Search

Background: Several pilot trials and the Clinical Evaluation of the Infinity Deep Brain Stimulation System (PROGRESS) study have found that directional stimulation can provide a wider therapeutic window and lower therapeutic current strength than omnidirectional stimulation., Objective: We conducted a single-center, open-label, registry-based, comparative trial to test the hypothesis that directional stimulation can be associated with a greater reduction in the total daily dose of antiparkinsonian medications (ApMeds) than omnidirectional stimulation., Materials and Methods: A total of 52 patients with directional and 57 subjects with omnidirectional bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) were enrolled. Preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, the dose of different ApMeds, the number of tablets used daily, the severity of motor and nonmotor symptoms using the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, and the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) were assessed., Results: According to the changes in the levodopa equivalent daily dose, directional STN-DBS led to a 13% greater reduction in the total daily dose of ApMed. The 10.3% greater reduction in the dose of levodopa was the main contributor to this difference. The number of different ApMed types also could be decreased in a greater manner with directional stimulation. The improvement in the severity of motor and nonmotor symptoms was comparable; however, we detected a 15.8% greater improvement in the global HRQoL among patients with directional stimulation according to the changes in the summary index of the PDQ-39. The total electrical energy delivered per second was comparable between the groups at 12-month postoperative visit, whereas the amplitude of stimulation was significantly lower and the impedance was significantly higher with directional leads., Conclusions: Directional programming can further increase the reduction in the total daily dose of ApMed after STN-DBS. In addition, directional stimulation can have additional beneficial effects on the global HRQoL. The greater reduction of ApMed doses did not require more energy-consuming stimulation with directional stimulation., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) teleprogramming may help reducing travel-related and other financial burdens for patients and maintaining DBS care in special situations. To determine travel-related burdens of DBS patients and explore effects of COVID-19 on DBS care. Travel- and visit-related data of 319 patients were retrospectively analyzed for the first year, five years, and ten years after initiating DBS. Frequencies of in-person and telemedicine visits over the 18-month periods just before and after the outbreak of COVID-19 in Hungary were also compared. Average travel distance during an in-person visit was 415.2 ± 261.5 km, while average travel time was 342.1 ± 199.4 min. Travel costs for the first year, five years, and ten years were 151.8 ± 108.7, 461.4 ± 374.6, and 922.7 ± 749.1 Euros, respectively. Travel distance, age, and type and severity of disease could help identify patients who would particularly benefit from teleprogramming. We detected a significant decrease in the number of visits during COVID-19 pandemic (from 3.7 ± 2.1 to 2.4 ± 2.7; p < 0.001) which mainly resulted from the decreased frequency of in-person visits (3.6 ± 2.0 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8; p < 0.001). Our results support the introduction of DBS teleprogramming in Hungary which could save money and time for patients while maintaining a secure delivery of DBS., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: COVID-19 has made providing in-person care difficult. In most countries, including Hungary, telemedicine has partly served as a resolution for this issue. Our purpose was to explore the effects of COVID-19 on neurological care, the knowledge of neurology specialists on telemedicine, and the present state of telecare in Hungary, with a special focus on Parkinson's disease (PD)., Methods: Between July and October 2021, a nationwide online survey was conducted among actively practicing Hungarian neurology specialists who were managing patients with PD., Results: A total of 104 neurologists were surveyed. All levels of care were evaluated in both publicly funded and private healthcare. Both time weekly spent on outpatient specialty consultation and the number of patients with PD seen weekly significantly decreased in public healthcare, while remained almost unchanged in private care (p<0.001); higher portion of patients were able to receive in-person care in private care (78.8% vs. 90.8%, p<0.001). In telecare, prescribing medicines has already been performed by the most (n=103, 99%). Electronic messages were the most widely known telemedicine tools (n=98, 94.2%), while phone call has already been used by most neurologists (n=95, 91.3%). Video-based consultation has been more widely used in private than public care (30.1% vs. 15.5%, p=0.001). Teleprocedures were considered most suitable for monitoring progression and symptoms of Parkinson's disease and evaluating the need for adjustments to antiparkinsonian pharmacotherapy., Conclusion: COVID-19 has had a major impact on the care of patients with PD in Hungary. Telemedicine has mitigated these detrimental effects; however, further developments could make it an even more reliable component of care.