Search

Study Objectives: Evaluate wrist-placed accelerometry predicted heartrate compared to electrocardiogram (ECG) heartrate in children during sleep., Methods: Children (n=82, 61% male, 43.9% Black) wore a wrist-placed Apple Watch Series 7 (AWS7) and ActiGraph GT9X during a polysomnogram. 3-Axis accelerometry data was extracted from AWS7 and the GT9X. Accelerometry heartrate estimates were derived from jerk (the rate of acceleration change), computed using the peak magnitude frequency in short time Fourier Transforms of Hilbert transformed jerk computed from acceleration magnitude. Heartrates from ECG traces were estimated from R-R intervals using R-pulse detection. Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE) assessed agreement with ECG estimated heartrate. Secondary analyses explored agreement by polysomnography sleep stage and a signal quality metric., Results: The developed scripts are available on Github. For the GT9X, CCC was poor at -0.11 and MAE and MAPE were high at 16.8 (SD=14.2) beats/minute and 20.4% (SD=18.5%). For AWS7, CCC was moderate at 0.61 while MAE and MAPE were lower at 6.4 (SD=9.9) beats/minute and 7.3% (SD=10.3%). Accelerometry estimated heartrate for AWS7 was more closely related to ECG heartrate during N2, N3 and REM sleep than lights on, wake, and N1 and when signal quality was high. These patterns were not evident for the GT9X., Conclusions: Raw accelerometry data extracted from AWS7, but not the GT9X, can be used to estimate heartrate in children while they sleep. Future work is needed to explore the sources (i.e., hardware, software, etc.) of the GT9X's poor performance., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the raw accelerometry output from research-grade and consumer wearable devices compared to accelerations produced by a mechanical shaker table. Raw accelerometry data from a total of 40 devices (i.e., n = 10 ActiGraph wGT3X-BT, n = 10 Apple Watch Series 7, n = 10 Garmin Vivoactive 4S, and n = 10 Fitbit Sense) were compared to reference accelerations produced by an orbital shaker table at speeds ranging from 0.6 Hz (4.4 milligravity-mg) to 3.2 Hz (124.7mg). Two-way random effects absolute intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) tested inter-device reliability. Pearson product moment, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), absolute error, mean bias, and equivalence testing were calculated to assess the validity between the raw estimates from the devices and the reference metric. Estimates from Apple, ActiGraph, Garmin, and Fitbit were reliable, with ICCs = 0.99, 0.97, 0.88, and 0.88, respectively. Estimates from ActiGraph, Apple, and Fitbit devices exhibited excellent concordance with the reference CCCs = 0.88, 0.83, and 0.85, respectively, while estimates from Garmin exhibited moderate concordance CCC = 0.59 based on the mean aggregation method. ActiGraph, Apple, and Fitbit produced similar absolute errors = 16.9mg, 21.6mg, and 22.0mg, respectively, while Garmin produced higher absolute error = 32.5mg compared to the reference. ActiGraph produced the lowest mean bias 0.0mg (95%CI = -40.0, 41.0). Equivalence testing revealed raw accelerometry data from all devices were not statistically significantly within the equivalence bounds of the shaker speed. Findings from this study provide evidence that raw accelerometry data from Apple, Garmin, and Fitbit devices can be used to reliably estimate movement; however, no estimates were statistically significantly equivalent to the reference. Future studies could explore device-agnostic and harmonization methods for estimating physical activity using the raw accelerometry signals from the consumer wearables studied herein., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Unrelated to this work Dr. Weaver and Dr. Armstrong report board membership and ownership shares in Trackster LLC. Unrelated to this work Dr. de Zambotti reports grants from Noctrix Health and Verily Life Science LLC (Alphabet Inc.), and is a co-founder and Chief Scientific Officer at Lisa Health Inc. and has ownership of shares in Lisa Health., (Copyright: © 2024 White et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Introduction: This study examined the potential of a device agnostic approach for predicting physical activity from consumer wearable accelerometry compared with a research-grade accelerometry., Methods: Seventy-five 5- to 12-year-olds (58% male, 63% White) participated in a 60-min protocol. Children wore wrist-placed consumer wearables (Apple Watch Series 7 and Garmin Vivoactive 4) and a research-grade device (ActiGraph GT9X) concurrently with an indirect calorimeter (COSMED K5). Activity intensities (i.e., inactive, light, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) were estimated via indirect calorimetry (criterion), and the Hildebrand thresholds were applied to the raw accelerometer data from the consumer wearables and research-grade device. Epoch-by-epoch (e.g., weighted sensitivity, specificity) and discrepancy (e.g., mean bias, absolute error) analyses evaluated agreement between accelerometry-derived and criterion estimates. Equivalence testing evaluated the equivalence of estimates produced by the consumer wearables and ActiGraph., Results: Estimates produced by the raw accelerometry data from ActiGraph, Apple, and Garmin produced similar criterion agreement with weighted sensitivity = 68.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 67.1%-69.3%), 73.0% (95% CI, 71.8%-74.3%), and 66.6% (95% CI, 65.7%-67.5%), respectively, and weighted specificity = 84.4% (95% CI, 83.6%-85.2%), 82.0% (95% CI, 80.6%-83.4%), and 75.3% (95% CI, 74.7%-75.9%), respectively. Apple Watch produced the lowest mean bias (inactive, -4.0 ± 4.5; light activity, 2.1 ± 4.0) and absolute error (inactive, 4.9 ± 3.4; light activity, 3.6 ± 2.7) for inactive and light physical activity minutes. For moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, ActiGraph produced the lowest mean bias (1.0 ± 2.9) and absolute error (2.8 ± 2.4). No ActiGraph and consumer wearable device estimates were statistically significantly equivalent., Conclusions: Raw accelerometry estimated inactive and light activity from wrist-placed consumer wearables performed similarly to, if not better than, a research-grade device, when compared with indirect calorimetry. This proof-of-concept study highlights the potential of device-agnostic methods for quantifying physical activity intensity via consumer wearables., (Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Sports Medicine.)

Discourse is a fundamentally important aspect of communication, and discourse production provides a wealth of information about linguistic ability. Aphasia commonly affects, in multiple ways, the ability to produce discourse. Comprehensive aphasia assessments such as the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R) are time- and resource-intensive. We examined whether discourse measures can be used to estimate WAB-R Aphasia Quotient (AQ), and whether this can serve as an ecologically valid, less resource-intensive measure. We used features extracted from discourse tasks using three AphasiaBank prompts involving expositional (picture description), story narrative, and procedural discourse. These features were used to train a machine learning model to predict the WAB-R AQ. We also compared and supplemented the model with lesion location information from structural neuroimaging. We found that discourse-based models could estimate AQ well, and that they outperformed models based on lesion features. Addition of lesion features to the discourse features did not improve the performance of the discourse model substantially. Inspection of the most informative discourse features revealed that different prompt types taxed different aspects of language. These findings suggest that discourse can be used to estimate aphasia severity, and provide insight into the linguistic content elicited by different types of discourse prompts., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Goal and Aims: Evaluate the performance of a sleep scoring algorithm applied to raw accelerometry data collected from research-grade and consumer wearable actigraphy devices against polysomnography., Focus Method/technology: Automatic sleep/wake classification using the Sadeh algorithm applied to raw accelerometry data from ActiGraph GT9X Link, Apple Watch Series 7, and Garmin Vivoactive 4., Reference Method/technology: Standard manual PSG sleep scoring., Sample: Fifty children with disrupted sleep (M = 8.5 years, range = 5-12 years, 42% Black, 64% male)., Design: Participants underwent to single night lab polysomnography while wearing ActiGraph, Apple, and Garmin devices., Core Analytics: Discrepancy and epoch-by-epoch analyses for sleep/wake classification (devices vs. polysomnography)., Additional Analytics and Exploratory Analyses: Equivalence testing for sleep/wake classification (research-grade actigraphy vs. commercial devices)., Core Outcomes: Compared to polysomnography, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 85.5, 87.4, and 76.8, respectively, for Actigraph; 83.7, 85.2, and 75.8, respectively, for Garmin; and 84.6, 86.2, and 77.2, respectively, for Apple. The magnitude and trend of bias for total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, and wake after sleep were similar between the research and consumer wearable devices., Important Additional Outcomes: Equivalence testing indicated that total sleep time and sleep efficiency estimates from the research and consumer wearable devices were statistically significantly equivalent., Core Conclusion: This study demonstrates that raw acceleration data from consumer wearable devices has the potential to be harnessed to predict sleep in children. While further work is needed, this strategy could overcome current limitations related to proprietary algorithms for predicting sleep in consumer wearable devices., (Copyright © 2023 National Sleep Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)