Search

A retrospective study conducted in Italy analyzed data from 116 patients with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) to determine if the drug upadacitinib could improve symptoms of concomitant allergic rhinitis (AR) or allergic asthma (AA). The study found that after 16 weeks of treatment with upadacitinib, 81.9% of patients achieved a reduction of at least 75% in their AD symptoms, and 56.03% achieved a reduction of at least 90%. Upadacitinib also showed a slight improvement in symptoms of AA and AR. The study suggests that upadacitinib may have a beneficial impact on AA and AR symptoms in patients with severe AD, but further research is needed. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Ixekizumab proved to be effective and safe for psoriasis treatment in several randomized clinical trials and real‐life studies. Nevertheless, long‐term real‐world experiences are still lacking, with little data up to 4 years of treatment. Objectives: To analyse survival, effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in a real‐life cohort of patients affected by moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis up to 260 weeks (5 years). Methods: We included all patients treated with ixekizumab from December 2017 to March 2021. Drug survival (DS) was analysed in patients at risk for up to 5 years. Cox analysis was adopted to evaluate possible predictive factors of discontinuation. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (meanPASI and PASI100, 90, and ≤3) was used as outcomes of effectiveness on observed patients at 16, 52, 104, 156, 208 and 260 weeks. Logistic regression was performed to identify possible predictive factors of response. Results: DS was 65.5% at 260 weeks, with being a super‐responder patient (achievement of PASI100 at 16 weeks and maintained at 28 weeks) correlated with less risk of discontinuation. PASI100, 90 and ≤3 was achieved by 54.1%, 60.5% and 73% of observed patients, respectively, at 16 weeks, and by 59.1%, 81.8% and 95.5%, respectively, at 260 weeks. High mean BMI was the only factor strongly associated with less achievement of the outcomes at the earlier time points: PASI100 at 16 weeks (OR 0.93, CI 0.87–0.98, p = 0.014) and at 104 weeks (OR 0.91, CI 0.84–0.98, p = 0.019), PASI90 achievement at 16 weeks (OR 0.94, CI 0.88–0.99, p = 0.028) and 104 weeks (OR 0.91, CI 0.83–0.99, p = 0.027), and PASI ≤3 (OR 0.86, CI 0.76–0.97, p = 0.018) at 104 weeks. No severe adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Ixekizumab showed high effectiveness and safety for up to 5 years, with survival of 2/3 of treated patients. Rapid response to treatment is predictive of long‐term response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article is a response to a letter by Dr. Yu and Cheng-Chun Wei regarding the efficacy of anti-IL-23 and anti-IL-17 treatments after adalimumab failure in psoriatic patients. The authors agree with the lack of real-life studies comparing the rapidity of action and drug survival between IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors. They provide data suggesting a higher survival rate for IL-23 inhibitors compared to TNF alpha inhibitors and IL-17 inhibitors. The authors also acknowledge the need for studies on the prevention of psoriasis-associated comorbidities and the inclusion of diverse ethnic groups in research. However, they note that their study was conducted in a university hospital in Northern Italy and had limited representation of non-Caucasian populations. They encourage researchers in other countries to share their experiences to better understand the response to biological treatments in different ethnic groups. [Extracted from the article]

Ixekizumab showed significantly higher efficacy in terms of PASI 90 at week 24, and a higher superiority of PASI 90 and PASI 100 also at week 48. In bio-naive patients, we found a significantly higher rate of PASI-90, PASI < 3 and PASI-100 with ixekizumab compared to the secukinumab ( I P i < 0.05), while in bio-experienced patients no significant difference was observed. There was no difference between the two drug survival curves among the two treatment arms. gl PASI-90 and PASI-100 response rates were achieved at week 12 by 124 (48%) and 108 (42%) in the secukinumab group ( I P i = 0.001), while 118 (64%) and 100 (54%) in the ixekizumab group ( I P i = 0.014) respectively (Figure 1b). [Extracted from the article]

Background: Guselkumab has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of psoriasis in numerous randomized clinical trials and real-life studies. Real life data on treatment up to 4 years are lacking., Objectives: The present study aims to estimate the drug survival DS, effectiveness, and safety of guselkumab over a period of 208 weeks (w)., Methods: We included all consecutive patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis receiving at least 1 dose of guselkumab. Effectiveness was evaluated according to the achievement of PASI100, 90 and <=3. DS was evaluated according to Kaplan-Meyer curve., Results: In atotal of 202 patients theeanPASI decreased from 10.88 (SD 5.76) at baseline to 0.48 at 208w. PASI100 showed an increasing response, the outcome was achieved in 30%, and 64.71% of patients at 16W, and 208W, respectively. For PASI90 and<=3 we found a similar trend. 208w of treatment, the estimated DS was 68.5% on observed cases. Being Super Responders (SRs) according to our (p=0.005) and the GUIDE definition (p<0.001), along with cardiovascular comorbidities reduced the risk of drug interruption. In our population none of the baseline characteristics showed a clear impact on the effectiveness of guselkumab. Considering both SR definitions, in our cohort being a SRs is associated with better response in the long-term when considering PASI100 and 90 in both linear and multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Our study confirms the good effectiveness and favorable safety profile of guselkumab in a real-world setting up to four years., (© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease. The monoclonal antibody dupilumab can provide a rapid response with achievement of stable clinical disease. This study aimed to confirm the effectiveness of a televisit approach for patients with AD and treated with dupilumab., Methods: Demographic data and characteristics at baseline including mean EASI, mean NRSp, mean DLQI, and mean NRSds were retrospectively assessed and subsequently collected at up to 48 weeks, last visit in attendance, and up to the fourth televisit. The mean reduction of the above scores, and achievement at each time point of EASI≤7, EASI 75, EASI 90, DLQI 0/1, and NRSp≤4 were considered as endpoints., Results: Twelve patients underwent at least 1 televisit. The mean follow-up on dupilumab before switching to a televisit was 28.5 months. The mean EASI at the last face-to-face visit was 0.75 and remained stable at subsequent televisit visits. All patients achieved EASI≤7 as early as week 16 which was during the televisits. A similar trend was seen for EASI 75. Only 1 patient discontinued the televisits after 2 visits, preferring to return in person., Conclusions: In our case series of remotely-followed patients, clinical and patient-reported outcomes remained stable.

Background: Inverse psoriasis (IP) is a variant of plaque psoriasis involving flexor surfaces. A clear definition of IP is still lacking. Therapy is based on topical and systemic treatments, including classic systemic drugs and biologic agents, but a well-defined therapeutic strategy is absent., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study investigated the general characteristics of patients with IP or vulgar psoriasis and compared the effectiveness of anti-interleukin-17 or anti-interleukin-23 agents in the same groups. Second, treatment effectiveness and the demographic characteristics of IP patients treated with IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors were also compared. IP patients were included if they had specific psoriatic involvement of the axillary, inguinal, or submammary lines, breast folds, antecubital and popliteal pits, intergluteal fold, and perianal area. Patients with vulgar plaque psoriasis and concomitant intertriginous involvement were included in the vulgar psoriasis cohort., Results: Patients with IP were prevalently female and treated with IL-17 inhibitors compared to those with vulgar psoriasis. They also had a greater risk of drug discontinuation and subsequent therapeutical switch (32.1% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.002). At later time points, those with IP showed progressively slower achievement of PASI100 and 90 compared to the cohort with vulgar psoriasis. In the IP cohort, there was greater joint involvement in patients treated with an anti-IL-17 agent (P = 0.011), who also had a lower median age of onset (P = 0.011) compared to patients treated with an anti-IL-23 agent. Patients with IP treated with an anti-IL-23 agent initiated with a lower mean PASI and showed a slower response than patients on an anti-IL-17 agent. At later time points, progressively greater effectiveness of IL-23 inhibitors was observed compared to IL-17 inhibitors., Conclusions: Patients with IP responded less to biologic agents than those with vulgar psoriasis. In the IP cohort, IL-17 inhibitors had a faster onset than IL-23 inhibitors, but long-term anti-IL-23 agents seem to be associated with better outcomes., (© 2024 the International Society of Dermatology.)

Aim: Abrocitinib is a JAK-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). We conducted a 16-week multicenter retrospective study to assess the short-term effectiveness and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe AD., Our retrospective study included 85 adult patients from 14 Italian Dermatology Units affected by moderate-to-severe AD treated with abrocitinib 100/200 mg., Methods: Effectiveness of abrocitinib at weeks 4 and 16 was assessed by using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), the peak pruritus and sleep- Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS and S-NRS, respectively)., Results: At week 16, improvement of at least 90% in EASI (EASI90) and IGA 0/1 was observed in 49.4% and 61.2% of patients, respectively. A reduction of at least 4 points in PP-NRS and S-NRS compared with baseline was achieved by 70.6% of patients for both endpoints. No significant safety reports were observed during the study period. Naïve patients had better rates of EASI 90 compared to patients who previously failed dupilumab. Conclusion: Our data confirm the effectiveness of abrocitinib in a real-world setting with better clinical responses at weeks 4 and 16, compared with Phase-III clinical trials. Longer analyses are required to further establish the safety profile of abrocitinib.

Background: The efficacy and safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis (AD) have been defined in clinical trials but limited real-world evidence on long-term treatment outcomes is currently available to inform clinical decisions., Objectives: To describe the long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab up to 48 months in patients with moderate-to-severe AD., Methods: A multicentre, retrospective, dynamic cohort study was conducted to assess long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe AD in a real-world setting. Predictors of minimal disease activity (MDA) optimal treatment target criteria [defined as the simultaneous achievement of a 90% reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index score, itch-numeric rating scale (NRS) score ≤ 1, sleep-NRS score ≤ 1 and Dermatology Life Quality Index ≤ 1] were investigated., Results: In total, 2576 patients were enrolled from June 2018 to July 2022. MDA optimal treatment target criteria were achieved by 506/2309 (21.9%), 769/1959 (39.3%), 628/1247 (50.4%), 330/596 (55.4%) and 58/106 (54.7%) of those that reached 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of follow-up, respectively. Logistic regression revealed a negative effect on MDA achievement for conjunctivitis and food allergy at all timepoints. Adverse events (AEs) were mild and were observed in 373/2364 (15.8%), 166/2066 (8.0%), 83/1291 (6.4%), 27/601 (4.5%) and 5/110 (4.5%) of those that reached 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of follow-up. Conjunctivitis was the most frequently reported AE during the available follow-up. AEs led to treatment discontinuation in < 1% of patients during the evaluated time periods., Conclusions: The high long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab were confirmed in this dynamic cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe AD, regardless of clinical phenotype and course (persisting or relapsing) at baseline. Further research will be needed to investigate the effect of T helper cell 2 comorbidities and disease duration on the response to dupilumab and other newer therapeutics for AD., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

Background: De-escalation strategies have become increasingly used in the treatment of atopic Dermatitis® (AD) patients with dupilumab. Dose spacing (DS) refers to dose reduction by dosage elongation strategies from 2 to 8 weeks between dupilumab injections, in patients with stable response to treatment or affected by numerous adverse events. Objectives: Investigate safety and clinical effectiveness of DS strategy in AD patients treated with dupilumab. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on AD patients aged ≥18 years treated with dupilumab undergoing DS. Pre-post analyses were conducted on this cohort, termed cohort A, between effectiveness outcomes at baseline, at 16 weeks of treatment, at the index date identified as the mean follow-up time between dupilumab initiation and DS, and at subsequent two follow-up visits: T1 and T2. Based on the index date, a cohort B of AD patients on dupilumab treatment not experiencing DS was then compared with cohort A for the same outcomes at the same time points. Results: Seventy-three out of 452 patients treated with dupilumab underwent DS. The mean time since treatment initiation was 28.6 months. Mean Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) from the index date remained stable until the second follow-up visit (T2) 0.2-0.8 with no significant pre-post differences ( P > 0.05). Similar considerations can be made for mean number rating scale worst pruritus (NRSp), numerical rating scale disturbs of sleeping/sleeping disturb (NRSsd), mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and EASI Head and Neck. Attainment of relative outcomes remained stable for EASI75, 90, ≤ 7, DLQI ≤ 5, and NRSp ≤ 4. When compared with cohort B, no clinically significant differences were observed in mean reductions in all outcomes analyzed. Conclusions: DS in our study appears to be an effective and safe strategy in treating patients with severe AD after the initial therapeutic response.

Background/Objectives: Patients with treated solid tumors (TST) are a highly heterogeneous and difficult-to-treat population due to the risk of disease progression/recurrence or infection. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center study at the Dermatology Clinic of Turin with a focus on the special population of cancer patients with psoriasis treated with biologics. Results: As of July 2023, 52 psoriatic patients with a prior/concomitant history of malignancy had taken biologic drugs. The median age was 67 years, and the median age of cancer onset was 55 years. The most common tumors were gastrointestinal cancer and melanoma. After the tumor diagnosis, 61% received an anti-IL17 drug; 37 patients continued the initiated biologic therapy, while 12 switched drugs due to secondary inefficacy. The estimated biologic DS was 55.6% at 50 months. Evidence suggests that IL-17 is a key pathogenic factor involved in tumorigenesis, resulting in a lower risk of malignancies in subjects managed with IL-17 inhibitors. Similarly, IL-23 plays a role in suppressing innate immunity and promoting tumor and metastases development. This is a consistent real-life case series that support the use of biologic drugs in patients with TST. Conclusions : IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors, being immunomodulators rather than immunosuppressants, may be a safe option for patients in an active oncological setting and for immune-correlated adverse events.

Background: Despite extraordinary improvements in the management of psoriasis in recent times, some areas of the body, such as the pretibial area, still show an unsatisfactory response and a more significant impact on patient quality of life. This multicentre study focuses on psoriasis affecting sensitive areas (particularly the pretibial area), its impact on quality of life and the therapeutic response to risankizumab., Methods: This multicentre prospective observational study recruited patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis with pretibial area involvement. All patients underwent treatment with risankizumab (150 mg every 3 weeks), and efficacy was assessed after 24 weeks., Results: The study included 128 patients with a mean age of 51 years, suffering from moderate-to-severe psoriasis with involvement of the pretibial area with median total Psoriasis Area Severity Index score of 17.05 and Dermatology Life Quality Index of 16.27. The group was further divided into two sub-groups: the 'mother patch' group, in whom the very first psoriatic plaque appeared in the pretibial region (45 patients), and the 'non-mother patch' group, in whom the psoriatic lesion in the pretibial region was present but not as the first manifestation (83 patients). In order to better assess the involvement of psoriasis in the pretibial area, the pretibial plaque lesion severity index was also calculated at baseline in all patients: extent 2.75, erythema 2.64, infiltration 2.45 and desquamation 2.38. All participants in this study showed a good therapeutic response, with a reduction in all scores., Conclusions: The pretibial area is becoming an object of therapeutic interest due to some resistance to clearance and the consequent impairment of patient quality of life. This study showed that risankizumab can give favourable therapeutic results not only in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis with involvement of the difficult-to-treat areas but particularly in patients with recalcitrant plaques in the pretibial area., Competing Interests: Disclosure and potential conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. All other authors declare no conflict of interest. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Potential Conflicts of Interests form for the authors is available for download at: https://www.drugsincontext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/dic.2024-6-3-COI.pdf, (Copyright © 2024 Bernardini N, Skroza N, Atzori L, Mugheddu C, Megna M, Cacciapuoti S, Ortoncelli M, Montesu MA, Carpentieri A, Carriero M, Atzori MG, Addis G, Balestri R, Rech G, Bruni P, Papini M, Potenza C.)

Background: There is limited epidemiological evidence on outcomes associated with dupilumab exposure during pregnancy; monitoring pregnancy outcomes in large populations is required., Objective: To investigate the potential association between exposure to dupilumab in pregnant women with atopic dermatitis and any adverse pregnancy, neonatal, congenital and post-partum outcomes., Methods: We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study across 19 Italian tertiary referral hospital. Childbearing women were eligible if aged 18-49 years and carried out the pregnancy between 1 October 2018 and 1 September 2022., Results: We retrospectively screened records of 5062 patients receiving dupilumab regardless of age and gender, identifying 951 female atopic dermatitis patients of childbearing age, 29 of whom had been exposed to the drug during pregnancy (3%). The median duration of dupilumab treatment prior to conception was 22.5 weeks (range: 3-118). The median time of exposure to the drug during pregnancy was 6 weeks (range: 2-24). All the documented pregnancies were unplanned, and the drug was discontinued in all cases once pregnancy status was reported. The comparison of the study cohort and the control group found no significant drug-associated risk for adverse pregnancy, congenital, neonatal or post-partum outcomes. The absence of a statistically significant effect of exposure on the event was confirmed by bivariate analysis and multivariate analysis adjusted for other confounding factors., Conclusions: This cohort of pregnant patients exposed to dupilumab adds to the existing evidence concerning the safety of biologic agents in pregnancy. No safety issues were identified regarding the primary outcome assessed. In clinical practice, these data provide reassurance in case of dupilumab exposure during the first trimester. However, the continuous use of dupilumab throughout pregnancy warrants further research., (© 2024 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background: There are currently limited data on dupilumab drug survival (DS), especially on factors possibly associated with drug discontinuation., Materials and Methods: The primary endpoint of this study is to evaluate the parameters that may determine drug discontinuation and the predictive factors associated with dupilumab DS. We considered as independent associated factors: childhood onset of disease, gender, age of onset of AD, age of initiation of dupilumab, previous use of cyclosporine, initial mean EASI, atopic family history, and predisposition to allergic conjunctivitis., Results: On 413 patients DS was 94.5% at 1 year, 89.5% at 2 years, and 83.7% at 3 years, and after a mean follow-up of 40.5 months (±1.6) 53 patients had discontinued the drug permanently (12.8%). Univariate analysis showed that the only factor associated with a reduction in drug survival was a predisposition to allergic conjunctivitis (p 0.009). At multivariate Cox regression, male sex (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.14-4.78; p 0.02) and predisposition to allergic conjunctivitis (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.37-5.00; p 0.004) were associated with lower DS of dupilumab., Conclusion: Male gender and predisposition to allergic conjunctivitis are negative predictors for maintenance of response to treatment with dupilumab and consequently associated with lower DS rates.

Introduction: the selective IL-17 inhibitor secukinumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis in recent years., Objective: evaluate effectiveness and drug survival (DS) of secukinumab in patients with psoriasis for up to 5 years., Methods: This is a retrospective study on a monocentric cohort of patients with psoriasis on secukinumab evaluating the achievement of PASI100, PASI90, and PASI ≤ 3 and DS analysis up to 260 weeks. DS multivariate analysis was carried out considering sex, age, age of onset of the disease, obesity, cardiovascular comorbidities, diabetes, involvement of difficult-to-treat sites, psoriatic arthritis, treatment-naïve status, and mean baseline PASI., Results: At baseline, we evaluated 255 patients on secukinumab. PASI100 was reached by 41.7% and 70.6% of patients at weeks 16 and 260, respectively. PASI90 showed a similar trend with 46.5% of patients achieving it at week 16 and 88.2% at week 260. Non-obese patients showed a faster response than patients with obesity in achieving PASI100, PASI90, and PASI ≤ 3, with significant differences at 28 weeks [55% vs. 40% ( p = 0.033), 64% vs. 49% ( p = 0.038), and 76% vs. 62% ( p = 0.036), respectively]. The estimated DS for secukinumab was 84.3% at 12 and 48% at 60 months. Obesity and smoking habits were associated with a higher risk of discontinuation in multivariate models (HR 1.6 CI 1.05-2.45, p = 0.028; HR 1.48 CI 1.01-2.17, p = 0.043, respectively)., Conclusions: Secukinumab showed effectiveness for up to 5 years of treatment, with a high DS and achievement of PASI100, PASI90, and PASI < 3 at these time points. Only obesity reduced the response and maintenance of DS.

Background: Brodalumab is a monoclonal antibody and IL-17 RA inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The present study aims to estimate the drug survival (DS), effectiveness, and safety of brodalumab over a period of 156 weeks., Methods: The primary objectives were: (i) to determine the treatment response rate at Weeks 16, 28, 52, 78, 104, and 156 as defined by PASI100, PASI90, and an absolute PASI ≤ 3 and (ii) long-term DS. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of possible predictive factors associated with the achievement of response outcomes, and possible predictive factors associated with lower DS., Results: The treatment response was rapid, with 80.3% of patients achieving PASI ≤ 3, 66% PASI90, and 54.3% the complete clearance of disease at Week 16. The response improved at Week 28, when a plateau was achieved with mild loss of response at later time points, in particular for PASI100 and PASI90 in 55.2 and 65.5% of patients, respectively, at Week 156. After 156 weeks of treatment, 66.22% of patients were still on therapy, and the previous use of IL-17 inhibitors appeared to be associated with an increased risk of treatment discontinuation (HR: 2.51, CI: 1.06-5.98, P = 0.037), and achievement of PASI ≤ 3 until Week 16 with less risk (HR: 0.27 CI: 0.14-0.51, P < 0.001). Bio-naïve status was favorably associated with treatment response, while high BMI negatively affected the achievement of outcomes., Conclusion: Our study confirms the good effectiveness and favorable safety profile of brodalumab in a real-world setting for up to 3 years of treatment., (© 2024 the International Society of Dermatology.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Introduction: Several systemic therapies have been approved for the treatment of severe AD. In particular, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), including abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, recently received approval for the treatment of patients with severe AD after being evaluated in several clinical trials. However, a few concerns have been raised regarding their long-term safety and the management of these drugs in real-world clinical practice. In this article we described the results of a Delphi consensus aimed at describing the knowledge on JAKi and focusing, in particular, on providing clinical recommendations for dermatologists in daily practice regarding the use of these drugs., Methods: Twelve Italian dermatologists reviewed the most recent literature regarding the efficacy and safety profiles of JAKi and proposed 24 statements., Results: Agreement was reached for statements focusing on three main topics: (1) place in therapy of JAKi in patients with moderate-to-severe AD; (2) effectiveness and safety of JAK inhibitors in different phenotypes; (3) different approaches to the management of patients treated with JAKi in clinical practice. The panel proposed several recommendations regarding all the statements., Conclusion: Given the wide use of JAKi in clinical practice, it is crucial to establish a specific follow-up for each patient's phenotype in order to achieve the best possible clinical outcome and minimize potential adverse events., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Patients with psoriasis who have failed multiple biologic drugs have been defined as "multi-failure," although there are no clear data on the characteristics, comorbidities, and best treatment strategies for this population. Nowadays, given the next generation and the number of biologics available, patients are considered multi-failure when ≥4 biologics fail to achieve a good response., Methods: Demographic characteristics and efficacy of anti-interleukin drugs in multi-failure patients were compared to a cohort of general psoriatic patients treated with IL-23 or IL-17 inhibitors., Results: In total 97 multi-failure patients (≥4 lines of biologics) were compared with 1,057 patients in the general cohort. The current drugs in the multi-failure group were risankizumab (34), ixekizumab (23), guselkumab (21), brodalumab (7), tildrakizumab (5), ustekinumab (4), secukinumab (2), and certolizumab pegol (1). A significant difference was found in the multi-failure cohort for age of psoriasis onset (mean 29.7 vs. 35.1, P < 0.001), concurrent psoriatic arthritis (45.4 vs. 26.9%, P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (30.9 vs. 10.9%, P < 0.001), and cardiovascular comorbidity (54.6 vs. 39.8%, P = 0.005). In multi-failure patients, current biological therapy showed a good initial response (PASI 90 and 100 of 41.24 and 27.84%, respectively, at 16 weeks); the response tended to decline after 40 weeks. Anti-IL-17 agents showed clinical superiority over IL-23 agents in terms of achieving PASI90 at 28 weeks (P < 0.001) and 40 weeks (P = 0.007), after which they reached a plateau. In contrast, IL-23 agents showed a slower but progressive improvement that was maintained for up to 52 weeks. A similar trend was also seen for PASI100 (28 weeks P = 0.032; 40 weeks P = 0.121)., Conclusions: The multi-failure patient is characterized by many comorbidities and longstanding inflammatory disease that frequently precedes the introduction of systemic biologic therapy. Further studies are needed to identify more specific criteria that could be applied as a guideline by clinicians., (© 2024 The Authors. International Journal of Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the International Society of Dermatology.)

Background and Aims: The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) proposed measures to address severe side effects linked to Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). Use of these medications in individuals aged 65 and older, those at high cardiovascular risk, active or former long-term smokers, and those with increased cancer risk should be considered only if no alternatives exist. Caution is advised when administering JAKi to patients at risk of venous thromboembolism. We aim to implement recommendations from regulatory guidelines based on areas of uncertainty identified., Methods: A two-round modified Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness methodology study was conducted. A panel of 21 gastroenterologists, dermatologists and rheumatologists used a 9-point Likert scale to rate the appropriateness of administering a JAKi for each proposed clinical scenario. Scores for appropriateness were categorized as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate. Two rounds were performed, each with online surveys and a virtual meeting to enable discussion and rating of each best practice., Results: Round 1 involved participants rating JAKi appropriateness and suggesting descriptors to reduce uncertainty. Survey results were discussed in a virtual meeting, identifying areas of disagreement. In round 2, participants rated their agreement with descriptors from round 1, and the level of uncertainty and disagreement reduced. Age flexibility is recommended in the absence of other risk factors. Active counseling on modifiable risks (e.g., overweight, mild hyperlipidemia and hypertension) and smoking cessation is advised. Uncertainty persists regarding cancer risk due to various factors., Conclusions: We outlined regulatory guidance without a personalized evaluation of the patient's risk profile might lead to uncertainty and become an arid technicality. Therefore, we identified gaps and implemented PRAC recommendations to help health professionals in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Virginia Solitano and Magnus Petersen declare no conflict of interest. Paola Facheris has served as consultant for Eli Lilly. Ferdinando D'Amico has served as a speaker for Sandoz, Janssen, Galapagos, and Omega Pharma. He has also served as advisory board member for Abbvie, Ferring, Galapagos, and Nestlè. Michela Ortoncelli has declared no conflicts of interest. Daniel Aletaha received grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Eli Lilly and Sanofi, and honoraria (speaker's bureau, consultancy) from AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and Sandoz and is a member of the ARD Editorial Board. Pablo A. Olivera received consulting fees from Abbvie, Takeda, and Janssen and lecture fees from Takeda and Janssen. Thomas Bieber was speaker or consultant or Investigator for AbbVie, Affibody, Allmiral, AnaptysBio, Arena, Asana Biosciences, ASLAN pharma, Bayer Health, BioVerSys, Böhringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Connect Pharma, Dermavant, Domain Therapeutics, EQRx, Eli Lilly and Company, Galderma, Glenmark, GSK, Incyte, Innovaderm, IQVIA, Janssen, Kirin, Kymab, LEO, LG Chem, L'Oréal, MSD, Novartis, Numab, OM-Pharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Q32bio, RAPT, Sanofi/Regeneron, UCB. He is founder and chairman of the board of the non-profit biotech “Davos Biosciences”. Sofia Ramiro research grants and/or consultancy fees: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janseen, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Sanofi. Subrata Ghosh declares receiving consulting fees from Pfizer, Janssen, AbbVie, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Receptos, Celgene, Gilead, Eli Lilly, and Boehringer Ingelheim, and speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, Ferring, Pfizer, Shield, and Falk Pharma outside of the submitted work. Maria Antonietta D'Agostino reports speaker or consultant fees from Novartis, BMS, Janssen,Pfizer, Amgen, Galapagos, AbbVie, UCB, and Eli Lilly. PC reports research grants from UCB, MSD and Pfizer; speaker fees or consultant fees from Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, UCB, Eli Lilly, Gilead and Celgene Corporation. Britta Siegmund has served as consultant for Abbvie, Abivax, Arena, BMS, Boehringer, CED Service GmbH, Celgene, CT Scout, Endpoint Health, Falk, Forga Software, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Materia Prima, Pfizer, Takeda, Pharma Insight, Predictimmune, PsiCro; Speaker fees: AbbVie, BMS, CED Service GmbH, Chiesi, Falk, Ferring, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Materia Prima, Takeda, Pfizer and grant support by Arena/Pfizer (served as representative of the Charité). Isabelle Chary-Valckenaere received consulting fees from Abbvie, BMS, Galapagos, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Ailsa Hart has served as consultant, advisory board member or speaker for AbbVie, Arena, Atlantic, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Falk, Galapogos, Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Napp Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Shire and Takeda. She also serves on the Global Steering Committee for Genentech. Lorenzo Dagna Lorenzo Dagna received consultation honoraria from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, and Vifor outside of the current work. Fernando Magro has served as a speaker and received honoraria from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Abbvie, Vifor, Falk, Laboratorios Vitoria, Ferring, Hospira, and Biogen. Renaud Felten has been a consultant for Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB. Paulo Kotze has received honoraria from AbbVie, Ferring, Janssen, Pfizer, and Takeda as a speaker and member of advisory boards. He also received scientific research grants from Pfizer and Takeda. Vipul Jairath has received consultancy/advisory board fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv Inc., Arena pharmaceuticals, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Flagship Pioneering, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Pandion, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Protagonist, Reistone Biopharma, Roche, Sandoz, Second Genome, Takeda, Teva, Topivert, Ventyx, and Vividion; and speaker's fees from, Abbvie, Ferring, Galapagos, Janssen Pfizer Shire, Takeda, and Fresenius Kabi. Antonio Costanzo has served as an advisory board member, consultant and has received fees and speaker's honoraria or has participated in clinical trials for Abbvie, Almirall, Biogen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme and UCB-Pharma. Lars Erik Kristensen has received fees for participation in speakers bureaus, research grants and consultancy fees from Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, UCB, Celgene, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Laurent Peyrin Biroulet has served as a speaker, consultant, and advisory board member for Merck, Abbvie, Janssen, Genentech, Mitsubishi, Ferring, Norgine, Tillots, Vifor, Hospira/Pfizer, Celltrion, Takeda, Biogaran, Boerhinger Ingelheim, Lilly, HAC Pharma, Index Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Sandoz, Forward Pharma GmbH, Celgene, Biogen, Lycera, Samsung Bioepis, and Theravance. Silvio Danese has served as a speaker, consultant, and advisory board member for Schering-Plough, AbbVie, Actelion, Alphawasserman, AstraZeneca, Cellerix, Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Ferring, Genentech, Grunenthal, Johnson and Johnson, Millenium Takeda, MSD, Nikkiso Europe GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Nycomed, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, UCB Pharma, and Vifor., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the variation of dry eye disease (DED) prevalence in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated with dupilumab., Methods: This prospective case-control study included consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe AD scheduled for dupilumab between May and December 2021 and healthy subjects. DED prevalence, the Ocular Surface Disease Index, tear film breakup time test, osmolarity, Oxford staining score, and Schirmer test results were collected at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months after dupilumab therapy. The Eczema Area and Severity Index was assessed at baseline. Ocular side effects and discontinuation of dupilumab were also recorded., Results: Seventy-two eyes from 36 patients with AD treated with dupilumab and 36 healthy controls were included. Prevalence of DED increased from 16.7% at baseline to 33.3% at 6 months in the dupilumab group ( P = 0.001), whereas it remained unchanged in the control group ( P = 0.110). At 6 months, the Ocular Surface Disease Index and Oxford score increased (from 8.5 ± 9.8 to 11.0 ± 13.0, P = 0.068, and from 0.1 ± 0.5 to 0.3 ± 0.6, P = 0.050, respectively), the tear film breakup time test and Schirmer test results decreased (from 7.8 ± 2.6 s to 7.1 ± 2.7 s, P < 0.001, and from 15.4 ± 9.6 mm to 13.2 ± 7.9 mm, P = 0.036, respectively) in the dupilumab group, whereas they remained stable in the control group ( P > 0.05). Osmolarity was unchanged (dupilumab P = 0.987 and controls P = 0.073). At 6 months after dupilumab therapy, 42% of patients had conjunctivitis, 36% blepharitis, and 2.8% keratitis. No severe side effects were reported, and none of the patients discontinued dupilumab. No association between Eczema Area and Severity Index and DED prevalence was shown., Conclusions: DED prevalence increased in patients with AD treated with dupilumab at 6 months. However, no severe ocular side effects were found and no patient discontinued therapy., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD), a relapsing, inflammatory skin disease, is associated with pruritus that can negatively affect patients' quality of life. Understanding the burden of AD is critical for informing and tailoring treatment and disease management to improve patient outcomes. This study characterized global treatment patterns and the clinical, psychosocial and economic burden of moderate-to-severe AD., Methods: MEASURE-AD was a cross-sectional 28-country study in patients with physician-confirmed moderate-to-severe AD who were either receiving or eligible for systemic therapy for AD. Patients ≥12 years were enrolled between December 2019 and December 2020 while attending routine office or clinic visit. Primary outcomes included Worst Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (WP-NRS; range: 0-10) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; range: 0-30) and Children's DLQI (CDLQI; range: 0-30). Secondary outcomes included physician- and patient-reported clinical, psychosocial and economic burden., Results: Of the 1591 patients enrolled, 1558 (1434 adults and 124 adolescents) fulfilled all patient selection criteria and were included in this analysis. Almost all patients (98.4%) in the total population were using AD medications and more than half (56%) were receiving systemic medication (15% systemic monotherapy). The most used systemic therapies were dupilumab (56.3%), systemic glucocorticoids (18.1%) and methotrexate (16.2%). Mean WP-NRS was 5.3 in the total population, and most patients (≥55%) reported moderate-to-severe pruritus (WP-NRS ≥4). Mean DLQI was 10.8 and mean CDLQI was 9.6. Secondary endpoints demonstrated substantial clinical, psychosocial, and economic burden of disease. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients receiving systemic therapy had lower disease burden than those not taking systemic medications., Conclusions: While systemic therapy lowers overall disease burden, patients with moderate-to-severe AD continue to have substantial multidimensional disease burden and uncontrolled disease. Overall, there is a need for effective disease management, including effective treatments that improve patients' psychosocial outcomes and reduce the economic burden of AD., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background: Limited real-world data are available on upadacitinib drug survival in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives: To investigate upadacitinib drug survival, and the reasons and predictors of drug discontinuation in AD patients. Methods: All consecutive patients aged 18-75 years, affected by moderate-to-severe AD, and treated with upadacitinib for more than 1 month at dermatological clinics were included during November 2020-August 2023. Upadacitinib survival was investigated through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the predictors through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Overall, 325 adult AD patients (mean (SD) age, 38.6(15.6) years) had a 1-year and 1.5-year upadacitinib drug survival of 91.5% and 80.2%, respectively. The main reasons for drug discontinuation (25/325, 7.7%) were adverse events (4.9%), including cutaneous or infectious diseases (1.5%), such as acne and herpes zoster; blood test changes (1.2%), including hypercholesterolemia, creatine phosphokinase or liver enzyme elevation, and lymphopenia; urinary or respiratory infections (0.9%); deep venous thrombosis (0.3%); malignancies (0.3%); loss of consciousness (0.3%); and arthralgias (0.3%); followed by ineffectiveness (0.6%). No specific characteristic was significantly associated with an increased risk of upadacitinib discontinuation. Conclusions: Our findings show that upadacitinib was effective in moderate-to-severe AD after more than 1 year of continuous treatment but point to the need for clinical and laboratory monitoring of patients.

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that negatively impacts the quality of life and work productivity of patients., Objectives: We sought to evaluate the real-world burden of AD patients in Italy., Methods: This sub-analysis of the MEASURE-AD multicountry study conducted between December 2019-2020 included patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe AD eligible for or receiving systemic therapy in the previous 6 months. During a single visit, physician and patient-reported questionnaires were used., Results: A total of 118 adult patients were enrolled and 57.6% (N = 68) of patients had moderate-to-severe AD at the time of enrolment according to the Eczema Area and Severity Index. Sleep disorders interfered with daily function in the previous week in 58.5% (N = 69) of patients, pruritus was severe in 50% (N = 59) and 42.4% (N = 50) reported a flare lasting >7 days in the previous 6 months. According to the Dermatology Quality of Life Index, 37.3% (N = 44) of patients reported a severe impact of AD and approximately 10% had clinical depression/anxiety. Current drug therapy was considered inadequate in controlling AD in 26.3% (N=31) of patients. Work activity impairment was 38.6±31.7% and monthly AD-related expenses were 148.6±134.6 Euros per patient., Conclusions: This real-life study documents a high burden of disease in patients with moderate-severe AD in Italy.