Search

Cough is the body's reflex when the throat or airway is irritated by a foreign body, such as irritants, microbes, and fluids. Cough caused due to a disorder or infection can last for a few days to a couple of weeks and is usually self-limiting and self-resolving. However, in certain cases, cough can persist for months, disrupting everyday activities, affecting the patient's mental health, and causing pain and fatigue. There are a number of different therapeutic strategies to manage acute and chronic cough, depending on the cause. Dry cough can be treated using opioids, nonopioids, antitussives, and antihistamines. Expectorants and mucolytics are widely used in the management of productive cough. The underlying cause of cough should be appropriately managed with specific therapy. The choice of treatment regimen is dependent on the patient's medical history, symptoms, and preexisting conditions. Based on the literature review and clinical practice, a comprehensive approach to the management of cough as a symptom has been proposed., (© Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 2011.)

This expert group consensus statement emphasises the need for standardising the definition of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs), with an accurate initial diagnosis being of paramount importance in ensuring appropriate initial management. Equally, case-by-case decisions on monitoring and management are essential, given the varying presentations of F-ILDs and the varying rates of progression. The value of diagnostic tests in risk stratification at presentation and, separately, the importance of a logical monitoring strategy, tailored to manage the risk of progression, are also stressed. The term "progressive pulmonary fibrosis" (PPF) exactly describes the entity that clinicians often face in practice. The importance of using antifibrotic therapy early in PPF (once initial management has failed to prevent progression) is increasingly supported by evidence. Artificial intelligence software for high-resolution computed tomography analysis, although an exciting tool for the future, awaits validation. Guidance is provided on pulmonary rehabilitation, oxygen and the use of non-invasive ventilation focused specifically on the needs of ILD patients with progressive disease. PPF should be differentiated from acute deterioration due to drug-induced lung toxicity or other forms of acute exacerbations. Referral criteria for a lung transplant are discussed and applied to patient needs in severe diseases where transplantation is not realistic, either due to access limitations or transplantation contraindications. In conclusion, expert group consensus guidance is provided on the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of F-ILDs with specific focus on the recognition of PPF and the management of pulmonary fibrosis progressing despite initial management., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: S.K. Rajan reports grants to their institution, consulting fees and lecture fees from Cipla and Boehringer Ingelheim; speaker fees from the Indian Chest Society; and support from Cipla to attend a European Respiratory Society meeting, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. V. Cottin reports an unrestricted grant to their institution from Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Galapagos, Galecto, Shionogi, Fibrogen, RedX Pharma and PureTech; payment or honoraria and support for attending meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Roche/Promedior, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb and Galapagos, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. R. Dhar reports external expert contracts from Cipla and Boehringer Ingelheim; speaker fees from the Indian Chest Society, Cipla and Boehringer Ingelheim; and support for attendance at a European Respiratory Society meeting from Cipla. S. Danoff reports grant funding from Bristol Myers Squibb (Myositis ILD Trial), Boehringer Ingelheim (INBUILD and INBUILD-ON Trials) and Roche/Genentech (TRAIL Trial); royalties from UpToDate; advisory board fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Lupin Pharma; payment for presentations from the France Foundation; funding for travel to present lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim; and participation on data safety monitoring boards for Galecto and Galapagos, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; as well as a role as senior medical adviser and interim CMO for the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation and membership of the board of directors of the American Thoracic Society. K.R. Flaherty reports research grants paid to their institution by Boehringer Ingelheim; and consulting fees paid to them by Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Genentech, Blade Therapeutics, Shionogi, DevPro, AstraZeneca, Pure Health, Fibrogen, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Pliant, United Therapeutics, Arrowhead, Lupin, Polarean and PureTech, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. K.K. Brown reports lung fibrosis research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; being an external science advisor to AbbVie, CSL Behring, Dispersol, Huitai Biomedicine, Lilly, RedX Pharma, Theravance and Translate Bio; being a DMC chair for Biogen; scientific advisory board membership for Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, DevPro Biopharma, Galapagos NV, Galecto, Open Source Imaging Consortium, Pliant, Sanofi and Third Pole; DMC membership for Humanetics; and a scientific collaboration with Sekisui Medical Co., all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; as well as leadership or fiduciary roles for the Fleischner Society and Open Source Imaging Consortium. A. Mohan declares no competing interests. E. Renzoni declares a research contract payment and advisory board meeting payment to their institution by Boehringer Ingelheim; lecture fees paid to their institution by Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Chiesi; and registration and travel expenses for the American Thoracic Society conference, paid by Boehringer Ingelheim, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. M. Mohan reports no competing interests. Z. Udwadia reports no competing interests. P. Shenoy reports no competing interests. D. Currow reports intellectual property payments and royalties from Mayne Pharma International Pty Ltd, a manufacturer of sustained-release morphine; and consulting fees from Helsinn Pharmaceuticals, in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; as well as leadership or fiduciary roles for the Dust Diseases Board of New South Wales and the Board of the Cancer Institute NSW. A. Devraj reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Galecto, Galapagos, Brainomix and Vicore, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. B. Jankharia reports payment or honoraria to their institution from Cipla India, Lupin India, Boehringer Ingelheim and German Remedies India, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission; as well as being a past president of the Indian Musculoskeletal Society and the Indian Radiology and Imaging Association. R. Kulshrestha reports no competing interests. S. Jones reports grants to their institution from Boehringer Ingelheim and Trevi for being Chair of Action for Pulmonary Fibrosis (APF) and President of the European Pulmonary Fibrosis Federation (EU-IPFF) (both these organisations implement projects in partnership with industry; the author is not involved in these projects and does not gain personally); reports payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Vicore and Roche (paid to their institution); and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board as Galecto DSMB for an anti-fibrotic therapy, in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. C. Ravaglia reports no competing interests. S. Quadrelli reports speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. R. Iyer reports no competing interests. S. Dhooria reports no competing interests. M. Kolb reports research funding for pre-clinical work from Boehringer Ingelheim and Pieris; research funding for a clinical project from Roche; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Horizon, Cipla, AbbVie, Belerophon, Algernon, CSL Behring, United Therapeutics and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; payment for court testimony from Roche; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Covance and United Therapeutics; and an allowance paid to their institution from the European Respiratory Society relating to their duties as European Respiratory Journal Chief Editor, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission. A.U. Wells reports payments or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Veracyte, all in the 36 months prior to manuscript submission., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Competing Interests: None

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is the second most common complaint in the postoperative period, often resulting in increased post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and hospital stay. Translation of knowledge into consistent practice was considered a major gap. Hence, the present study was undertaken to test the efficacy of locally developed evidence-based institutional protocol for prevention of PONV., Methods: Phase I consisted of determining the baseline incidence of PONV before introduction of the institutional protocol for PONV prophylaxis. In phase II, educational sessions for anaesthesiologists for PONV prevention and treatment were conducted, after which an institutional protocol was introduced. In phase III, this protocol was implemented, and the incidence of PONV was recorded using the same methodology as in phase I. The rate of adherence to the institutional protocol was also recorded., Results: The incidence of postoperative nausea (PON) dropped significantly from 32.5% in phase I to 20% in phase III (p = 0.033). Similarly, the incidence of postoperative vomiting (POV) decreased from 20.5% in phase I to 9.1% in phase III (p = 0.016). Of all anaesthesiologists, 78.18% were noted to adhere to the protocol in phase III. Incidence of PON and POV was significantly less in patients in whom PONV prophylaxis was administered in adherence to protocol (8.3% vs 57.7%, p < 0.001; 3.6% vs 26.9%, p < 0.001, respectively)., Conclusion: Evidence-based institutional protocols are effective in significantly reducing the incidence of PONV in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery under anaesthesia., Clinical Trial Number and Registry Url: The trial was registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India (http:/ctri.nic.in) (CTRI/2015/12/006432)., Competing Interests: The authors have none to declare., (© 2020 Director General, Armed Forces Medical Services. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India Pvt. Ltd.)