Search

Tumor types in the study

Innovative molecular diagnostics deployed in the clinic enable new ways to stratify patients into appropriate treatment regimens. These approaches may resolve a major challenge for early-phase clinical trials, which is to recruit patients who, while having failed previous treatments, may nevertheless respond to molecularly targeted drugs. We report the findings of a prospective, single-center study conducted in patients with diverse refractory cancers who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP; next-generation sequencing, 236 genes). Of the 500 patients enrolled, 188 (37.6%) received either matched (N = 122/188, 65%) or unmatched therapy (N = 66/188, 35%). The most common reasons that patients were not evaluable for treatment included insufficient tissue, death, or hospice transfer. The median number of molecular alterations per patient was five (range, 1–14); median number of prior therapies, four. The most common diagnoses were ovarian cancer (18%), breast cancer (16%), sarcoma (13%), and renal cancer (7%). Of the 339 successfully profiled patients, 317 (93.5%) had at least one potentially actionable alteration. By calculating matching scores, based on the number of drug matches and genomic aberrations per patient, we found that high scores were independently associated with a greater frequency of stable disease ≥6 months/partial/complete remission [22% (high scores) vs. 9% (low scores), P = 0.024], longer time-to-treatment failure [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.36–0.74; P = 0.0003], and survival (HR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.43–1.0; P = 0.05). Collectively, this study offers a clinical proof of concept for the utility of CGP in assigning therapy to patients with refractory malignancies, especially in those patients with multiple genomic aberrations for whom combination therapies could be implemented. Cancer Res; 76(13); 3690–701. ©2016 AACR.

Comparison of TTF1 between groups

Statistical futility analysis

Supplementary Figure from Tadalafil Enhances Immune Signatures in Response to Neoadjuvant Nivolumab in Resectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose:We hypothesize that the addition of the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor tadalafil to the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab, is safe and will augment immune-mediated antitumor responses in previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC).Patients and Methods:We conducted a two-arm multi-institutional neoadjuvant randomized trial in any-stage resectable HNSCC (NCT03238365). Patients were stratified at randomization by human papillomavirus (HPV) status. Patients in both arms received nivolumab 240 mg intravenously on days 1 and 15 followed by surgery on day 28. Those in the combination therapy arm also received tadalafil 10 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks. Imaging, blood, and tumor were obtained pretreatment and posttreatment for correlative analysis.Results:Neoadjuvant therapy was well-tolerated with no grade 3 to 5 adverse events and no surgical delays. Twenty-five of 46 (54%) evaluable patients had a pathologic treatment response of ≥20%, including three (7%) patients with a complete pathologic response. Regardless of HPV status, tumor proliferation rate was a negative predictor of response. A strong pretreatment T-cell signature in the HPV-negative cohort was a predictor of response. Tadalafil altered the immune microenvironment, as evidenced by transcriptome data identifying enriched B- and natural killer cell gene sets in the tumor and augmented effector T cells in the periphery.Conclusions:Preoperative nivolumab ± tadalafil is safe in HNSCC and results in more than 50% of the patients having a pathologic treatment response of at least 20% after 4 weeks of treatment. Pretreatment specimens identified HPV status-dependent signatures that predicted response to immunotherapy while posttreatment specimens showed augmentation of the immune microenvironment with the addition of tadalafil.

Supplementary Date from Tadalafil Enhances Immune Signatures in Response to Neoadjuvant Nivolumab in Resectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

SUPPLEMENTAL METHODS

Purpose: We hypothesize that the addition of the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor tadalafil to the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab, is safe and will augment immune-mediated antitumor responses in previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). Patients and Methods: We conducted a two-arm multi-institutional neoadjuvant randomized trial in any-stage resectable HNSCC (NCT03238365). Patients were stratified at randomization by human papillomavirus (HPV) status. Patients in both arms received nivolumab 240 mg intravenously on days 1 and 15 followed by surgery on day 28. Those in the combination therapy arm also received tadalafil 10 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks. Imaging, blood, and tumor were obtained pretreatment and posttreatment for correlative analysis. Results: Neoadjuvant therapy was well-tolerated with no grade 3 to 5 adverse events and no surgical delays. Twenty-five of 46 (54%) evaluable patients had a pathologic treatment response of ≥20%, including three (7%) patients with a complete pathologic response. Regardless of HPV status, tumor proliferation rate was a negative predictor of response. A strong pretreatment T-cell signature in the HPV-negative cohort was a predictor of response. Tadalafil altered the immune microenvironment, as evidenced by transcriptome data identifying enriched B- and natural killer cell gene sets in the tumor and augmented effector T cells in the periphery. Conclusions: Preoperative nivolumab ± tadalafil is safe in HNSCC and results in more than 50% of the patients having a pathologic treatment response of at least 20% after 4 weeks of treatment. Pretreatment specimens identified HPV status-dependent signatures that predicted response to immunotherapy while posttreatment specimens showed augmentation of the immune microenvironment with the addition of tadalafil.

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) maintenance therapy is standard of care for frontline management of extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES SCLC). However, overall survival benefit of addition of ICI maintenance to frontline ES SCLC treatment is modest and further improvement is needed. We hypothesized that addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition to ICI maintenance therapy for patients with platinum sensitive ES SCLC could improve antitumor efficacy of ICI. Methods: A single-arm, investigator-initiated phase II trial (NCT03958045) enrolled patients with platinum sensitive ES SCLC who received frontline maintenance nivolumab 480 mg IV every 4 weeks, and rucaparib, 600 mg PO twice a day after completion of 4-6 cycles of platinum doublet. The primary outcome was median progression free survival. Secondary endpoints included assessment of objective response and adverse effects (AEs) per CTCAE 5.0. Correlative studies included pretreatment and during-treatment immune assays and circulating tumor DNA TP53 mutation status. Results: A total of 42 patients were consented and 33 met eligibility criteria and were treated. All patients received 4-6 cycles of frontline platinum doublet and had at least a partial response by RECIST at the time of enrollment. In the 33 participants, the most common grade 3 and 4 AEs (at least possibly related) were hypokalemia (3%), hyponatremia (3%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (3%), neutropenia (3%) and leukocytopenia (3%). No grade 5 AE was noted. The median PFS (mPFS) was 3 months from time of enrollment on frontline maintenance (post platinum doublet). The mPFS was 11 months from cycle 1 of platinum doublet. Overall, 89.8% patients were alive at 12 months and 54.4 % patients were alive at 24 months from the start of platinum doublet. Currently 2 patients are on active treatment and other two have completed study treatment and are on observation with stable disease. Conclusions: Maintenance rucaparib combined with immune checkpoint inhibition was tolerable and showed promising activity after completion of frontline chemotherapy in platinum sensitive extensive stage small cell lung cancer patients. Citation Format: Aman Chauhan, Jill Kolesar, Donglin Yan, Zhonglin Hao, Ronald McGarry, John Villano, Ralph Zinner, Ashish Maskey, Jordan Miller, Timothy Mullett, Aman Khurana, Xitong Zhou, Garima Gupta, Daniel Flora, Colleen Darnell, Richard O'Neil, Charles Kunos, Mark B. Evers, Lowell Anthony, Susanne Arnold. Phase II of frontline maintenance rucaparib in combination with nivolumab in ES SCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT221.

Few treatment decision support interventions (DSIs) are available to engage patients diagnosed with late-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in treatment shared decision making (SDM). We designed a novel DSI that includes care plan cards and a companion patient preference clarification tool to assist in shared decision making. The cards answer common patient questions about treatment options (chemotherapy, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, clinical trial participation, and supportive care). The form elicits patient treatment preference. We then conducted interviews with clinicians and patients to obtain feedback on the DSI. We also trained oncology nurse educators to implement the prototype. Finally, we pilot tested the DSI among five patients with NSCLC at the beginning of an office visit scheduled to discuss treatment with an oncologist. Analyses of pilot study baseline and exit survey data showed that DSI use was associated with increased patient awareness of the alternatives’ treatment options and benefits/risks. In contrast, patient concern about treatment costs and uncertainty in treatment decision making decreased. All patients expressed a treatment preference. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to assess DSI implementation feasibility and efficacy in clinical care.