Search

Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs) are transforming the intersection of computer vision and natural language processing. Nonetheless, the potential of using visual prompts for emotion recognition in these models remains largely unexplored and untapped. Traditional methods in VLLMs struggle with spatial localization and often discard valuable global context. To address this problem, we propose a Set-of-Vision prompting (SoV) approach that enhances zero-shot emotion recognition by using spatial information, such as bounding boxes and facial landmarks, to mark targets precisely. SoV improves accuracy in face count and emotion categorization while preserving the enriched image context. Through a battery of experimentation and analysis of recent commercial or open-source VLLMs, we evaluate the SoV model's ability to comprehend facial expressions in natural environments. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating spatial visual prompts into VLLMs for improving emotion recognition performance., Comment: Accepted by EMNLP2024 (Main, Long paper)

Nowadays, the open-source software (OSS) ecosystem suffers from security threats of software supply chain (SSC) attacks. Interpreted OSS malware plays a vital role in SSC attacks, as criminals have an arsenal of attack vectors to deceive users into installing malware and executing malicious activities. In this paper, we introduce tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) proposed by MITRE ATT\&CK into the interpreted malware analysis to characterize different phases of an attack lifecycle. Specifically, we propose GENTTP, a zero-shot approach to extracting a TTP of an interpreted malware package. GENTTP leverages large language models (LLMs) to automatically generate a TTP, where the input is a malicious package, and the output is a deceptive tactic and an execution tactic of attack vectors. To validate the effectiveness of GENTTP, we collect two datasets for evaluation: a dataset with ground truth labels and a large dataset in the wild. Experimental results show that GENTTP can generate TTPs with high accuracy and efficiency. To demonstrate GENTTP's benefits, we build an LLM-based Chatbot from 3,700+ PyPI malware's TTPs. We further conduct a quantitative analysis of malware's TTPs at a large scale. Our main findings include: (1) many OSS malicious packages share a relatively stable TTP, even with the increasing emergence of malware and attack campaigns, (2) a TTP reflects characteristics of a malware-based attack, and (3) an attacker's intent behind the malware is linked to a TTP., Comment: 19 pages, 11 figures

Nowadays, attackers target Internet of Things (IoT) devices for security exploitation, and search engines for devices and services compromise user privacy, including IP addresses, open ports, device types, vendors, and products.Typically, application banners are used to recognize IoT device profiles during network measurement and reconnaissance. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to obfuscating IoT device banners (BANADV) based on adversarial examples. The key idea is to explore the susceptibility of fingerprinting techniques to a slight perturbation of an IoT device banner. By modifying device banners, BANADV disrupts the collection of IoT device profiles. To validate the efficacy of BANADV, we conduct a set of experiments. Our evaluation results show that adversarial examples can spoof state-of-the-art fingerprinting techniques, including learning- and matching-based approaches. We further provide a detailed analysis of the weakness of learning-based/matching-based fingerprints to carefully crafted samples. Overall, the innovations of BANADV lie in three aspects: (1) it utilizes an IoT-related semantic space and a visual similarity space to locate available manipulating perturbations of IoT banners; (2) it achieves at least 80\% success rate for spoofing IoT scanning techniques; and (3) it is the first to utilize adversarial examples of IoT banners in network measurement and reconnaissance.

Package managers such as NPM, Maven, and PyPI play a pivotal role in open-source software (OSS) ecosystems, streamlining the distribution and management of various freely available packages. The fine-grained details within software packages can unveil potential risks within existing OSS ecosystems, offering valuable insights for detecting malicious packages. In this study, we undertake a large-scale empirical analysis focusing on fine-grained information (FGI): the metadata, static, and dynamic functions. Specifically, we investigate the FGI usage across a diverse set of 50,000+ legitimate and 1,000+ malicious packages. Based on this diverse data collection, we conducted a comparative analysis between legitimate and malicious packages. Our findings reveal that (1) malicious packages have less metadata content and utilize fewer static and dynamic functions than legitimate ones; (2) malicious packages demonstrate a higher tendency to invoke HTTP/URL functions as opposed to other application services, such as FTP or SMTP; (3) FGI serves as a distinguishable indicator between legitimate and malicious packages; and (4) one dimension in FGI has sufficient distinguishable capability to detect malicious packages, and combining all dimensions in FGI cannot significantly improve overall performance.

The open-source software (OSS) ecosystem suffers from various security threats and risks, and malicious packages play a central role in software supply chain (SSC) attacks. Although malware research has a history of over thirty years, less attention has been paid to OSS malware. Its existing research has three limitations: a lack of high-quality datasets, malware diversity, and attack campaign context. In this paper, we first build and curate the largest dataset of 23,425 malicious packages from scattered online sources. We then propose a knowledge graph to represent the OSS malware corpus and conduct malicious package analysis in the wild. Our main findings include (1) it is essential to collect malicious packages from various online sources because there is little data overlap between different sources; (2) despite the sheer volume of SSC attack campaigns, many malicious packages are similar, and unknown/sophisticated attack behaviors have yet to emerge or be detected; (3) OSS malicious package has its distinct life cycle, denoted as {changing->release->detection->removal}, and slightly changing the package (different name) is a widespread attack manner; (4) while malicious packages often lack context about how and who released them, security reports disclose the information about corresponding SSC attack campaigns.