11 results on '"Piatanesi A."'
Search Results
2. Joint inversion of Geodetic and Strong Motion data for the 2012, M w 6.1‐ 6.0, May 20 th and May 29 th , Northern Italy Earthquakes: Source models and seismotectonic interpretation
- Author
-
Improta, L., primary, Cirella, A., additional, Pezzo, G., additional, Molinari, I., additional, and Piatanesi, A., additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The Tsunami Warning triggered in the Mediterranean Sea by the 2023 February 6 Mw 7.8 Türkiye-Syria earthquake: from the present Decision Matrix (DM) to Probabilistic Tsunami Forecasting (PTF)
- Author
-
Stefano Lorito, Jacopo Selva, Alessandro Amato, Andrey Babeyko, Basak Bayraktar, Fabrizio Bernardi, Marinos Charalampakis, Louise Cordrie, Nikos Kalligeris, Alessio Piatanesi, Fabrizio Romano, Antonio Scala, Roberto Tonini, Manuela Volpe, Musavver Didem Cambaz, and Doğan Kalafat
- Abstract
The 2023 February 6 Mw 7.8 earthquake was the first one of a doublet which shook Türkiye and Syria causing, as per the estimates at the time of writing of this abstract, more than 45,000 casualties.The current standard operating procedures of the NEAMTWS (Tsunami Warning System in the North-Eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean and connected seas, coordinated by UNESCO/IOC) for the initial tsunami warning message following an earthquake are based on a Decision Matrix (DM), whose input parameters are hypocentre and magnitude of the earthquake. Since the epicentre of this earthquake was located at a depth between 15-35 km at almost 100 km from the coast, both KOERI (Türkiye) and INGV (Italy) Tsunami Service Providers (TSPs) of the NEAMTWS issued a Tsunami Watch message (i.e., runup expected to exceed 1 m) for the whole Mediterranean Sea. NOA (Greece) did not issue any alert, because its initial location was more than 100 km from the coast.In response to the tsunami warning, trains were stopped in different locations in Southern Italy for several hours, and evacuation of some coastal areas was enforced. However, only a relatively small tsunami was recorded by Turkish close-by tide-gauges in the Eastern Mediterranean, with a maximum recorded amplitude of less than 50 cm. Based on these measurements and on others showing little to no tsunami at increasing distances, the alert was then ended after 5 and 9 hours by INGV and KOERI, respectively, based on the available tide-gauge recordings and interaction with Civil Protection Officers.This event has highlighted that NEAMTWS is an asset for the coastal communities. It can provide rapid alerts, which can save lives if the last-mile of the procedures is in place and the communities are “Tsunami Ready”, that is aware and prepared to respond with evacuations and other appropriate countermeasures. On the other hand, while it is reasonable – and dutiful based on current standard operation procedures – to issue a basin-wide, or at least a local alert, for an inland earthquake of unknown mechanism and of such a large magnitude, it is perhaps possible to improve the DM, which is totally heuristic and characterized by hard-thresholds, with consideration of numerical tsunami simulations and quantitative uncertainty treatment with more continuous variations. Moreover, there is no procedure currently in place to differentiate among locations where the expected time of arrival differs by many hours across the Mediterranean basin, nor a sufficient instrumental coverage that could make cancellation/ending faster due to a more solid observational basis.We will discuss some of the scientific and operational aspects with the aim of identifying which lessons can be learned to improve the NEAMTWS efficiency. We will also compare the DM-based alerts with those that would be produced with the recently introduced Probabilistic Tsunami Forecasting (PTF, Selva et al., 2021, Nature Communications), presently in pre-operational testing at INGV.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Comparison between the uncertainty in the tsunami forecast from slip models obtained from geophysical data inversion and by a Phase Variation Method
- Author
-
Fabrizio Romano, Patricio Catalan, Stefano Lorito, Escalante Sanchez Cipriano, Simone Atzori, Thorne Lay, Roberto Tonini, Manuela Volpe, Alessio Piatanesi, Macias Sanchez Jorge, and Castro Diaz Manuel J
- Abstract
Subduction zones are the most seismically active regions in the world and hosted many great tsunamigenic earthquakes in the past, often with destructive coastal consequences. Hence, an accurate estimate of the tsunami forecast is crucial in Tsunami Early Warning Systems (TEWS) framework. However, the inherent uncertainties associated with the tsunami source estimation in real-time make tsunami forecasting challenging. In this study, we consider the South American subduction zone, where in the last 15 years occurred, three M8+ tsunamigenic earthquakes; in particular, we focus on the 2014 Mw 8.1 Iquique event.Here, we evaluate the variability of the tsunami forecasting for the Chilean coast as resulting i) from the coseismic slip model obtained by geophysical data inversion and ii) from an expeditious method for the tsunami source estimation, based on an extension of the well-known spectral approach. In the former method, we estimate the slip distribution of the 2014 Iquique earthquake by jointly inverting tsunami (DARTs and tide-gauges) and GPS data; we adopt a 3D fault geometry and Green’s functions approach.On the other hand, a set of stochastic slip models in the latter is generated through a Phase Variation Method (PVM), where realizations are obtained from both the wavenumber and phase spectra of the source.In the analysis, we also evaluate how the different physics complexity included in the tsunami modelling (e.g. by including dispersion or not) can be mapped into the tsunami forecasting uncertainty. Finally, as an independent check, we compare the predicted deformation field from the slip models (inverted or by PVM) with the RADARSAT-2 InSAR data.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Joint Inversion of Geodetic and Strong Motion Data for the 2012, M w 6.1–6.0, May 20th and May 29th, Northern Italy Earthquakes: Source Models and Seismotectonic Interpretation
- Author
-
L. Improta, A. Cirella, G. Pezzo, I. Molinari, and A. Piatanesi
- Subjects
Geophysics ,Space and Planetary Science ,Geochemistry and Petrology ,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) - Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Italian 24/7 real-time earthquakes and tsunamis monitoring system
- Author
-
Scognamiglio, L., Bernardi, F., Bono, A., Bruni, S., Lauciani, V., Quintiliani, M., Bacchi, P., De Santis, G., Di Benedetto, A., Trotta, M., Amato, A., Margheriti, L., Piatanesi, A., and Stramondo, S.
- Abstract
The Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) has the primary responsibility for the seismic surveillance service of the Italian territory and the tsunami alert in the Mediterranean Sea.The activities in the monitoring room at the INGV National Earthquake Observatory headquarters in Rome (hereafter INGV-Rome), are carried on by two seismologists, one tsunami specialist and one technician/engineer who work in three shifts a day to provide monitoring service on a 24/7 basis. They calculate, as rapidly and accurately as possible, the location and size of all Italian earthquakes with M2.5+ and swiftly disseminate such information to emergency authorities, to government agencies, to the public and the media by different platforms (email, text message, and via Facebook and Twitter). Starting with hypocentral and magnitude parameters, the moment tensors, the historical seismicity map and the shakemaps are also published in (near) real time.In addition, the INGV-Rome monitoring room hosts the Italian Tsunami Alert Center (CAT-INGV). CAT-INGV is one of the Tsunami Service Providers acting in the North-eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean and connected sea (NEAM) region of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC)/UNESCO and is responsible for monitoring the seismicity of the Mediterranean Sea and disseminating tsunami alert messages to member States and EU agencies subscribing its services. The operation and the performance of the INGV monitoring system is ensured by a dedicated research and IT staff who facilitate real-time waveform acquisition and distribution, develop real-time seismic processing systems and new processing algorithms., The 28th IUGG General Assembly (IUGG2023) (Berlin 2023)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Tsunami forecasting variability as resulting from slip models obtained by geophysical data inversion and by a Phase Variation Method
- Author
-
Romano, F., Catalan, P., Lorito, S., Escalante Sanchez, C., Atzori, S., Lay, T., Tonini, R., Volpe, M., Piatanesi, A., Macias Sanchez, J., and Castro Diaz, M.
- Abstract
The accurate estimate of the tsunami forecast is crucial in Tsunami Early Warning Systems (TEWS) framework. However, the inherent uncertainties associated with the tsunami source estimation in real-time make tsunami forecasting challenging.In this study, we consider the South American subduction zone, one of the most seismically active regions in the world, where in the last 15 years occurred, three M8+ tsunamigenic earthquakes; in particular, we focus on the 2014 Mw 8.1 Iquique event.Here, we compare the tsunami forecasting for the Chilean coast as resultingi)from the coseismic slip model obtained by geophysical data inversion andii)from an expeditious method for the tsunami source estimation, based on an extension of the well-known spectral approach.In the former method, we estimate the slip distribution of the 2014 Iquique earthquake by jointly inverting tsunami waveforms and GPS data; on the other hand, a set of stochastic slip models in the latter is generated through a Phase Variation Method (PVM), where realizations are obtained from both the wavenumber and phase spectra of the source.We also evaluate how the different physics complexity included in the tsunami modelling (e.g. by including dispersion or not) can be mapped into the tsunami forecasting uncertainty. Finally, as an independent check, we compare the predicted deformation field from the slip models (inverted or by PVM) with the RADARSAT-2 InSAR data., The 28th IUGG General Assembly (IUGG2023) (Berlin 2023)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. The Tsunami Warning triggered in the Mediterranean Sea by the 2023 February 6 Mw 7.8 Türkiye-Syria earthquake: from the present Decision Matrix (DM) to Probabilistic Tsunami Forecasting (PTF).
- Author
-
Lorito, Stefano, primary, Selva, Jacopo, additional, Amato, Alessandro, additional, Babeyko, Andrey, additional, Bayraktar, Basak, additional, Bernardi, Fabrizio, additional, Charalampakis, Marinos, additional, Cordrie, Louise, additional, Kalligeris, Nikos, additional, Piatanesi, Alessio, additional, Romano, Fabrizio, additional, Scala, Antonio, additional, Tonini, Roberto, additional, Volpe, Manuela, additional, Cambaz, Musavver Didem, additional, and Kalafat, Doğan, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Comparison between the uncertainty in the tsunami forecast from slip models obtained from geophysical data inversion and by a Phase Variation Method
- Author
-
Romano, Fabrizio, primary, Catalan, Patricio, additional, Lorito, Stefano, additional, Cipriano, Escalante Sanchez, additional, Atzori, Simone, additional, Lay, Thorne, additional, Tonini, Roberto, additional, Volpe, Manuela, additional, Piatanesi, Alessio, additional, Jorge, Macias Sanchez, additional, and Manuel J, Castro Diaz, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Joint Inversion of Geodetic and Strong Motion Data for the 2012, Mw 6.1–6.0, May 20th and May 29th, Northern Italy Earthquakes: Source Models and Seismotectonic Interpretation.
- Author
-
Improta, L., Cirella, A., Pezzo, G., Molinari, I., and Piatanesi, A.
- Subjects
EARTHQUAKE aftershocks ,SEISMIC reflection method ,SEISMOTECTONICS ,EARTHQUAKES ,THRUST faults (Geology) ,GEOLOGICAL modeling ,CARBONATE rocks ,THRUST belts (Geology) - Abstract
We present the first rupture models of the two mainshocks of the 2012 northern Italy sequence, determined by jointly inverting seismic and geodetic data. We aim at providing new insights into the mainshocks for which contrasting seismotectonic interpretations are proposed in literature. Sources' geometric parameters were constrained by seismic reflection profiles, 3‐D relocations and focal mechanisms of mainshocks/aftershocks. Site‐specific velocity profiles were used to model accelerograms affected by strong propagation effects related to the Po basin. Our source models differ significantly from previous ones relying on either seismic or geodetic data. Their comparison against geological sections and aftershock distribution provides new insights about the ruptured thrust faults. The May 20th Mw6.1 mainshock activated the Middle Ferrara thrust‐ramp dipping ∼45° SSW‐wards, breaking a main eastern slip patch 4–15 km deep in Mesozoic carbonates (maximum slip 0.7–0.8 m) and Paleozoic‐Triassic basement rocks, and a small western patch in the basement. The May 29th Mw6.0 mainshock featured two separated asperities along the Mirandola thrust‐ramp dipping ∼42° S‐wards: an eastern asperity 4–15 km deep in Mesozoic carbonates and basement rocks (maximum slip 0.7 m) and a deeper western one (7–16 km depth) mainly in the basement (slip peak 0.8 m). On‐fault aftershocks were concentrated within the basement and Mesozoic carbonates, devoiding high‐slip zones. Slip and aftershock distribution was controlled by the rheological transition between Mesozoic carbonates and Cenozoic sediments. Unlike previous thin‐skinned tectonic interpretations, our results point to a complex rupture process along moderately dipping (40°–45°) thrust‐ramps deeply rooted into the Paleozoic crystalline basement. Plain Language Summary: The two M6 mainshocks of the 2012 Italy sequence are the strongest earthquakes ever observed in the Po Plain, a strategic region for the Italian economy. The mainshocks ruptured blind thrust‐faults, however their source models and seismotectonic interpretation are still debated because the thrust‐system architecture is controversial. Contrasting thick‐skinned and thin‐skinned tectonic models are proposed. In thick‐skinned interpretations, shortening is accommodated by thrust‐ramps rooted into the crystalline basement that represent main seismogenic structures, whereas in thin‐skinned interpretations, shortening and seismicity are controlled by listric faults splaying out from dècollement levels in the sedimentary crust. A comprehensive analysis of the mainshocks' source represents an opportunity to provide new insights into the seismogenesis in northern Italy and on a broader scale into seismotectonics of thrust‐and‐fold belts. We get a complete picture of the mainshocks kinematics by jointly inverting, for the first time, seismic and geodetic data, and unravel rupture heterogeneities not resolved by previous studies. By integrating source models with aftershock locations and geological models, we propose a comprehensive seismotectonic interpretation of the sequence. We conclusively identify the ruptured faults that correspond to thrust‐ramps rooted into the crystalline basement and evidence the key role played by lithological changes in the rupture process. Key Points: Rupture models of the 2012 northern Italy mainshocks obtained by inverting the most comprehensive geodetic and strong motion data set to dateBoth mainshocks ruptured two asperities along moderately dipping thrusts rooted into the Paleozoic crystalline basement down to ∼15 km depthAsperities located in Mesozoic carbonates and Paleozoic basement and slip distribution controlled by lithological and structural barriers [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Joint Inversion of Geodetic and Strong Motion Data for the 2012, Mw6.1–6.0, May 20th and May 29th, Northern Italy Earthquakes: Source Models and Seismotectonic Interpretation
- Author
-
Improta, L., Cirella, A., Pezzo, G., Molinari, I., and Piatanesi, A.
- Abstract
We present the first rupture models of the two mainshocks of the 2012 northern Italy sequence, determined by jointly inverting seismic and geodetic data. We aim at providing new insights into the mainshocks for which contrasting seismotectonic interpretations are proposed in literature. Sources' geometric parameters were constrained by seismic reflection profiles, 3‐D relocations and focal mechanisms of mainshocks/aftershocks. Site‐specific velocity profiles were used to model accelerograms affected by strong propagation effects related to the Po basin. Our source models differ significantly from previous ones relying on either seismic or geodetic data. Their comparison against geological sections and aftershock distribution provides new insights about the ruptured thrust faults. The May 20th Mw6.1 mainshock activated the Middle Ferrara thrust‐ramp dipping ∼45° SSW‐wards, breaking a main eastern slip patch 4–15 km deep in Mesozoic carbonates (maximum slip 0.7–0.8 m) and Paleozoic‐Triassic basement rocks, and a small western patch in the basement. The May 29th Mw6.0 mainshock featured two separated asperities along the Mirandola thrust‐ramp dipping ∼42° S‐wards: an eastern asperity 4–15 km deep in Mesozoic carbonates and basement rocks (maximum slip 0.7 m) and a deeper western one (7–16 km depth) mainly in the basement (slip peak 0.8 m). On‐fault aftershocks were concentrated within the basement and Mesozoic carbonates, devoiding high‐slip zones. Slip and aftershock distribution was controlled by the rheological transition between Mesozoic carbonates and Cenozoic sediments. Unlike previous thin‐skinned tectonic interpretations, our results point to a complex rupture process along moderately dipping (40°–45°) thrust‐ramps deeply rooted into the Paleozoic crystalline basement. The two M6 mainshocks of the 2012 Italy sequence are the strongest earthquakes ever observed in the Po Plain, a strategic region for the Italian economy. The mainshocks ruptured blind thrust‐faults, however their source models and seismotectonic interpretation are still debated because the thrust‐system architecture is controversial. Contrasting thick‐skinned and thin‐skinned tectonic models are proposed. In thick‐skinned interpretations, shortening is accommodated by thrust‐ramps rooted into the crystalline basement that represent main seismogenic structures, whereas in thin‐skinned interpretations, shortening and seismicity are controlled by listric faults splaying out from dècollement levels in the sedimentary crust. A comprehensive analysis of the mainshocks' source represents an opportunity to provide new insights into the seismogenesis in northern Italy and on a broader scale into seismotectonics of thrust‐and‐fold belts. We get a complete picture of the mainshocks kinematics by jointly inverting, for the first time, seismic and geodetic data, and unravel rupture heterogeneities not resolved by previous studies. By integrating source models with aftershock locations and geological models, we propose a comprehensive seismotectonic interpretation of the sequence. We conclusively identify the ruptured faults that correspond to thrust‐ramps rooted into the crystalline basement and evidence the key role played by lithological changes in the rupture process. Rupture models of the 2012 northern Italy mainshocks obtained by inverting the most comprehensive geodetic and strong motion data set to dateBoth mainshocks ruptured two asperities along moderately dipping thrusts rooted into the Paleozoic crystalline basement down to ∼15 km depthAsperities located in Mesozoic carbonates and Paleozoic basement and slip distribution controlled by lithological and structural barriers Rupture models of the 2012 northern Italy mainshocks obtained by inverting the most comprehensive geodetic and strong motion data set to date Both mainshocks ruptured two asperities along moderately dipping thrusts rooted into the Paleozoic crystalline basement down to ∼15 km depth Asperities located in Mesozoic carbonates and Paleozoic basement and slip distribution controlled by lithological and structural barriers
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.