Search

Objective: Adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) are often prescribed an orthosis to prevent curve progression and avoid surgery. Standard-of-care scoliosis orthoses are designed for full-time (FT) wear, which can be burdensome for some patients. Nighttime (NT) hypercorrective scoliosis orthoses are another option that has a lower impact on daily life, however, additional research is needed to guide the prescription of NT orthoses. The aim of this study was to assess the willingness of patients with IS and their parents/guardians to enroll in a randomized controlled study on bracing in scoliosis., Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to survey adolescents with IS and their parents/guardians. Eligibility criteria for adolescent participants included: (1) diagnosis of IS, (2) no previous orthosis use, (3) currently seeing a provider for their scoliosis, and (4) able to communicate in English. Parent/guardian participants were the parent or guardian of an adolescent participant and were able to communicate in English. Separate online surveys were designed for adolescents and their parents/guardians. Surveys provided information about a hypothetical study and queried respondents about whether they would participate in the study, their willingness to randomize brace treatment, and their preferences for NT or FT bracing. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize survey data., Results: One hundred four adolescent/parent dyads completed the survey (104 adolescents and 103 parents). Most participants (adolescents: 55.8%, parents: 55.3%) indicated an interest in study participation, and approximately one-third of participants (adolescents: 31.8%, parents: 30.1%) reported that they would be willing to randomize to brace type. Most participants (adolescent: 77.0%, parent: 81.6%) preferred the NT brace if they needed brace treatment., Conclusions: High-quality evidence is needed to inform the use of FT and NT scoliosis orthoses. Approximately a third of respondents would enroll in a randomized trial, indicating that multiple collaborative sites will be needed to recruit a sufficient sample into a randomized study on scoliosis bracing. Study findings also demonstrate support from adolescents and their parents/guardians for research on scoliosis bracing., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Geographic and environmental variation in the animal microbiota can be directly linked to the evolution and wild fitness of their hosts but often appears to be disordered. Here, we sought to better understand patterns that underlie wild variation in the microbiota composition of Drosophila melanogaster . First, environmental temperature predicted geographic variation in fly microbial communities better than latitude did. The microbiota also differed between wild flies and their diets, supporting previous conclusions that the fly microbiota is not merely a reflection of diet. Flies feeding on different diets varied significantly in their microbiota composition, and flies sampled from individual apples were exceptionally depauperate for the Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB), a major bacterial group in wild and laboratory flies. However, flies bore significantly more LAB when sampled from other fruits or compost piles. Follow-up analyses revealed that LAB abundance in the flies uniquely responds to fruit decomposition, whereas other microbiota members better indicate temporal seasonal progression. Finally, we show that diet-dependent variation in the fly microbiota is associated with phenotypic differentiation of fly lines collected in a single orchard. These last findings link covariation between the flies' dietary history, microbiota composition, and genetic variation across relatively small (single-orchard) landscapes, reinforcing the critical role that environment-dependent variation in microbiota composition can play in local adaptation and genomic differentiation of a model animal host., Significance Statement: The microbial communities of animals influence their hosts' evolution and wild fitness, but it is hard to predict and explain how the microbiota varies in wild animals. Here, we describe that the microbiota composition of wild Drosophila melanogaster can be ordered by temperature, humidity, geographic distance, diet decomposition, and diet type. We show how these determinants of microbiota variation can help explain lactic acid bacteria (LAB) abundance in the flies, including the rarity of LAB in some previous studies. Finally, we show that wild fly phenotypes segregate with the flies' diet and microbiota composition, illuminating links between the microbiota and host evolution. Together, these findings help explain how variation in microbiota compositions can shape an animal's life history.

Purpose: To describe the incidence of reoperation and factors contributing to surgical revision within a minimum of 10 years after spinal fusion for scoliosis in patients with nonambulatory cerebral palsy (CP)., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive nonambulatory patients with CP who underwent primary spinal fusion at a single specialty care center with a minimum of 10 years from their index surgery (surgery dates 2001-2011). Causes of reoperation were classified as implant failure/pseudoarthrosis, surgical site infection (SSI), proximal junctional kyphosis, prominent/symptomatic implants, and implant removal. Reoperation rates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each time interval, and an actuarial survival curve was generated., Results: 144 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age = 14.3 ± 2.6 years, 62.5% male); 85.4% had 5 years follow-up data; and 66.0% had 10 years follow-up data. Estimates from the actuarial analysis suggest that 14.9% (95% CI: 10.0-22.0) underwent reoperation by 5 years postsurgery, and 21.7% (95% CI: 15.4-30.1) underwent reoperation by 10 years postsurgery. The most common causes for reoperation were implant failure/pseudoarthrosis, SSI, and prominent/symptomatic implants., Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study is the largest long-term follow-up of nonambulatory patients with CP and neuromuscular scoliosis who underwent spinal fusion. Approximately 22% of these patients required reoperation 10 years after their index surgery, primarily due to implant failure/pseudoarthrosis, SSI, and prominent/symptomatic implants. Complications and reoperations continued throughout the 10 years period after index surgery, reinforcing the need for long-term follow-up as these patients transition into adulthood., Level of Evidence: III., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Rainbow young people (RYP; people of diverse genders, sexualities, and variations in sex characteristics) face barriers accessing primary care, often report negative experiences and the need to educate clinicians on rainbow-specific issues. This study explores general practice staff views and experiences of providing care to RYP., Methods: Three focus groups were held with staff from 5 general practices in an urban area of Aotearoa New Zealand (25 participants in total). Practices were purposively selected to include some known to be more "rainbow-friendly" seeing larger numbers of RYP and some with no particular focus on RYP. All members of each practice were invited to participate, including administration and reception staff. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed in NVivo using inductive thematic analysis., Results: Four main themes were identified: (i) Practice experience, (ii) Feeling awkward, (iii) Knowledge and training, and (iv) Structural barriers. Differences were apparent in health provider knowledge, comfort, and experience in providing care to RYP. Participants identified a lack of knowledge and training and wanted more resources and education. Systems limitations were common (e.g. with IT systems for recording gender) and often contributed to awkward clinical encounters., Conclusions: Participants recognized shortcomings in their training, knowledge, and level of confidence providing care to RYP and expressed a desire to improve their competency. Further work is needed to identify and trial practical strategies that help improve communication skills, knowledge, and the delivery of more equitable healthcare to RYP., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Introduction: Lower limb orthoses (LLOs) and assistive devices (ADs) can be used together or separately to improve mobility when performing daily activities. The goal of this study was to examine utilization of LLOs and ADs in a national sample of adult LLO users., Methods: A survey was designed to ask participants whether they typically use their LLOs and/or ADs to perform 20 daily activities. LLO users from orthotic clinics across the United States were invited to complete the survey. Descriptive statistics were used to examine utilization trends., Results: Survey responses from 1036 LLO users were analyzed. Community-based activities were performed with LLOs by at least 80% of participants. Activities that involved walking short distances in the home were more often performed without LLOs or ADs. Among participants with the four most prevalent health conditions, LLO use in the community was greatest among participants with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease., Conclusions: LLOs were frequently used for a wide range of community-based activities. Simultaneous use of ADs and LLOs may be most beneficial for LLO users when performing activities outside of the home. Clinicians can discuss LLO and AD use with patients to optimize their functional outcomes at home and in the community., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures the excitability and inhibition of corticomotor networks. Despite its task-specificity, few studies have used TMS during dynamic movements and the reliability of TMS paired pulses has not been assessed during cycling. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of motor evoked potentials (MEP) and short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI) on vastus lateralis and rectus femoris muscle activity during a fatiguing single-leg cycling task. Nine healthy adults (2 female) performed two identical sessions of counterweighted single-leg cycling at 60% peak power output until failure. Five single pulses and ten paired pulses were delivered to the motor cortex, and two maximal femoral nerve stimulations (M max ) were administered during two baseline cycling bouts (unfatigued) and every 5 min throughout cycling (fatigued). When comparing both baseline bouts within the same session, MEP·M max -1 and LICI (both ICC: >0.9) were rated excellent while SICI was rated good (ICC: 0.7-0.9). At baseline, between sessions, in the vastus lateralis, M max (ICC: >0.9) and MEP·M max -1 (ICC: 0.7) demonstrated good reliability; LICI was moderate (ICC: 0.5), and SICI was poor (ICC: 0.3). Across the fatiguing task, M max demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC > 0.8), MEP·M max -1 ranged good to excellent (ICC: 0.7-0.9), LICI was moderate to excellent (ICC: 0.5-0.9), and SICI remained poorly reliable (ICC: 0.3-0.6). These results corroborate the cruciality of retaining mode-specific testing measurements and suggest that during cycling, M max , MEP·M max -1 , and LICI measures are reliable whereas SICI, although less reliable across days, can be reliable within the same session., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Outcome measures (OMs) are useful tools; however, clinicians may find implementing them into clinical practice challenging., Objectives: To characterize Canadian prosthetists' use of OMs for people with lower-limb amputation, including motivations for use, comfort selecting OMs, resources available for administration, and barriers to implementation., Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between March and July 2021. Orthotics Prosthetics Canada sent Canadian prosthetists an invitation to take the online survey., Results: Forty-nine Certified Prosthetists completed the survey. Only 16% of participants reported that they were expected to use OMs. Participants reported being more comfortable administering performance-based OMs than self-report surveys. More than two-thirds of participants agreed that OMs "can be administered with knowledge they have" and are "within their scope of practice." However, less than 25% agreed that OMs are "administered in a standardized way in the profession," and less than 40% indicated they are "easy to make part of my routine." Participants reported they generally have time and space to do OMs, but there was no agreed-on reason to use them., Conclusions: Use of OMs among Canadian prosthetists seems to be low relative to prosthetists in the United States. Education, financial incentives, or changes to professional expectations are likely needed to increase routine OM use. Efforts to improve the standardization of OM administration and ease the incorporation of OMs into routine practice may also increase use. Canadian prosthetists may elevate their standards of clinical practice and better understand the impact of prosthetic treatments on their patients by more routinely using OMs., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Purpose: Prostheses designed for daily use are often inappropriate for high-level activities and/or are susceptible to water damage and mechanical failure. Secondary prostheses, such as activity-specific or back-up prostheses, are typically required to facilitate uninterrupted participation in desired life pursuits. This study estimated the prevalence of secondary prosthesis use in a large, national sample of lower limb prosthesis users (LLPUs)., Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of survey data from three cross-sectional studies that assessed mobility in LLPUs. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the percentage of secondary prosthesis users and percentages of LLPUs that used different type(s) of secondary prosthesis(es). Secondary prosthesis users and non-users were compared to identify differences in participant characteristics between groups., Results: Of participants in the analysis ( n  = 1566), most (65.8%) did not use a secondary prosthesis. The most common secondary prosthesis types were back-up (19.2%) and activity-specific prostheses (13.5%). Secondary prosthesis users differed significantly from non-users with respect to gender, race, and other characteristics., Conclusions: Results suggest that secondary prosthesis use for most LLPUs is limited and may differ based on users' demographic and clinical characteristics. Future research should determine how LLPUs' health-related quality-of-life outcomes are affected by access to and use of secondary prostheses.Implications for RehabilitationSecondary prostheses, including activity-specific, back-up, and shower prostheses, have the potential to improve function, mobility, and participation for people who use lower limb prostheses.Most lower limb prosthesis users do not use secondary prostheses, and access to these devices may be related to users' demographic and clinical characteristics.Rehabilitation professionals play a key role in facilitating prosthesis users' access to secondary prostheses and should advocate for those who need them.

To evaluate whether preoperative conversion from a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) to a gastrojejunostomy tube (GJ-tube) decreases short-term postoperative aspiration pneumonia and gastrointestinal complications in children with neuromuscular scoliosis. We conducted a retrospective chart review from January 2006 to October 2021 of pediatric patients who had neuromuscular scoliosis and were fed with a G-tube before spinal fusion. Eligible patients were divided into two groups based on whether they were converted to a GJ-tube preoperatively. Preoperative characteristics and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared between groups using Chi-square tests. Of 261 eligible patients, 205 were converted to a GJ-tube, while 56 underwent spinal fusion with a G-tube. Common complications following G-tube to GJ-tube conversion were feeding intolerance (25.2%), GJ-tube malfunction (17.7%), and at least one episode of vomiting (17.4%). Within 30 days of discharge, 12.5% of GJ-tube patients and 11.5% of G-tube patients experienced aspiration pneumonia (P = 0.85). The GJ-tube group received postoperative tube feeds 7 hours earlier than the G-tube group on average (51.6 h vs. 44.5 h, P = 0.02). Within 30 days of discharge, one (0.5%) patient from the GJ-tube group died of gastrointestinal complications unrelated to conversion and two (3.6%) patients in the G-tube group died from aspiration pneumonia (P = 0.12). Results suggest that there were no appreciable differences in outcomes between patients converted to a GJ-tube preoperatively compared to those who continued to use a G-tube. However, preoperative characteristics indicate that a higher number of complex patients were converted to a GJ-tube, indicating potential selection bias in this retrospective sample. Level of evidence: Level III., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objective: This study aimed to identify clinical measures that have been used to evaluate function, health related quality of life (HRQoL), and/or satisfaction in children who use lower limb prostheses (LLP). The data reported on psychometric properties for children who use LLP were collected for each measure., Methods: First, PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were searched using broad search terms to identify standardized outcome measures of function, HRQoL, and/or satisfaction with treatment used in pediatric LLP research published in 2001 or after. For each of the eligible measures found, a second search was performed to identify psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability) assessed with children who use LLP., Results: Forty-four standardized outcome measures were identified from 41 pediatric LLP research articles. Five measures (i.e., Gait Outcomes Assessment for Lower Limb Differences, Functional Mobility Assessment, Child Amputee Prosthetics Project- Prosthesis Satisfaction Inventory, Child Amputee Prosthetics Project- Functional Scale Index, and Lower Limb Function Questionnaire) had data on psychometric properties for children who use LLP., Conclusions: Few studies report psychometric data for assessing the overall HRQoL, function, and/or satisfaction for children who use LLP. Further research is needed to validate or create new outcome measures that assess the HRQoL, satisfaction, and/or function of children who use LLP.

Lower limb orthoses (LLOs) are externally-applied leg braces that are designed to improve or maintain mobility in people with a variety of health conditions that affect lower limb function. Clinicians and researchers are therefore often motivated to measure LLO users' mobility to select or assess the effectiveness of these devices. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can provide insights into important aspects of a LLO user's mobility for these purposes. However, few PROMs are available to measure mobility of LLO users. Those few that exist have issues that may limit their clinical or scientific utility. The objective of this study was to create a population-specific item bank for measuring mobility of LLO users. Previously-developed candidate items were administered in a cross-sectional study to a large national sample of LLO users. Responses from study participants (n = 1036) were calibrated to a graded response statistical model using Item Response Theory methods. A set of 39 items was found to be unidimensional, locally independent, and function without bias due to characteristics unrelated to mobility. The set of final calibrated items, termed the Orthotic Patient-Reported Outcomes-Mobility (OPRO-M) item bank, was evaluated for initial evidence of convergent, divergent, and known groups construct validity. OPRO-M was strongly correlated with existing PROMs designed to measure aspects of physical function. Conversely, OPRO-M was weakly correlated with PROMs that measured unrelated constructs, like sleep disturbance and depression. OPRO-M also showed an ability to differentiate groups with expected mobility differences. Two fixed-length short forms were created from the OPRO-M item bank. Items on the short forms were selected based on statistical and clinical criteria. Collectively, results from this study indicate that OPRO-M can effectively measure mobility of LLO users, and OPRO-M short forms can now be recommended for use in routine clinical practice and research studies., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Balkman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Prosthetic treatment options for people with ankle disarticulation (i.e., Syme amputation) are limited. Prosthetic feet designed for people with Syme amputation are often low profile to accommodate build-height restrictions, resulting in decreased energy return during gait. High-profile crossover feet that attach to the posterior proximal aspect of the prosthetic socket can bypass these restrictions and may promote a more physiologic gait pattern., Objectives: To compare level-ground gait biomechanics and patient-reported outcomes between crossover and traditional energy-storing feet in people with Syme amputation., Study Design: Within-participant pilot study., Methods: Both participants were fit with energy-storing and crossover feet and were randomized to the order they used the feet. Participants used each foot for 2 weeks before assessment. Step length symmetry, prosthetic ankle range of motion, prosthetic-side energy return, and peak sound-side loading were determined from motion capture data obtained in a laboratory. Mobility and balance confidence were measured using standardized patient-reported outcome measures. Foot preference was assessed with an ad hoc survey., Results: Two participants with Syme amputations completed the study. Prosthetic ankle peak dorsiflexion and push-off power increased with the crossover foot compared with the energy-storing foot for both participants. Both participants reported an overall preference of the crossover foot. Changes in patient-reported outcomes did not exceed published minimum detectable change values., Conclusion: Crossover feet increased prosthetic ankle range of motion and energy return compared with traditional energy-storing feet in this pilot investigation of 2 participants. Crossover feet seem to promote physiologic gait and may be a promising alternative to traditional low-profile feet for people with Syme amputation., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Purpose: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is often treated with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) which can be lengthened with a magnetic external remote control (ERC). Many individuals with EOS have concomitant medical conditions which are managed with other implanted programmable devices (IPD). Some providers are concerned that the magnetic field generated during MCGR lengthening may interfere with other IPD, such as ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS), intrathecal baclofen pumps (ITBP), vagal nerve stimulators (VNS), and cochlear implants (CI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of MCGR lengthenings in patients with EOS and other IPD., Methods: This single-center, single-surgeon case series followed 12 patients with 13 IPD as they underwent treatment with MCGR. Post MCGR lengthening, monitoring of patient symptoms, and interrogation of IPD were conducted to evaluate for magnetic interference., Results: After 129 MCGR lengthenings, post-lengthening VPS interrogation found 2 instances of potential interference in settings (both in Medtronic Strata shunts); however, no pre-lengthening interrogation was completed to confirm if these changes occurred prior to or during the lengthening procedure. ITBP interrogation found no changes, and there were no patient-reported adverse effects related to VNS or CI function., Conclusion: It is safe and effective to utilize MCGR in patients with IPD. However, the possibility of magnetic interference must be considered, particularly in individuals with VPS. We recommend approaching with the ERC from a caudal direction to minimize potential interference and all patients be monitored during treatment. If possible, IPD settings should be assessed pre-lengthening, confirmed afterwards and readjusted if necessary., Level of Evidence: Level IV., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

In this work, we use Drosophila melanogaster as a model to identify bacterial genes necessary for bacteria to colonize their hosts independent of the bulk flow of diet. Early work on this model system established that dietary replenishment drives the composition of the D. melanogaster gut microbiota, and subsequent research has shown that some bacterial strains can stably colonize, or persist within, the fly independent of dietary replenishment. Here, we reveal transposon insertions in specific bacterial genes that influence the bacterial colonization persistence phenotype by using a gene association approach. We initially established that different bacterial strains persist at various levels, independent of dietary replenishment. We then repeated the analysis with an expanded panel of bacterial strains and performed a metagenome-wide association (MGWA) study to identify distinct bacterial genes that are significantly correlated with the level of colonization by persistent bacterial strains. Based on the MGWA study, we tested if 44 bacterial transposon insertion mutants from 6 gene categories affect bacterial persistence within the flies. We identified that transposon insertions in four flagellar genes, one urea carboxylase gene, one phosphatidylinositol gene, one bacterial secretion gene, and one antimicrobial peptide (AMP) resistance gene each significantly influenced the colonization of D. melanogaster by an Acetobacter fabarum strain. Follow-up experiments revealed that each flagellar mutant was nonmotile, even though the wild-type strain was motile. Taken together, these results reveal that transposon insertions in specific bacterial genes, including motility genes, are necessary for at least one member of the fly microbiota to persistently colonize the fly. IMPORTANCE Despite the growing body of research on the microbiota, the mechanisms by which the microbiota colonizes a host can still be further elucidated. This study identifies bacterial genes that are associated with the colonization persistence phenotype of the microbiota in Drosophila melanogaster, which reveals specific bacterial factors that influence the establishment of the microbiota within its host. The identification of specific genes that affect persistence can help inform how the microbiota colonizes a host. Furthermore, a deeper understanding of the genetic mechanisms of the establishment of the microbiota could aid in the further development of the Drosophila microbiota as a model for microbiome research., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

BackgroundLung infections are among the most consequential manifestations of cystic fibrosis (CF) and are associated with reduced lung function and shortened survival. Drugs called CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators improve activity of dysfunctional CFTR channels, which is the physiological defect causing CF. However, it is unclear how improved CFTR activity affects CF lung infections.MethodsWe performed a prospective, multicenter, observational study to measure the effect of the newest and most effective CFTR modulator, elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), on CF lung infections. We studied sputum from 236 people with CF during their first 6 months of ETI using bacterial cultures, PCR, and sequencing.ResultsMean sputum densities of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter spp., and Burkholderia spp. decreased by 2-3 log10 CFU/mL after 1 month of ETI. However, most participants remained culture positive for the pathogens cultured from their sputum before starting ETI. In those becoming culture negative after ETI, the pathogens present before treatment were often still detectable by PCR months after sputum converted to culture negative. Sequence-based analyses confirmed large reductions in CF pathogen genera, but other bacteria detected in sputum were largely unchanged. ETI treatment increased average sputum bacterial diversity and produced consistent shifts in sputum bacterial composition. However, these changes were caused by ETI-mediated decreases in CF pathogen abundance rather than changes in other bacteria.ConclusionsTreatment with the most effective CFTR modulator currently available produced large and rapid reductions in traditional CF pathogens in sputum, but most participants remain infected with the pathogens present before modulator treatment.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04038047.FundingThe Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and the NIH.

Background: Parental leave impacts family engagement, bonding, stress, and happiness. Because parental leave benefits are important to all surgeons regardless of sex, understanding parental leave practices in pediatric orthopaedic surgery is critical to promote equity within the profession and supporting balance in work and family life. The aim of this study was to survey pediatric orthopaedic surgeons about their knowledge of parental leave policies, attitudes towards parental leave, and their individual experiences taking leave., Methods: A 34-question anonymous survey was distributed to the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America membership. Eligible respondents were attending pediatric orthopaedic surgeons practicing in the United States or Canada. The survey gathered information about employer parental leave policies, perceptions about and experiences with parental leave while practicing as a surgeon, and demographic information about respondents., Results: A total of 77 responses were completed and used for analysis. Most respondents were men (59.7%), <50 years old (67.5%), married (90.9%), and in urban communities (75.3%). A large majority were practicing in the United States (97.4%). Most respondents were unfamiliar with employer parental leave policies (maternity: 53.3%; paternity: 67.5%; and adoption: 85.7%). Those familiar with policies reported that employers offered 7 to 12 weeks for maternity leave (45.7%) and <1 week for paternity leave (50%) and adoption leave (45.5%). Most respondents believed 7 to 12 weeks should be offered for maternity leave (66.2%), 1 to 6 weeks for paternity leave (54.6%), and 7 to 12 weeks for adoption leave (46.8%). Many respondents reported taking 1 to 6 weeks of parental leave as a surgeon (53.3%) and that their colleagues were supportive of their parental leave (40.3%)., Conclusions: Most pediatric orthopaedic surgeons were unfamiliar with parental leave benefits provided by employers. Respondents who were familiar with these policies believed that more parental leave should be provided, especially for men who may feel social pressure to take less time for leave. Although respondents reported that their work environments were supportive, this study identified opportunities for improvement to support surgeons who wish to balance parental experiences with work responsibilities., Level of Evidence: Level V., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of this case series is to present the outcomes of surgical correction of hyperkyphosis, and subsequent management of complications for three patients with a rare chromosomopathy, Trisomy 9 Mosaicism (T9M)., Methods: Case series with 2 year outcomes following index surgery., Results: Case 1 presented at 9 years of age with 103° of kyphosis (T3-T10), which progressed to 118° despite bracing. Case 2 presented at 7 years of age with 113° of kyphosis (T3-T11). Case 3 presented at 4 years of age with 103° of kyphosis (T1-T11). Cases 1 and 2 underwent T2-L2 posterior instrumented spinal fusion (PISF). Upon follow up, radiographs for Cases 1 and 2 revealed severe, symptomatic proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) of 71° and 50°, respectively, requiring surgical revision proximally to the C4 level. Case 3 underwent placement of magnetically controlled growing rods given young age and growth potential. Surgical levels for Case 3 were extended from C4-pelvis in an attempt to prevent development of symptomatic PJK. Most recent radiographs for Case 3 taken 21 months postoperatively demonstrate a stable 50° of kyphosis. PJK above C4 was noted but is stable and asymptomatic., Conclusion: T9M often presents with progressive hyperkyphosis. Despite instrumentation above the upper end vertebra (UEV), PJK may be a common complication in this small patient population. This novel report on spine deformity correction in the T9M population may provide preliminary guidance for the treatment of hyperkyphosis in patients with T9M and help surgeons avoid common pitfalls., Level of Evidence: IV., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Background: Achieving mobility with a prosthesis is a common post-amputation rehabilitation goal and primary outcome in prosthetic research studies. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) available to measure prosthetic mobility have practical and psychometric limitations that inhibit their use in clinical care and research., Objective: To develop a brief, clinically meaningful, and psychometrically robust PROM to measure prosthetic mobility., Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted to administer previously developed candidate items to a national sample of lower limb prosthesis users. Items were calibrated to an item response theory model and two fixed-length short forms were created. Instruments were assessed for readability, effective range of measurement, agreement with the full item bank, ceiling and floor effects, convergent validity, and known groups validity., Setting: Participants were recruited using flyers posted in hospitals and prosthetics clinics across the United States, magazine advertisements, notices posted to consumer websites, and direct mailings., Participants: Adult prosthesis users (N = 1091) with unilateral lower limb amputation due to traumatic or dysvascular causes., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: Candidate items (N = 105) were administered along with the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Brief Profile, Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire - Mobility Subscale, and Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale, and questions created to characterize respondents., Results: A bank of 44 calibrated self-report items, termed the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M), was produced. Clinical and statistical criteria were used to select items for 7- and 12-item short forms. PLUS-M instruments had an 8th grade reading level, measured with precision across a wide range of respondents, exhibited little-to-no ceiling or floor effects, correlated expectedly with scores from existing PROMs, and differentiated between groups of respondents expected to have different levels of mobility., Conclusion: The PLUS-M appears to be well suited to measuring prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation. PLUS-M instruments are recommended for use in clinical and research settings., (© 2023 The Authors. PM&R published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.)

Background: Orthoses are often prescribed to improve mobility of people with chronic health conditions that affect lower limb function. Patient-reported survey instruments can be used to measure aspects of mobility that cannot be easily assessed in clinical or research settings. A population-specific item bank could be designed to measure aspects of mobility that are most important to lower limb orthosis users and used to evaluate the effects of orthoses., Objective: To develop items for a new survey instrument to measure mobility of lower limb orthosis users., Design: Survey items were developed using a qualitative item review process., Setting: Focus groups were held by video conferencing. Cognitive interviews were conducted by telephone., Participants: Focus group and cognitive interview participants were adults with at least 6 months of experience using a lower limb orthosis that extended from the foot to a level above the ankle., Methods: Research methods included focus groups with lower limb orthosis users, an item generation and reduction process that involved a stakeholder advisory panel, and cognitive interviews with target respondents., Results: A total of 1180 extant items were identified in a literature review. Focus group participants (n = 29) provided feedback that informed the suitability of a construct definition and conceptual model. An advisory panel contributed to the selection of 118 candidate items for measuring orthotic mobility. Feedback from cognitive interview participants (n = 30) informed removal or revision of problematic items, resulting in a candidate bank of 100 mobility items., Conclusions: The rigorous qualitative methods applied here resulted in a large set of candidate items that spanned a range of situations relevant to moving with a lower limb orthosis. Next steps include administration of the candidate items to a large sample of lower limb orthosis users and calibration of the item bank., (© 2022 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.)

The Five-time Sit-to-Stand (5xSTS) Test is a performance-based measure used by clinicians and researchers to assess the body functions needed to accomplish sit-to-stand transitions (e.g., lower limb strength, balance, and trunk control). The current requirements for performance of the 5xSTS Test (i.e., crossing arms over the chest) may not be appropriate for many, if not most lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users. The study aims were to (1) develop a modified five-time sit-to-stand (m5xSTS) Test protocol; (2) to examine initial evidence of known-groups construct validity among LLP users by comparing differences in performance by amputation level, amputation etiology, and functional level; and (3) to assess initial evidence of convergent construct validity by examining the correlations between m5xSTS performance with self-reported mobility (Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M)), self-reported balance confidence (Activities-balance Confidence Scale (ABC)) and functional capability (comfortable walking speed). Three-hundred sixty-one LLP users participated in this cross-sectional study. The investigators developed a m5xSTS Test protocol that allows tested individuals to use different assistance strategies (i.e., use of upper limbs to push off thighs, push up from the armrests, or use a walker) when needed to perform the test. The investigators recorded m5xSTS Test times and assistance strategies. Significant differences in m5xSTS Test times were found between those who did and did not use an assistance strategy, as well as between participants grouped by different amputation level, etiology, and functional level. Significant moderate negative correlations were found between m5xSTS Test times and PLUS-M T-score (ρ = -0.42, p<0.001), ABC score (ρ = -0.42, p<0.001), and comfortable walking speed (ρ = -0.64, p<0.001), respectively. The m5xSTS Test allows LLP users to perform sit-to-stand transitions in a manner that accounts for their functional impairments, is consistent with post-amputation training, and is safe for the tested individual. Results from this study provide preliminary evidence of known groups and convergent construct validity for the m5xSTS Test with a large national sample of LLP users., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.)

Background: Validated criteria to guide assessment of student performance in clinical tasks in prosthetics and orthotics education have not been established. Lack of established criteria and assessment methods presents challenges in evaluating student performance on clinical tasks, such as taking impressions for patellar-tendon-bearing (PTB) sockets., Objectives: To establish assessment criteria for the PTB impression process for use in educational settings., Study Design: Delphi consensus process., Methods: Initial Delphi survey items were based on interviews with prosthetic instructors and focus groups with prosthetic students. Expert prosthetic educators were then identified by purposive sampling to complete multiple-round Internet-based Delphi surveys. The Delphi surveys asked experts to indicate their level of agreement on various assessment methods and criteria in PTB education. Consensus for survey items was reviewed after each survey round and used to determine the content of and need for subsequent rounds., Results: Fourteen experts completed two Delphi survey rounds. Items were categorized into educational materials/strategies, impression stages/materials, measurement tools, measurements taken, assessment during impression, assessment after impression, feedback, student self-assessment, and grading. In two survey rounds, 40 items guiding assessment methods and criteria for PTB impressions achieved 80% consensus., Conclusions: A high level of consensus was achieved in two survey rounds. Lower levels of consensus were reached on specific objective criteria, such as use of measurement thresholds when evaluating student impressions. Standardized assessment of student performance on PTB impression-taking instead relies primarily on qualitative assessments based on instructor expertise., (Copyright © 2022 International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.)

Purpose: People with lower limb impairments are often prescribed orthoses to preserve or enhance their mobility. Exploration of mobility experiences common among orthosis users may provide insights into how orthoses, and other mobility aids, are utilized and regarded. The objective of this study was to broadly explore how lower limb orthosis users describe their mobility., Materials and Methods: Four focus groups were held online with participants who lived in the U.S. or Canada. Participants had at least six months of experience using an ankle-foot- and/or a knee-ankle-foot-orthosis for one or both legs. All discussions were transcribed and coded. Thematic analysis was used to identify cross-cutting themes., Results: Participants included 29 orthosis users with a variety of health conditions. Inter-related themes, including personal factors, situational contexts, and assistance were identified as elements that influenced participants' mobility. Participants described a process of modifying their mobility through the use and non-use of one or more mobility aids., Conclusions: The current study findings may assist clinicians in developing strategies to optimize orthosis users' mobility in different situations. Experiences described by participants in this study may also help researchers identify aspects of mobility most pertinent to orthosis users and inform the development of new outcome measures.Implications for RehabilitationPeople who use lower-limb orthoses share common mobility experiences, despite differences in health diagnoses.Orthosis users often have opportunities to modify their mobility by choosing to use or not use their brace(s) and/or handheld mobility aids.When providing mobility aid interventions, clinicians should consider how each patient's individual characteristics, including physical characteristics (e.g., the health condition and how it presents, pain, fatigue) and psychosocial characteristics (e.g., fear and confidence, self-motivation, emotional responses), can affect mobility.Clinicians may be able to help patients optimize their mobility by asking about environmental obstacles they regularly encounter and recommending strategies for utilization of mobility aids, including simultaneous use of multiple aids, use of one aid, or choosing not to use any aids, depending on the activity and situation.Clinicians should inquire about all mobility aids available to a patient at home and in the community, including fixed objects, and consider how new mobility aid interventions might affect the patient's mobility when used alone and in combination with other forms of assistance.

Within-host evolution produces genetic diversity in bacterial strains that cause chronic human infections. However, the lack of facile methods to measure bacterial allelic variation in clinical samples has limited understanding of intrastrain diversity's effects on disease. Here, we report a new method termed genome capture sequencing (GenCap-Seq) in which users inexpensively make hybridization probes from genomic DNA or PCR amplicons to selectively enrich and sequence targeted bacterial DNA from clinical samples containing abundant human or nontarget bacterial DNA. GenCap-Seq enables accurate measurement of allele frequencies over targeted regions and is scalable from specific genes to entire genomes, including the strain-specific accessory genome. The method is effective with samples in which target DNA is rare and inhibitory and DNA-degrading substances are abundant, including human sputum and feces. In proof-of-principle experiments, we used GenCap-Seq to investigate the responses of diversified Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations chronically infecting the lungs of people with cystic fibrosis to in vivo antibiotic exposure, and we found that treatment consistently reduced intrastrain genomic diversity. In addition, analysis of gene-level allele frequency changes suggested that some genes without conventional resistance functions may be important for bacterial fitness during in vivo antibiotic exposure. GenCap-Seq's ability to scalably enrich targeted bacterial DNA from complex samples will enable studies on the effects of intrastrain and intraspecies diversity in human infectious disease. IMPORTANCE Genetic diversity evolves in bacterial strains during human infections and could affect disease manifestations and treatment resistance. However, the extent of diversity present in vivo and its changes over time are difficult to measure by conventional methods. We developed a novel approach, GenCap-Seq, to enrich microbial DNA from complex human samples like sputum and feces for genome-wide measurements of bacterial allelic diversity. The approach is inexpensive, scalable to encompass entire targeted genomes, and works in the presence of abundant untargeted nucleic acids and inhibiting substances. We used GenCap-Seq to investigate in vivo responses of diversified bacterial strains to antibiotic treatment. This method will enable new ideas about the effects of intrastrain diversity on human infections to be tested.

Objective: To assess the effects of different prosthetic feet on energy costs associated with walking and running in people with transtibial amputation., Literature Survey: The Pubmed, CINAHL, and Web-of-Science bibliographic databases were searched for original research published through June 30, 2018. References from identified articles were also reviewed., Methodology: Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and articles for pertinent studies. Details were extracted with a standardized template. Risk of bias was assessed using domain-based methods. Prosthetic feet were grouped into categories and compared according to energy costs associated with walking or running over various terrain conditions. Meta-analyses were conducted when data quantity and homogeneity permitted. Evidence statements were formed when results were consistent or undisputed., Synthesis: Fifteen studies were included. Participants (n = 141) were predominantly male (87.9%), had unilateral amputation (95.7%) from non-dysvascular causes (87.9%), and were classified as unlimited community ambulators or active adults (56.0%). Participants were often young but varied in age (mean age 24.8-66.6 years). Available evidence indicates that feet with powered dorsiflexion reduce energy costs relative to dynamic response feet in unlimited community ambulators or active adults when walking on level or declined surfaces. Dynamic response feet do not significantly reduce energy costs compared to energy storing, flexible keel, or solid ankle feet when walking on level terrain. Running feet do not reduce energy costs relative to dynamic response in active adults when running. Select feet may reduce energy costs under specific conditions, but additional research is needed to confirm preliminary results., Conclusions: The overall body of evidence is based on small samples, comprised mostly of participants who may not well represent the population of prosthesis users and test conditions that may not well reflect how prostheses are used in daily life. However, evidence suggests energy costs are affected by prosthetic foot type only under select conditions., (© 2021 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.)

Objective: To assess the clinical resources available for the assessment of health outcomes in people with lower limb amputation and to understand barriers and facilitators associated with use of standardized outcome measures in clinical practice., Design: Cross-sectional survey., Setting: General community (online)., Participants: A volunteer sample of prosthetic practitioners was recruited through national professional organizations. Eligible participants were practitioners certified by a professional prosthetics organization and currently practicing as a prosthetist, prosthetist-orthotist, or prosthetic assistant., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: A custom-designed online survey on clinical use of patient-reported and performance-based standardized outcome measures to assess patients with lower limb amputation., Results: A total of 375 participants completed the survey. Most participants (79%) reported that they are encouraged or required to administer standardized outcome measures in their clinic or facility. Most participants reported that use of patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures are within their scope of practice (88%) and that they have the knowledge required for outcomes measurement (84%). Few participants agreed that outcomes measurement is standardized across the profession (30%). Most participants had access to small spaces and equipment for outcomes measurement, such as short hallways (65%-94%), stairs (69%), and tablets with wireless internet connection (83%). Most participants reported that they would be willing to spend between 5 (36% of participants) and 10 (43% of participants) minutes on self-reported surveys, and between 10 (41% of participants) and 20 (28% of participants) minutes on performance-based tests., Conclusions: Outcomes measurement is encouraged or expected in contemporary prosthetic practice. Strategies to improve standardization and efficiency of administration are needed to facilitate routine use of outcome measures in clinical care., (Copyright © 2022 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Operative and postoperative management of early onset scoliosis (EOS) patients with programmable implanted devices has not been well characterized in the literature. The aim of this study was to describe current practices for pediatric spine surgeons who operate on patients with these devices., Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to 167 pediatric spine surgeons between January and March of 2021. The survey queried participants on operative and postoperative management of patients with the following implanted devices: vagal nerve stimulators, ventriculoperitoneal shunts, intrathecal baclofen pumps, pacemakers, and cochlear implants. Descriptive statistics were used to assess survey data., Results: Fifty-three respondents (31.7% response rate) with a mean 16.5 (SD 12.0) years in practice completed the survey. Depending on the type of device present, surgeons report changing their operative plan anywhere from 28.6 to 60.1% of the time when inserting magnetically controlled growing rods. Most respondents reported performing transcranial motor evoked potentials (80.0-98.0%) and monopolar cautery (70.0-92.9%) across implanted devices. Only 10% (n = 5) of surgeons reported complications related to operative and/or postoperative management of these patients. No complications were related to cautery, neuromonitoring, or surgical placement of MCGRs., Conclusions: This study demonstrates variation in operative and postoperative management of these patients with various programmable implanted devices. Much of this inconsistency in practice is likely due to decades old case reports, constantly changing device manufacturer recommendations, and/or published simulation studies. Reported heterogeneity in management across surgeons necessitates development of published guidelines regarding proper operative and postoperative management of patients with EOS and implanted devices., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Purpose: The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) is a self-report item bank designed to measure the abilities with which people with lower limb amputation perform physical activities. Although PLUS-M includes items that span a range of mobility, additional items are needed to accurately measure mobility of highly active prosthesis users, such as athletes and service members with lower limb amputation. The aim of this study was to understand mobility in highly active lower limb prosthesis users to inform the development of new items for the PLUS-M item bank., Methods: Focus groups were conducted with active, lower limb prosthesis users from across the USA. In-person and online focus groups were conducted by a trained facilitator using a semi-structured guide. Focus group transcripts were reviewed and coded by two researchers. Thematic analysis was used to identify important experiences across participants., Results: Twenty-nine participants took part in four focus groups. Three resultant themes were identified: mobility after amputation, mobility characteristics, and healthcare providers and systems., Conclusions: Identified themes inform clinician and researcher understanding of mobility in highly active lower limb prosthesis users. The results of this study will be used to inform development of high-activity items for the PLUS-M item bank.Implications for rehabilitationParticipants described engagement in high-level activities as a learning process that included elements such as equipment challenges and modifications, pain and injury, and the need to trust the prosthetic limb.Participants with lower limb amputation who use prostheses identified mobility characteristics, such as postural changes, terrain, and obstacles, that influenced their ability to perform high-level activities.High-level mobility characteristics identified in these focus groups can be integrated into a revised version of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility to assess mobility in active adults and athletes with amputation.Rehabilitation professionals play an important role in facilitating access to specialized prosthetic components and training that can help patients achieve their mobility goals and potential.

Objective: To evaluate test-retest reliability and related measurement properties of items developed to assess best, worst, and average prosthetic socket comfort., Design: Methodological research to assess test-retest reliability of 4 individual socket comfort survey items. Socket comfort items were included in a self-report paper survey, which was administered to participants 2 to 3 days apart., Setting: General community., Participants: A minimum convenience sample of participants (N=63) was targeted for this study; 72 lower limb prosthesis users (>1y postamputation) completed the survey and were included in the final dataset., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measure: The expanded socket comfort score (ESCS) was adapted from the original socket comfort score (SCS). The original SCS is a single-item self-report instrument developed to assess a lower limb prosthesis user's current socket comfort. Three additional items were designed to assess the user's best, worst, and average socket comfort over the previous 7 days., Results: Best, worst, and average socket comfort items demonstrated better reliability, as indicated by higher intraclass correlation coefficients. As such, these items also exhibited lower measurement error and smaller minimal detectable change values than the item that measured current socket comfort. However, test-retest coefficients for all 4 ESCS items were below the level desired for evaluation of within-individual changes of socket comfort., Conclusions: Items that assess best, worst, and average comfort provide a more stable measurement of socket fit than the existing SCS instrument. Although administration of all 4 ESCS items may provide more comprehensive assessment of a lower limb prosthesis user's socket fit, administrators should expect variations in scores over time owing to the variable nature of the underlying construct over time. Future research should examine whether the ESCS provides an improved overall assessment of socket fit., (Copyright © 2021 The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Inhaled tobramycin and oral azithromycin are common chronic therapies in people with cystic fibrosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infection. Some studies have shown that azithromycin can reduce the ability of tobramycin to kill P. aeruginosa . This trial was done to test the effects of combining azithromycin with inhaled tobramycin on clinical and microbiological outcomes in people already using inhaled tobramycin. We theorised that those randomised to placebo (no azithromycin) would have greater improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ) and greater reduction in P. aeruginosa sputum in response to tobramycin., Methods: A 6-week prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial testing oral azithromycin versus placebo combined with clinically prescribed inhaled tobramycin in individuals with cystic fibrosis and P. aeruginosa airway infection., Results: Over a 6-week period, including 4 weeks of inhaled tobramycin, the relative change in FEV 1 did not statistically significantly differ between groups (azithromycin (n=56) minus placebo (n=52) difference: 3.44%; 95% CI: -0.48 to 7.35; p=0.085). Differences in secondary clinical outcomes, including patient-reported symptom scores, weight and need for additional antibiotics, did not significantly differ. Among the 29 azithromycin and 35 placebo participants providing paired sputum samples, the 6-week change in P. aeruginosa density differed in favour of the placebo group (difference: 0.75 log 10 CFU/mL; 95% CI: 0.03 to 1.47; p=0.043)., Conclusions: Despite having greater reduction in P. aeruginosa density in participants able to provide sputum samples, participants randomised to placebo with inhaled tobramycin did not experience significantly greater improvements in lung function or other clinical outcomes compared with those randomised to azithromycin with tobramycin., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DN and NM-H, as part of their roles at the Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Foundation Therapeutics Development Network Coordinating Centre, provide consulting to industry sponsors who are developing new drug therapies for cystic fibrosis. Some of these sponsors are working to develop antimicrobial agents. PS and DN report grants from Vertex and Gilead Sciences outside of the published work. RG and GR-B report grants from Vertex outside of the published work. LS reports grants from Merck Co and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation outside of the published work and payments for Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Boards from Merck Co. Multiple authors have grant support or payments from the CF Foundation., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To determine if the two-minute walk test (2MWT) could serve as an alternative measure of high-level mobility in lower limb prosthesis users when circumstances preclude administration of the Comprehensive High-level Activity Mobility Predictor (CHAMP)., Design: Cross-sectional study., Setting: Indoor recreational athletic field and gymnasium., Subjects: Fifty-eight adult lower limb prosthesis users with unilateral or bilateral lower limb amputation who participate in recreational athletic activities., Intervention: N/A., Main Measures: The 2MWT and CHAMP while using their preferred prosthesis(es) on an indoor artificial athletic field or hardwood gymnasium floor., Results: Thirty-nine men and nineteen women with a median age of 38.3 years participated in the study. Most participants experienced amputation(s) due to trauma (62%) or tumor (10%) and were generally higher functioning (K4 (91.4%) and K3 (8.6%)). The median (range) score for the CHAMP was 23.0 points (1.5-33.5) and the mean ± standard deviation (range) 2MWT distance walked was 188.6 ± 33.9 m (100.2-254.3 m). The CHAMP demonstrated a strong positive relationship with 2MWT (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). The 2MWT distance predicted 70% of the variance in CHAMP score., Conclusions: Although the 2MWT does not test multi-directional agility like the CHAMP, they were found to be highly correlated. If space is limited, the two-minute walk test can serve as an alternative measure for assessing high-level mobility capabilities in lower limb prosthesis users.

Introduction: Mobility tests are increasingly used in prosthetic rehabilitation to evaluate patient outcomes. Knowledge of the space, equipment, and time resources available to clinicians who work in different settings can guide recommendations for which tests are most clinically-feasible and promote coordination of mobility testing among members of the rehabilitation team. The primary aim of this study was to characterize the different resources available to clinicians for measuring mobility of people with lower limb amputation. A secondary aim was to identify performance tasks that clinicians use to evaluate prosthetic mobility., Materials and Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with prosthetists, physical therapists, and physiatrists who treat people with lower limb amputation. Researchers used convenience and snowball sampling to identify participants. Interviews included questions about the resources available for conducting mobility tests, as well as questions about which tasks clinicians deemed valuable to assessing mobility of patients with lower limb amputation. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Summary and frequency statistics were calculated for quantitative data; explanatory comments were summarized., Results: Interviews were conducted with 25 clinicians (8 prosthetists, 9 physical therapists, and 8 physiatrists). Participants had access to multiple spaces and basic measurement equipment. The maximum time participants were willing to spend on performance tests varied. Physiatrists reported less time available (median=10 minutes, range 5-30 minutes) than prosthetists and physical therapists (median=30 minutes, range 5-60 minutes for both professions). Mobility tasks commonly used to evaluate patients with lower limb amputation included sit-to-stand, standing balance, walking, and varying speed. Participant comments suggested that mobility tests need to be quick, simple, and add value; existing mobility tests are beneficial but challenging to incorporate into practice; mobility tests should reflect real-world activities; and technological advancements could improve mobility testing., Conclusions: Clinicians generally had small-to-medium spaces, basic measurement equipment, and sufficient training to administer mobility tests in their clinics. A limiting factor was time, which can be addressed through selection of efficient measures and collaboration within the rehabilitation team., Competing Interests: Declaration of interest statement The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Purpose: Standard treatment for skeletally immature adolescents with moderate Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a full-time spinal orthosis. However, adherence to full-time wear (≥ 18 h/day) is often challenging for these patients. Nighttime bracing is an alternative option that may improve patient adherence and/or satisfaction. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of nighttime bracing in patients with AIS., Methods: A systematic review of studies evaluating nighttime bracing was performed. PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane library databases were searched (01/1975-03/2020); two reviewers assessed eligibility. Eligible articles were peer reviewed, in English, and reported outcomes for patients who met Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) criteria. The primary outcome was curve progression ≥ 6°. Pooled progression rates were calculated from random effects meta-analyses with inverse-variance weights; 95% CIs were calculated., Results: Nine studies (n = 595) were included. The overall pooled progression rate to ≥ 6° was 40.7% (95% CI: 30.4-51.5%). The pooled progression rate to surgical magnitude was 24.8% (95% CI: 4.5-53.6%). The most successful outcomes were in subjects with thoracolumbar/lumbar curves and subjects who initiated bracing at Risser 1/2 (pooled progression rates were 27.8% (95% CI: 17.0-40.0%) and 16.5% (95% CI: 11.7-21.8%), respectively). Univariate sub-analyses were conducted due to sample sizes., Conclusions: Progression rates in patients with primary thoracolumbar/lumbar curves and in patients who initiated nighttime bracing at Risser 1/2 were comparable to published progression rates for full-time bracing, indicating that nighttime bracing may be equally effective for these patients. However, the strength of these conclusions is limited by the sample size and the overall quality of included studies., (© 2021. Scoliosis Research Society.)

A hallmark of chronic bacterial infections is the long-term persistence of 1 or more pathogen species at the compromised site. Repeated detection of the same bacterial species can suggest that a single strain or lineage is continually present. However, infection with multiple strains of a given species, strain acquisition and loss, and changes in strain relative abundance can occur. Detecting strain-level changes and their effects on disease is challenging because most methods require labor-intensive isolate-by-isolate analyses, and thus, only a few cells from large infecting populations can be examined. Here, we present a population-level method for enumerating and measuring the relative abundance of strains called population multi-locus sequence typing (PopMLST). The method exploits PCR amplification of strain-identifying polymorphic loci, next-generation sequencing to measure allelic variants, and informatic methods to determine whether variants arise from sequencing errors or low-abundance strains. These features enable PopMLST to simultaneously interrogate hundreds of bacterial cells that are cultured en masse from patient samples or are present in DNA directly extracted from clinical specimens without ex vivo culture. This method could be used to detect epidemic or super-infecting strains, facilitate understanding of strain dynamics during chronic infections, and enable studies that link strain changes to clinical outcomes.

Drugs called CFTR modulators improve the physiologic defect underlying cystic fibrosis (CF) and alleviate many disease manifestations. However, studies to date indicate that chronic lung infections that are responsible for most disease-related mortality generally persist. Here, we investigated whether combining the CFTR modulator ivacaftor with an intensive 3.5-month antibiotic course could clear chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus lung infections in subjects with R117H-CFTR , who are highly ivacaftor-responsive. Ivacaftor alone improved CFTR activity, and lung function and inflammation within 48 h, and reduced P. aeruginosa and S. aureus pathogen density by ∼10-fold within a week. Antibiotics produced an additional ∼10-fold reduction in pathogen density, but this reduction was transient in subjects who remained infected. Only 1/5 P. aeruginosa-infected and 1/7 S. aureus-infected subjects became persistently culture-negative after the combined treatment. Subjects appearing to clear infection did not have particularly favorable baseline lung function or inflammation, pathogen density or antibiotic susceptibility, or bronchiectasis scores on CT scans, but they did have remarkably low sweat chloride values before and after ivacaftor. All persistently P. aeruginosa-positive subjects remained infected by their pretreatment strain, whereas subjects persistently S. aureus-positive frequently lost and gained strains. This work suggests chronic CF infections may resist eradication despite marked and rapid modulator-induced improvements in lung infection and inflammation parameters and aggressive antibiotic treatment. IMPORTANCE Recent work shows that people with CF and chronic lung infections generally remain persistently infected after treatment with drugs that target the CF physiological defect (called CFTR modulators). However, changes produced by modulators could increase antibiotic efficacy. We tested the approach of combining modulators and intensive antibiotics in rapid succession and found that while few subjects cleared their infections, combined treatment appeared most effective in subjects with the highest CFTR activity. These findings highlight challenges that remain to improve the health of people with CF.

Background Young people need equitable access to high-quality sexual and reproductive health care to enjoy good sexual health. Methods This online survey of people aged 15-24years in a defined region of New Zealand asked about unmet need for sexual health care and sought views on improving access to sexual health care. Results Fivehundred participants took part in the study between August and October 2020, of whom 60% were female, 25% were of Māori (indigenous) ethnicity, and 21.4% were gender and/or sexuality diverse. Sixty percent had ever received sexual health care (300/500), and 74.3% received it from a general practice clinic (223/300). Overall, 41% (204/500) reported they needed, but had not received sexual health care in the past ('unmet need'). Reasons for unmet need included being shy, embarrassed or ashamed (74.5%, 152/204), fear of judgment by clinic staff (42.6%, 87/204), cost (32.8%, 67/204), concerns about confidentiality (28.9%, 59/204), and not knowing where to go (24%, 49/204). Māori participants were more likely to report not knowing where to go (32.1% vs 20%, P=0.04). Participants identified the need to reduce stigma, normalise sexual health care, improve convenience, affordability and awareness of services as key to improving access. Reassurance about confidentiality and being treated with kindness, empathy and respect were deemed critical to service acceptability. Conclusions Action is urgently needed at policy, funding and practice levels to improve access to services by: reducing societal stigma, normalising discussions around sexual health, improving affordability and raising awareness of services. Quality improvement is also needed in general practice to ensure young people can routinely access youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health care.