraorbital nerve paresthesia (suspected midface injury); visible nasal deformity or palpable nasal deformity or tenderness to palpation of the nose or epistaxis (suspected nasal bone injury); and trismus or malocclusion or gingival hemorrhage or mucosal hemorrhage or loose teeth or fractured teeth or displaced teeth (suspected mandibular injury). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This article presents guidelines for initial imaging utilization in patients presenting with sinonasal disease, including acute rhinosinusitis without and with suspected orbital and intracranial complications, chronic rhinosinusitis, suspected invasive fungal sinusitis, suspected sinonasal mass, and suspected cerebrospinal fluid leak. CT and MRI are the primary imaging modalities used to evaluate patients with sinonasal disease. Given its detailed depiction of bony anatomy, CT can accurately demonstrate the presence of sinonasal disease, bony erosions, and anatomic variants, and is essential for surgical planning. Given its superior soft tissue contrast, MRI can accurately identify clinically suspected intracranial and intraorbital complications, delineate soft tissue extension of tumor and distinguish mass from obstructed secretions.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the follow-up treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGGs), differentiating true tumor progression from treatment-related effects, such as pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis, presents an ongoing clinical challenge. Conventional MRI with and without intravenous contrast serves as the clinical benchmark for the posttreatment surveillance imaging of HGG. However, many advanced imaging techniques have shown promise in helping better delineate the findings in indeterminate scenarios, as posttreatment effects can often mimic true tumor progression on conventional imaging. These challenges are further confounded by the histologic admixture that can commonly occur between tumor growth and treatment-related effects within the posttreatment bed. This review discusses the current practices in the surveillance imaging of HGG and the role of advanced imaging techniques, including perfusion MRI and metabolic MRI., Competing Interests: KSw was co-founder of Precision Oncology Insights, US Patent US8571844B2. KSc: financial interest—Imaging Biometrics LLC; ownership interest—IQ-AQ Ltd; ownership interest—Prism Clinical Imaging, Inc. LH: Imaging Biometrics (Medical Advisory Board); Precision Oncology Insights (co-founder), Bayer Pharmaceutical (paid speaker), US Patent Number 10,909,675. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Malik, Rath, Urcuyo Acevedo, Canoll, Swanson, Boxerman, Quarles, Schmainda, Burns and Hu.)

Objective: Improper embryological development of the clivus, a bony structure that comprises part of the skull base, can lead to a clival canal defect. Previously thought to be a benign condition, clival canals have been reported to be associated with meningitis and meningoceles. In this review, the authors sought to present an unpublished case of a patient with a clival canal defect associated with meningitis and to evaluate all other reported cases., Methods: In October 2020, a search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted to identify all cases of clival canals reported from January 1, 1980, through October 31, 2020., Results: Including the case presented herein, 13 cases of clival canals, 11 in children (84.6%) and 2 in adults (15.4%), have been identified. Of the pediatric patients, 5 (45.5%) had an associated meningocele, and 8 (72.7%) had meningitis. Nine of the 13 patients (69.2%) had defects that were treated surgically, 5 (38.5%) by a transnasal approach and 4 (30.8%) by a transoral approach. Two patients (15.4%) were treated with drainage and antibiotics, 1 patient (7.7%) was treated solely with antibiotics, and 1 patient (7.7%) was not treated. In the literature review, 8 reports of clival canals were found to be associated with meningitis, further contributing to the notion that the clival canal may be an overlooked source of recurrent infection. In several of these cases, surgical repair of the lesion was curative, thus preventing continued episodes of meningitis., Conclusions: When a patient has recurrent meningitis with no clear cause, taking a closer look at clival anatomy is recommended. In addition, if a clival canal defect has been identified, surgical repair should be considered a safe and effective primary treatment option.