Search

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a hepatic malignancy that has a rapidly increasing incidence. CCA is anatomically classified into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic (eCCA), which is further divided into perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) subtypes, with higher incidence rates in Asia. Despite its rarity, CCA has a low 5-year survival rate and remains the leading cause of primary liver tumor-related death over the past 10–20 years. The systemic therapy section discusses gemcitabine-based regimens as primary treatments, along with oxaliplatin-based options. Second-line therapy is limited but may include short-term infusional fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin. The adjuvant therapy section discusses approaches to improve overall survival (OS) post-surgery. However, only a minority of CCA patients qualify for surgical resection. In comparison to adjuvant therapies, neoadjuvant therapy for unresectable cases shows promise. Gemcitabine and cisplatin indicate potential benefits for patients awaiting liver transplantation. The addition of immunotherapies to chemotherapy in combination is discussed. Nivolumab and innovative approaches like CAR-T cells, TRBAs, and oncolytic viruses are explored. We aim in this review to provide a comprehensive report on the systemic and locoregional therapies for CCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Due to the rarity of the entity of cholangiocarcinoma, there is a lack of randomized clinical trials which can compared modalities of treatment for unresectable intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC). In this review, we proposed to summarize current evidence regarding all the modalities of loco-regional treatment in iCC in order to help clinicians in their decision-making. For unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC), different locoregional treatments (LRT) could be proposed to patients, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or transarterial treatments, depending on patient and tumor characteristics and local expertise. These different techniques of LRT have not been compared in a randomized clinical trial; most of the relevant studies are retrospective and not comparative. The aim of this narrative review is to help clinicians in their everyday practice discuss the pros and cons of each LRT, depending on the individual characteristics of their patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Due to the late onset of symptoms and aggressive growth, cholangiocellular carcinomas (CCA) are associated with poor outcome. In advanced stages, interventional therapies and systemic therapies are particularly used. The combination of locoregional therapeutic approaches with modern system therapies represents a promising approach to improve the outcome for cholangiocellular carcinoma patients. Locoregional therapy options for CCA are used, in particular, for non-resectable tumors and aim to reduce tumor viability or delay tumor growth and ultimately prolong overall survival. In addition to local ablative procedures such as radiofrequency- or microwave-ablation, transarterial procedures such as transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), or selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) play a major role. In particular, in combination with advances in molecular medicine and immunotherapy, there has been a further development in the therapy of primary malignant liver tumors in recent years. In this review, we analyze data from recent studies and examine the implications for therapy of CCA, particularly with regard to the combination of locoregional therapies with modern systemic therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The medical fraternity is currently burgeoned and stressed with a huge rush of patients who have inflammatory conditions, metabolite diseases, and cardiovascular diseases. In these circumstances, advanced sensing technologies could have a huge impact on the quality of life of patients. Given plasmonic resonance effects significantly improve the ability to rapidly and accurately detect biological markers, plasmonic technology is harnessed to develop a fast and accurate diagnosis that can provide timely intervention with the diseases and can also aid the recovery process by complementing the therapy stage. In this short review, we provide an overlook of how the field of plasmonic sensing has revolutionized the field of medical diagnostics. This article reviews the fundamentals and development of plasmonics. In addition, we highlight the sensitivity of various SPR and LSPR sensors. The chemistry for functionalizing plasmonic sensors is also discussed. This review also outlines some general suggestions for future directions that we feel might be useful to advance our understanding of the universe or speed up the development of plasmonic sensors in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy delivers the drug directly to the liver. We aim to explore the benefits and tolerability of Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus regorafenib in advanced colorectal liver metastasis refractory to standard systemic chemotherapy.Methods: This study analyzed 47 patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus regorafenib after standard systemic oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan in combination with bevacizumab or cetuximab between Jan 2017 and Jun 2020. Regorafenib was given for only 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle.Results: Among 47 patients, 32 (68%) were males. The median age was 61 (29-75). With a median follow-up of 22.2 months (3.7-50.7 months). Before Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy administration in combination with regorafenib, 34 (72.3%) patients previously received ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy and 37 (78.7%)patients previously received targeted biological treatment (anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR, or both). The initial doses of regorafenib were 40 mg/d (n = 1, 2.13%), 80 mg/d (n = 11, 23.43%), 120 mg/d (n = 2, 4.26%), and 160 mg/d (n = 23, 48.94%), while for 24.6% (n = 14) dose was unknown. Median Overall Survival was 22.2 months. Median Progression-Free Survival was 10.8 (95% CI: 9.0-13.7) months. Common Adverse Events were hand-foot skin reaction (12.77%), fatigue (6.38%), vomiting (6.38%), and decreased appetite (6.38%). Only 2 patients discontinued regorafenib due to Adverse Events.Conclusions: Regorafenib combined with Hepatic arterial infusion was effective and tolerable in patients with liver predominant metastasis of colorectal cancer. Hence, this therapy can be considered as an alternative for second- or subsequent lines of therapy in patients refractory to standard systemic chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) following the simultaneous placement of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) and iodine-125 (125I) seed strands for the management of advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients presenting with malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ). Methods: Data from 74 patients with MOJ caused by advanced CCA treated with stent placement with 125I seed strands with or without HAIC between November 2015 and October 2020 were analysed retrospectively. Eighteen patients received 5 sessions of HAIC after SEMS placement with 125I seed strands (HAIC group), and 56 patients only underwent SEMS placement with 125I seed strands and served as controls (control group). HAIC consisted of infusions of gemcitabine (600–1000 mg/m2 given over 30 min) followed by oxaliplatin (60–100 mg/m2 given over 2 h), with an interval of 4 weeks. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to adjust for differences in the baseline characteristics of the groups (including age, total bilirubin, and serum alanine aminotransferase level). Overall survival (OS), stent patency, and adverse events were compared between the two groups. Results: OS and stent patency were significantly better in patients in the HAIC group than in those in the control group (median survival time: before PSM, 362 vs. 185 days, p = 0.005; after PSM, 357 vs. 183 days, p = 0.012; median duration of stent patency: before PSM, 294 vs. 156 days, p = 0.001; after PSM, 287 vs. 183 days, p = 0.039). All adverse reactions were controllable by temporary symptomatic treatment. Serious complications and treatment-related deaths were not observed. Conclusion: Our preliminary study showed that HAIC following SEMS placement with 125I seed strands is effective and safe for the management of advanced CCA patients presenting with MOJ and could improve stent patency and patient survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]