Search

Objectives: Hospital internal-use pharmacies are required to make pharmaceutical preparations in order to obtain a medication in a dosage and/or Galenic form (FG) suitable for pediatric use. The aim of this study is to assess the procedures for continuing pharmaceutical preparations initiated within the Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille in an outpatient setting., Methods: Hospital discharge prescriptions and/or consultation prescriptions involving paediatric magistral preparations and issued by our Hospital Centre were collected from two pharmacies with significant preparation activity at national level. An analysis of regulatory compliance was carried out, as well as a comparison of the formulation of preparations made in the outpatient setting and in the hospital., Results: Au total, 45 prescriptions were collected, representing 52 preparation lines. The regulatory analysis revealed that all the prescriptions contained at least one non-conformity, 60.8% of which related to drug treatments. The prepared FG differed in the outpatient setting compared to the hospital in 46.2% of cases, and in 56% of cases, the vehicle and concentration of the active ingredient used differed when the FG was a liquid oral form., Conclusions: The lack of clear and complete hospital prescriptions makes it difficult to carry out treatment initiated in hospital in the outpatient setting. The multiplicity of information systems between hospitals and outpatient settings are obstacles to the interoperability needed to coordinate patient treatment, particularly in paediatrics. The quality of discharge prescriptions needs to be improved to optimise the patient care pathway., (Copyright © 2024 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: During life-threatening emergencies or risky cardiologic interventions, pharmacology can be limited and the use of appropriate medical devices is then necessary. The Impella™ catheter, CP and 2.5, has been referenced for the exclusive use of the interventional cardiology technical platform at Hôpital Nord (AP-HM) in the absence of rapid access to the Extracorporeal Circulation unit. It is a temporary mechanical circulatory support device mainly indicated in refractory cardiogenic shock and coronary angioplasty at high risk of hemodynamic instability. The objective of this study, observational and retrospective, is to carry out a clinical and economic assessment linked to the use of this device over a period of four years (2017-2020)., Methods: The criteria relating to the 71 patients (51 Impella™ CP and 20 Impella™ 2.5) and their clinical evolution as well as the costs and valuation of the stays were determined., Results: In particular, the Impella™ CP enabled myocardial recovery in 18 out of 51 patients and it was an intermediary in the context of heavier care for 11 patients. The balance between expenditure and valuation shows a deficit of -819,937 euros over the study period, with however a probable margin for improvement., Conclusions: The Impella™ is of clinical interest under very specific conditions. Its high cost and the absence of inclusion on the list of reimbursements in addition to Homogeneous Groups of Stays represent a significant financial burden for health care establishments. Thus, optimizing the rating of future stays is a necessity., (Copyright © 2023 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Low-viscosity bone cement impregnated with gentamicin is frequently used to fix femoral prostheses. Three cardiac arrests occured successively during cementoplasty oh hip replacements, leading to the death of two patients. The objective of this study is to describe the actions undertaken to establish a potential link between the use of the bone cement and the occurrence of these serious adverse events (SAE)., Methods: A mortality and morbidity review was organised in order to study the causality of bone cement and to propose improvement actions, following 3 considered SAE associated to materiovigilance reporting., Results: All three SAE occurred following the injection of the same reference of bone cement. The incriminated batches were rapidly placed in quarantine. Analysis by the manufacturer revealed no defects in production quality requirements but suggested the possibility of Bone Cement Implantation Syndrome (BCIS). A literary review on BCIS confirmed that this rare intraoperative complication was plausible in all three cases. Management of these SAE via a health care safety process enabled to provide a rapid answer concerning the causality of the cement and practice deviations of its use., Conclusions: Systemic analysis completed by the manufacturer's analysis provided corrective actions for professional practices. Implementation and efficacy of these actions will be monitored as part of the facility's programme for the improvement of quality and patient safety., (Copyright © 2023 Académie Nationale de Pharmacie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)