Search

Aims: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) combined with exercise echocardiography (CPETecho) allows simultaneous assessments of cardiac, pulmonary, and ventilation in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study sought to determine whether simultaneous assessment of CPET variables could provide additive predictive value over exercise stress echocardiography in patients with dyspnoea. Methods and results: CPETecho was performed in 443 patients with suspected HFpEF (240 HFpEF and 203 controls without HF). Patients with HFpEF were divided based on peak oxygen consumption (VO2, ≥10 or <10 ml/min/kg) or the slope of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production (VE vs. VCO2 slope ≥45.0 or <45.0). The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of all‐cause mortality, HF hospitalization, unplanned hospital visits requiring intravenous diuretics, or intensification of oral diuretics. During a median follow‐up of 399 days, the composite outcome occurred in 57 patients. E/e' ratio during peak exercise was associated with adverse outcomes. Patients with HFpEF and lower peak VO2 had increased risks of the composite event (hazard ratio [HR] 5.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.65–9.62, p < 0.0001 vs. controls; HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.69–5.84, p = 0.0003 vs. HFpEF with higher peak VO2). Elevated VE versus VCO2 slope was also associated with adverse events in HFpEF. The addition of either the presence of abnormal peak VO2 or VE versus VCO2 slope increased the predictive ability over the model based on age, sex, atrial fibrillation, left atrial volume index, and exercise E/e' (p < 0.05). Conclusion: These data provide new insights into the role of CPETecho in patients with HFpEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, bedside ultrasound examinations have been used in many clinical departments and are called point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Regarding POCUS in the cardiac field, a protocol called focus (focused) cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) has been developed in Europe and the United States, is being used clinically, and an educational syllabus has been created. According to them, FoCUS is defined as a point-of-care cardiac ultrasound examination using standardized limited sections and protocols. FoCUS is primarily intended to be performed by non-cardiologists, and in order to avoid making mistakes in judgment, it is important to be familiar with its limitations and it is necessary to understand pathological conditions that can only be diagnosed using conventional comprehensive echocardiography. The Japanese Society of Echocardiography has edited this clinical guideline because we believe that FoCUS should be used effectively and appropriately in Japan, and that appropriate education is essential to popularize FoCUS in Japan. Furthermore, lung POCUS has recently come into clinical use. Lung POCUS is useful for the diagnosis and follow-up of heart failure when used in conjunction with FoCUS, and is especially useful in primary care where chest X-rays are not available. The working group that created this manual agreed that it is desirable to educate patients about lung POCUS in conjunction with FoCUS, so we decided to include the basic techniques of lung POCUS and how to use them in this manuscript. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Exercise intolerance is the primary symptom of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Chronotropic incompetence has been considered to be common and contribute to poor exercise capacity in HFpEF. However, clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, and outcomes of chronotropic incompetence in HFpEF remain poorly understood. Patients with HFpEF (n = 246) underwent ergometry exercise stress echocardiography with simultaneous expired gas analysis. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of chronotropic incompetence, which was defined by heart rate reserve <0.80. Chronotropic incompetence was common in HFpEF (n = 112, 41 %). Compared to HFpEF patients with a normal chronotropic response (n = 134), those with chronotropic incompetence had higher body mass index, a higher prevalence of diabetes, more frequent β-blocker use, and worse New York Heart Association class. During peak exercise, patients with chronotropic incompetence demonstrated less increase in cardiac output and arterial oxygen delivery (cardiac output × saturation × hemoglobin × 1.34 × 10), higher metabolic work (peak oxygen consumption [VO 2 ]/watt), an inability to increase arteriovenous oxygen difference, and poorer exercise capacity (lower peak VO 2) than those without. Chronotropic incompetence was associated with higher rates of a composite of all-cause mortality or worsening HF events (hazard ratio, 2.66, 95 % confidence intervals, 1.16–6.09, p = 0.02). Chronotropic incompetence is common in HFpEF, and is associated with unique pathophysiologic characteristics during exercise and clinical outcomes. [Display omitted] • Chronotropic incompetence, defined by heart rate reserve <0.80, was common in HFpEF. • Chronotropic incompetence was related to higher body mass index, diabetes, and β-blocker use. • Chronotropic incompetence was related to poor cardiac output reserve and exercise capacity. • Chronotropic incompetence was associated with higher rates of clinical events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Left atrial (LA) myopathy is increasingly recognized as an important phenotypic trait in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Right atrial (RA) remodelling and dysfunction also develop in HFpEF, but little data are available regarding the clinical characteristics and pathophysiology among patients with isolated LA, RA, or biatrial myopathy. Methods and results: Patients with HFpEF underwent invasive haemodynamic exercise testing, comprehensive imaging including speckle tracking strain echocardiography, and clinical follow‐up at Mayo Clinic between 2006 and 2018. LA myopathy was defined as LA volume index >34 ml/m2 and/or LA reservoir strain ≤24% and RA myopathy by RA volume index >39 ml/m2 in men and >33 ml/m2 in women and/or RA reservoir strain ≤19.8%. Of 476 consecutively evaluated patients with HFpEF defined by invasive exercise testing with evaluable atrial structure/function, 125 (26%) had no atrial myopathy, 147 (31%) had isolated LA myopathy, 184 (39%) had biatrial myopathy, and 20 (4%) had isolated RA myopathy. Patients with HFpEF and biatrial myopathy had more atrial fibrillation, poorer left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, more severe pulmonary vascular disease, tricuspid regurgitation, ventricular interdependence and right ventricular dysfunction, and poorer cardiac output reserve with exercise. There were 94 patients with events over a median follow‐up of 2.9 (interquartile range 1.4–4.6) years. Individuals with biatrial myopathy had an 84% higher risk of HF hospitalization or death as compared to those with isolated LA myopathy (hazard ratio 1.84; 95% confidence interval 1.16–2.92, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Biatrial myopathy identifies patients with more advanced HFpEF characterized by more severe pulmonary vascular disease, right HF, poorer cardiac reserve, and a greater risk for adverse outcomes. Further study is required to define optimal strategies to treat and prevent biatrial myopathy in HFpEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a syndrome characterized by multiple cardiac reserve limitations during exercise. Cardiac power output (CPO) is an index of global cardiac performance and can be estimated non-invasively by echocardiography. We hypothesized that CPO reserve during exercise would be associated with impaired cardiovascular reserve, exercise intolerance, and adverse outcomes in HFpEF. Methods and results Exercise stress echocardiography was performed in 425 dyspnoeic patients [217 HFpEF and 208 non-heart failure (HF) controls] to estimate CPO at rest and during exercise. We classified patients with HFpEF based on the median value of changes in CPO from rest to peak exercise (ΔCPO >0.49 W/100 g). Patients with HFpEF and a lower CPO reserve had poorer biventricular systolic function, impaired chronotropic response during exercise, and worse aerobic capacity than controls and those with a higher CPO reserve. During a median follow-up of 358 days, a composite outcome of all-cause mortality or HF events occurred in 30 patients. Patients with a lower CPO reserve had four-fold and nearly 10-fold increased risks of the outcomes compared with those with a higher CPO reserve and controls, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 4.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16–10.1, P = 0.003 and HR 9.61, 95% CI 3.58–25.8, P < 0.0001]. We further found that a lower CPO reserve had an incremental prognostic value over the H2FPEF score and exercise duration. In contrast, resting CPO did not predict clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. Conclusion A lower CPO reserve was associated with biventricular systolic dysfunction, chronotropic incompetence, exercise intolerance, and adverse outcomes in patients with HFpEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]