Search

The ocular lens is an important determinant of overall vision quality whose refractive and transparent properties change throughout life. The lens operates an internal microcirculation system that generates circulating fluxes of ions, water and nutrients that maintain the transparency and refractive properties of the lens. This flow of water generates a substantial hydrostatic pressure gradient which is regulated by a dual feedback system that uses the mechanosensitive channels TRPV1 and TRPV4 to sense decreases and increases, respectively, in the pressure gradient. This regulation of water flow (pressure) and hence overall lens water content, sets the two key parameters, lens geometry and the gradient of refractive index, which determine the refractive properties of the lens. Here we focus on the roles played by the aquaporin family of water channels in mediating lens water fluxes, with a specific focus on AQP5 as a regulated water channel in the lens. We show that in addition to regulating the activity of ion transporters, which generate local osmotic gradients that drive lens water flow, the TRPV1/4‐mediated dual feedback system also modulates the membrane trafficking of AQP5 in the anterior influx pathway and equatorial efflux zone of the lens. Since both lens pressure and AQP5‐mediated water permeability (PH2O${P_{{{\mathrm{H}}_{\mathrm{2}}}{\mathrm{O}}}}$) can be altered by changes in the tension applied to the lens surface via modulating ciliary muscle contraction we propose extrinsic modulation of lens water flow as a potential mechanism to alter the refractive properties of the lens to ensure light remains focused on the retina throughout life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The optical properties of the bovine lens have been shown to be actively maintained by an internal microcirculation system. In the mouse lens, this water transport through gap junction channels generates an intracellular hydrostatic pressure gradient, which is subjected to a dual feedback regulation that is mediated by the reciprocal modulation of the transient receptor potential vanilloid channels TRPV1 and TRPV4. Here we test whether a similar feedback regulation of pressure exists in the bovine lens and whether it regulates overall lens optics. Lens pressure was measured using a microelectrode/pico-injector-based pressure measurement system, and lens optics were monitored in organ cultured lenses using a laser ray tracing system. Like the mouse, the bovine lenses exhibited a similar pressure gradient (0 to 340 mmHg). Activation of TRPV1 with capsaicin caused a biphasic increase in surface pressure, while activation of TRPV4 with GSK1016790A caused a biphasic decrease in pressure. These biphasic responses were abolished if lenses were preincubated with either the TRPV1 inhibitor A-889425 or the TRPV4 inhibitor HC-067047. While modulation of lens pressure by TRPV1 and TRPV4 had minimal effects on lens power and overall vision quality, the changes in lens pressure did induce opposing changes to lens geometry and its gradient of refractive index that effectively kept lens power constant. Hence, our results suggest that the TRPV1/4-mediated feedback control of lens hydrostatic pressure operates to ensure that any fluctuations in lens water transport, and consequently water content, do not result in changes in lens power and therefore overall vision quality.