Search

Introduction: Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) significantly impacts women's quality of life and often shows a high recurrence rate despite conventional antifungal therapies. This study evaluates the efficacy of Limosilactobacillus fermentum (LF5), a probiotic, as an alternative treatment option to conventional miconazole therapy in managing VVC. Methods: The randomized, single-blind clinical trial involved 100 premenopausal women diagnosed with VVC. Participants were assigned to either a vaginal capsule containing LF5 probiotic strain or miconazole. Treatments were administered once daily for three consecutive days. Microbiological eradication of Candida spp. and recurrence rates were assessed at 30 days post-treatment. The trial was registered with the Italian Ministry of Health. Results: Both treatments achieved a high rate of microbiological eradication of Candida spp. within the three-day treatment period (96% for LF5 and 94% for miconazole). Recurrence rates within 2 weeks post-treatment were low and similar between the groups (10% for LF5 and 17% for miconazole). LF5 was found to have a significantly lower incidence of local adverse reactions compared to miconazole (4 vs. 12%). Discussion: LF5 presents a viable alternative to miconazole for the treatment of VVC, offering comparable efficacy with fewer side effects. The results suggest that probiotic treatments can potentially enhance patient compliance and quality of life by reducing adverse reactions and recurrence rates. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in larger and more diverse populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) is a potent analytical method for the realtime assessment of microbial metabolic activity, which serves as an indicator of microbial viability. This approach is highly relevant to the fields of probiotics and Live Biotherapeutic Products (LBPs), offering insights into microbial viability and growth kinetics. One important characteristic of IMC is its ability to measure microbial metabolic activity separately from cellular enumeration. This is particularly useful in situations where continuous tracking of bacterial activity is challenging. The focus on metabolic activity significantly benefits both probiotic research and industrial microbiology applications. IMC's versatility in handling different media matrices allows for the implementation of viability assessments under conditions that mirror those found in various industrial environments or biological models. In our study, we provide a proof of concept for the application of IMC in determining viability and growth dynamics and their correlation with bacterial count in probiotic organisms. Our findings reinforce the potential of IMC as a key method for process enhancement and accurate strain characterization within the probiotic sector. This supports the broader objective of refining the systematic approach and methods used during the development process, thereby providing detailed insights into probiotics and LBPs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The role of Bifidobacterium species and microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and human milk oligosaccharides in controlling intestinal inflammation and the pathogenesis of obesity and type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been largely studied in recent years. This paper discusses the discovery of signature biomarkers for obesity and T1D based on data from a novel test for profiling several Bifidobacterium species, combined with metabolomic analysis. Through the NUTRISHIELD clinical study, a total of 98 children were recruited: 40 healthy controls, 40 type 1 diabetics, and 18 obese children. Bifidobacterium profiles were assessed in stool samples through an innovative test allowing high taxonomic resolution and precise quantification, while SCFAs and branched amino acids were measured in urine samples through gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). KIDMED questionnaires were used to evaluate the children's dietary habits and correlate them with the Bifidobacterium and metabolomic profiles. We found that B. longum subs. infantis and B. breve were higher in individuals with obesity, while B. bifidum and B. longum subs. longum were lower compared to healthy individuals. In individuals with T1D, alterations were found at the metabolic level, with an overall increase in the level of the most measured metabolites. The high taxonomic resolution of the Bifidobacterium test used meant strong correlations between the concentrations of valine and isoleucine, and the relative abundance of some Bifidobacterium species such as B. longum subs. infantis, B. breve, and B. bifidum could be observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Methicillin-resistant biofilm-forming Staphylococcus spp. are found in about 25% of the overall cases of chronic wounds, which can undergo malignant degeneration and be associated with skin cancer. Although antimicrobial agents are clinically used to counteract pathogens and promote wound healing, they are increasingly ineffective against multi-drug resistant bacteria. Moreover, they can induce dysbiosis, which favors opportunistic pathogen infections and alters immune responses. Consequently, research on pathogen containment strategies is crucial. We aimed to evaluate the potential beneficial effect of Lactobacillus johnsonii LJO02 cell-free supernatant (CFS) and vitamin D, as single treatments or in combination, on cell viability, wound healing, and the pro-inflammatory interleukin-6 (IL-6) production of a Staphylococcus aureus-infected human immortalized keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) in vitro model. The analysis showed that LJO02 CFS 20% v/v ratio and 100 nM vitamin D promoted infected cell viability and wound healing and significantly reduced IL-6 production. However, their effect was not synergic, since no significant difference between the single and combined treatments was observed. LJO02 CFS topic application and vitamin D supplementation could provide a valuable strategy for attenuating S. aureus-induced pathogenesis, promoting wound healing and opening new therapeutic strategies supporting the conventional approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Type-2 inflammation commonly marks asthma in childhood. Also, gut and lung dysbiosis is detectable in patients with asthma. Strain-related probiotic supplementation may restore a physiological immune response, dampen airway inflammation, and repair dysbiosis. Therefore, the probiotics in pediatric asthma management (PROPAM) study is aimed at demonstrating that Ligilactobacillus salivarius LS01 (DSM 22775) and Bifidobacterium breve B632 (DSM 24706) mixture could reduce asthma exacerbations in children, followed in a primary care setting.Methods: The study was randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind. It involved 11 Italian primary care pediatricians. The probiotic mixture (containing Ligilactobacillus salivarius LS01 1 × 109 live cells and Bifidobacterium breve B632 1 × 109 live cells) or placebo was taken twice daily (1 sachet in the morning and 1 in the evening) for eight weeks and subsequently once daily for a further eight weeks. Outcomes included number, severity, and duration of asthma exacerbations, intensity of maintenance and as need treatments, and safety.Results: The per-protocol population included 422 children (mean age seven years, 240 males and 182 females). The probiotic mixture significantly reduced the number of asthmatic exacerbations (OR = 3.17). In addition, the number of children with two exacerbations was less than a third in the active group (OR = 3.65).Conclusions: This PROPAM study demonstrated that probiotic strains Ligilactobacillus salivarius LS01 (DSM 22775) and Bifidobacterium breve B632 (DSM 24706) were safe and significantly reduced by more than a third the frequency of asthma exacerbations. At present, the first-line treatment of asthma is still drug-based, but specific strains of probiotics may be auxiliary remedies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Application of beneficial microorganisms as probiotics targets a broad range of intended uses, from maintaining health and supporting normal bodily functions to curing and preventing diseases. Currently, three main regulatory fields of probiotic products can be defined depending on their intended use: the more similar probiotic foods and probiotic dietary supplements, and live biotherapeutic products. However, it is not always straightforward to classify a probiotic product into one of these categories. The regulatory nuances of developing, manufacturing, investigating and applying each category of probiotic products are not universal, and not always apparent to those unfamiliar with the various global probiotic regulatory guidelines. Various global markets can be significantly different regarding legislation, possible claims, market value and quality requirements for the development and commercialization of probiotic products. Furthermore, different probiotic product categories are also linked with variable costs at different stages of product development. This review outlines the current landscape comparing probiotic foods, probiotic dietary supplements, and live biotherapeutics as probiotic products from a regulatory lens, focusing on product development, manufacturing and production, and clinical research agenda. The aim is to inform and promote a better understanding among stakeholders by outlining the expectations and performance for each probiotic product category, depending on their intended use and targeted geographical region., Competing Interests: SB and SH were employed by Lallemand Health Solutions. JH was employed by the International Probiotics Association. SL-R was employed by Lesaffre. JD was employed by Fonterra. JE-M was employed by AB-Biotics SA (Kaneka Group). MP was employed by Probiotical Research. AO was employed by IFF Health. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Spacova, Binda, ter Haar, Henoud, Legrain-Raspaud, Dekker, Espadaler-Mazo, Langella, Martín, Pane and Ouwehand.)

The present randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study showed that a probiotic mixture significantly reduced the number of asthma exacerbations in schoolchildren https://bit.ly/382LYKV., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: L. Drago has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Cioffi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Giuliano has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Pane is an employee of Probiotical. Conflict of interest: G. Ciprandi is an associate editor of this journal., (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)

Background: Type-2 inflammation commonly marks asthma in childhood. Also, gut and lung dysbiosis is detectable in patients with asthma. Strain-related probiotic supplementation may restore a physiological immune response, dampen airway inflammation, and repair dysbiosis. Therefore, the probiotics in pediatric asthma management (PROPAM) study is aimed at demonstrating that Ligilactobacillus salivarius LS01 (DSM 22775) and Bifidobacterium breve B632 (DSM 24706) mixture could reduce asthma exacerbations in children, followed in a primary care setting., Methods: The study was randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind. It involved 11 Italian primary care pediatricians. The probiotic mixture (containing Ligilactobacillus salivarius LS01 1 × 10 9 live cells and Bifidobacterium breve B632 1 × 10 9 live cells) or placebo was taken twice daily (1 sachet in the morning and 1 in the evening) for eight weeks and subsequently once daily for a further eight weeks. Outcomes included number, severity, and duration of asthma exacerbations, intensity of maintenance and as need treatments, and safety., Results: The per-protocol population included 422 children (mean age seven years, 240 males and 182 females). The probiotic mixture significantly reduced the number of asthmatic exacerbations (OR = 3.17). In addition, the number of children with two exacerbations was less than a third in the active group (OR = 3.65)., Conclusions: This PROPAM study demonstrated that probiotic strains Ligilactobacillus salivarius LS01 (DSM 22775) and Bifidobacterium breve B632 (DSM 24706) were safe and significantly reduced by more than a third the frequency of asthma exacerbations. At present, the first-line treatment of asthma is still drug-based, but specific strains of probiotics may be auxiliary remedies., Competing Interests: MP and AA are employees of Probiotical Research. The other authors have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Lorenzo Drago et al.)