5 results on '"Murphy, G. J."'
Search Results
2. Pre‐operative and prehabilitation services in UK cardiac surgery centres.
- Author
-
Gibbison, B., Murphy, G. J., Akowuah, E., Loubani, M., and Pufulete, M.
- Subjects
- *
CARDIAC surgery , *PREHABILITATION , *ELECTIVE surgery - Abstract
Cardiac surgery has two distinct treatment pathways; approximately half of the 32,000 adult cardiac surgery episodes in the UK per year are planned (mean waiting time of 104 days) and half are urgent inpatients (mean waiting time of 11 days), plus a small number of emergency cases [[3]]. Prehabilitation is the practice of enhancing a patient's functional capacity before surgery, with the aim of improving postoperative outcomes [[1]]. 1 Table Pre-operative assessment (POA) service and prehabilitation components in urgent and elective cardiac surgery pathways from 34 cardiac surgery centres. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The association between iron deficiency and outcomes: a secondary analysis of the intravenous iron therapy to treat iron deficiency anaemia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT) trial.
- Author
-
Richards, T., Miles, L. F., Clevenger, B., Keegan, A., Abeysiri, S., Rao Baikady, R., Besser, M. W., Browne, J. P., Klein, A. A., Macdougall, I. C., Murphy, G. J., Anker, S. D., Dahly, D., Richards, Toby, Besser, Martin, Browne, John, Clevenger, Ben, Kegan, Anastazia, Klein, Andrew, and Miles, Lachlan
- Subjects
IRON deficiency anemia ,IRON deficiency ,INTRAVENOUS therapy ,ABDOMINAL surgery ,SECONDARY analysis ,RED blood cell transfusion - Abstract
Summary: In the intravenous iron therapy to treat iron deficiency anaemia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT) trial, the use of intravenous iron did not reduce the need for blood transfusion or reduce patient complications or length of hospital stay. As part of the trial protocol, serum was collected at randomisation and on the day of surgery. These samples were analysed in a central laboratory for markers of iron deficiency. We performed a secondary analysis to explore the potential interactions between pre‐operative markers of iron deficiency and intervention status on the trial outcome measures. Absolute iron deficiency was defined as ferritin <30 μg.l−1; functional iron deficiency as ferritin 30–100 μg.l−1 or transferrin saturation < 20%; and the remainder as non‐iron deficient. Interactions were estimated using generalised linear models that included different subgroup indicators of baseline iron status. Co‐primary endpoints were blood transfusion or death and number of blood transfusions, from randomisation to 30 days postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included peri‐operative change in haemoglobin, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. Most patients had iron deficiency (369/452 [82%]) at randomisation; one‐third had absolute iron deficiency (144/452 [32%]) and half had functional iron deficiency (225/452 [50%]). The change in pre‐operative haemoglobin with intravenous iron compared with placebo was greatest in patients with absolute iron deficiency, mean difference 8.9 g.l−1, 95%CI 5.3–12.5; moderate in functional iron deficiency, mean difference 2.8 g.l−1, 95%CI −0.1 to 5.7; and with little change seen in those patients who were non‐iron deficient. Subgroup analyses did not suggest that intravenous iron compared with placebo reduced the likelihood of death or blood transfusion at 30 days differentially across subgroups according to baseline ferritin (p = 0.33 for interaction), transferrin saturation (p = 0.13) or in combination (p = 0.45), or for the number of blood transfusions (p = 0.06, 0.29, and 0.39, respectively). There was no beneficial effect of the use of intravenous iron compared with placebo, regardless of the metrics to diagnose iron deficiency, on postoperative complications or length of hospital stay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Identifying potential predictors of the risk of surgical site infection following cardiac surgery: a scoping review.
- Author
-
Charlwood KV, Jackson J, Vaja R, Rogers LJ, Dawson S, Moawad KR, Brown J, Trevis J, Vokshi I, Layton GR, Magboo R, Tanner J, Rochon M, Murphy GJ, and Whiting P
- Abstract
Objectives: This scoping review was undertaken to identify risk prediction models and pre-operative predictors of surgical site infection (SSI) in adult cardiac surgery. A particular focus was on the identification of novel predictors that could underpin the future development of a risk prediction model to identify individuals at high risk of SSI, and therefore guide a national SSI prevention strategy., Methods: A scoping review to systematically identify and map out existing research evidence on pre-operative predictors of SSI was conducted in two stages. Stage 1 reviewed prediction modelling studies of SSI in cardiac surgery. Stage 2 identified primary studies and systematic reviews of novel cardiac SSI predictors., Results: The search identified 7887 unique reports; 7154 were excluded at abstract screening and 733 were selected for full-text assessment. Twenty-nine studies (across 30 reports) were included in Stage 1 and reported the development (N=14), validation (N=13), or both development and validation (N=2) of 52 SSI risk prediction models including 67 different pre-operative predictors. The remaining 703 reports were re-assessed in Stage 2; 49 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 56 novel pre-operative predictors that have not been assessed previously in models were identified., Conclusions: This review identified 123 pre-operative predictors of the risk of SSI following cardiac surgery, 56 of which have not been included previously in the development of cardiac SSI risk prediction models. These candidate predictors will be a valuable resource in the future development of risk prediction scores, and may be relevant to prediction of the risk of SSI in other surgical specialities., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement None declared., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A comprehensive qualitative investigation of the factors that affect surgical site infection prevention in cardiac surgery in England using observations and interviews.
- Author
-
Tanner J, Brierley Jones L, Westwood N, Rochon M, Wloch C, Vaja R, Rogers LJ, Dearling J, Wilson K, Kirmani BH, Bhudia SK, Rajakaruna C, Petrou M, Bailes L, Jawarchan A, Baker M, and Murphy GJ
- Subjects
- Humans, England, Infection Control methods, Infection Control standards, COVID-19 prevention & control, COVID-19 epidemiology, Qualitative Research, Surveys and Questionnaires, Surgical Wound Infection prevention & control, Surgical Wound Infection epidemiology, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Interviews as Topic
- Abstract
Background: Interview and questionnaire studies have identified barriers and challenges to preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) by focusing on compliance with recommendations and care bundles using interviews, questionnaires and expert panels. This study proposes a more comprehensive investigation by using observations of clinical practice plus interviews which will enable a wider focus., Aim: To comprehensively identify the factors which affect SSI prevention using cardiac surgery as an exemplar., Methods: The study consisted of 130 h of observed clinical practice followed by individual semi-structured interviews with 16 surgeons, anaesthetists, theatre staff, and nurses at four cardiac centres in England. Data were analysed thematically., Findings: The factors were complex and existed at the level of the intervention, the individual, the team, the organization, and even the wider society. Factors included: the attributes of the intervention; the relationship between evidence, personal beliefs, and perceived risk; power and hierarchy; leadership and culture; resources; infrastructure; supplies; organization and planning; patient engagement and power; hospital administration; workforce shortages; COVID-19 pandemic; 'Brexit'; and the war in Ukraine., Conclusion: This is one of the first studies to provide a comprehensive overview of the factors affecting SSI prevention. The factors are complex and need to be fully understood when trying to reduce SSIs. A strong evidence base was insufficient to ensure implementation of an intervention., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.