Search

BACKGROUNDRemdesivir improves clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with moderate-to-severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Whether the use of remdesivir in syrtlptomatic, norillospitalized patients with Covid-19 who are at high risk for disease progression prevents hospitalization is uncertain. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving non-hospitalized patients with Covid-19 who had symptom onset within the previous 7 days and who had at least one risk factor for disease progression (age ≥60 years, obesity, or certain coexisting medical conditions). Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous remdesivir (200 mg on day 1 and 100 mg on days 2 and 3) or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of Covid-19-related hospitalization or death from any cause by day 28. The primary safety end point was any adverse event. A secondary end point was a composite of a Covid-19-related medically attended visit or death from any cause by day 28. RESULTS A total of 562 patients who underwent randomization and received at least one dose of remdesivir or placebo were included in the analyses: 279 patients in the remdesivir group and 283 in the placebo group. The mean age was 50 years, 47.9% of the patients were women, and 41.890 were Hispanic or Latinx. The most common coexisting conditions were diabetes mellitus (61.690), obesity (55.2%) and hypertension (47.7%). Covid-19--related hospitalization or death from any cause occurred in 2 patients (0.7%) in the remdesivir group and in 15 (5.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.59; P= 0.008). A total of 4 of 246 patients (1.6%) in the remdesivir group and 21 of 252 (8.3%) in the placebo group had a Covid-19--related medically attended visit by day 28 (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.56). No patients had died by day 28. Adverse events occurred in 42.3% of the patients in the remdesivir group and in 46.3% of those in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS Among nonhospitalized patients who were at high risk for Covid-19 progression, a 3-day course of remdesivir had an acceptable safety profile and resulted in an 87% lower risk of hospitalization or death than placebo. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; PINETKEE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04501952; EudraCT number, 2020-003510-12.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Treatment for people with HIV-1 and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on haemodialysis (HD) has previously required complex dose-adjusted regimens, with limited data on the use of a single-tablet regimen in this population. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of bictegravir (BIC) in adults with HIV-1 and ESKD on HD., Methods: We performed an open-label extension (OLE) of an open-label, multicentre, single-group phase 3b study (NCT02600819) of adults with ESKD on HD and HIV-1 with virological suppression. Participants switched to elvitegravir/cobicistat/F/TAF (E/C/F/TAF) 150/150/200/10 mg for 96 weeks, following which a subgroup of US participants entered an OLE phase in which they switched to B/F/TAF 50/200/25 mg for 48 weeks, returning for study visits at weeks 4 and 12, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Study assessments included virological response, safety and pharmacokinetic analysis of BIC., Results: Ten participants entered the OLE (median age, 55 years). Virological suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) was maintained in all participants over 48 weeks of B/F/TAF treatment. B/F/TAF was well tolerated, with no treatment discontinuations. Mean BIC trough concentrations were lower than those previously reported for people with HIV-1 with normal kidney function, but remained four- to seven-fold higher than the established protein-adjusted 95% effective concentration against wild-type HIV-1., Conclusion: These findings support the use of the once-daily B/F/TAF single-tablet regimen for people with HIV-1 and ESKD on HD. This regimen offers a convenient treatment option for this population as it reduces the need for dose adjustment, eases pill burden and avoids potential drug-drug interactions associated with alternatives that may impact individuals on multiple medications or awaiting transplantation., (© 2024 The Author(s). HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association.)

Background: Switching to the 2-drug regimen dolutegravir/lamivudine demonstrated durable non-inferior efficacy vs continuing 3- or 4-drug tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens for maintaining virologic suppression in people with HIV-1 through Week 144 in TANGO., Setting: 134 centers, 10 countries., Methods: Adults with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for >6 months and no history of virologic failure were randomized to switch from stable tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens to dolutegravir/lamivudine on Day 1 (early-switch group) for 196 weeks. Those randomized to continue tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens on Day 1 who maintained virologic suppression at Week 144 switched to dolutegravir/lamivudine at Week 148 (late-switch group). Efficacy, safety, and tolerability (including weight and biomarker changes) of dolutegravir/lamivudine in early-switch and late-switch groups were assessed through Week 196., Results: Overall, 369 participants switched to dolutegravir/lamivudine on Day 1 (early-switch) and 298 switched at Week 148 (late-switch). In the early-switch group, 83% (306/369) maintained virologic suppression through Year 4, and 3% (11/369) reported new adverse events between Weeks 144 and 196. The late-switch group at Week 196 and early-switch group at Week 48 had comparable proportions with virologic suppression (93% each) and similar safety profiles. No late-switch participants and 1 early-switch participant met confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria through Week 196, with no resistance-associated mutations observed. Treatment continued to be well tolerated long-term., Conclusion: Switching from tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens to dolutegravir/lamivudine showed durable efficacy, high barrier to resistance, and good tolerability through 4 years. These results support dolutegravir/lamivudine as a robust treatment for maintaining virologic suppression., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: SDW has received funding from ViiV Healthcare paid to his institution. FBonnet has served as a consultant, invited speaker, and/or received grants from Gilead and ViiV Healthcare. OO has served as a consultant for Gilead and ViiV Healthcare and received honoraria from ViiV Healthcare. FBisshop has participated in advisory boards for Gilead. JOlalla has served as a consultant, invited speaker, and/or received grants from Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare. J-PR has served as a consultant, invited speaker, and/or received grants from AbbVie, Gilead, GSK, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare. CW has no conflicts to disclose. RM, KP, RW, JOyee, EL, BW, BJ, KYS, and MA-K are employees of ViiV Healthcare or GSK and own stock in GSK. PS is a complimentary worker on behalf of GSK. This study was funded by ViiV Healthcare., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Cabotegravir plus rilpivirine is the only approved complete long-acting regimen for the maintenance of HIV-1 virological suppression dosed every 2 months. The SOLAR study aimed to compare long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine every 2 months with continued once-daily bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide for the maintenance of HIV-1 virological suppression in adults living with HIV., Methods: SOLAR is a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3b, non-inferiority study. The study was done in 118 centres across 14 countries. Participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL were randomly assigned (2:1), stratified by sex at birth and BMI, to either long-acting cabotegravir (600 mg) plus rilpivirine (900 mg) dosed intramuscularly every 2 months or to continue daily oral bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg). Participants randomly assigned to long-acting therapy had a choice to receive cabotegravir (30 mg) plus rilpivirine (25 mg) once daily as an optional oral lead-in for approximately 1 month. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants with virological non-response (HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies per mL; the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm, 4% non-inferiority margin; modified intention-to-treat exposed population) at month 11 (long-acting start with injections group) and month 12 (long-acting with oral lead-in group and bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04542070, and is ongoing., Findings: 837 participants were screened between Nov 9, 2020, and May 31, 2021, and 687 were randomly assigned to switch treatment or continue existing treatment. Of 670 participants (modified intention-to-treat exposed population), 447 (67%) switched to long-acting therapy (274 [61%] of 447 start with injections; 173 [39%] of 447 with oral lead-in) and 223 (33%) continued bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide. Baseline characteristics were similar; median age was 37 years (range 18-74), 118 (18%) of 670 were female sex at birth, 207 (31%) of 670 were non-White, and median BMI was 25·9 kg/m 2 (IQR 23·3-29·5). At month 11-12, long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine showed non-inferior efficacy versus bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies per mL, five [1%] of 447 vs one [<1%] of 223), with an adjusted treatment difference of 0·7 (95% CI -0·7 to 2·0). Excluding injection site reactions, adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between groups. No treatment-related deaths occurred. More long-acting group participants had adverse events leading to withdrawal (25 [6%] of 454 vs two [1%] of 227). Injection site reactions were reported by 316 (70%) of 454 long-acting participants; most (98%) were grade 1 or 2., Interpretation: These data support the use of long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine dosed every 2 months as a complete antiretroviral regimen that has similar efficacy to a commonly used integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based first-line regimen, while addressing unmet psychosocial issues associated with daily oral treatment., Funding: ViiV Healthcare., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MNR reports consulting fees from Merck, Gilead, ViiV Healthcare, and Janssen, and honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead, ViiV Healthcare, and Janssen. RD reports owning stock in Gilead, GSK, BMS, Pfizer, Merck, and Janssen, and financial support for research from Merck, Gilead, ViiV Healthcare, and Janssen. SO reports research grants from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead Sciences, honoraria from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and MSD, and participation in advisory boards for ViiV Healthcare. SW reports funding for investigator-initiated clinical trials from Merck, ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Janssen, consulting fees from Merck and ViiV Healthcare, honoraria from Merck, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead, and is the Co-Director of the Canadian HIV Trials Network. GDP reports consulting fees from AbbVie, GS Pharma, Merck, Janssen, ViiV Healthcare, Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Atea Pharmaceuticals, honoraria from AbbVie, GS Pharma, Merck, Janssen, ViiV Healthcare, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca, and participation in advisory boards for AbbVie, GS Pharma, Merck, Janssen, ViiV Healthcare, Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Atea Pharmaceuticals. KSu, DS-P, CLL, RD'A, MPB, PP, VC, WRS, HPG, KSm, and JvW are employees of ViiV Healthcare and stockholders of GSK. AB and FZ are employees and stockholders of GSK. RVS-R and VVE are employees and stockholders of Janssen. AC, CC, OO, VD-B, and JS declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In TANGO, switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) demonstrated long-term noninferior efficacy vs continuing tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens in treatment-experienced adults with HIV-1. The phase 3 SALSA study evaluated efficacy and safety of switching to DTG/3TC compared with continuing various 3-/4-drug current antiretroviral regimens (CARs)., Methods: Adults with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL and no previous virologic failure were randomized (1:1, stratified by baseline third agent class) to switch to once-daily fixed-dose combination DTG/3TC or continue CAR (primary endpoint: proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at week 48; Snapshot, intention-to-treat-exposed population, 5% noninferiority margin)., Results: Overall, 493 adults (39% women; 39% aged ≥50 years; 19% African American/African heritage; 14% Asian) were randomized to switch to DTG/3TC (n = 246) or continue CAR (n = 247). At week 48, 1 (0.4%) participant in the DTG/3TC group and 3 (1.2%) in the CAR group had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL (Snapshot), demonstrating noninferiority (adjusted difference, -0.8%; 95% CI, -2.4%, .8%). Zero participants met confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria; therefore, no resistance testing was performed. Drug-related adverse events were more frequent with DTG/3TC (20%) than CAR (6%) through week 48 but comparable post-week 24 (5% vs 2%, respectively). Proximal tubular renal function and bone turnover biomarkers improved with DTG/3TC. Both groups had generally minimal changes in lipids and inflammatory biomarkers., Conclusions: Switching to DTG/3TC was noninferior to continuing CAR for maintaining virologic suppression at week 48 with no observed resistance, supporting the efficacy, good safety, and high barrier to resistance of DTG/3TC., Clinical Trials Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04021290., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. J. M. L. has received honoraria or consultation fees from and participated in company-sponsored speakers bureaus for ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Janssen-Cilag. C. B. has received grants for an investigator-initiated study from GSK and honoraria for presentations from GSK, Gilead, and Merck Sharpe and Dohme; and has participated in advisory boards for GSK and Gilead. L. H. has received fees for participation in advisory boards or presentations from ViiV Healthcare, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, and Gilead and has received travel support for congress attendance from ViiV Healthcare, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, and Gilead. O. O. has received honoraria from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead. C. G. has received consulting fees and honoraria from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Janssen and has received support for meeting attendance from Gilead and Janssen. F. M. has received grants from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Janssen, which were paid to his institution; has received honoraria from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, Janssen, and Merck Sharp and Dohme; and has participated in data safety monitoring/advisory boards for ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, Janssen, and Merck Sharp and Dohme. S. T. has received grants for investigator-initiated studies from Gilead; has participated in and received honoraria for advisory boards or company-sponsored speakers bureaus from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Merck Sharp and Dohme; has received support for registration at scientific conferences from ViiV Healthcare; and is the unpaid Medical Director of Saving Lives. E. B., C. M., B. W., M. U., G. B., and J. v. W. are employees of ViiV Healthcare and may own stock in GSK. J. O. and L. C. are employees of and may own stock in GSK. C.-Y. C. and O. D. report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) was noninferior to continuing tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)-based regimens for maintaining virologic suppression at week 48 of the TANGO study. Here we present week 144 outcomes (efficacy, safety, weight, and biomarkers)., Methods: TANGO is a randomized (1:1, stratified by baseline third agent class), open-label, noninferiority phase 3 study. Virologically suppressed (>6 months) adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) switched to once-daily DTG/3TC or continued TAF-based regimens., Results: A total of 741 participants received study treatment (DTG/3TC, n = 369; TAF-based regimen, n = 372). At week 144, the proportion of participants with an HIV-1 RNA level ≥50 copies/mL (primary end point, Snapshot; intention-to-treat-exposed population) after switching to DTG/3TC was 0.3% (1 of 369) versus 1.3% (5 of 372) for those continuing TAF-based regimens, demonstrating noninferiority (adjusted treatment difference, -1.1 [95% confidence interval, -2.4 to .2), with DTG/3TC favored in the per-protocol analysis (adjusted treatment difference, -1.1 [-2.3 to -.0]; P = .04). Few participants met confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria (none in the DTG/3TC and 3 in the TAF-based regimen group), with no resistance observed. Drug-related adverse events were more frequent with DTG/3TC (15%; leading to discontinuation in 4%) than TAF-based regimens (5%; leading to discontinuation in 1%) through week 144, but rates were comparable after week 48 (4%; leading to discontinuation in 1% in both groups). Changes from baseline in lipid values generally favored DTG/3TC; no clinical impact on renal function and comparable changes in inflammatory and bone biomarkers across groups were observed., Conclusions: Switching to DTG/3TC demonstrated noninferior and durable efficacy compared with continuing TAF-based regimens in treatment-experienced adults with HIV-1, with good safety and tolerability, and no resistance through 144 weeks., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. O. O. has received personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Merck; has received financial support for meeting attendance/travel from GlaxoSmithKline and Merck; and owns stock in Gilead, Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline. S. D. W. has received financial support or grants paid to his institution from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Janssen and has participated in data safety monitoring or advisory boards for ViiV Healthcare and Curevac. F. B. has participated in advisory boards for Gilead and is the president of AusPATH. J. P. 
has received grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Janssen-Cilag. C. W. has received personal fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Roche, Theratechnologies, and ViiV Healthcare for speaking at educational events or participating in advisory boards. M. A. -K., 
P. L., K. A. P., R. W., B. W., M. A., J. v. W., and K. Y. S. are employees of ViiV Healthcare and own stock in GlaxoSmithKline. J. W. and N. G. are employees of and own stock in GlaxoSmithKline. F. A. and J. -P. R. report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Few therapies are approved for hospitalized patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Ibrutinib, a once-daily Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, may mitigate COVID-19-induced lung damage by reducing inflammatory cytokines. The multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 2 iNSPIRE study evaluated ibrutinib for prevention of respiratory failure in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19., Methods: Adult patients with severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalization and supplemental oxygen but without respiratory failure were randomized 1:1 (stratified by remdesivir prescription) to ibrutinib 420 mg or placebo once daily for up to 28 days plus standard of care (SOC), including remdesivir and/or dexamethasone., Results: Forty-six patients were randomized to ibrutinib plus SOC (n = 22) or placebo plus SOC (n = 24). The primary endpoint (proportion of patients alive and without respiratory failure through day 28) was not met, with no statistically significant difference adjusting for remdesivir prescription (86% with ibrutinib plus SOC vs 79% with placebo plus SOC; adjusted difference, 5.8% [80% confidence interval, -9.2% to 20.4%]; P  = .599). Secondary endpoints also showed no statistically significant improvement with ibrutinib plus SOC. Median treatment duration was 14 days for ibrutinib and placebo. Adverse events were similar with ibrutinib plus SOC vs placebo plus SOC (overall: 55% vs 50%; serious: 18% vs 13%) and were consistent with the known safety profile of ibrutinib., Conclusions: Addition of ibrutinib to SOC did not improve the proportion of patients alive and without respiratory failure through day 28 in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. Ibrutinib had a manageable safety profile, with similar safety to placebo., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04375397., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Objectives: To evaluate safety and immunogenicity of V114 [15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) containing serotypes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, 22F, 23F, and 33F], followed by 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) 8 weeks later, in adults living with HIV., Design: In this phase 3 study (V114-018; NCT03480802), pneumococcal vaccine-naive adults with HIV (CD4+ cell count ≥50 cells/μl, plasma HIV RNA <50 000 copies/ml, receiving antiretroviral therapy) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive one dose of V114 or licensed 13-valent PCV (PCV13) on day 1; participants received PPSV23 at week 8., Methods: Adverse events and serotype-specific opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were evaluated after each vaccination., Results: Of 302 participants enrolled, 292 (96.7%) completed the study. Proportions of participants experiencing at least one adverse event were 73.0 and 62.7% in the V114 and PCV13 groups following PCV and 60.7 and 71.6% following PPSV23. Most solicited adverse events were of mild or moderate severity and short duration. OPA geometric mean titers (GMTs) and IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were generally comparable between groups for shared serotypes at day 30 and maintained at week 12. OPA and IgG responses for additional serotypes in V114 (22F, 33F) were higher following V114 than PCV13 at day 30 but comparable at week 12, 30 days post-PPSV23., Conclusion: In pneumococcal vaccine-naive adults living with HIV, V114 was well tolerated and induced immune responses for all 15 pneumococcal serotypes. V114 can be followed by PPSV23 8 weeks later to broaden serotype coverage., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objectives: Long-acting formulations of cabotegravir (CAB) and rilpivirine (RPV) have demonstrated efficacy in Phase 3 studies. POLAR (NCT03639311) assessed antiviral activity and safety of CAB+RPV long-acting administered every 2 months (Q2M) in adults living with HIV-1 who previously received daily oral CAB+RPV in LATTE (NCT01641809)., Design: A Phase 2b, multicenter, open-label, rollover study., Methods: LATTE participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml who completed at least 300 weeks on study were eligible. Participants elected to switch to either CAB+RPV long-acting Q2M or daily oral dolutegravir/RPV for maintenance of virologic suppression. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA greater than or equal to 50 copies/ml at Month 12 (M12) per the Food and Drug Administration Snapshot algorithm. The incidence of confirmed virologic failure (CVF, two consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements greater than or equal to 200 copies/ml), as well as safety, laboratory, and patient-reported outcomes (HIV Treatment Satisfaction and preference questionnaires) were also assessed., Results: Of 97 participants enrolled, 90 chose to receive CAB+RPV long-acting and seven chose dolutegravir/RPV. At M12, no participant had HIV-1 RNA greater than or equal to 50 copies/ml or met the CVF criterion in either treatment group. No new safety signals were identified. Total treatment satisfaction was high at Baseline and remained stable through M12 across both treatment groups. Overall, 88% (n = 77/88) of long-acting arm participants preferred CAB+RPV long-acting to oral CAB+RPV., Conclusion: CAB+RPV long-acting maintained virologic suppression in participants who had previously received daily oral CAB+RPV for at least 5 years in LATTE, with a favorable safety profile. Most participants preferred CAB+RPV long-acting to their prior oral CAB+RPV regimen at M12., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)