2 results on '"Pompilus F"'
Search Results
2. Belantamab Mafodotin, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma.
- Author
-
Dimopoulos MA, Beksac M, Pour L, Delimpasi S, Vorobyev V, Quach H, Spicka I, Radocha J, Robak P, Kim K, Cavo M, Suzuki K, Morris K, Pompilus F, Phillips-Jones A, Zhou XL, Fulci G, Sule N, Kremer BE, Opalinska J, Mateos MV, and Trudel S
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Bortezomib administration & dosage, Bortezomib adverse effects, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Lenalidomide administration & dosage, Lenalidomide adverse effects, Recurrence, Treatment Outcome, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local diagnosis, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local mortality, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Disease Progression, Eye Diseases chemically induced, Eye Diseases epidemiology, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Dexamethasone administration & dosage, Dexamethasone adverse effects, Multiple Myeloma diagnosis, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Multiple Myeloma mortality, Progression-Free Survival, Thalidomide administration & dosage, Thalidomide adverse effects, Thalidomide analogs & derivatives
- Abstract
Background: Triplet or quadruplet therapies incorporating proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and anti-CD38 antibodies have led to prolonged survival among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; however, most patients have a relapse. Frontline lenalidomide therapy has increased the number of patients with lenalidomide-refractory disease at the time of the first relapse., Methods: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, we evaluated belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (BPd), as compared with pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd), in lenalidomide-exposed patients who had relapsed or refractory myeloma after at least one line of therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Disease response and safety were also assessed., Results: A total of 302 patients underwent randomization; 155 were assigned to the BPd group, and 147 to the PVd group. At a median follow-up of 21.8 months (range, <0.1 to 39.2), the 12-month estimated progression-free survival with BPd was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63 to 78), as compared with 51% (95% CI, 42 to 60) with PVd (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.73; P<0.001). Data on overall survival were immature. The percentage of patients with a response to treatment (partial response or better) was 77% (95% CI, 70 to 84) in the BPd group and 72% (95% CI, 64 to 79) in the PVd group; 40% (95% CI, 32 to 48) and 16% (95% CI, 11 to 23), respectively, had a complete response or better. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 94% of the patients in the BPd group and 76% of those in the PVd group. Ocular events occurred in 89% of the patients who received BPd (grade 3 or 4 in 43%) and 30% of those who received PVd (grade 3 or 4 in 2%); ocular events in the BPd group were managed with belantamab mafodotin dose modification. Ocular events led to treatment discontinuation in 9% of the patients in the BPd group and in no patients in the PVd group., Conclusions: Among lenalidomide-exposed patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma, BPd conferred a significantly greater benefit than PVd with respect to progression-free survival, as well as deeper, more durable responses. Ocular events were common but were controllable by belantamab mafodotin dose modification. (Funded by GSK; DREAMM-8 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04484623; EudraCT number, 2018-004354-21.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.